Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

In Defense of the Fanboy

Posted by CowboyNeal on Sat Dec 16, 2006 08:49 AM
from the alt-dot-nerd-dot-obsessive dept.
It's funny. Laugh. Entertainment
An anonymous reader writes "Ran across a great article over at TV Squad regarding obsessive internet fanboys. It's funny and pretty dead on about how we all benefit from the monomania of the typical fanboy." Where would my own useless mental database of knowledge about Green Lantern and Mobile Suit Gundam be without fanboys? Probably out on a date, but for now, thank a fanboy!
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

In Defense of the Fanboy 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Ummm... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Golias (176380) on Saturday December 16 2006, @08:51AM (#17268082)
    Where would my own useless mental database of knowledge about Green Lantern and Mobile Suit Gundam be without fanboys?

    I think you can stop talking about them in the third person.

  • So....are you saying I'm OK now? (Score:5, Funny)

    by thomasdz (178114) on Saturday December 16 2006, @09:18AM (#17268248)
    My obsession with PDP-11 computers (well, actually, all things DEC) and Valerie Bertinelli is OK now?
    So I can actually speak in public about my pilgrimages to Maynard Massachusetts, 31736 Broadbeach Road, Malibu, and 3361 Coldwater Canyon, Beverly Hills California?
    ummm...not that I know those addresses by heart or anything... :-)

    TDz.
    1) hmmmm...I wonder...should I hit the "Post Anonymously" button?
    2) yes, my wife does know about my obsessions
    3) how many Slashdotters can guess my age from this post?

  • Well. (Score:3, Funny)

    by ari wins (1016630) on Saturday December 16 2006, @09:36AM (#17268350)
    I'd imagine that the /. fanboi's are going to tear TFA apart.

    Of course, I haven't read it, so I could be wrong.
    • Wrong.

      A true /. fanboy wouldn't even RTFA.

      A TRUE /. fanboy just bashes what he ASSUMES the article said.
      • A TRUE /. fanboy just bashes what he ASSUMES the article said.

            No, jackass. A true /. fanboy bashes a post like yours without even reading it. Moron.

        It's a joke - laugh ;)
        • Sorry. I didn't actually read your original post, duh. Really great /. fanboys don't even read posts before they respond to them. (I'm on break right now, though)

  • Male obsessions (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward
    It is typical of the male to concentrate on things that most females (as in the guy's wife in tfa) don't understand. I think it's something like the same kind of attention my cat pays to a mouse hole. Maybe it comes from the same place, ie. the ability to stalk prey. Men are hunters, women are gatherers. They're different skill sets and different personality traits are rewarded. Most of our technological progress probably comes from the fact that males are willing to concentrate on things that are just

    • Re:Male obsessions (Score:5, Funny)

      by ettlz (639203) on Saturday December 16 2006, @09:49AM (#17268398) Homepage Journal
      It is typical of the male to concentrate on things that most females don't understand.
      Um... boobs?

    • Re:Male obsessions (Score:4, Interesting)

      by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Saturday December 16 2006, @10:01AM (#17268476) Journal
      Most of our technological progress probably comes from the fact that males are willing to concentrate on things that are just stupid to the average female.

      Since I can readily think of several things females are willing to concentrate on, and which are at the same time supid or downright incomprehensible to the average male, I do wonder what comes from that? Any kind of progress?

      Whatever, really... Fanboyism is pretty much a generic trait of human personality, from what I've had a chance to witness... whereever you're given a choice and you choose one option, you're more likely to defend it than change your mind.
      And if you do change your mind at some point, your fanboyism quotient rises.
      That's why ex-smokers are even more intolerant to smokers than me, and that says something. And, of course, the most zealous fanatics are the converts.

      • I'm going to get modded down to hell for this, but here goes..

        This would have sounded so much bolder if you hadn't posted anonymously...

      • Have you heard of Marie Curie?
        Grandma Moses? Georgia O'Keefe? Frida Kahle?
        Jane Austen? Emily Dickenson? Maya Angelou? Mary Shelley?
        Harriet Tubman? Susan B. Anthony? Sacajawea? Florence Nightingale?
        Women have not been repressed, but they have been suppressed at times.

  • The obvious follow-up (Score:3, Interesting)

    by realinvalidname (529939) on Saturday December 16 2006, @09:44AM (#17268380) Homepage
    So who would win in a fight: Hal Jordan or Char Aznable?
    • Hal Jordan, of course. After all, even without his ring some of his most important...err...attributes are still present. [superdickery.com]
      • Hal is a GL....

        He was magically transformed from the Spectre back to Hal...

        Yes, it really was just a poof and I'm not really sure why...

        Perhaps a true fan boy can enlighten us...

        The GL Corps are back, guardians are back, and pretty much the whole slew is back...

        Even Kyle is back as ION again...

        Yeah, I never did stop reading Green Lantern and I suppose I mostly kept it as a service to the local comic shop.

  • I agree! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sg3000 (87992) * <sg_public.mac@com> on Saturday December 16 2006, @10:05AM (#17268494)
    Great article!

    Fanboys are a national treasure. Their diligence to spending hours/days/years nurturing and cataloging their obsession provide a useful function for the rest of us. Like a beaver spending its life building and maintaining a dam, or an oyster taking a piece of dirt and slowly making a pearl, we benefit from the years of their hard work for the few short moments when we care.

    I'm sure we all go through periods when we run across something cool and it keeps our interest for a few weeks. We develop an interest and we're grateful to find the web site of some guy who has obsessed about our new subject for most of his life. We satisfy our desire for learning about whatever the subject du jour is, and then we go about our lives. I for one appreciate the effort they put into their obsession.

    For example, over the years, I've developed or rekindled an interest in random topics: the show "The Prisoner" [netreach.net] (from the 1960s), Magic the Gathering [wikipedia.org] (which I hadn't played for 10 years), the musician Donovan [donovan.ie], and other oddball things. I thought it was cool that one quick search on the Web revealed information that probably took all of someone's free time for several years (reading biographies, attending fan conventions, and talking to other hardcore fans):

    1. I know that from the opening sequence from the Prisoner describes both the desire to get secrets from the spy named Number 6 but was also a pun for conformity: "What do you want?" Was he saying "Information" or "In formation"? Neat.

    2. I know that the rules for "banding" were changed three times for MTG. Nifty.

    3. I know that Donovan sang on the song "Billion Dollar Babies" by Alice Cooper. And Jimmy Page from Led Zeppelin may or may not have played guitar on "Hurdy Gurdy Man", but John Paul Jones (the bassist from Led Zeppelin) did play bass on the song. Neato.

    Could I have lived my life having never learned this info? Sure. Am I glad to learn this trivia? Yes. With fanboys, I can do both! Fanboys are like the Cliff Notes for millions of subjects, albeit disproportionately on Hobbits, lightsabers, or even Billy Joel [theonion.com].

    I'm not mocking them, of course. I think it's funny because we're all obsessed about something or another -- they're called hobbies. For example, I probably seem to be a fanboy about some topics (I'll let the bored Slashdot reader sift through my previous posts to figure those out).

    Anyway, here's to you, fanboys! Keep up the good work!

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by Das Modell (969371)
      I've always defined fanboy differently. To me, "fanboy" means a person, usually a teenager, who is aggressively and blindly obsessed with something to the point of going batshit crazy if somebody criticizes it. Usually their obsession is a movie, video game or band. They deflect criticism with flames and amazing leaps of logic (like "yeah, the game crashes every five minutes, but that only makes it more challenging and weeds out the noobs who aren't hardcore enough"). If the fanboy's target of obsession has
  • Attention all planets of the Solar Federation!!
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation!!!
    We have assumed control.
    We have assumed control.
    We have assumed control.
  • It is a great method of birth control
  • ... Clearly fangirls have better things to do.
      • hyperintelligent pandimensional beings from Magrathea

              But - but... you don't look like mice...
  • Whatever your bag, the internet has the ability to promote it beyond whatever was possible prior to having such a simple medium of information exchange.

    The best part is you aren't judged for your expression beyond the content of that expression. The worst part is the empowerment by way of obscure unity provided to the "fan boy" who reads without question of credibility. It's a problem when righteousness ensues a night of staying up till 6am washing down caffeine pills with ballz soda.

    Media hasn't changed f

  • In defense of the Fangirl (Score:3, Informative)

    by 32771 (906153) on Saturday December 16 2006, @11:52AM (#17269202) Journal
    For some reason I mostly meet serious engineers and family people but it once happened that
    I went to a conference in California with some of my colleagues. There we were sitting in a hotel lounge fuzzing around with our laptops trying to get WLAN to work. Some girl sat nearby and said out of the blue that she didn't have any problems with her MAC to get trough their 'firewall' and that only pc people like us usually have problems with it.

    I was taken aback, speechless, well I probably mumbled something. I have a MAC myself and was maybe a MAC fanboy as long as they used PowerPCs as CPUs, yet I didn't say anything.

    There she was:
    1. female
    2. geeky
    3. audacious
    4. MAC fangirl (maybe convertible to a PowerPC fangirl?)

    She might have been the last crazy woman out there for me and I didn't say anything.

    Damn!

       
  • The article makes a reference to a literal avalanche of pornography. but provides no link or further information about it. I would like to see this literal avalanche of pornography. If anyone is aware of any historical record of this literal avalanche, please post more information so that we may track down this unusual literal occurrence.
    • It's the huge pile of unsorted porn CDs in a friend's back room. If you're not careful where you step, the damned things will indeed literally avalanche all over you!

    • Re:literal avalanche of pornography (Score:4, Interesting)

      by jayblackcomedy (1040750) on Saturday December 16 2006, @03:44PM (#17271210) Homepage
      when i wrote that line i debated whether or not people would nitpick the use of the word "literal." i decided to use it since i was writing a semi-comedic piece and i thought that the ironic use of the word there might be funny. my fear was that people might not realize i was using the word ironically and would call me out on it. it's probably weak writing on my part that didn't make the comedic overtones of that paragraph more obvious.

      i've been reading more and more screeds against people using the word "literally" in situations when they actually mean "figuratively." i think what's happened is that people started using the word "literally" as a way to ironically create hyperbole (i'm so hungry, i could literally eat a million pounds of pizza). it became a popular way to create hyperbole but since it's devilishly difficult to communicate irony through text a lot of uninformed readers began to infer that "literally" actually meant "figuratively." the result of this is that there are now approximately eleven million blogs out there using the word "literally" incorrectly (and unironically).

      (this is probably as good as time as ever to say that my own little grammar nitpick is when people use the word "ironic" to mean "coincidental." it drives me crazy. but it's likely that in a generation or two the words will be synonymous. today's mistakes are tomorrow's rules, as they say...)

      all this being said, i'm enough of a geek to be honored that something i wrote has been nitpicked on slashdot.

      now, if you'll excuse me, i literally have a million things to do today...

      all the best,

      --jayblack

  • Beware when you use the term fanboy.

    One sense refers to the focused and deep-delving geeks/nerds which are the radiant source of geek chic.

    Another sense refers to unreasonable and often belligerent adherence to favored ideas.

    Earnest exploration and revelry: awesome.

    Sectarianism, jingoism, groupthink, witch hunting, xenophobia, and shoddy reasoning catalyzed by wishful thinking and cognitive dissonance: not so much.
  • The guy needs to do a little fanboy search of his own and find out what Web 2.0 means...

    And, as he even said... Wiki [wikipedia.org] will work fine too!

  • I keep a fanboy chained to my server for when I need him. I think I'll feed him this week, out of appreciation for this article.
    • How come there are no fanboys of soap and shampoo?

      Of course there are. They are usually called metrosexuals. Or gays.
      Not to mention other names.

      But see? every kind of fanboy, including soap and shampoo fanboys gets dissed by everyone else, including other fanboys.

      Truly, we never grow up.

      • And you can be a fanboy of the Oakland Raiders and noone blinks an eye...

        • And you can be a fanboy of the Oakland Raiders and noone blinks an eye...

          Check Google... ah, that's what I'd thought... a football club.

          Though in Europe football is the name of a completely different game, let's pretend that they're the same for all practical purposes.

          If I see a football fan, I usually immediately think "what a moron" or, more often, "what a bunch of morons".
          Seeing quite a lot of people wearing war^H^H^Hface paint, honking like mad and singing badly and, most importantly, heavily intoxi

          • Seeing quite a lot of people wearing war^H^H^Hface paint, honking like mad and singing badly and, most importantly, heavily intoxicated somehow doesn't put any nice imags in my mind.

            that's funny because nice images are exactly what i get. when the world cup was in the u.s. and i lived in chicago it was awesome having fans walking about in big groups, singing, honking, etc. i'd never seen anything like it and haven't since, it was a lot of fun. maybe seeing it too much is the problem. for me it

            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              by cp.tar (871488)

              that's funny because nice images are exactly what i get. when the world cup was in the u.s. and i lived in chicago it was awesome having fans walking about in big groups, singing, honking, etc. i'd never seen anything like it and haven't since, it was a lot of fun. maybe seeing it too much is the problem. for me it was a really novel and cool thing.

              Well, I live in Croatia.

              We have probably the worst-behaved fans in the world, second only to the English.
              And the UK plays nice with the rest of the world, so

    • "How come there are no fanboys of soap and shampoo?"

      Shampoo? [wikipedia.org]
    • yeah it is. that show had such promise and proceeded to suck at unprecedented levels.

      • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

        by Anonymous Coward
        And here we have an example of a fanboy vs whiner "debate".

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by BakaHoushi (786009)
        I believe fanboyism is fine, like most things, in moderation.

        I'm an obsessive gamer. And Otaku. And... well, okay, I'm a lot of varieties of nerd/geek. And I do spend a lot more time involved in these activities than most people would consider "normal," but I keep boundaries.

        As much as I love some particular items that have come from the Japanese culture, I have no intentions of moving to Japan, learning the language (it'd be sweet to order things that won't come to America/get it early, but it's an extreme

        • I have no intentions of moving to Japan, learning the language (it'd be sweet to order things that won't come to America/get it early, but it's an extremely complicated and, in my opinion, somewhat archaic language. English may be complicated grammatically, but we still only use 26 characters, most of which are identical to Romance/Germanic languages. And, as a multi-lingual friend has said to me, other than our grammar, English's biggest problem, if anything, is that it's overly simple in structure.)

          The o

          • I believe in this case it was a matter of poor wording. What I simply meant was that the language is far too complicated in a modern world. I've heard something to the effect of the Japanese language (in terms of writing) being so complicated that normally someone can't become literate until about the age of 9.

            Ironically, the Japanese, IIRC, have one of the highest literacy rates in the world. However, that may be due to the culture of the country, and the priorities of the people in general (I.E. education
        • Let's not forget that our entire legal system is based on dueling fanboys (fanpersons?).

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.