Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Techie Fight Clubs Springing Up

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Tue May 30, 2006 06:17 PM
from the unleashing-geek-fury dept.
Browncoat writes "USAToday reports a new phenomenon hitting some of the cubicles of Silicon Valley. It seems that engineers and developers previously confined to sitting in front of their computers are getting their anger out the healthy way: by pummeling each other. From the article 'Inspired by the 1999 film Fight Club, starring Brad Pitt and Ed Norton, underground bare-knuckle brawling clubs have sprung up across the country as a way for desk jockeys and disgruntled youths to vent their frustrations and prove themselves. "This is as close as you can get to a real fight, even though I've never been in one," the soft-spoken Siou said.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Weenie Club (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Skyshadow (508) * on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:18PM (#15431849) Homepage
    Weird, I don't remember Fight Club being about a bunch of dorks in headgear smacking each other with sticks until one of them got a bloody nose while spouting poorly-paraphrased movie quotes at some bored reporter.

    Aside from which, I loved how they worked in this:

    Earlier this month in Arlington, Texas, a high school student who didn't want to participate was beaten so badly that he suffered a brain hemorrhage and broken vertebrae. Six teenagers were arrested after DVDs of the fight appeared for sale online.

    So exactly when did "getting your ass kicked by a bunch of jerks" turn into being "an unwilling Fight Club participant"? I suppose next we'll be hearing about how Ken Lay and company were actually just repeating what they learned by watching "Wall Street" at the executive team-building offsite? Or how the well-abused Zonk and ScuttleMonkey voodoo dolls on my desk are actually just a result of my having seen part of "The Craft" one time on HBO?

    • No weapons! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by khasim (1285) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:24PM (#15431877)
      From TFA:
      Kicking, punching and swinging every household object imaginable -- from frying pans and tennis rackets to pillowcases stuffed with soda cans -- they beat each other mercilessly in a garage in this bedroom community south of San Francisco.
      What the fuck?

      Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?

      Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.

      But using a blunt object? If you're anything other than a spaz, you'll crush a few ribs the first time you connect. Then the fights over.
      • Re:No weapons! (Score:5, Informative)

        by mepex (687816) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:30PM (#15431920)
        Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low (unless you're trained) and you get really tired really quickly.
        Being married to a health care professional and hearing the stories of the ER, I know (secondhand) how wrong this is. Broken orbital bones happen all the time. Broken hands can take years to heal, and hurt like hell (just ask Fernando Vargas). The one picture in TFA shows a guy trying to knee another guy in the head. You get lucky and land flush, you're talking brain bleed, easily fatal. Actually, in my limited time of martial arts sparring when I was young, I noticed that it was the novices and not the experts that seemed to hurt and get hurt more often than the experts. But this was sparring for points, not for damage.
        • Re:No weapons! (Score:5, Informative)

          by vux984 (928602) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:42PM (#15431979)
          Actually, in my limited time of martial arts sparring when I was young, I noticed that it was the novices and not the experts that seemed to hurt and get hurt more often than the experts. But this was sparring for points, not for damage.

          The experts know how to both hit and be hit (and are better at avoiding the hits); they take a lot less damage than novices, and unless they INTEND to deal damage, they deal less damage too.

          On the flip side an expert INTENDING to deal damage will deal it a lot more effectively than a novice.

          The same is generally true in most sports.
          • The experts know how to both hit and be hit (and are better at avoiding the hits); they take a lot less damage than novices, and unless they INTEND to deal damage, they deal less damage too.

            On the flip side an expert INTENDING to deal damage will deal it a lot more effectively than a novice.

            The same is generally true in most sports.


            Yeah, I've noticed the same thing in golf. My father-in-law takes a whole lot less damage than my brother-in-law, in general.

            They play full-contact, though, which I'm told is uncommon.
        • by khasim (1285) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:45PM (#15431999)
          Look at the position of the leg with regards to the arm.

          If it was a straight in kick, his leg would be tangled up with his opponent's hand.

          If it was a side kick, his leg would be connecting with his opponent's shoulder. Look how his kicking foot is outside of both their bodies.
        • by CodeBuster (516420) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @09:43PM (#15432797)
          Using your fists on someone ... that I can see. The damage level is low

          That depends upon your class and level. I have five levels in the monk class with the shadow warrior prestige class, +3 brass knuckles of the whale, and 18/00 strength, so technically I would deal 3d6 + 3 hit points of damage and with my improved dodge feat you would not be fast enough to parry my attacks of opportunity.
          • Fist to skull ... (Score:5, Informative)

            by willtsmith (466546) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @09:32PM (#15432760) Journal

            You are right that fist to skull contact is more likely to result in a broken hand. But orbital bones can certainly break under contact with elbow (as sometimes happens in basketball games).

            The skull is NOT impenetrable. A properly swung baseball bat can easily penetrate it. More to the point, a properly swung staff or wooden sword can do the job as well. It can most certainly be accomplished with a hammer, but you'd have to be VERY skilled with a frying pan (though you could certainly kill with blunt force).

            http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/00 0060.htm [nih.gov]

            For the record, one punch can CERTAINLY kill if the person is hit in the correct way. The fact that you have not perished yet does not constitute evidence.

      • Re:No weapons! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by DragonWriter (970822) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:42PM (#15431976)
        Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?


        The same fool, I suppose, that would say "I'm bored, let's find some other techies and start beating the crap out of each other."

        Or, I suppose, that would watch the fictional account of a character that went completely and destructively insane (but who may have, at the end of the story, "saved" himself by shooting himself in the head) and say "hey, let's imitate that."

        Fight Club is a good movie. Imitating because your life is boring is, well, a sign that you need serious help.

      • Re:No weapons! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Adult film producer (866485) <van@i2pmail.org> on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:10PM (#15432127)
        "Hitting someone with a frying pan? What fool would take that?

        But using a blunt object? If you're anything other than a spaz, you'll crush a few ribs the first time you connect. Then the fights over.
        "

        We live in a nation where 45% of eligible voters believe the world is 6000 years old and their kids think WWF wrestlers are quality role models to be emulated.... [google.com] It doesn't surprise me at all that people are smacking each other around with frying pans.

          • Re:No weapons! (Score:5, Insightful)

            by molarmass192 (608071) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @10:07PM (#15432877) Homepage Journal
            According to a 2001 Gallup poll on the origins of humans, they estimate that 72% of Americans believe in some form of creationism (as defined above). They also estimate that about 45% of Americans concurred with the statement that "God created man pretty much in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years."

            Supporting link [unl.edu], link [asa3.org], and right from the horse's mouth link [gallup.com].
    • Re:Weenie Club (Score:5, Insightful)

      by timeOday (582209) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @08:26PM (#15432493)
      I don't remember Fight Club being about a bunch of dorks in headgear smacking each other with sticks until one of them got a bloody nose while spouting poorly-paraphrased movie quotes at some bored reporter.
      Then again, Fight Club is not real. It's not fair to complain when real life falls short of fiction.
      • Re:Repetition Club (Score:5, Insightful)

        by linvir (970218) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:41PM (#15431972)
        It's sad, too, because if people would give it a rest I actually liked the book and the movie.
        You know, you are allowed to like them despite a load of other people being dicks about it. Kind of like the internet.
      • by Morten Hustveit (722349) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:16PM (#15432156) Homepage Journal

        I am sick to death of Fight Club. People talking about it, [...]

        I take it most people didn't pay attention when they were told the first and second rules.

      • Re:Repetition Club (Score:4, Interesting)

        by twistedsymphony (956982) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:32PM (#15432233) Homepage
        I'd have to agree. Fight Club is easily one of my favorite movies and Chuck Palahniuk is one of my favorite authors. I liked the book/movie for a lot of reasons other then the actual "fight club". Even still when I was in college (RPI) as a freshmen one of my buddies told me one day that some guys in his dorm started a fight club... I didn't believe him till he took me down there and I watched two clumsy nerds slap each other for 5 minutes before getting tired and reaching for their inhalers. This was years ago now... 2000 I believe. Pretty stupid if you ask me, if you want to fight people take a boxing or martial arts class...
            • by Skevin (16048) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @11:28PM (#15433087) Journal
              > ok ok... s/hands/penis/ ...better?

              I took your advice and began coding with my penis instead of my hands. Everyone in my office is avoiding my cubicle now. On the plus side, I finally got other people to stop using my keyboard.

              Solomon
      • Sorry ... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by willtsmith (466546) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @09:41PM (#15432791) Journal

        Sorry, "Fight Club" was about rebellion and self realization. Same thing with another movie of that time "American Beauty".

        The protaginist (he has no name) is a bitch office worker who subconsciously develops an aggressive persona that manifests itself when he "sleeps". There was no homo-sexuality in the film. The only person who got fucked was Marla. The fact that men were hugging in a testicle cancer support group is meant to be farscicle.

        Quit projecting.

  • by Kagura (843695) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:19PM (#15431853)
    Doesn't this article violate the first and second rules of fight club?
    • by Tackhead (54550) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:28PM (#15431909)
      > Doesn't this article violate the first and second rules of fight club?

      It's geek fight club. There is no second rule; only a zeroth, first, and tenth rule.

      Rule #0: You start counting from zero.
      Rule #1: Do not talk about geek fight club.
      Rule #10: Do not talk about geek fight club.
      Rule #11: Only two bits to the rules.

  • by UmberGryphon (937359) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:19PM (#15431858)
    The teams I've been on have always handled stress by Quake/Unreal Tournament/etc. deathmatching. What's the appeal of brawling? Same thrill of victory, longer-lasting agony of defeat.
    • by Irish_Samurai (224931) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:57PM (#15432060)
      While i will admit that a good multiplayer fragfest will vent some frustrations, there is nothing better than a good sparring match. You don't even have to get to heavy with it, some basic response and counter work is really exhilerating - especially between two equally skilled people who respect each other and are open to practicing variants.

      These guys sound like dickless morons who watch way too much UFC. The guy in the photo looks like an idiot using those Kali sticks. When using them you don't get within knee strike range, and you definitely dont try to graple in the manner he is.

      In my opinion these guys need to go to a real dojo, roll with some real experts, and learn that combat for the purpose of ego masturbation is fucking pointless.
    • by kfg (145172) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:30PM (#15432220)
      What's the appeal of brawling?

      Depends on how big an asshole you are.

      KFG
  • well now (Score:4, Funny)

    by spune (715782) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:20PM (#15431859) Homepage
    No one saw this coming. No one.
  • Unsupport claims (Score:5, Insightful)

    by remembertomorrow (959064) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:22PM (#15431869)
    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Is this fact, or just poor reporting?
    • by DragonWriter (970822) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:29PM (#15431914)
      It is probably a fact that "Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor".

      It is poor (though typical) reporting that these types of claims are reported simply as "so-and-so says", but it saves journalist from having to have any knowledge of or do any research in the field they are covering, they can simply find the nearest person with a degree or job in a superficially relevant field, and get a quote, and go home for the day. If they are particularly ambitious, they'll get two conflicting quotes from different experts, to show "balance".

        • by slamb (119285) * on Tuesday May 30 2006, @09:22PM (#15432732) Homepage

          The article said: Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

          DragonWriter said: It is poor (though typical) reporting that these types of claims are reported simply as "so-and-so says", but it saves journalist from having to have any knowledge of or do any research in the field they are covering, they can simply find the nearest person with a degree or job in a superficially relevant field, and get a quote, and go home for the day. If they are particularly ambitious, they'll get two conflicting quotes from different experts, to show "balance".

          PCM2 said: I see. And so, in your opinion, not-poor reporting would presumably involve the reporter spending the next six years getting an advanced degree in psychiatry and then stating his own opinion?

          Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

          I can't speak for DragonWriter, but I'd like to see evidence for a wild claim like that. Perhaps a reference to a peer-reviewed study. I don't have much respect for sociologists or gender studies professors. I can't think off-hand how to perform a well-controlled experiment that would determine if what this guy said is true, so I bet he couldn't either.

    • Re:Unsupport claims (Score:5, Interesting)

      by feyhunde (700477) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:35PM (#15431958)
      Poor reporting treats it as a fact.

      There was violence before TV and Games and Movies.

      There were farm boys who grew up in peaceful farms that never heard a shot fired in anger or had a punch thrown whom grew up to be Soldiers. There were gun deaths that had nothing to do with Grand Theft Auto.

      The reporter (or more likely editor) is a PC fool whom doesn't realize the simple basic truth. Violent Video games save us from wayyyyyy more random acts of violence then they do encourage them. Anyone whose actually played the things in a bad mood knows what I'm talking about. The simulation is a cathartic. The bad date or club cockteases have made plenty a man hate women, if only for a bit. Killing a whore in GTA lets you get the release and satisfaction without actually hurting a human being.

      I guess too many of these folks are naive and really believe everything is sunshine and lollypops and don't understand the dark sides we all have. The side that comes out when we get cut off in traffic, the side that wants to slap everyone with a stupid answer. The part of us deep down that wants to be a Viking and Rape, Pillage and Burn. Or they might know they have such a side, but their own morality is such that they can not admit such a side exists.
    • by nsmike (920396) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:42PM (#15432280)
      Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

      Read:

      Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from jocks, jerks and bullies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor, who got the sh*t kicked out of him every day for wanting to be a gender studies professor.
  • by ConfusedGuy (791335) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:23PM (#15431871) Homepage
    This doesn't worry me much... yet. I mean, transgressional fiction was bound to come true at some point. People tend to break out of the cube. What worries me is that this might be a trend in fiction influencing reality. If Patrick Batemans start cropping up all over the place then we have a problem.
  • by bigtangringo (800328) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:25PM (#15431881) Homepage
    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Dear Michael Messner,

    Please accept this large steaming cup of shut the hell up.

    Sincerely,

    BigTanGringo
  • by Otter (3800) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:26PM (#15431890) Journal
    Ummm, Roger Tinkoff -- you might want to wear rubber gloves befor wiping up some random weirdo's blood...

    Anyway, my favorite part is the two professors eagerly spouting theories about "fight clubs" as though they'd ever heard of this before the USA Today reporter came calling.

    No, my real favorite part is:

    Five-year fight club veteran Dinesh Prasad, 32, a heavily tattooed Santa Clara engineer, said he once broke a rib in a match but never complained to his fellow combatants. He also recently skipped his first wedding anniversary to attend a fight rather than drive to Los Angeles, where his wife is finishing law school.
    Fast forward to Marital Fight Club...
  • Utopian Nostalgia (Score:5, Insightful)

    by GeekLife.com (84577) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:27PM (#15431902) Homepage
    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Hopefully we can someday return to the world where none of thoseexisted, and men never fought each other.
    • by linvir (970218) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:50PM (#15432026)
      Dude, he's a university professor! Don't try to lecture him on common sense! He knows sociology! One day you're just walking along the street, whistling some new Eminem song, and BAM!!, he descends from the rafters, slices your head off with a 200-page dissertation on the causal relationship between videogames and violence, and gets like 6000 boners all at once. And that's what I call Real Ultimate Power!
  • His name is Linus Torvalds.
    His name is Linus Torvalds.
  • Consumerism (Score:4, Insightful)

    by oSand (880494) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:33PM (#15431941)
    "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    Yes, buy things like the Fight Club DVD, you sheep. Some people, if worried about excessive consumerism, would stop buying shit.

    Men involved in fight clubs often carry bottled-up violent impulses learned in childhood from video games, cartoons and movies, said Michael Messner, a University of Southern California sociology and gender studies professor.

    Videogames. Always videogames. I'm surprised he hasn't blamed myspace.
  • "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said. "We have to go to work every day. We're constantly told to buy things we don't need, and just for a couple hours we have the freedom to do what we want to do."

    And that is beating each other up? Idiots...
    • by DragonWriter (970822) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:51PM (#15432029)
      Along the line of the parent:

      "You get to be a superhero for a night," Klimanis said.

      Superheros go out and fight wrongdoing in society.

      Beating up (or being beaten up by) other geeks is not being "a superhero for a night".

  • if elif fi (Score:5, Funny)

    by packetmon (977047) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @06:47PM (#15432010) Homepage
    10 REM Nerd Fight Club
    20 REM packetmon
    30 FOR X=10 TO 1 STEP -1
    40 PRINT X;"Oh yea";
    50 IF X<>1 THEN PRINT "!";
    60 PRINT "take that,";X;"jackass";
    70 IF X<>1 THEN PRINT "!";
    80 PRINT "give in!"
    90 NEXT
  • by tetsu96 (790788) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:40PM (#15432271)
    ...is that the themes in the book / movie really hit home for a lot of people. Sitting back in your chair laughing at the idiots may be fun for the armchair warriors at large, but not everyone has really been tested and that was one of the core themes FC - how do you know what you've got if you never put it to the test? How do you know how you'll react to a fight when you've never been in one? How can you prove you've really pushed yourself to the limit without scars to show for it?

    And talk about a way to find out - if it's either kick some tail or get yours kicked in for you, I think that almost everyone would go into a full on a$$ kicking mode. At that point, it's the better man that wins but either way you're gonna push yourself harder than posting comments on a web site.

    For the office warrior who never got into a fight in his life, I can easily see this as thrilling beyond compare.

    I wouldn't recommend this to everyone, and there should probably be some safeguards put into this as even the UFC has rounds and referees to stop fights when it's clear that 1 person is taking too much of a beating, but I get it.
  • by jlarocco (851450) on Tuesday May 30 2006, @07:49PM (#15432324) Homepage

    Exclusive pictures [jlarocco.net] from one of the fights.

  • ...you do not talk about fight-like-a-girl club. For obvious reasons.
      • Re:IMHO... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by ArchAngelQ (35053) on Wednesday May 31 2006, @12:02AM (#15433187) Homepage Journal
        I don't disagree, really. I'm not saying this is a healthy outlet, just that it's healthier than some of the alternatives, such as taking out these destructive tendancies on people who *didn't* ask to be involved. TFA didn't provide much detail.

        As for techies being smarter than the majority? Not really. They are more capable of more focused, dedicated tasks. They are able to expend all their energies concentrating on a singular task. This makes them ideal for jobs where this is required. Coding is one of them. Design in general, really. You've got to be completely dedicated to truely get something right. Or even half right. That doesn't, inherantly, make someone smarter. I've met some brick stupid techies.

        As far as the 'evil' bit? I agree. It's why I'm not involved in corporate americ (or any other nation's version of same) any longer, and why I personally find this rather needless, mindless, and sad. But I can't just step in and say 'that person is doing something stupid' without justification, because frankly, I tell people who do that to me off, and go on with my life. And I'm not really intrested in posting such justification on, ya know, slashdot. I mean, c'mon. Slashdot. The majority of the people reading this have already made up their minds anyway.