Slashdot Log In
RIAA Wants Student Deposed On School Day
Posted by
kdawson
on Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:05 AM
from the drop-everything-and-get-in-here dept.
from the drop-everything-and-get-in-here dept.
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a Houston, Texas, case, UMG v. Hightower, the RIAA has served a subpoena on the defendant's son, a high school student, on one day's notice, telling him to be at a lawyer's office at 9:00 a.m. the next day, a school day, for a deposition. The defendant's lawyer objected (PDF)."
Related Stories
[+]
Your Rights Online: A Look at The RIAA's War Against College Students 159 comments
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "p2pnet.net has put together a fascinating retrospective on the RIAA's war against college students, commenced February 28, 2007. The campaign is described as one to 'force "consumers" to buy what they're told to buy — corporate "content," as the Big 4 call their formulaic outpourings.' In a scathing indictment not only of the major record labels, but of those schools, administrators, and educators who have yet to take a stand against it, Jon Newton reviews a number of landmark moments in the 11-month old 'reign of terror'. They include the announcement of the bizarre 'early settlement' sale, the sudden withdrawal of a case in which a 17 year old Texas high school student had been subpoenaed while in class during school hours to attend a deposition the very next day during his taking of a standardized test, the call by Harvard law professors for the university to fight back when and if attacked, and the differing reactions by other schools."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
i don't know about the 'bloody' part, but article 1 section 4 of the bill of 'rights' of the texas constitution states that people may not hold office if they don't "acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being".
the full text is:
"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."
my source is here [state.tx.us].
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Informative)
And while I'm not sure if that segment of the Texas con. has specifically been challeneged, but other states that have similar provisions have had them struck down unanimously by the USSC [Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)]. The Article VI language preventing religious tests or oaths for federal office was ruled to apply to the states.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:4, Funny)
So they gave him an enema, and buried him in a shoe-box...
*ducks*
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Insightful)
The Texas constitution was made a long time ago by the people of the time. So were the original designs for US currency, and protocol for swearing on a bible before testifying in court. Do people look at currency and think, "Gee golly, it's right! In God I trust!"? Do they swear on the bible and actually feel compelled to tell the truth more so than otherwise? No.
Most nonsense that people complain about is left over tradition. Yes, sometimes tradition has to go. Other times, it doesn't, as it really means nothing to the people anymore. The moment someone complains about something like the Texas constitution, it starts a shoving battle between people who feel like their culture is being attacked and people who feel the need to fix something that isn't broken. IMO, in some cases it's better to let tradition and culture, remnants of the past, fade out silently than to attack them and renew interest in them.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:4, Interesting)
Atheism is as much a religion as not collecting stamps is a hobby.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Michael Jordan is real enough for me to sign that contract.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:4, Insightful)
No it doesn't. Read it again. It says that people who acknowledge the existence of a supreme being are not subject to any other religious requirements. It doesn't say anything about people who do not acknowledge the existence of a supreme being.
It's a statement restricting what the government can demand of public officials who believe in a deity. It's practically the opposite of a requirement to hold office — it's a loophole, not a demand.
It's a stupid law alright, but it doesn't forbid atheists from holding office per se, it just doesn't give them the same loophole as everybody else.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Informative)
4. to make earnest petition to (a person).
5. to make petition or entreaty for; crave
(See: dictionary.com [reference.com])
The legal "pray" simply is a formal way to ask the Court for an action. You will find this phrase [google.com] in many [google.com] legal filings, not just in Texas courts.
Thanks for the slam, though; always good to see the myths and legends preserved.
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
oblivious, adjective: see FooAtWFU
Parent
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
(Of course, the origin of the word curia is even earlier and during roman times simply meant a division of the people, then the term was applied to the people meeting as a body in order to make civil and judicial decisions. It is through the Catholic church that "curia" acquired its eclesiatical meaning.)
Parent
School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Interesting)
Why does the music industry feel it should tamper with the education of our minors just to placate some facile legal action?
Parent
Shows what you know (Score:5, Funny)
Dude, get a clue: these are *pirates, they don't care about education. All they care about is stealing, stealing, stealing other people's intellectual property.
If anything is tampering with their education, it's the alien viruses in their brains, which impel them to download our songs for *nothing, thereby descrating our intellectual property. The same intellectual property provided for in the Constitution, section IV, which says
"Intellectual property rocks. We should have lots of it."
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
THEY want his deposition. Not the other way around.
Why should he suffer an inconvenience to suit their schedule?
In the same situation, if I had to lose a day's pay to humor the RIAA, I'd feel mightily pissed off. OTOH, I have very little doubt that some hungry young lawyer would work OT on the RIAA's dollar to take the deposition on Saturday or some weeknight.
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because this is one of the RIAA file sharing lawsuits. Making people suffer is their primary objective. The greater inconvenience in the initial stages, the less likely someone will actually challenge them. This is the RIAA saying "We can make life miserable for you and your entire family, and it's completely legal. So cough up whatever amount of money _we_ think is fair, and we won't keep you dangling in legal hell for the next decade."
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:4, Interesting)
If they're going to force him out of class for their benefit, they need to pay him for his losses.
Parent
They work weekend anyway. (Score:3, Insightful)
-GiH
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
BTDT.
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Well special provisions are afforded to minors as opposed to adults. Also one of the objections was that the deposition would be during school hours. Certainly the plaintiff could have done it on a weekend or after school hours, but didn't do so.
Reading the motion, it appears that the subpoena was done in a very sloppy manner which explains the short notice. It appears that the plaintiff tried to email the subpoena (not legal from what I recall) and to the wrong attorney at first. The plaintiff finally sent a subpoena to the defendants home with less than 24 hours. Now, if it is true that the plaintiff's attorney failed to deliver a subpoena in a timely manner, they should have moved back the deposition to accomodate. It appears that they didn't do that either.
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, it's not just any school day they picked. It's TAKS testing day - a statewide test in Texas that has to be passed to graduate from high school. They picked one of the worst possible days of the year to compel him to show up. They are either evil or ignorant, in my opinion.
Parent
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
In Other News... (Score:4, Funny)
June Dawson, 43, waited on him this morning. She is a single mother of two, battling cancer. She was not enthusiastic about the tip: "He left a stinking dime. Next time I'm going to spit in his eggs."
The RIAA did not respond to enquiries at press time.
Go figure. (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone needs to start doing something about RIAA's boundaries and arrogance, considering they're getting so careless with who they're attacking nowadays. How long will it be, before Judges and courtrooms are sick of these petty charges, and start only allowing the larger criminals who actually sell and distribute?
Right now, you're paying less when distributing marijuana or posessing cocaine, than you are to host MP3's.. EVEN if you're a child!
There HAS to be a line drawn somewhere.
Re:Go figure. (Score:5, Insightful)
Or they could spend their time prosecuting price fixing media cartels.
Parent
Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
Why would they need a deposition anyway? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since he would not be facing a policeman but the opposition lawyer, can he simply walk away anytime he wants or refuse to sign anything?
What happened? (Score:4, Insightful)
hmm (Score:3, Insightful)
One day notice is pretty weird, though. Traditionally you clear dates with opposing counsel as professional courtesy, or you at least set it far enough in advance to work things out.
TAKS Test (Score:5, Informative)
RIAA's fishing expedition (Score:5, Insightful)
The subpoena is being used for patently improper purpose, namely as a fishing expedition by plaintiffs'
That sums up the RIAA's entire strategy.
School's wasted on the kid anyway (Score:5, Funny)
They're doing him a favor. Really.
It's intentional (Score:5, Interesting)
Response: (Score:5, Insightful)
Serving a notice for a sworn deposition on one day's notice is contrary to the rules of professional conduct, and can (and should) result in penalties against the lawyers' clients in court, as well as with with the lawyer regulatory disciplinary authority.
How to avoid RIAA entanglements (Score:4, Insightful)
2. Do not share RIAA music (help prevent the spread of mindshare) (ugh, I hate buzzwords)
3. Do not buy RIAA music (or if you do, stick to back catalogues from USED CD/record stores)
4. Do not tune to new RIAA music on the radio so you can avoid being tempted to buy new product from RIAA
By doing so, RIAA members will eventually either go broke or go independent, and the independent labels will rise in popularity as their buying power increases beyond that of the dying RIAA cartel.
Judge Atlas will sort this out. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:School day (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:3:30 is far better (Score:4, Interesting)
Parent
Re:Just say no? (Score:5, Informative)
I may not be a lawyer, but I know this to be false. Don't give the RIAA any more power of fear than they already enjoy. Deponents can object, if a witness refuses the moving party can ask for a motion to compel, there are lots of rememdies other than automatically losing. The biggest problem isn't that the kid is going to miss school, its that they are attempting to take his deposition with only 24 hours notice. In my experience as a paralegal, again- IANAL, that is simply poor if not abusive practice.
Parent
What happens when a disposition is blown off (Score:5, Informative)
Parent