Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

William Gibson's AGRIPPA Recovered and Revealed

Posted by kdawson on Wed Dec 10, 2008 08:16 AM
from the gripping-hand dept.
Bud Cook writes "While the text of William Gibson's elusive electronic poem AGRIPPA is widely posted around the Web, it has not been seen in its original incarnation — custom-built software designed to scroll the poem through a single play before encrypting each line with an RSA algorithm — since 1992. Today is the 16th anniversary, to the day, of the poem's initial release. A team of scholars at the University of Maryland and UC Santa Barbara used forensic computing to restore the code from an original diskette loaned by a collector and have placed video of the complete 'run,' as well as never-before-seen footage from the night of AGRIPPA's public debut in 1992, up on a Web site called the Agrippa Files. There's also a detailed essay documenting the forensic process, plus a mess of stills, screenshots, and a copy of the disk image itself."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Harold AI? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by PakProtector (115173) <cevkiv@ g m a i l . c om> on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:27AM (#26058935) Journal

    We finally found the Epitaph of the Twilight?!

  • by contra_mundi (1362297) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:30AM (#26058959)
    Could this be the first DRM? It's much more draconian than the 3 activations and buy a new game from EA.
    • by Qzukk (229616) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:58AM (#26059293) Journal

      It's much more draconian than the 3 activations and buy a new game from EA.

      And apparently just as ineffective.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        And apparently just as ineffective.

        Considering it took 16 years for it to become widely available in its original form, I'm not sure I'd exactly call that ineffective.
        • Re:Could this be.. (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Lisandro (799651) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @09:54AM (#26060027)

          Considering it took 16 years for it to become widely available in its original form, I'm not sure I'd exactly call that ineffective.

          Maybe it's just no one cared too much about it...

    • Somebody obviously never played pirated computer games in the '80s. The "cracker" who had defeated the copy protection on the original software would add a splash screen with his name when he distributed the game. Similarly (although perhaps not strictly digitally), you couldn't just hook two VCRs together and copy a film you rented at Blockbuster onto a blank tape.
  • by The Ultimate Fartkno (756456) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:30AM (#26058969)

    ...it's quite heartbreaking to see a work that intentionally removed itself from your grasp. It's quite the change from people who expect immortality simply for having cameras pointed at them or semi-literate fiction aimed at people who think MTV is the height of culture.

      • by Splab (574204) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:58AM (#26059289)

        Except the dead sea scrolls is hide from animals, not paper from your printer. Normal printing paper has a very short life span (comparatively).

          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Modern mass produced paper is comparatively low quality and has a much higher acid content than older paper, thus aging much, much worse, to the point where early 20th century books are much worse off than much older ones (I assume modern high-end paper has better durability than that though, and old paper is, by definition, the high-end stuff because that's all there was). Not sure how the printer ink itself ages.
          • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

            by iocat (572367)
            Use an inkjet for those prinouts! -- Ink on paper, good. Toner on paper, not so good -- it loses its grip after just a few dozen years. A lot depends on the paper too. I have pulp magazines and books that I have compared to AGRiPPA simply because as you turn the pages they basically disintigrate.

            As for AGRiPPA itself, I get the point, but it always struck me as Gibson's shark jumping moment. An extremely unegalitarian artwork that only a few people can see in its intended form is certainly the artist's rig

            • Only if the ink doesn't just fade away. Older inkjets were notorious for this. One year of use and the print was basically gone.
          • Family Bibles are printed on PH neutral lignin-free paper and sometimes there is a coating on the edges to keep out dust and chemicals.
          • Replace "Bible" with "source code" and I could easily imagine someone trying one of my ancient programs in the year 2900..... by which point the original disks would have long been erased.

            I hope they use MLX [wikipedia.org] to aid in typing them in, mistake free.

          • Most printer paper these days is essentially throwaway stuff, like much of the rest of our society.

            Archival paper is special. Not only is it acid-free, but it is made with a base reserve of alkaline to resist later exposure to acid in the environment. It also has a different composition, most notably low amounts of lignin (from wood pulp). Basic stuff should last 100 years, good stuff maybe 500 years, the best maybe 1,000.

            I bet your Bible is yellowed and the paper is slightly brittle. I have one like that.

      • by smoker2 (750216) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @09:31AM (#26059701) Homepage Journal
        - 1 Missing the point.

        The whole point of this was to show you it disappearing. End of. No more. Done.

        Putting into a medium designed for longevity would be precisely against the intention of the work. How do you demonstrate the effect of a highly mobile medium on literature if you protect against that effect ? Do you (can you) see DRM in action through the medium of paper ? It is impossible because you can always go back a page - not so with this. This is ice sculpture for the modern age.
        • How dare you preserve something That Must Die!

        • by jvkjvk (102057)

          Well, perhaps not missing the point.

          How do you demonstrate the effect of a highly mobile medium on literature if you protect against that effect ?

          Well, perhaps there is less of an effect to be demonstrated since this clearly rebuts your premise.

          Certainly it may be against the intent of the artist but perhaps the point to be made is that the work is much more resilient than you think.

          Do you (can you) see DRM in action through the medium of paper ? It is impossible because you can always go back a page - not so with this. This is ice sculpture for the modern age.

          Yes, we can do so even with this. period. We now know experientially that the "ice sculpture for the modern age" can be placed in a "modern age refrigerator" and be kept indefinitely, DRM or no.

          The true issue of DRM is the legal ramifi

      • The Sumerians [ancientscripts.com] had a pretty decent system, as far as longevity goes. I think I'm going to have my autobiography printed up on clay tablets and stored in a salt cave in southern NM. Should get some longevity out of that.

  • by krou (1027572) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:40AM (#26059083)
    "The 2008 incarnation of the poem consists of custom-built software that, when /. readers try to read the poem, it is encrypted in a weird Web-based algorithm that transforms the text into a message saying 'Error establishing a database connection'.
    • by Sanat (702)

      Obviously, it is a substitution code.

      You read 'Error establishing a database connection'.

      I read 'about the love of life, the lovely woman, and the angst of making a choice'.

    • by mazarin5 (309432) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @10:40AM (#26060771) Journal

      "The 2008 incarnation of the poem consists of custom-built software that, when /. readers try to read the poem, it is encrypted in a weird Web-based algorithm that transforms the text into a message saying 'Error establishing a database connection'.

      Sorry, that was my fault. I was the first one to visit the website, and it consequently encrypted itself. I should have mirrored it.

    • With the added feature that the text will never get transformed because none of us RTFA
    • Slow down, Poet Laureate! It has been 8 minutes since you last read a poem!
      • Mine reads:

        Connection Interrupted
        The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.
        The network link was interrupted while negotiating a connection. Please try again.

        Fascinating stuff.

  • Que? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mrpacmanjel (38218) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:49AM (#26059187)

    I have to say the book is beautifully put together - a real work of art.

    But I have read the poem (a copy of it is on Gibson's website) isn't it a bit pretentious?

    However as a piece of art it is an interesting idea (minus the poem).

    • by k_187 (61692)
      it really is an interesting idea, particularly in today's age of "your data is around forever, whether you want it to be or not", current developments not withstanding. I always thought this was fascinating, for that reason. There's a certain amount of permanency to computers. They've been in use for all of my lifetime, and its hard to envision a time before they were ubiquitous (for me at least). I think this poem is really designed to show how ethereal bits can (and possibly should) be.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by Magada (741361)

        Old enough to get it, are you? Hrm. haven't gone far enough in your thinking though. The text is not destroyed after reading. It is encrypted. It's the digital equivalent of locking something away and then throwing the key into the sea.

        It was probably Gibson's way of saying he's trying to forget whatever made him make Agrippa in the first place. I also think he did it knowing full well that the text will be recovered. Dunno what this means in the context of the work (it's not a poem, although it contains a

        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          At this point, you're probably pondering if Gibson really gave that much thought to what was essentially a side-project for him. He did. He's careful like that.

          To this day I am still amazed at how prescient he was in Neuromancer. The details -- all wrong, killing each other over a few megs of RAM, the virtual reality helmet, yadda yadda. The real interesting part is the atmosphere, e.g., at one point they go to a site that where people have been scrawling passwords for various high profile computers eve

          • So what you're saying is that even if he doesn't have perfect clairvoyance as far as events are concerned, William Gibson really gets people, better than most people even understand themselves? I'd agree with that.

        • pay attention (Score:5, Insightful)

          by hal9000(jr) (316943) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @09:48AM (#26059959)
          an alternative interpretation is that in a world that Gibson envisioned where data is fleeting and we are deluged with it, there are times when you need to pay attention.

          This poem, for all intents and purposes self destructs after the first reading. Therefore, you should pay attention the first time--you won't get another chance.

          That was, I think, the intent. Whether he could have written a program that would have enforced that intent better is beside the point (apparently it was "broken"). For the average reader, you'd get one shot.

          It's still a compelling thought.
          • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

            by Fnord666 (889225)
            Interesting iinterpretation, but it is contradicted by William Gibson's own blog post [williamgibsonbooks.com] about Agrippa. In that post Gibson says:

            Ashbaugh's design eventually included a supposedly self-devouring floppy-disk intended to display the text only once, then eat itself. Today, there seems to be some doubt as to whether any of these curious objects were ever actually constructed. I certainly don't have one myself.

            From this I would have to conclude that Gibson wasn't involved in the whole "one chance" aspect of the w

        • by metlin (258108)

          And I had the chance to meet him when I was in grad school, and he said that Agrippa was a dedication to his father (Gibson lost his parents at a fairly young age).

    • by Hatta (162192)

      But I have read the poem (a copy of it is on Gibson's website) isn't it a bit pretentious?

      It *is* a poem, so yes.

  • Good art (Score:5, Interesting)

    by smoker2 (750216) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @09:13AM (#26059467) Homepage Journal
    Good art requires the viewer to think. What is more indicative of the state of social consumerism and the temporary nature of anything, than a document that allows precisely one viewing then removes itself from the page. Not to mention the indirect commentary on the transitory nature of language as a communication mechanism. It doesn't matter what the theme of the poem was, the art was the action of allowing one reading then visibly degrading the communication to the point where it was no longer communicating anything other than loss. What is poetic about a sunset ? The scientific fact that the sun is merely being hidden by the rotation of the earth ? Or the mental notion of the day coming to an end, time passing, out with the old, everything dies, sadness, hope etc. ?

    I would see Gibsons work as deliberately demonstrating the sadness of work being published, read, then being removed from view and denying future readings. Very nice work considering the date it was first published, and our current problems with DRM and copyright.
    • Buhddist sand art (Score:4, Interesting)

      by dazedNconfuzed (154242) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @10:48AM (#26060891)

      That's a major factor in Buhddist/Nepalese sand art (proper name escapes me): a great deal of effort goes into making an intricate work of art, only to have it brushed away a few days later.

      From the Japanese samurai classic text Hagakure: "In the Kamigata area, they have a sort of tiered lunchbox they use for a single day when flower viewing. Upon returning, they throw them away, trampling them underfoot. The end is important in all things."

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Omestes (471991)

      Though creating something and destroying is rather a cliche. How many artists have painted a picture, then dowsed it in gasoline and destroyed it forever immediately after? Or, like Duchamp, made intentionally made installations of materials that decay to add the aspect of time and temporariness to them.

      This isn't to rain on anyones parade, or say the idea isn't valid. Being that it is a common theme among modern arts, it surely represents something in society, some important concept.

      I was tempted to wri

      • Re:Good art (Score:4, Insightful)

        by fracai (796392) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @10:55AM (#26061029)

        I think the real trick is to display a work of art, while concealing said art, while also not allowing the act of concealing to turn into art itself. It seems to me that many would consider the "performance" of concealing the poem a work of art in itself.

        I also have a hard time stating that "bad art" is "not art".
        And I struggle over whether "not art" can be "accidental art".

  • by benwiggy (1262536) on Wednesday December 10 2008, @10:34AM (#26060707)
    This is only news if your opponent has studied his Agrippa.... which I have.
  • I remember working on this for a bit. One reason it was a bit more difficult than normal to crack open is we replaced all the appropriate 68k exception vectors with RTEs, so you couldn't hop into Macsbug or do an NMI and disassemble anything.

    Once multifinder came out that method died, because the exception vectors were on a per-process basis. You could just break into another app and dump the RAM.

    I vaguely remember that it was a fun and interesting idea back in the day. Plus, it was william gibson, and his

  • FROM SITE:

    Due to overwhelming demand, The Agrippa Files site has been moved to a new server. There may be some delay as the DNS change propagates. Please try again in a few hours.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

    -- The Agrippa Files Web Hosting Service

    • Re:Yawn (Score:5, Funny)

      by morgan_greywolf (835522) <morgan_greywolf@ ... m ['rr.' in gap]> on Wednesday December 10 2008, @08:57AM (#26059285) Homepage Journal

      it is a 5th grade programming project

      So, let me get this straight. You were writing programs that RSA encrypt data embedded within its own executable in the 5th grade?

      Wow. And here I was just writing programs in LOGO that made a turtle move around the screeen. :(

      You were a gifted child, weren't you?

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Abcd1234 (188840)

        Actually, interestingly enough, RSA is about as simple a cryptosystem as they come (next to OTP, that is). Really. The complexity is actually in the key generation (and even that is pretty simple once you've got a couple large primes). But once you have them, the actual encryption algorithm is dead simple.

        'course, that's not to say it ain't still an impressive accomplishment. But it's no DES implementation. :)

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Otto (17870)

        RSA encryption: c = m^e mod n.

        It really is something a 5th grader could write. The security is in the selection of e and n (and d, for decryption).

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by HTH NE1 (675604)

          RSA encryption: c = m^e mod n.

          It really is something a 5th grader could write. The security is in the selection of e and n (and d, for decryption).

          Assuming of course you wanted to decrypt it. That doesn't seem to be part of the design in this case.

        • I think I can get it down to 1st grader level:

          include rsa;
          rsa_encrypt(stuffToEncrypt);

    • I love art

      Thanks for clarifying that.

      Lookit, I'm no expert on the topic, but as I recall the whole thing from when it debuted in '92, the use of the self-scrolling, self-encrypting gimmick was Gibson's toe-dip into a whole new creative medium.

      The poem was about his mother, memories for whom were very dim, ephemeral even. Gibson selected this new "self-destructing" medium as a metaphor, to facilitate the poetry: Once you had read the poem, you could not go back and re-visit it, you had to rely upon your me

      • A woman who had never read Shakespeare went to a performance of Hamlet and complained, "I don't know what anybody sees in that play. It's just a bunch of cliches strung together."

      • by kv9 (697238)

        Or am I missing some geeky thing that Gibson did?

        problem is you're some old guy from the internet that back in his day walked uphill both ways, while this is Gibson.