Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Banned Words List Carries Its First Emoticon

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:08 AM
from the bet-they-have-power-in-the-upper-penninsula dept.
DynaSoar writes "Lake Superior State University in Michigan's Upper Peninsula ('The land of four seasons: June, July, August and Winter') has just published its 34th annual List of Words to Be Banished from the Queen's English for Mis-use, Over-use and General Uselessness. Besides such unsurprising inclusions such as 'green' corporations being 'game changing' due to concern with their 'carbon foot print,' this year's list contains an emoticon for the first time — not a smiley face or variant, but the 'heart' symbol made from the characters 'less than' and 'three.' It's perhaps a sign of the evolution of language, or at least of this volunteer linguistic watchdog group, that a symbol compounded of two characters, neither of them a letter, is considered not only a word, but a particularly egregious one."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by slim (1652) <john&hartnup,net> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:11AM (#26280809) Homepage

    Let's celebrate.

    \o/

  • Link to the list (Score:4, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:14AM (#26280885)
    http://www.lssu.edu/banished/current.php [lssu.edu] They appear to either hate political discourse or the sound-bite products of political discourse.
  • wtf (Score:5, Funny)

    by pohl (872) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:16AM (#26280905) Homepage
    <3  is supposed to be a heart!?  And all this time
    I thought it was mammaries or butt-cheeks, depending
    on the context.
    • Maybe it's just tapped? Like some weird cardiac mana?
    • Re:wtf (Score:5, Funny)

      by TheRealMindChild (743925) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:31AM (#26281117) Homepage Journal
      ( . )( . ) = Boobies
      ( O )( O ) = Boobies with big nipples
      [ . ][ . ] = Robot boobies
      ( : )( . ) = Triple Nipple Boobies
      ( % )( % ) = Pierced Boobies
      ( @ )( @ ) = Epic Boobies
      ( ^ )( ^ ) = Perky Boobies
      ( , )( ' ) = Lop-sided Boobies
      ( U )( U ) = Long nipple Boobies
      \ . /\ . / = Saggy Boobies
      | . | . | = Man Chested
      ( . )( . )( . ) = Total Recall


      There are inevitably more. Add to the list.
      This has been a public service announcement.
    • Re:wtf (Score:5, Funny)

      by Overzeetop (214511) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @12:36PM (#26282009) Journal

      The first time I saw it I thought it was an emoticon for teabagging. Looks a lot more like a sac than a heart, imho.

    • <3 is supposed to be a heart!? And all this time I thought it was mammaries or butt-cheeks, depending on the context.

      It's actually "asshat".

  • by rikkards (98006) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:20AM (#26280983) Journal

    8====D

  • New Summary (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:25AM (#26281043)
    Some no-name college makes a list of phrases that they think are stupid and they get on the news.

    Someone sees '<3' and nerdgasms. The aftermath is left here on Slashdot.

    This is not news, it's spam.

    Move along please.
  • by Megatron3W (1442245) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:25AM (#26281055)
    And all along I thought it <3 stood for Boobs on a cone.
  • But... (Score:5, Funny)

    by jellomizer (103300) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:26AM (#26281057)

    I <3 monkeys and have set up a green organization so to achieve our directive and maintain a low carbon footprint, along with my wife to protect them. My wife is a bit of a Maverick and is trying to run for president but I am ok with being First Dude.

  • by SpeedyDX (1014595) <speedyphoenix.gmail@com> on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:29AM (#26281089)

    Americans leave out the "u" in colour, armour, neighbour, etc. We no longer pronounce "night" as [ni:xt] or [ni:t] (IPA [wikipedia.org]). We could come up with a huge number of examples, but why bother? Language evolves over time, words lose or gain meaning. It's a natural process. You'd think an academic institution would understand this simple concept, but I guess grabbing headlines is more important than practicing proper academia.

    Emoticons are just an evolution of a new language. It's actually quite extraordinary. We have now created symbols that can represent simple meanings cross-culturally and cross-linguistically, and these symbols are popularized in large part by the youth of the world. They are creating a whole new language right before our eyes. I wouldn't be surprised if we would soon be able to communicate simple messages between different cultures that speak different languages via symbols (some would argue we already can). It's a shame that institutions such as this one and the "get off my damn lawn" crowd are ridiculing such an extraordinary example of the human ability to adapt and break down communicative barriers.

    • by Lobster Quadrille (965591) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:53AM (#26281395)

      We have now created symbols that can represent simple meanings cross-culturally and cross-linguistically

      We had these thousands of years ago, on the walls of caves.

      • by siride (974284) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:55AM (#26281433)
        "Hacker" still means what it used to mean, but only among the community of for-fun programmers. So those people who get incensed about it are half-right. They are generally wrong, however, because in the common parlance, it really does truly mean someone who breaks into computers. Context almost always clears up whether it is meant to be used in the common fashion or in the jargon fashion. "I spent all weekend hacking on my Perl module" is clearly positive (well, unless you hate Perl) and would only be used amongst people who know what any of that means anyways.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:30AM (#26281099)

    Me: LSSU! <3
    LSSU: </3
    Me: :(
    LSSU: ( ^_^ )
    LSSU: <(^_^<)
    LSSU: (>^_^)>
    LSSU: (o^_^)O
    LSSU: O(^_^o)
    Me: :D
    LSSU: (>O<)
    Me: D:

  • by GlobalColding (1239712) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:51AM (#26281371) Journal
    (_)_)/////////////////////D OMG I got Filter error: Please use fewer 'junk' characters. I cant use fewer characters, then it wouldnt be to scale...
  • by alanwj (242317) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:55AM (#26281439)

    For some time now I've been using >=3 as an emoticon for "hate". Rarely do people seem to get it, though.

    • by siride (974284) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:33AM (#26281147)
      The KJV is in Early Modern English, not Old English. Old English is incomprehensible to modern speakers. u scealt witan over æm e u segest ær u spricst.
      • Hah-ha! You've fallen into GP's trap -- he's redefined "old" to mean "early modern." Because languages change over time, and early modern definitions are forced to give way to frobble glorkle prabulax.
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          Interesting - that appears to be closer to modern German (my native language) than modern English.

          It's cause we stole it from you long ago. Most of English's "base" is German derived. It's just we're also very loose about adding words stolen from other languages. Making a faux pas at a rodeo is strictly verboten - you say this to an English speaker, and most of us will know what you're talking about, even though "faux pas", "rodeo", and "verboten" have all entered the English lexicon in the past 150 year

    • by betterunixthanunix (980855) on Wednesday December 31 2008, @11:45AM (#26281289)
      My bible is in Hebrew, you insensitive clod!

      Actually, if you are referring to the bibles that the Gideon society leaves in hotel rooms, that is in modern English. You can tell it is in modern English because, as a native English speaker, you have little difficulty reading it. Also, "wife" is not spelled "wyf," as it would be in middle English, and it does not read like German or contain any "ash" (æ) characters, at it would if it were actually old English.
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Well, all right...

      zomg wtf why is this not in idle why did it appear on my home screen i wasted my precious time reading it ill never get that time back slashdot has gone downhill this isnt news for nerds why am i reading it i hate it why cant we just stick to news on my personal minutiae thats what news for nerds should be all about not this humor crap i traded my emotions for efficiency for a reason you insensitive clods stop that laughing one of these days youre going to wind up dead just like your idiot