Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
Search

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

South Park To Be Available Online Free and Legal

Posted by Zonk on Thu Mar 27, 2008 01:41 PM
from the i-like-the-crazy-future dept.
Media Television The Internet Entertainment
garnetlion writes "South Park is coming online, free and legal. My brief research has not indicated if it will use DRM, require some silly Windows-only software or be otherwise substandard. According to a Wired blog article, 'Parker and Stone said they were inspired to start the site when they got 'really sick of having to download our own show illegally all the time. So we gave ourselves a legal alternative.'" In this regard South Park joins fellow Comedy Central notable The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, whose archive was made freely available online late last year.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] News: Viacom Puts the Daily Show Archive Online 153 comments
tburton writes "Viacom has put the entire eight year run of the Daily Show with John Stewart online. The content is available from the official Daily Show site, and features clip rating, tags, and numerous community features. The whole thing is supported by relatively unobtrusive contextual ads. 'Viacom's decision to post its entire archive--while fighting YouTube in the courts--sets the scene for a battle between the established media players and their high profile entertainment brands against the user generated content sites, most notable YouTube. Also watching closely the Viacom experiment will be the telco IPTV industry which has seen the market place change rapidly as the quality of online video continues to improve, with at least one platform/site, Vimeo, already offering 1280X720 HD quality direct from the browser.'"
Submission: South Park online free and legal by garnetlion (786722)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

South Park To Be Available Online Free and Legal 50 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.

  • Illegally? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Brian Gordon (987471) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:43PM (#22884612)
    But they literally have the right to copy their own show (that's the meaning of copyright) so how is it illegal for them? And how is DRM free?

    • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Rob T Firefly (844560) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:48PM (#22884670) Homepage Journal
      Not sure how their particular deal works, but I think if Comedy Central actually owns the show they make, then they could have actually been criminally breaking the copyright of their own employers and in theory could be sued for it. IANAL, etc.

      • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by deanlandolt (1004507) on Thursday March 27 2008, @03:18PM (#22885908) Journal

        Not sure how their particular deal works, but I think if Comedy Central actually owns the show they make, then they could have actually been criminally breaking the copyright of their own employers and in theory could be sued for it. IANAL, etc.
        Wow -- it's all almost as illogical as academia, where professors have to beg permission from publishers to distribute their own works to students. Almost.

        • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Insightful)

          by edwdig (47888) on Thursday March 27 2008, @03:37PM (#22886110) Homepage
          Wow -- it's all almost as illogical as academia, where professors have to beg permission from publishers to distribute their own works to students. Almost.

          It's the same exact thing. The author gives the publisher some or all rights to their work in exchange for money and/or royalties. If they have a problem with it, they should have negotiated for more rights.

    • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Informative)

      by boguslinks (1117203) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:48PM (#22884682)
      Dont' assume they have the copyright to the show just because they're the creative guys behind it. When Arthur C. Clarke reprinted a chapter from 2001: A Space Odyssey in the sequel novel, he had to get permission from the publisher of 2001.

    • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Informative)

      by snowraver1 (1052510) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:48PM (#22884692)
      They don't own it, Viacom owns it.
      • Whether it's tacit or explicit approval, everybody wins. Hell, even Microsoft is "cool" sometimes, right?

          • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Funny)

            by HolyCrapSCOsux (700114) on Thursday March 27 2008, @03:11PM (#22885788)
            If it's the same orange pen I got, it summed up vista and office 2k7 nicely:
            it looked like a fairly standard retractable ballpoint. It had features that were pretty but pointless (led lights) that were activated using the interface (clicker at the end) that is normally reserved for the pen tip Hide/Unhide function. To Unhide the pen tooltip, you had to turn the barrel (requiring both hands). Making it twice as difficult to use as opposed to it's implied functionality.

            Furthermore, it crapped out on me halfway through the keynote.

    • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by zappepcs (820751) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:50PM (#22884706) Journal
      The point is that they and everyone else has no 'legal' way to download it and watch. They are siding with john q. here. If there is no legal way, then everything else must be illegal.

      It's not like South Park and The Daily Show are shows that no one has ever heard of before, so it's good to see that mainstream content producers are in agreement with pretty much all the consumers of that content. I hope that it catches on, and with widespread attention in the MSM. There is nothing like some very popular people telling the world that *Hey, this should not be illegal!* to get the ball rolling.

      I'm sure there will be more support for such activity when the RIAA finally admits they wasted all the money from the Napster case suing grannies and basically ruining all the good will that the recording industry ever had. Not many artists will continue to support that kind of stupidity when it gets rubbed in their face harshly like that.

      woot! I'd like to see an entire network follow suit... say SciFi or Commedy Central or you pick... but one whole network that just says fuck it, lets let them download the stuff...

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by MightyMartian (840721)

        I'm sure there will be more support for such activity when the RIAA finally admits they wasted all the money from the Napster case suing grannies and basically ruining all the good will that the recording industry ever had. Not many artists will continue to support that kind of stupidity when it gets rubbed in their face harshly like that.

        What good will has the recording industry ever had? Between the manipulation and outright theft from artists to the foisting of crap pseudo-artists to maintain product fl

      • Re:Illegally? (Score:5, Funny)

        by trolltalk.com (1108067) on Thursday March 27 2008, @02:48PM (#22885480) Homepage Journal

        Yeah, but making it legal to download will take all the fun out of it ...

        • Re:Illegally? (Score:4, Informative)

          by Artuir (1226648) on Thursday March 27 2008, @03:01PM (#22885650)
          I hate to burst your bubble but south park's creators have had this stuff up on their site for weeks. The summary makes it seem like it will happen soon but in reality all of the episodes have been viewable before now.

        • Re:How is this different? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by PopeRatzo (965947) * on Thursday March 27 2008, @05:49PM (#22887566) Homepage Journal

          This is legal, South Park Zone isn't.
          Funny, South Park zone doesn't look illegal.

          And that's a problem with the entire intellectual property battle. Batting an old woman over the head and taking her purse is clearly, to anyone with a conscience, illegal and wrong. Clicking a link on South Park Zone doesn't look or feel or act any different than clicking a link on Comedy Central Zone, so how is the average person supposed to come to the decision that it's "wrong"?

          It's like the old question about how someone is supposed to instinctively know copying a Music CD is illegal when the same company that makes the Music CD also makes and sells blank CDs for copying?

  • More free, legal TV online (Score:5, Informative)

    by DogDude (805747) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:44PM (#22884616) Homepage
    Just discovered last week... NBC has the entire season 4 of The Office online, watchable in full screen, with traditional TV-like ads interrupting the shows. Of course, nobody likes ads, but it's worth it to me, at least, and I'm glad to see some of the old-school media companies like NBC FINALLY starting to "get it".

    • Re:More free, legal TV online (Score:5, Funny)

      by garett_spencley (193892) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:55PM (#22884788) Journal
      "Just discovered last week... NBC has the entire season 4 of The Office online"

      OMG ... that's almost as good as if Paramount were to offer Star Trek V for free download.

      *crosses fingers*

    • Re:More free, legal TV online (Score:5, Insightful)

      by an.echte.trilingue (1063180) on Thursday March 27 2008, @02:23PM (#22885168) Homepage
      Yeah, but having seen Comedy Central's other offerings (Colbert Report and the Daily Show), I am skeptical. Take two sites:
      • The Official Colbert Report [comedycentral.com] site is slow, experiences frequent outages, has mediocre quality video, crashes several major browsers after 10-20 minutes of viewing, and shows you the same add every two and a half minutes. On the plus side, it looks pretty.
      • The pirate south park [southparkzone.com] site is slow, experiences frequent outages and has mediocre quality video. However, the shows are easy to browse and the adds are limited to things outside of the viewer window (and are blockable).
      From my perspective, the choice is clear here. I am sure that Comedy Central will do a worse job than the pirates did. It will be just like when they got Colbert off of YouTube and replaced it with something worse.

      The media companies are really slow to learn: the Internet gives them a potential gold mine, they just have to come up with a way to deliver their wares that sucks less than what Joe up the street can do. So far, they fail, Comedy Central and Viacom included.

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by elrous0 (869638) *
        Reminds me of when Fox started cracking down on YouTube and claiming that Hulu would make up for it. There was a time when you could find virtually every episode and skit from Family Guy on YouTube. Now Fox's great legal alternative, that was supposed to be everything YouTube wasn't, offers a grand total 3 lousy episodes. Whoopty fucking do.

      • Re:More free, legal TV online (Score:5, Informative)

        by Mex (191941) on Thursday March 27 2008, @03:28PM (#22886016) Homepage
        " I am sure that Comedy Central will do a worse job than the pirates did. It will be just like when they got Colbert off of YouTube and replaced it with something worse."

        Did you even bother to check the South Park site? It's really good, actually.

        Full episodes, 3 segments per episode and usually one ad per segment. You can fast forward or back if you want and you don't get another advert.

        All seasons from the beginning at pretty good quality (not DVD but very good for online), except for the most recent season which apparently needs 1 month to be shown.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by Sancho (17056)
        You forgot to put the word keep in quotation marks.

        If it's DRMed, you don't get to keep it. You get to watch it until the content provider decrees that you can't anymore.

  • Obligatory (Score:5, Funny)

    by OverlordQ (264228) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:45PM (#22884630) Journal
    First (Cat) Piss.

    Now we'll see which mods have seen s12e03 yet.

    • Re:Obligatory (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Hatta (162192) on Thursday March 27 2008, @02:01PM (#22884858) Journal
      I haven't seen it, but I heard about it. That's just too much. Cat Piss (CP) has been a running joke on drug sites for years. There even used to be an Erowid spoof, the Vaults of Meowid, complete with information about a supposed tryptophan derivitive 5-MeO-W. I've got to wonder, have Trey and Matt been visiting the Shroomery much?
    • ...at about 600kb a second.

      That's the kind of service the studios should be aiming for if they want people to subscribe to something. It shouls also cost about $0.10 - that's what it would cost me on cable and I don't see why Internet is really much different, BitTorrent means I'm paying the bandwidth fees myself.

      When that's set up they might have a chance of getting me to "do the decent thing". Anything else is a ripoff.

  • You bastards! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Rob T Firefly (844560) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:45PM (#22884632) Homepage Journal

    really sick of having to download our own show illegally all the time.
    They just admitted to piracy! Don't these two guys know that such a thoughtless criminal act takes the very food out of the mouths of.. um.. these two guys?

  • "Oh my God... (Score:5, Funny)

    by LM741N (258038) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:49PM (#22884698)
    they killed DRM! You bastards!"

  • Wrong tense. (Score:5, Informative)

    by The-Bus (138060) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:50PM (#22884708) Homepage
    The episodes are already online. Not "coming soon", not "to be"... you can see them right now.

  • laxity (Score:4, Interesting)

    by esocid (946821) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:51PM (#22884732) Journal
    I don't think Viacom was really strict about SP being online to begin with. I remember countless websites offering SP episodes for free, many of which were crappy websites, but were around for quite some time. I haven't frequented them in some time but I don't ever recall hearing any outburst from Viacom about SP being made freely available. It is commendable for Matt and Trey to come out and get Viacom to actually put it in writing that it is free online (via their website) but I still don't see any other sites getting hammered b/c of what they do. Another win for freely available content. Now if only they would host Cannibal! The Musical [cannibalthemusical.net].

  • Censored Mohammad episode (Score:5, Interesting)

    by crow (16139) on Thursday March 27 2008, @01:57PM (#22884822) Homepage Journal
    Remember after the Mohammad cartoon panic, the episode where they were making a big deal that they were going to show Mohammad? The end where they were going to show him was apparently censored by Comedy Central. Is it cut in the online version?

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Shados (741919)
      hmm? I always thought that the censoring by the network was PART of the joke...

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by bogjobber (880402)
      They have showed images of Mohammad uncensored before in the Super Best Friends episode. It was before the Danish cartoon controversy while the Cartoon Wars episode was after, so I'm not sure if Comedy Central actually censored the cartoon or it was a political statement or joke.

  • no drm (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 27 2008, @02:01PM (#22884856)
    it's a flash based web player. there's no drm. same deal with all the new video from mtv networks. flash players, no windows stuff, etc.

    * i work for mtv networks doing video syndication, so i'm posting anonymously.

  • They don't mind (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Apoorv Khatreja (1263418) on Thursday March 27 2008, @02:38PM (#22885366) Homepage
    I have been watching South Park since the first season aired on Comedy Central. But then I got bored of waiting for a new episode every week, so I waited for a lot of episodes to pile up and then downloaded them off BitTorrent. Next, I found a site called southparkx.net, which offered news on South Park and offered episode downloads.

    Their FAQs said that "Matt and Trey do not mind when fans download their episodes off the Internet; they feel that its good when people watch the show no matter how they do it." I felt good when I heard this, not because they legalised what I was doing, but because they made a truly great show and didn't believe in all the evil copyright laws.

    Now, when they have offered a service to watch full episodes online, and to make small clips from episodes embeddable, I am a bigger South Park fan than ever.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by irishdaze (839248)
      Go here: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml [thedailyshow.com]. Slide the slider to a date to get the Episode Number that aired on that date. Type that Episode Number in the Search box. The episode will be there in clips. For example, I went there: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml [thedailyshow.com], slid the slider to March 20, 2008. The first clip in the results showed it was Episode 13039. I then typed "13039" (no quotes) in the Search box. Voila! 5 clips were displayed. I added up all of the running times, and

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.