Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Klingons Cut From Final Star Trek XI Movie

Posted by timothy on Thu Apr 30, 2009 03:32 PM
from the gravest-importance dept.
darthcamaro writes "Classic era trek was all about Kirk kicking the Klingons' tails. But the new Star Trek XI movie, the reboot, will not have any spoken Klingon in it — a travesty that has some fan sites up in arms already. 'We actually had a sequence that ended up getting cut from the movie that took place on Rura Penthe, in a Klingon prison,' Star Trek co-writer Alex Kurtzman said, explaining the deletion. 'And there was definitely Klingon spoken in the movie, and it ended up getting cut.' Frakkin' Federation ..."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by elrous0 (869638) * on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:34PM (#27778317)
    "Get a life"?
  • Travesty? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cheebie (459397) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:34PM (#27778331)

    Oh dear God.

    The original Trek only rarely dealt with the Klingons. It was more about the crew exploring the unknown.

    This is just a fanboi snit.

    • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MBGMorden (803437) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:38PM (#27778411)

      I gotta agree. While the MOVIES generated from the original series dealt pretty heavily with Klingons, the actual TV series didn't go much into it. And TBH, the Klingons of the original TV series were pretty uninteresting IMHO. The change that they started going into the movies and more or less finalized moving into TNG made them far more interesting. Also, to a whole ton of fans from the TNG-onward days kinda view the Klingons as buddies of the Federation. Seeing them put back into a negative light just wouldn't be interesting to me.

      • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by eln (21727) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:42PM (#27778471) Homepage

        Weren't the Klingons in TOS basically just bad-tempered humans? They didn't develop the weird growths on their foreheads until much later. They were basically just a poorly fleshed out analogue for the Soviet Union.

        • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Informative)

          by Dolohov (114209) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:50PM (#27778635)

          Yeah, most of the aliens got "facelifts" in the animated series, as I recall.

        • by pallmall1 (882819) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:52PM (#27778679)

          They didn't develop the weird growths on their foreheads until much later.

          Those growths are why the Klingons are called clit-heads, or vulva-faces. Without those features, the Klingons wouldn't have any personality or geek popularity at all.

          • Re:Travesty? (Score:4, Informative)

            by catmistake (814204) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:13PM (#27779047) Journal

            The actual cannon is, I believe, that the growths were always there on the Klingon's foreheads, but during the short time period of TOS (?4 years), there was a fashion trend that was popular among Klingons to flatten their foreheads. Worf says at some point in DS9 (the other tribbles episode) that "we do not speak of it," so it was apparently an embarassing trend that they try to forget (think about all the straight-laced former hippies burning pics of themselves out of embarrassment).

            • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Informative)

              by MPolo (129811) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:21PM (#27779159)
              I think "Enterprise" expanded on this, and had the smooth-headed Klingons resulting from a genetic disease, caused by trying to implement human Eugenics techniques. The disease was cured, but the physical results remained, and took many generations for the Klingons to get rid of them.
            • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Informative)

              by hardburn (141468) <hardburn@wum[ ]-cave.net ['pus' in gap]> on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:22PM (#27779179)

              It was explained away in the last season of Enterprise. A rouge human researcher in genetic engineering had made some superhumans, and Klingons wanted the tech, too. So they copied/stole the research and ended up implanting themselves with human DNA. The changes went viral, and soon affected the entire Klingon race. They presumably found a fix some time in between TOS and the first movie.

              • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Insightful)

                by guyminuslife (1349809) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:49PM (#27779575)

                That's a very plausible, reasonable-sounding explanation. Not nearly as plausible and reasonable-sounding as, "Jesus H. Christ! It's not even important! We changed the way they're supposed to look, we didn't even have the make-up budget to do that shit at the time, deal with it, use your imagination, stop worrying about canon and watch the goddamn show!"

                • by idontgno (624372) on Thursday April 30 2009, @05:43PM (#27780315) Journal

                  There's a mild irony here. The one profession great concern for canon misspelled it (unless he meant to speak of large-bore projectile weapons), and the one professing unconcern for canon spelled, and used, it perfectly.

                  My inner pedant is smiling a smug satisfied smile.

        • Re:Travesty? (Score:4, Insightful)

          by DNS-and-BIND (461968) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:03PM (#27778879) Homepage
          Actually, closer to the Mongols than the Soviets. One of the ideas floating around in sci-fi of the time was the "space barbarian" or "space mongol", an archetype who could operate space ships, but couldn't build new ones, had to rely on captured peoples, etc. The Klingons definitely look like a stereotype of Mongols, including the warrior culture.
      • Re:Travesty? (Score:4, Informative)

        by afabbro (33948) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:12PM (#27779029)

        I gotta agree. While the MOVIES generated from the original series dealt pretty heavily with Klingons, the actual TV series didn't go much into it.

        If memory serves, the Klingons were featured in these episodes:

        • Errand of Mercy - John Colicos, baby!
        • Friday's Child
        • The Trouble With Tribbles
        • A Private Little War
        • Day of the Dove

        In addition, the appeared periphrially in "Elaan of Troyius" and "The Savage Curtain" (I don't think the Kahless in that episode even spoke).

        So, 5 major appearances in 79 eps, plus a couple small mentions.

        And TBH, the Klingons of the original TV series were pretty uninteresting IMHO.

        They were certainly one-note, though some of the episodes listed above used them to good effect. There certainly was not the kind of cultural exploration we saw in later series, that's for sure.

    • Re:Travesty? (Score:4, Informative)

      by Kelson (129150) * on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:43PM (#27778513) Homepage Journal

      The original Trek only rarely dealt with the Klingons. It was more about the crew exploring the unknown.

      That was my first thought as well. Klingons were in, what, 7 or 8 episodes? Out of around 70 episodes total? And the spoken Klingon language wasn't introduced until the movies.

      So there's no Klingons -- or at least no spoken Klingon -- in the story. Big deal.

      And I say that as someone who's in the middle of rewatching TOS.

    • Re:Travesty? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by MightyMartian (840721) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:12PM (#27779041) Journal

      I agree. This is, after all, a REBOOT. That means a lot of the cruft from about thirty years of post-ToS development is being dispensed with, and that's fine by me. This is meant to rejuvenate a series that had pretty much become one monstrous cliche of itself. If there's one thing ToS had that, over time, the later series lacked, it was solid, straightforward storytelling. Everything was burdened down by the vast edifice of Everything-That-Had-Come-Before. The last two attempts, the dull Voyager and the increasingly-pathetic Enterprise, showed just how uninteresting it had all become.

      The Trouble With Tribbles was just fine with Klingons speaking English, thank you very much. In fact, and so will this.

  • by Idiomatick (976696) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:35PM (#27778335)
    qaStaH nuq jay!!!!
  • by get quad (917331) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:36PM (#27778369)
    Smooth heads or bumpy?
  • by SDF-7 (556604) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:36PM (#27778371)

    Seems like a non-story to me. Wrath of Khan didn't have any spoken Klingon either (closest was Khan claiming the Klingon proverb: Revenge is a dish best served cold.... It is very cold, in spaaaaaaaaaaace.) I don't seriously think anyone missed it there, and while I know little of the plot of this film (intentionally, so no -- I don't want a summary) if the story doesn't really involve Klingons, no need to toss them in just to have them.

    • by DragonWriter (970822) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:00PM (#27778837)

      Seems like a non-story to me. Wrath of Khan didn't have any spoken Klingon either (closest was Khan claiming the Klingon proverb: Revenge is a dish best served cold.... It is very cold, in spaaaaaaaaaaace.)

      Since the Klingon language (tlhIngan Hol), as such (that is, having an actual grammar rather than just a handful of words) was created for Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, this is not all that surprising. OTOH, its been used pretty heavily in the movies (and, to a lesser extent, series) since that, though I can't see why anyone would complain about it not being used in a new film (I can see, perhaps, complaining if Klingon's were talking in what was supposed to be "Klingon" but it wasn't tlhIngan Hol, particularly if there was no in-setting justification, but that's a different issue.)

  • by dk90406 (797452) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:38PM (#27778409)
    No need to kling on to old plot devices.

    Argh - can't believe I just wrote that.

  • Bah... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Etrias (1121031) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:40PM (#27778449)
    Funny how all of the swearing is following the BSG meme then. Frakking? Really? I would expect no less than a double dumbass on you!
  • by jollyreaper (513215) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:45PM (#27778539)

    I heard Tom Bombadil isn't even in this one!

  • Spider-Man 3 (Score:5, Insightful)

    by XanC (644172) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:46PM (#27778571)

    Everybody complained that Spider-Man 3 tried to cram too many different characters and plots together. Chill out! This is but the first in a new series of films. There will be plenty of time for Klingons.

  • If you really, really, wanted to piss somebody off, they should remake the Edith Keeler episode as a feature film, but change it in some way as to really just make Harlan Ellison flip out. Have his "great work" get butchered by TWO generations of film-makers, now that would be priceless.

  • by Gauthic (964948) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:42PM (#27779469)
    I know I'll be modded down for mentioning this: Why are the Klingons the only species in the whole movie series that the "Universal Translator" didn't automatically translate to both the audience and the characters while not in private conversation at home planet (i.e. TMP's Spock's failture scene)?

    It should be all or nothing. Romulans should speak Romulan, Vulcans speak Vulcan (unless speaking Starfleet English) due to the technomagical universal translator.
    • by cashman73 (855518) on Thursday April 30 2009, @03:35PM (#27778337) Journal
      As long as they don't replace the Klingons Gungans with Jamaican accents, we're cool! ;-)
        • by xerxesVII (707232) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:24PM (#27779189)

          No kidding. Chewbacca always struck me as very dog-like with his speech. He was practically incapable of whispering, and it looked like it caused him great physical discomfort to hold his tongue. I'm sure he was a good friend to have in a pinch, but sometimes you don't need your friends gargling every half-formed thought that flashes through their brains.

          • Re:who cares? (Score:5, Informative)

            by Em Ellel (523581) on Thursday April 30 2009, @05:15PM (#27779883)

            No kidding. Chewbacca always struck me as very dog-like with his speech.

            Gee, very strange for a being who's very name is a mixture of words for man (chelovek) and dog(sobaka). Its not a coincidence that in Spaceballs the character was "Mog". (half-man, half dog)

            -Em

        • by Mister Whirly (964219) on Thursday April 30 2009, @04:49PM (#27779563) Homepage
          Yeah, but Gungans don't pull people's arms out of their sockets when they lose. Wookiees are known to do that.