Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Record-Breaking Model Rocket Launch Set For April 25

Posted by timothy on Sat Apr 18, 2009 01:27 PM
from the mx-missile-would-have-been-more-exciting dept.
darkjohnson writes with this impressive excerpt from Rocketry Planet: "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet tall and it will be powered by a massive array of nine motors: eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by stoolpigeon (454276) * <bittercode@gmail> on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:28PM (#27628589) Homepage Journal

    Even though it makes this stuff [amazon.com] look pretty simple in comparison, it still makes me want to dig out my old home made launcher and build a rocket.
     
    I remember as a teenager saving up for months to buy the Estes designer's kit. I set up a card table in my room where I designed and built quite a few rockets - nothing that used bigger than a D engine. I'll never forget the night I left a bottle of dope open on the table. Very bizarre dreams that night. Learned to keep the window open when I worked on stuff and to shut everything up when I was done.

  • So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cortesoft (1150075) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:31PM (#27628607)

    When exactly does a model rocket become just a rocket?

    • Re:So..... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by SputnikPanic (927985) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:33PM (#27628615)

      When the FAA and NASA know about it...

      • Re:So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

        by 644bd346996 (1012333) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:44PM (#27628729)

        The FAA probably already knows about this rocket. I've been to a few launches with a local rocketry club, and they always get FAA clearance. My understanding is that they have a permanent clearance for their launch site for the first few thousand feet, but when they're launching the high-power rockets, they get unlimited clearance, making the area essentially a no-fly zone for planes. (Although that clearly didn't stop the Predator drone that was hanging out above us one day.)

        • Re:So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by notthepainter (759494) <obliqueNO@SPAMalum.mit.edu> on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:06PM (#27628939) Homepage

          I was talking with a friend about 5-10 years back and the FAA had recently pulled all approvals for model rocket launches. Being the resourceful group that model rocketeers are, they found some connections and got all set to launch from some Navy proving grounds. FAA got wind of that and got all huffy and said "no no no boys."

          And then the Navy got all huffy at the FAA, "You talking to me?"

          Must have been a fun few meetings!

          • Well, in theory the civilian FAA should have more authority over domestic airspace in peacetime. And until a formal declaration of war is in effect, we are at "peace". The FAA decides what airspace is restricted, not the military.

            • Re:So..... (Score:4, Informative)

              by notthepainter (759494) <obliqueNO@SPAMalum.mit.edu> on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:24PM (#27629073) Homepage
              I'm not a pilot, nor a military person, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_use_airspace [wikipedia.org] may give some clues. Basically, as told to me the Navy had some airspace that was "theirs" and didn't take kindly to the FAA trying to tell them what they could do with it.
              • by sjbe (173966) on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:56PM (#27629323)

                Well, that breaks down when the FAA tries to take over control of one of the Navy's designated area of operations.

                Right, because the Navy has weapons and the FAA doesn't. I'll put my money on the Navy in that fight.

                  • by UnknowingFool (672806) on Saturday April 18 2009, @03:54PM (#27629891)

                    And so does the guy at the FAA. While the FAA has jurisdiction over the granting of the airspace, I don't see that they will win in a dispute especially if the Navy is still using those proving grounds. The guy at the FAA who insists that they modelers not launch has one option to force the Navy not to let them launch: revoke the Navy's privileges. Now that's going to be a bureaucratic mess with all sorts of paperwork and battles. When their bosses step in and see what the dispute here's what they are going to hear.

                    Navy guy: The FAA is revoking our license to the proving grounds.
                    Navy boss: On what grounds?
                    FAA guy: The Navy is allowing prohibited actions on the grounds. We have the right to revoke. I have initiated the proper paperwork to revoke.
                    FAA boss: What prohibited actions are being allowed?
                    FAA guy: They are launching model rockets there.
                    FAA boss: So let me get this straight. You have initiated a move that involves at least 6 months of meetings and paperwork. And gotten us into a turf war with the Navy because you don't like them launching model rockets from their site. Gentleman, I thank the Navy for its time. This matter will be resolved here very shortly.

              • No sir. The FAA sets those areas at the request of the military. If it came down to a real legal turf war, the FAA must have the ultimate authority. Otherwise we are under military rule. As far as I know the US is not...yet.

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      When it's more then a glorified pop-bottle rocket.

      Which means it has to have active stabilization and a guidance package.

    • Sometime just before the government steps in and shuts down the whole project.

    • When an antagonistic foreign power launches it. I get the feeling this guy is about to be declared an antagonistic foreign power.

    • No definite size; but not being built to look exactly like a larger rocket probably helps.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      it's a model rocket because it's a 1/10th scale replica of the saturn V.

  • by netruner (588721) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:34PM (#27628631)
    The German V2 rockets were only 46 feet in length - although they were much heavier.

    What I'm trying to say is this dude's rocket ain't no model - he's launching a real rocket.
  • broken summary (Score:3, Informative)

    by mjensen (118105) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:36PM (#27628659) Journal

    "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet tall and it will be powered by a massive array of nine motors: eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor."

  • by nurb432 (527695) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:37PM (#27628665) Homepage Journal

    Not joking here, i'm surprised the government has not stepped in and stopped him.

    • "they can have my rocket when they pry it from my cold, dead hands"
      "when rockets are outlawed, only outlaws will have rockets"
      weak, i know. it's a boring rainy day...
    • by John Hasler (414242) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:52PM (#27628803)

      The BATF tried to stop all amateur rocketry beyond the toy size but they lost the lawsuit. A Federal judge ruled that solid rocket fuel of the type used by these rockets is not an explosive.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          > Why did they?

          Because it is in their nature to grab for power and "terrorism" provided an excuse.

        • by sjames (1099) on Saturday April 18 2009, @05:15PM (#27630683) Homepage

          In order to justify it's existance and grow, a government bureau must continuously find new excuses to add layers of regulatory bureaucracy and new things to regulate. They were far far more interested in throwing their weight around and making people kiss their ass than they were in any sort of safety or public well-being.

          The fact that the rocket engine cores cannot be made to explode even intentionally was irrelevant to them. A regulatory agency saw a group of people who they weren't directly regulating. The group was small enough to not create an inconveniently noisy public protest but large enough to stroke their collective ego.

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      Well, with a maximum altitude under 5000 feet, this guy's not going for performance, he's just putting a scale model up in the air high enough to say it flew. High performance means high propellant mass fractions (where up to 90% of the launch weight is propellant) and almost certainly multiple stages. This rocket has an 18% propellant fraction and is single stage. It will look very cool coming off the launchpad and that's all it needs to do.

      The government gets interested when you start heading for 50,00

  • Reminds me of this not amazing, but fun for kids movie about a guy that built the full size thing in his backyard.

    Funny, the alarmist guy here sounds like some of the government types int he movie :)
    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1203785&cid=27628631 [slashdot.org]

  • by StarManta.Mini (860897) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:40PM (#27628689)

    .....the world's tallest midget?

  • by ZERO1ZERO (948669) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:42PM (#27628707)
    It's great that regular folk can do these things One thing though - I wonder just how bi
  • it will stand over 36 fe*END OF CARRIER*

    Little did Timothy know the true purpose of the rocket and its payload. ::evil laughter in the distance::

  • communications (Score:4, Insightful)

    by wjh31 (1372867) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:44PM (#27628725) Homepage
    honest, its just a communications satellite
  • by Anachragnome (1008495) on Saturday April 18 2009, @01:46PM (#27628757)

    "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the smallest full-scale rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet..."

  • ...need to prove the existence of the Higgs Farm. Some have theorized that all vegetables gain their mass from the Higgs field. Now we may finally know.

  • I thought model rockets were just when you were following a kit and/or exact instructions..... I would think this would just fall under amateur rocketry....

    From wikipedia:

    A model rocket is a small rocket capable of being launched by anybody, to generally low altitudes (usually to around 100-500 m (300-1500 ft) for a 30 g (1 oz.) model) and recovered by a variety of means.

    According to the National Association of Rocketry, (NAR) Safety Code[1], model rockets are constructed of paper, wood, plastic and other l

  • How does one add tags, or is that for ubergurus only? This site has crashed and burned. I got database errors, the first page for a moment, and then:
    This site is temporarily unavailable.
    Please notify the System Administrator

  • A "model" rocket? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sphealey (2855) on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:03PM (#27628909)

    I have a hard time seeing how something larger and more powerful than most of Goddard's devices can be called a "model". Amateur-built, sure. But not a "model".

    sPh

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      The only thing I would say that goes against your point is that this is a 1/10th scale model of a Saturn V. That's enough in my mind to call it a model.

    • Re:A "model" rocket? (Score:4, Informative)

      by pz (113803) on Saturday April 18 2009, @03:08PM (#27629439) Journal

      I have a hard time seeing how something larger and more powerful than most of Goddard's devices can be called a "model". Amateur-built, sure. But not a "model".

      sPh

      Did you bother to click to the article? It's a model of a Saturn V. A real Saturn V is ten times taller. So, yes, it's a 1:10 scale model of a frelling HUGE rocket, and is therefore quite large on an absolute scale, but it is still a model.

  • by wdhowellsr (530924) on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:32PM (#27629131)
    This is not a new process just the biggest yet. There have been FAA clearance to 50k feet out west. The difference between a NASA or Military Rocket and a Model Rocket is one costs billions of dollars and has fail rate of thirty percent. A model rocket cost less than fifty thousand and has a fail rate of fifty percent.

    William D Howell Sr.
  • by svnt (697929) on Saturday April 18 2009, @02:50PM (#27629275)

    I was waiting for an editorial comment to the effect of "knock on wood."

    He could very easily become the person who exploded the largest model rocket before it left the launch pad.

  • Google for "MudRock" (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FlyingGuy (989135) <flyingguy @ g m a i l . com> on Saturday April 18 2009, @05:16PM (#27630703)

    Every year they launch from BLM land on the Blackrock dessert. On two days the have FAA clearance to 100,000' MSL

    Last year the highest rocket hit 31,000' MSL and hit just pver mach 3. The motor had a burn time of just a little under 4 seconds.

    And yes the FAA issues NOTAM's ( Notice to airman ) with the appropriate lat and long for the launch area.

  • Hire him (Score:3, Funny)

    by tuxgeek (872962) on Saturday April 18 2009, @05:35PM (#27630855)
    Maybe N. Korea should hire him
    Considering their most recent attempt was a grand botch-o-lito
  • FAA Rocketry Rules (Score:5, Informative)

    by dtmos (447842) * on Saturday April 18 2009, @05:55PM (#27631043)

    The US Federal Aviation Administration rules relevant to unmanned rocketry are in CFR Title 14, 101.21 to 101.27 [gpoaccess.gov]. In 101.22 one finds the definitions of "Model Rocket", "High-Power Rocket", and "Advanced High-Power Rocket" relevant in the United States:

    101.22 Definitions.
    The following definitions apply to this subpart:

    (a) Class 1--Model Rocket means an amateur rocket that:
            (1) Uses no more than 125 grams (4.4 ounces) of propellant;
            (2) Uses a slow-burning propellant;
            (3) Is made of paper, wood, or breakable plastic;
            (4) Contains no substantial metal parts; and
            (5) Weighs no more than 1,500 grams (53 ounces), including the propellant.

    (b) Class 2--High-Power Rocket means an amateur rocket other than a model rocket that is propelled by a motor or motors having a combined total impulse of 40,960 Newton-seconds (9,208 pound-seconds) or less.

    (c) Class 3--Advanced High-Power Rocket means an amateur rocket other than a model rocket or high-power rocket.

    [Doc. No. FAA-2007-27390, 73 FR 73781, Dec. 4, 2008]

    So according to this taxonomy, Mr. Eves' rocket is an advanced high-power rocket, and is not a model rocket.

  • Oh, yeh. (Score:3, Funny)

    by actionbastard (1206160) on Saturday April 18 2009, @09:00PM (#27632395)
    There will be a KABOOM!
    • At 1600 pounds and 36 feet when does a model rocket become just a rocket?

      When it achieves orbit around Uranus?

      Picture of the model, since the site is slow http://www.rocketryplanet.com/images/content/2829/1.jpg [rocketryplanet.com]

    • The only reason I can think of that this is being called a model rocket, is that it is using engines of the same basic design as modern model rockets. If this was being launched by more traditional rocket fuels then due it the size and weight it would surely be a full fledged rocket.

      • The propellant formulations (Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant--APCP) used for high power model rockets are essentially the same as the one used in the solid rocket boosters that lift the Space Shuttle.

        Granted, model rockets don't use LOX. LH2 or hypergolics, but some of us are playing around with hybrids like Rutan used on SpaceShipOne.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The sanctioning organization for model rocketry is called Tripoli, so named because its founder sold a collection of Libyan coins to get the incorporation money. That caused a bit of a flap during the troubles with Khaddafi, but they managed to straighten it out.

      rj