Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

"Back To My Mac" Catches a Thief

Posted by kdawson on Saturday May 10, @11:45PM
from the don't-mess-with-an-apple-grrrl dept.
robipilot writes "Mac stolen, Mac comes online, owner connects using 'Back to My Mac,' owner takes picture of culprit, and voila, criminal caught. OK, it wasn't quite that simple, but here's an interesting story of using some built-in technology on the Mac to recover a stolen laptop."

Related Stories

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 10, @11:54PM (#23366478)
    I'm curious to know how would taking a picture of a musical instrument help in this matter...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 11, @12:08AM (#23366530)

    Mr. Jackson said that Mr. Frias and Mr. Shahikian were arrested last year on a felony marijuana possession charge, but are not career criminals.
    No, just career idiots.
  • by LoverOfJoy (820058) on Sunday May 11, @12:08AM (#23366540) Homepage

    At first, the photo application revealed only a smoky room and an empty chair, Mr. Jackson said, but then a man sat down. Ms. Duplaga, again using remote technology, typed in the command to snap a photo. When you take a picture with that computer, it shows a countdown, and when it does, this guy figures out whats going on, Mr. Jackson said. It all clicks for him, and he puts his hand up to cover the lens, but it was too late. She had already taken the picture.
    If she could see him, why would she need to use the software to take a snapshot? Don't apple computers have Prnt Scrn or an equivalent button?
  • Poetic Justice (Score:5, Insightful)

    by beadfulthings (975812) on Sunday May 11, @01:12AM (#23366872) Journal

    I know, this being Slashdot we have to worry about the privacy issues, compare the Mac to somebody's Vista laptop, disparage the cops, fret about security in general, and not fail to point out that a viola is indeed a stringed instrument.

    But there's just something so damned satisfying about imagining these two thugs being caught red-handed with the loot. There's the impression of the victim realizing that she may be onto something. Her "Now I've got you, you son of a bitch!" as the fatal snap takes place. The "Oh, shit" realization of the thief, probably followed by frantic thoughts of how he might go about flushing two widescreen TV's and assorted recreational electronics. The genuine gratification of being able to walk into the police station and say, "Here are photographs of the guys who ripped off our stuff, actually using some of our stuff, and we know who they are..." Perhaps then the THUD THUD THUD at the malefactors' door.

    It's got all the elements of the classic cautionary tale, and just reading it should bring at least a brief and sarcastic smile to the face of anybody who's ever been robbed.

  • Home Version (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DeanFox (729620) * <fox DOT dean AT gmail DOT com> on Sunday May 11, @08:21AM (#23368262)

    I run Ubuntu on my home PCs and changed the default login screen to list the users. I created a 'Guest' account and in it's description I put 'Password = 123qwe' (not the real password). The assumption is that a burglar , not knowing much about OS'es, will want to use the PC and will choose the easiest path to gain access. When they turn the PC on the login screen gives them a list of users and an option of choosing "Guest Account with the Password shown. All household users have been told to *never* use this account and why.

    This 'Guest' account is CharRooted and has Firefox, IM and other Internet clients all on the desktop but that's about it. Under the hood it opens up SSH, VNC, Terminal Server and every other conceivable way of gaining access. It starts a script that every 30 minutes emails my Gmail account with IP address and connection information. Also, logging on to this account invokes a 'Nuke' scrip that will DBAN type wipe the system if I don't deactivate it within 7 days.

    It's not a perfect solution but it has all the capabilities and features of the subscription tracking services that can cost hundreds a year and it's all pretty easy to setup. If any thief steals my PC and uses it to connect to the Internet I will know everything about their connection and have full access to the machine. If it's truly lost and I can't regain control after they login, it self destructs.

    Now that I thinks about it, this should be a Ubuntu package or at least a HowTO.

    -[d]-
    • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 11, @12:09AM (#23366544)
      How long before the paparazzi start arranging for Macs to be "won" by celebrities or "given" to them as "thanks". For that matter how long before a stalker arranges such a prize/gift?

      With this having been posted to Slashdot, Natalie Portman is going to wonder where all those Macs and cases of instant grits came from. ;P
    • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Informative)

      by Niten (201835) on Sunday May 11, @03:18AM (#23367368) Homepage

      Like most computers with built-in webcams, the MacBooks feature a prominent green LED that lights up when the camera is in use. This LED cannot be disabled in software. If Apple were actually spying on people with their computers' built-in cameras, someone would have noticed, fast.

        • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)

          by 0100010001010011 (652467) on Sunday May 11, @04:20AM (#23367598)
          The LED is probably sitting across the power lines to the camera. Camera has power = LED is on. there is no non-physical way to disable it.

          Personally, I have Undercover installed on all my and my siblings laptops.

          I wish the guy that wrote the command line tool (iSightCapture [macupdate.com]) to take photos would either release the source or make some updates. A video capture CLI tool would be awesome.

          I'm thinking of writing my own poor man's Undercover using cron, bash scripts and curl. Attempt to curl a website which I have access to, all the website does is return a 1 or a 0. (Stolen, not stolen). If anything gets taken just update my website and next time my Mac connects to the net, it gets what it needs.
    • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 11, @04:42AM (#23367662)
      here's a little poem i wrote entitled
      "WHEN I STEAL YOUR LAPTOP"

      When i steal your laptop
      i'm going to use it offline
      so i can harvest your personal info
      with a data miner i have on my usb keychain
      then i'm going to wipe the os clean
      and change the mac address on your network card
      and sell the fucker on kijiji
      i'll meet you in the arby's parking lot
      to sell you back your own machine
      that you no longer recognize
      because I put hello kitty decals on it.
      • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Culture20 (968837) on Sunday May 11, @07:24AM (#23368064)

        Presumably one must use a password.
        You could write a cronjob on the laptop to check an https "website" for a boolean value, and send pictures to the site if the boolean is set to true. Make it look like a weather applet for extra points.
        • Re:Imagine (Score:5, Informative)

          by kesuki (321456) on Sunday May 11, @11:45PM (#23374222) Journal
          in this case, the 'victim' had her IM automatically sign in whenever the laptop went online, and she got a call from a good friend, congratulating her on getting her laptop back. But the thing is, the laptop owner was paying '$99 a year' for the 'ability' from any 'mac' to sign in and control the computer from anywhere (including, taking a photo and sending it over IM)

          now, you could have a an automatic program to upload to a web server, but in this case, the owner used a subscription service from apple to gain control of the camera remotely, and snap a picture, ironically, the laptop starts a timer , and he tried to raise his hand to obscure the camera, but apparently, the picture is taken too fast for a person to realize what's going on.

          just the picture the cops said would have been useful in catching the crook (they would have given copies to the places that fence stolen stuff, and they'd call the cops while 'figuring out the value' of the goods before they knew what was happening... it's a crime to purchase stolen goods after all) but in this case, the person was an acquaintance of their roommate, so they went to the cops to tell then who had the stuff, before they had even fenced the goods.

          so apparently, you should fence your stolen laptops without hooking them to the internet. (and with automatic wireless networking and people with open networks, that might be hard in some cities if you even turn it on)
      • by Lloyd_Bryant (73136) on Sunday May 11, @02:08AM (#23367072)

        Mr. Jackson said that Ms. Duplaga did not wish to be interviewed. On Friday, no one answered the door at the beige colonial-style house on Ridgeview Avenue where she rents an apartment diagonally opposite a church. The neighborhood is on the edge of the city's downtown; in recent years, many of the prewar homes have been renovated.
        Gee, anybody in White Plains want to have a go at tracking her down? Thanks to this superfluous info, you now know:

        a) She lives on Ridgeview Avenue.
        b) She's at the edge of the city's downtown.
        c) Many of the homes in the area have been renovated recently.
        d) She lives in a colonial-style house.
        e) The house is diagonally opposite a church.

        If that's not enough info:

        One of the laptops was a Macintosh belonging to Kait Duplaga, who works at the Apple store in the Westchester mall and thus knows how to use all its bells and whistles.
        Just tail her from where she works.

        The only info in this that's actually relevant is the fact that she works at an Apple store, and that's she did not wish to be interviewed. The rest is either a reporter padding an article with irrelevant information, or attempting to indirectly violate her right to privacy.

        Either way, very poor journalism.