Slashdot Log In
"Back To My Mac" Catches a Thief
Posted by
kdawson
on Saturday May 10, @11:45PM
from the don't-mess-with-an-apple-grrrl dept.
from the don't-mess-with-an-apple-grrrl dept.
robipilot writes "Mac stolen, Mac comes online, owner connects using 'Back to My Mac,' owner takes picture of culprit, and voila, criminal caught. OK, it wasn't quite that simple, but here's an interesting story of using some built-in technology on the Mac to recover a stolen laptop."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
No, you misunderstood. They were able to use the software with no strings attached.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
That's an awful pun. You should be ashamed of yourself, you've really lowered the tone in this thread.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:A viola? Really? (Score:5, Funny)
(I don't know why I bother. Most
Reply to This
Parent
their real occupation (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Why take a snapshot? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Re:Why take a snapshot? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Why take a snapshot? (Score:5, Informative)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Why take a snapshot? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Why take a snapshot? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Poetic Justice (Score:5, Insightful)
I know, this being Slashdot we have to worry about the privacy issues, compare the Mac to somebody's Vista laptop, disparage the cops, fret about security in general, and not fail to point out that a viola is indeed a stringed instrument.
But there's just something so damned satisfying about imagining these two thugs being caught red-handed with the loot. There's the impression of the victim realizing that she may be onto something. Her "Now I've got you, you son of a bitch!" as the fatal snap takes place. The "Oh, shit" realization of the thief, probably followed by frantic thoughts of how he might go about flushing two widescreen TV's and assorted recreational electronics. The genuine gratification of being able to walk into the police station and say, "Here are photographs of the guys who ripped off our stuff, actually using some of our stuff, and we know who they are..." Perhaps then the THUD THUD THUD at the malefactors' door.
It's got all the elements of the classic cautionary tale, and just reading it should bring at least a brief and sarcastic smile to the face of anybody who's ever been robbed.
Reply to This
Home Version (Score:5, Interesting)
I run Ubuntu on my home PCs and changed the default login screen to list the users. I created a 'Guest' account and in it's description I put 'Password = 123qwe' (not the real password). The assumption is that a burglar , not knowing much about OS'es, will want to use the PC and will choose the easiest path to gain access. When they turn the PC on the login screen gives them a list of users and an option of choosing "Guest Account with the Password shown. All household users have been told to *never* use this account and why.
This 'Guest' account is CharRooted and has Firefox, IM and other Internet clients all on the desktop but that's about it. Under the hood it opens up SSH, VNC, Terminal Server and every other conceivable way of gaining access. It starts a script that every 30 minutes emails my Gmail account with IP address and connection information. Also, logging on to this account invokes a 'Nuke' scrip that will DBAN type wipe the system if I don't deactivate it within 7 days.
It's not a perfect solution but it has all the capabilities and features of the subscription tracking services that can cost hundreds a year and it's all pretty easy to setup. If any thief steals my PC and uses it to connect to the Internet I will know everything about their connection and have full access to the machine. If it's truly lost and I can't regain control after they login, it self destructs.
Now that I thinks about it, this should be a Ubuntu package or at least a HowTO.
-[d]-
Reply to This
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)
With this having been posted to Slashdot, Natalie Portman is going to wonder where all those Macs and cases of instant grits came from.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Informative)
Taking iSight photos during invalid login attempts [macosxhints.com]
Take photos via cron every 5 minutes [blogspot.com]
Take a photo everytime the lid is opened [deography.com] (Includes all of his pictures.
Reply to This
Parent
Why do we... wtf is wrong with you? (Score:5, Funny)
You act like you haven't had your domain sqatted on by Jenny's Personal Co-Ed Webcam Sexperience after missing a payment that one time that it happened to me.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Informative)
Like most computers with built-in webcams, the MacBooks feature a prominent green LED that lights up when the camera is in use. This LED cannot be disabled in software. If Apple were actually spying on people with their computers' built-in cameras, someone would have noticed, fast.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, I have Undercover installed on all my and my siblings laptops.
I wish the guy that wrote the command line tool (iSightCapture [macupdate.com]) to take photos would either release the source or make some updates. A video capture CLI tool would be awesome.
I'm thinking of writing my own poor man's Undercover using cron, bash scripts and curl. Attempt to curl a website which I have access to, all the website does is return a 1 or a 0. (Stolen, not stolen). If anything gets taken just update my website and next time my Mac connects to the net, it gets what it needs.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Funny)
"WHEN I STEAL YOUR LAPTOP"
When i steal your laptop
i'm going to use it offline
so i can harvest your personal info
with a data miner i have on my usb keychain
then i'm going to wipe the os clean
and change the mac address on your network card
and sell the fucker on kijiji
i'll meet you in the arby's parking lot
to sell you back your own machine
that you no longer recognize
because I put hello kitty decals on it.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Imagine (Score:5, Informative)
now, you could have a an automatic program to upload to a web server, but in this case, the owner used a subscription service from apple to gain control of the camera remotely, and snap a picture, ironically, the laptop starts a timer , and he tried to raise his hand to obscure the camera, but apparently, the picture is taken too fast for a person to realize what's going on.
just the picture the cops said would have been useful in catching the crook (they would have given copies to the places that fence stolen stuff, and they'd call the cops while 'figuring out the value' of the goods before they knew what was happening... it's a crime to purchase stolen goods after all) but in this case, the person was an acquaintance of their roommate, so they went to the cops to tell then who had the stuff, before they had even fenced the goods.
so apparently, you should fence your stolen laptops without hooking them to the internet. (and with automatic wireless networking and people with open networks, that might be hard in some cities if you even turn it on)
Reply to This
Parent
Off topic - example of poor journalism (Score:5, Insightful)
a) She lives on Ridgeview Avenue.
b) She's at the edge of the city's downtown.
c) Many of the homes in the area have been renovated recently.
d) She lives in a colonial-style house.
e) The house is diagonally opposite a church.
If that's not enough info:
The only info in this that's actually relevant is the fact that she works at an Apple store, and that's she did not wish to be interviewed. The rest is either a reporter padding an article with irrelevant information, or attempting to indirectly violate her right to privacy.
Either way, very poor journalism.
Reply to This
Parent