Disney Plans Tron Remake 434
blkmagic writes "Sci Fi Wire is reporting that Disney will remake Tron. The original article was in Variety, but requires a pay subscription, unless you want to sign up for a 14-day free trial. The article didn't mention what stage they're at, but sounds like they're changing the story a bit (surprise). I loved the original when I was younger (and still watch it again once in a while), so I don't know how I feel about this one!"
Poor choice for a remake. (Score:5, Insightful)
With all of the CGI enhanced movies being done today, great special effects won't have the same impact.
There will certainly be some draw based on nostalgia, however I think that will lead mostly to disappointment.
...hm (Score:5, Insightful)
A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.
And CGI? (Score:3, Insightful)
Will Jeff Bridges be in it?
Enough with the remakes already! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:...hm (Score:3, Insightful)
You know what'd be crazy ? A new movie. Like with new ideas. That'd be crazy.
Well sure, but Disney's not talking to Pixar anymore... :-(
Re:Poor choice for a remake. (Score:5, Insightful)
You put your finger on it. I remember hearing on the Tron DVD that they were wanting to do "Tron 2" (as a movie) and thinking "what is the point?"
Tron was never a great movie; visually it was outstanding (I don't want to repeat myself, so click here [slashdot.org]), but if they were to do a sequel it would have to replicate the visual impact. The still images of the proposed "Tron 2" looked like pretty computer graphics that could have been done anywhere.
A remake or a sequel would have to try very hard to do justice to the original and be fresh and innovative; the best way to do that would be to do some great visuals, combine it with a more sophisticated (for todays' audiences) computer-based plot, and create something like.... 'The Matrix'. Oops.
I agree 100%. Tron was a landmark movie in some ways, but things have moved on, and I'm not sure what they want to get out of this. People *will* be disappointed, and kids will wonder what the deal is.
Re:...hm (Score:3, Insightful)
however, I think the parent is getting at lack of original sci-fi in film, which there is a lack of. The only thing jumping out at me right now as original is Sky Captain, which wasn't a juge hit.
I'll get flamed for saying this I'm sure, but Sci-fi does not have the same wide appeal as any of the movies, for example, you just named... You need something to hook people, something they can relate to based on something they have already seen. That's why all Sci-Fi or fantasy is coming out of things that already exist.
or maybe Hollywood really is out of ideas...
Re:...hm (Score:2, Insightful)
Not for kids -- for adults (Score:3, Insightful)
Danger, Will Robinson!
Brian Klugman, if you're lurking, take a page from the Pixar notebook, and write a movie that will appeal to adults. The kids will get it, really. They're a lot smarter than most people in Hollywood give them credit for.
Chip H.
Not man into hell, but god into earth. (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, in many more ways it was a movie about a god venturing incarnate into the world.
"Do you believe in the users?"
"Of course! I mean, if there are no users, then...who wrote me?"
The oh-so transparent metaphors of atheism versus belief in a higher power are draped all over the movie.
You can't "remake" a work of art (Score:3, Insightful)
"Sternthal told the trade paper that the new conceit is that the computer programmer gets trapped in a cyberworld, so that the film can utilize the Internet."
That's not TRON. That has nothing to do with the movie TRON. If they call it TRON, they're retarded.
Re:Maybe they can add some cheezy singing and musi (Score:2, Insightful)
Jasmine had a handful at best. Not that they're real.
Re:Yay for Disney, you rock! (Score:3, Insightful)
One word: Fastpass.
(I'm only semi-serious)