SF Writers Sting Supposedly Traditional Publisher 474
deeptrace writes "A group of SF writers all submitted purposely awful stories to a publisher that purported to publish only selected high quality works. They created the worst story they could come up with, and it was accepted for publication." Their press release is pretty funny -- and if you'd like a sample of their insane prose, it's available through the book's Lulu site. (Where, Yes, you could also buy the whole thing.)
Re:The Press Release Text (Score:3, Funny)
oh thats easy (Score:5, Funny)
Slashdot editoral process ? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:oh thats easy (Score:5, Funny)
My Review of "Atlanta Nights" (Score:2, Funny)
Re:SF is broader than sci-fi (Score:5, Funny)
Re:preview (Score:5, Funny)
Whispering voices.
Pain.
Pain. Pain. Pain.
Need pee--new pain--what are they sticking in me? . .
Sleep.
Pain.
Whispering voices.
Woah.. slow down... is this a preview of the story, or a first hand account of reading the front page of Slashdot?
Love the name... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:preview (Score:2, Funny)
Re:No surprise here. (Score:5, Funny)
I know! I know! The correct answer is: "multiple times", right?
Re:preview (Score:5, Funny)
Aieee!!! Feral apo'strophes. Oh noe's th'ey're spr'ead'ing !!!'!' G'et the'm o'ff!!''!'
TH'E'Y'RE A'LI''V'E''''''''''''''''''''''
coming soon (Score:3, Funny)
Here's another explanation... (Score:2, Funny)
Actually, I'll amend that: reading nearly any science fiction is like eating flan, but reading Neal Stephenson is like eating flan from between Jennifer Connelly's breasts while you're high.
Goodkind (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Follow a publishers formula = get published. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:preview (Score:3, Funny)
I've seen better writing from bad high school students. Though, on the flip side, it's likely on par with most of the romance novels out there.
Oh, what suffering.
It was a dark and stormy night (Score:4, Funny)
--Edward George Bulwer-Lytton, Paul Clifford (1830)
Yes yes, karma-whoring again, go ahead and say it.
Re:preview (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Weird acronym use (Score:5, Funny)
When you put it that way, it makes me really care what the sci-fi community wants to be called.
Re:It was a dark and stormy night (Score:2, Funny)
Not so stupid as you think: (Score:2, Funny)
1) Get bunch of writes to write "crappy" novel
2) Advertise how bad it is on slashdot
3) Profit!
Just because its horribly bad doesnt mean some of you wont be buying it out of curiosity.
Re:Nothing new... (Score:2, Funny)
Wkipedia, as usual, has more spin than a top quark.
Re:From the site (Score:3, Funny)
Do they mean the manuscript or Slashdot?
Re:Here's another explanation... (Score:3, Funny)
Flan or flarn?
Watching Star Trek is like eating flarn. Watching B5 is like eating flarn out from between Mira Furlann and Claudi*ahem*, uh, never mind. We have always eaten flarn.