Time Travelers' Convention 836
usermilk writes "Some folks at MIT are holding a time-travelers' convention. The idea is to make it so famous and so widely-known that even thousands of years in the future, people will still know exactly when and where this time-traveler convention went down, and will all come travel to it at some point in their illustrious time-traveling careers. For those interested in attending, it's on May 7, 2005, 10:00pm EDT (08 May 2005 02:00:00 UTC) in the East Campus Courtyard at MIT. 42:21:36.025N, 71:05:16.332W (42.360007,-071.087870 in decimal degrees)."
Paradoxes (Score:5, Insightful)
If no time travellers turn up on May 7th, will everyone stop promoting it after the date?
Personally I would have thought it'd make sense to give a bit more advanced notice than a week, if only to give people a chance to get the word around more beforehand (thus more likely to be archived).
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
zerg (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why did they set the date in the future? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Vonnegut? (Score:1, Insightful)
Larry Niven Already Dealt With This (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure you meant to say that if you travel back in time to shoot hitler, you could in fact shoot him, just that once you left on your mission to shoot him you could never return to that same place because that place exists in a relative path from a place where hitler was not shot.
Of course if you could transcend time and thus travel freely thru the infinite possible dimensions, why would you want to go and shoot hitler.. the dimension in which you shoot hitler would probably cast you a pretty dark lifetime anyways. You'd be better off choosing a dimension where somebody else shot hitler and has yourself cast as a young millionaire or something.
They Don't Get It! (Score:2, Insightful)
Easier way is, "Time is an illusion" (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, like the government won't be watching THAT (Score:5, Insightful)
Or if you're the big-business conspiracy theory type, substitute "government" for "private mercenaries."
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, almost like it's impossible for objects heavier than air to fly
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:1, Insightful)
I am a time traveller, it is just that I seem unable to alter the direction and speed from that of everything else.
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:2, Insightful)
There are two common arguments for free will and they are both extremely weak:
(1) I feel like I have free will, therefore I do.
(2) Free will must exist because lots of other stuff (like our moral systems, the law, etc.) don't make sense without it.
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
If he hadn't... (Score:3, Insightful)
Obviously, he went back in time. Pervert.
Re:I tried to make it (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ahh... (Score:3, Insightful)
Hyuk hyuk
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you sure? If quantum mechanics are involved in any meaningful way, then some of the events may be literally random (i.e. not a function of any observable input). In that case, even perfect knowledge of the inputs and the wiring would be insufficient.
Re:Ahh... (Score:3, Insightful)
Striving to represent all sides of an issue is one thing, but those who believe a lame hoax and those who don't, do not two valid sides of an issue make.
I mean, come on: "there are discrepancies between Titor's claims of the future and actual events"? Oh really, cause it all looked pretty solid to me!
Somehow their reputation just got knocked down a notch for me.
Re:Ahh... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Insightful)
We speak of "time" because it's convenient. It allows us to measure our lives and our activities against a single background. We keep track of "time" by observing the predictable patterns of celestial objects, as well as by setting mechanical devices to synchronize with those celestial movement cycles.
But what exactly is "time"? Time is a series of events. Nothing more. You can't undo things in real life. A broken vase can't be put back together just by reversing the event that caused it to break. Why? Because events are irreversible. You can cause a negating event for some things (like turning a light on or off), but you can never undo an event once it's done.
So, simply put, time doesn't exist. It's merely perception of a series of events. The fact that it's perception is made clear by the phrase "time flies when you're having fun." Your brain records images of events into your memory, sometimes with a record of celestial body locations or numeric representations thereof.
The more interested you are in what is happening around you, the more things your brain will record. But having limited processing resources, it will skip the "timestamp" on many of those events. The relative difference between each "timestamp" is much farther apart than is expected or normal, so "time flies."
When you're disinterested in events around you, the opposite is true. Your brain records some meaningless drivel and since it has lots of resources available, it slaps a "timestamp" on every one of those mental notes. Boring stuff seems to take much longer because of this.
Let's see the writers for the next Star Trek series (several years from now, I hear) put this tidbit of time-travel logic to work. It'll at least spare us some crappy re-hashes of Nazis in space (spaaaaaaaaaaaace?).
Re:Ahh... (Score:3, Insightful)
Yep, I understand the "Titor urge" well. People are willing to believe the darndest things, so long as they are "told with a straight face". The classic example is the Ouija board. There are two kinds of people when it comes to using a Ouija board as a group: the people saying "look! it's spelling something!", and the one guy who's gently pushing the pointer around and saying "I'm not pushing it!" like everyone else. I've always been the guy pushing the pointer around, myself...
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Think of it this way, the way something happened, is the way it happened.
Buddy, I've got a cat in a box that would or would not beg to disagree.
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, here's the tricky part: what if I decide not to go in the past and me going into the past is part of history? That would change history and oh I've gone crosseyed.
Since I'm not a big fan of predetermined fate, I must assume that no one may go in the past of their own dimension. The two seem to go hand-in-hand as far as I see.
Re:Why this ain't gonna fly (Score:3, Insightful)
Sort of a multi line/track switch theory you have for your explanation.
Now try and work it with single-line editing allowed and still explain away the 'paradox' that implies, for extra credit give two paradox solvers.
Time Travel is one of the more fun things to consider.
Wish I could remember if anyone fun showed up at this one.
Mycroft
Re:Hmmm.... (Score:2, Insightful)
But they are all your choices. So in my theory you have in fact already chosen your future choices, but not really because it's outside of time so there is no "already chosen".
It's more like, your choices are as much a part of your being as your left arm or your mind, soul, spirit, whatever. So at the same time that your choices are "set" in advance, you still freely make all your choices, since they are a part of you.
This roughly solves the paradox of a set time continuum and having free will. It precludes you to believe in your being existng outside of time and such.
Re:Ahh... (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course many people don't buy the time travel story, hence don't believe anything of it. But at least he has managed to address some people. And for the others it was just entertaining