Dr Who Rolls On 258
derek_farn writes "It looks like us lucky Brits will be getting a Dr Who christmas special, plus a third series has been commissioned. Those of you who get their news from the BBC web site will know that the current Dr Who, Christopher Eccleston, left after the first series and was replaced by the actor who recently played Casanova in a mini-series (not quite the same as the women wearing lycra in Star Trek, but we Brits are a bit more reserved)."
Re:Rose (Score:2, Interesting)
Although, I thought Chris Eccleston was brilliant and this new guy has some big shoes to fill.
Will this Dr. Who tackle harsh political issues? (Score:5, Interesting)
While I haven't seen it, I must ask, does this Dr. Who series do the same? Are they tackling issues such as the torture of innocents at Abu-Ghraib, Guantanamo, etc.? Will they look at the issues behind the fakery of terrorism?
In short, is this new series a provocative, worthwhile viewing experience?
Re:Rose (Score:2, Interesting)
great (Score:3, Interesting)
I sit and plan how to infiltrate the bbc james bond style just so i can see the next ep.
I really hope this new guy can match Eccleston, but right now i find Eccleston to be one of the best actors on tv, i even include voice actors in this statement.
the scene in the last ep when he is holding a bfg and then throws it to the guy he is pointing it at saying "like i was ever going to use that" or something like that was brilliant.
sorry for sounding so fanboyish but this show seams to drag this side of me out in the open, my beloved sarcasm is blown away when dr.who is on hehe.
A Doctor Who Christmas (Score:3, Interesting)
Ah yes.
Time to break out the Dalek Christmas Tree [bsfs.org] and sit down for the Dalek Christmas feast [cuttingsarchive.org.uk], while listening to your favourite Dalek Christmas Carols [millenniumeffect.co.uk]
Re:Third series? (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, in case any Americans are reading this and are slightly confused, we tend to use the word 'series' instead of 'season'.
Re:Rose (Score:3, Interesting)
One significant difference (Score:4, Interesting)
This makes a big difference, as it mean that early stories could be longer if needed (6-part and 8-part stories were not uncommon, and the longest was 13), which made for potentially richer stories. On the flip-side, the actors were pushed to their physical limits and there simply wasn't that much time available for script editing or rehearsal.
The practical upshot is that modern stories have to sell on impact (there isn't time for an in-depth plot), whereas older stories had to sell on plot twists (otherwise nobody would tune in next week).
Personally, I think the 25 episode format was the ideal balance and I wish they would switch back to that. Since Dr Who has proven so popular in its revival, it is possible the BBC might do that. Especially as the actors are only lasting one season anyway. The BBC might as well get the most for its money.
Re:Rose (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Eccleston made a good doctor. (Score:1, Interesting)
What's too bad is that many of the episodes are missing, so there were many holes in the storylines... Plus I didn't like it back then. The new show - much better
Re:I just want to say... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I just want to say... (Score:3, Interesting)
Postal Joe-job, anyone?
Re:The stand out - absolute stand out... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I just want to say... (Score:3, Interesting)
Dalek should have been a tense episode where The Doctor and the Dalek pit their wits against each other for 45 minutes in an attempt to eliminate each other with the audience wondering how each character will avoid the next trap set for them by their opponent. Or at least that's how I would have written it. Above all, no schmalz.