Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Media Movies

Gaiman and Whedon Discuss the Rise of the Geek 256

CABridges writes "In a lengthy Time Magazine interview, Neil Gaiman ("Sandman," "American Gods") and Joss Whedon ("Buffy the Vampire Slayer," "Firefly") talk about their audience. Gaiman: "Mostly they're people. They're us. That's what they look like." Whedon: "They're a lot more attractive than I am, actually, which kind of disturbs and upsets me." Both men, known for their cult-favorite creations, have movies debuting this Friday. For Gaiman it's MirrorMask, for Whedon it's Serenity."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gaiman and Whedon Discuss the Rise of the Geek

Comments Filter:
  • by thc69 ( 98798 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @10:52AM (#13666901) Homepage Journal
    In the list of works for which Gaiman is known..."Don't Panic" is missing!
  • by RyanFenton ( 230700 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @10:59AM (#13666970)
    AVClub article [avclub.com]

    AVClub is from the same guys who do The Onion [theonion.com]

    This interview also features Dave McKean.

    Ryan Fenton
  • One Page Print View (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:03AM (#13667002)
    Always with the multiple pages, yes I know you get ansy and start doubleclicking words or some other psychological thing, but for those with attention spans:

    One Nice Single Page With No Ads [time.com]
  • by ideonode ( 163753 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:05AM (#13667023)
    Indeed. So also is his most recent book, Anansi Boys. No doubt there'll be a /. review in a few days' time. However, I have finished it, and I thought it was a good read. More humorous than American Gods, although still with that Gods-on-Earth theme. It actually reminded me of the Dirk Gently books of Douglas Adams, but if I say any more, I'd be into spoiler territory.
  • Re:Mmmmm... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Maxo-Texas ( 864189 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:17AM (#13667115)
    Allyson Hannigan.

    She married Wesley (Alexis Duchanov?)

    Firefly is not EQ/WoW/Buffy/Angel.

    They are drifting into it at the end of the series a tiny bit- apparently Joss likes supergirls.

    No idea about Serenity except that I am going to see it.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:19AM (#13667127)
    Interesting, since the final version wasn't shown until Comic-Con in July.
  • Re:Mmmmm... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Kazzahdrane ( 882423 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:21AM (#13667136)
    Please watch Firefly. It's nothing like Buffy, by which I mean both are good in their own ways but: "It's like watching EverQuest, World of Warcraft, and EverQuest II on TV. A bunch of well endowed girls with doll-like figures capable of defeating creatures 10 times their size." does NOT apply to Firefly.
  • by frankie ( 91710 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:28AM (#13667173) Journal
    Take a look at the Mirrormask promo site. They list all of its theaters on a single page. Not exactly a major blockbuster release, but hey one of them is near me, so I won't complain.

    The trailer looks like a sharp left turn from Labyrinth, although I may have been swayed by the Henson logo.

    Inspiration & visuals by Dave McKean, written by Neil Gaiman, where have I seen that combination before? But it's the first feature-length movie for both of them. If they're even half as good at film as they were at comics, should be a surreal treat.
  • Re:Mmmmm... (Score:2, Informative)

    by DestroyAllZombies ( 896198 ) * on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:30AM (#13667200)
    Too bad. Gaiman's work is a lot more interesting.
  • by Bruzer ( 191590 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:41AM (#13667315) Homepage
    The movie has flashes and slow pans of dead and decaying corpses.

    The reaver scenes are very quick cut away shots that are more to surprise and shock than anything else.

    There are no scenes that in my memory that are physical gore. I don't want to spoil the movie, there are no flesh eating scenes or the like. But let me again point to the slow pans of dead corpses, I guess that could be considered gory.

    Serenity is one of the best movies I have ever seen. I have read some posts that some don't like going to the theater. In truth you don't have to see Serenity on the big screen to enjoy it. But please plan on seeing Serenity at some point, it is a GREAT story. I took 8 people to the preview last night (Tuesday) and every one of them enjoyed the movie. Even after I raved about it non stop. One of my friends said "This was the first movie that has been hyped up (mainly by me) and lived up to the hype."

    Slashdot the theaters for the Serenity release.

        - Bruzer
  • Re:Rise of the Geek (Score:2, Informative)

    by shudde ( 915065 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:43AM (#13667341)

    Actually, Buffy was a successful movie before it was a TV show. The movie was basically a comedy, along the lines of Clueless, and was very different from the show.

    While I did enjoy the movie when I was younger, it was critically panned and considered a box office failure so I'm not really sure how you consider it a success. That's why, in the early days of the television series, Whedon was having a lot of network opposition to reviving what they considered a 'dead horse'.

  • Re:Mmmmm... (Score:2, Informative)

    by jcarter ( 726183 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @11:56AM (#13667479)
    It took me a while to turn on to Buffy. I had similar complaints as the parent post originally, and I couldn't understand what made some of my friends such uberfans.

    But I watched an episode here and there, and I began to realize how good the writing really is. How good the stories get sometimes.

    There's a lot of subtext in the Buffy scripts. Everything is a metaphor, especially the monster/vortex/curse/evilfishpeople of the week. So there's this one level on which the show is beautiful fluff - kick-ass chicks and scary blood-sucking monsters - and then there's this other level on which the single-minded, relentlessness of the monster is played as counterpoint to some other character's desire to get that boyfriend/that 'A'/that job at all costs, and hurt whoever they have to to get there.

    And all that aside, it's _entertaining_. What makes something entertaining is hard to define, but, in my subjective viewpoint, this show had it in spades. The imagery, the dialogue, the whole look and feel and sound and experience of it - it ain't TV crack, but it ain't bad.

  • by Kelson ( 129150 ) * on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @12:14PM (#13667648) Homepage Journal
    From interviews with Neil Gaiman, the movie got started when the Henson company looked at Dark Crystal and Labyrinth and noticed that while they didn't do very well in theaters, they've turned out to be quite successful in the home video market. People keep buying the tapes, DVDs, etc. year after year.

    So they went to him and said, "Can you come up with an idea for a movie in this style, that we could produce on a low budget, and could you put in a word with Dave McKean? And we know we can't affort you as the writer, but would you at least come up with the story?" At that point he said something like "If Dave's direting it, I'm writing it," they got the deal, the two of them went off to spend a week or two in the Hensons' vacation home developing the story, and launched into it from there.

    So while it would be wonderful if it did well in theaters, the studio is really counting on it being part of their home video line for the next 20 years -- just like The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth.
  • by Shajenko42 ( 627901 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @03:31PM (#13669353)
    The executive responsible for bringing Firefly to the network was canned, and the rest of the execs would have to explain why somebody who brought a show that was doing so well was fired.

    So they did everything in their power to kill the show.
  • by RealAlaskan ( 576404 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @04:02PM (#13669613) Homepage Journal
    I still don't get it. :( I have never seen a geek bite a chicken head off like that. And I am a geek.

    Since you still don't get it, maybe this is an honest request for information, rather than an attempt at sarcasm or irony. So, here goes.

    A geek was a carnival sideshow freak, whose act was doing disgusting things like eating a live rat or biting the head off a chicken or two (chickens were too big to eat whole, unlike a small rat). Tradition has it that they were usually alcoholics, made to perform by witholding booze until they got the shakes so bad they'd do anything for a drink. Like all end-stage alcoholics, they didn't usually eat much, unless they happened to swallow a rat or a chicken head. The booze was the pay, so they were cheap. They didn't usually live long, but you could always find another in any town big enough to have a town drunk. Every carnival had a geek, and he was the very lowest of the low: the one person that everyone, including the hermaphrodite and the crap-shoveler, could look down on.

    That is why I never refer to myself as a geek.

  • by xirusmom ( 815129 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @04:33PM (#13669876)
    Oh, please!

    Money is not the best part!

    Geek sex! I've tested! I recommend it!
  • by orkysoft ( 93727 ) <orkysoft@m y r e a l b ox.com> on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @04:40PM (#13669964) Journal

    It could derive from the Dutch word "gek", which means madman as a noun, or mad/weird/crazy as an adjective.

    (Legal notice: this does not imply that all Dutch nouns can be used as adjectives as well.)

  • by xirusmom ( 815129 ) on Wednesday September 28, 2005 @05:05PM (#13670286)
    My husband likes star trek...

    ...he is a Sys Admin...

    ...all other geek signs included....

    Yes! He gets blowjobs and he does not have to ask for it !

    He also gets porn occasionally, just to spice it up.

    So... you see, if you have to ask for it (or pay for it), YOU are the one not doing it right!

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...