Future Cell Phone Knows You By Your Walk 156
jangobongo writes "Researchers at the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland have come up with a unique way to secure your cell phone if it should get lost or stolen: 'Gait code'. Motion sensors in the phone would monitor the walking pattern (or gait) of whoever is in possession of the phone, and if the 'gait' doesn't match a pre-established biometric the phone would require a password to operate. The prototype cell phone correctly identified when it was being carried by someone other than its owner 98% of the time. The research team points out (powerpoint document) that this method could also work for PDAs, laptops, USB tokens, smart cards, wallets, suitcases, and guns."
cool tech, but dumb implementation (Score:5, Insightful)
Great. (Score:2, Insightful)
So, someone gets hit by a car, struggles to their feet, limps along a bit and then pulls out their phone to call for help... and it doesn't work.
Nice one.
Re:cool tech, but dumb implementation (Score:5, Insightful)
Because the device isn't secure at all when the owner turns off the password protection because they're tired of entering their password. If they only have to enter it 2% of the time, they're less likely to disable it.
I think we can both agree that password protection is better than nothing.
Used to detect drunkenness (Score:4, Insightful)
I R'dTFA, and they said that one of the things that alters the user's gait "code" is when they're drunk. If you paired a Bluetooth phone with a car, and added this, it could be a biometric way of making sure someone doesn't drive drunk. Just a thought.
Doesn't work in airports (Score:3, Insightful)
The Slashdot Obvious (tm) (Score:5, Insightful)
And it all must be true, because the engineers who spent years designing this must be complete idiots, and would never think of these things on their own.
Ready, set, go!
Wouldn't voiceprint be a lot easier? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Better biometric than fingerprints? (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Used to detect drunkenness (Score:3, Insightful)
ever notice... (Score:2, Insightful)
critics missing the point (Score:5, Insightful)
Technology succeeds largely if it panders to one of the dominant human traits - lazyness.
If the gait thing means i can save 5 secs, or maybe more on a cold day with gloves that have to be taken off, it will have a good chance in the market.
Re:cool tech, but dumb implementation (Score:3, Insightful)
Up in Canada, it's nice to not have to take off your gloves. It's cold outside, and if you're carrying stuff in your other hand it can be difficult to do. (You end up trying to place a call with a glove held in your teeth.)
Also, a fingerprint scanner involves a surface on the telephone's exterior that has to be kept fairly clean and is vulnerable to pointy things. The gait monitor discussed here can be entirely internal.