Media Fight - PS3 Blu-ray vs. 360 HD DVD Add-On 214
An anonymous reader sent a link suggesting we might enjoy High Def Digest's next-gen console media comparison. They take a look at the PlayStation 3's Blu-ray playback capabilities, and compare it to the performance of the Xbox 360's HD DVD add-on. The article offers a number of technical details for the movie, audio, and gaming buff. As you might expect, given the companies involved, both products basically perform their functions very well. From the article: "That doesn't mean both aren't without their drawbacks. The Xbox 360 add-on suffers from a lack of HDMI and analog outputs, though it still delivers excellent results despite those limitations. The PS3, meanwhile, also lacks analog outs, but it does have HDMI 1.3 support and can decode Dolby TrueHD. The lack of 1080 upconversion of 720p sources on the PS3 is a huge issue, though, so unless you have a 1080p-capable HDTV, you may suffer buyer's remorse."
it's the games, stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
A comparison of the actual games might be a bit more relevant. To be perfectly honest, I don't think anyone buys a gaming console BASED ON THE FUCKING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPTICAL DRIVE. They buy it because it has the games they want to play.
Add-on peripherals (like drives) to consoles... (Score:4, Insightful)
-Sega CD, 32X, etc.
No one wants to buy extra hardware to play games and these add-ons better be dirt cheap if they expect anyone to pick them up for HD-DVD playback. That and why is there even a need to replace DVD as it stands for most people?
I understand the benefits of blue-ray and HD-DVD for computer storage for applications like games, archiving, etc. But console history is filled with failed peripherals.
Re:it's the games, stupid (Score:5, Insightful)
The main reason for the PS3? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:it's the games, stupid (Score:1, Insightful)
Which means that most consumers aren't going to spend the time to even understand what the fuck blu-ray is, or what HD-DVD is, and why it provides them a (slight) benefit over DVD. Honestly, what percentage of consumers are buying the PS3 to play movies? Look at it this way; we have two groups of customers:
1. Hardcore videophiles: Anyone seriously into movies isn't going to be satisfied with the PS3's mediocre blu-ray output (i.e. not 1080p), which means if they buy it, they'll be buying it for the games.
2. Casual videoconsumers: Anyone not into movies isn't going to give a fuck about the blu-ray movie performance details, and will be buying it for the games.
This "optical drive pissing match" article is completely irrelevant to the customer base they're aiming at. It's Sony marketing, and it's not even done well.
Re:Add-on peripherals (like drives) to consoles... (Score:4, Insightful)
as for the sales of the add-on, there is no large critical mass required - as long as MS dont overproduce them and sell the minimum amount needed to cover costs then it wont be a problem.
Re:The main reason for the PS3? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why are we advertising this failed format war.. (Score:2, Insightful)
The difference is that there were about four people in that backlash watching eight films between them. The real dominant format was VHS; laserdisc was just a museum piece to most people.
Now almost everyone has a DVD player and a pile of movies and are not sitting in front of their TV going "Jesus, this is crap quality. I wish there was something better", which was what a lot of people WERE saying about VHS.
Re:HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray (Score:3, Insightful)
To someone uniformed, the name "HD-DVD" doesn't stand out, it sort of sounds like "HDTV" and sort of like "DVD" so you group it in with those technologies in your mind. Blu-ray on the otherhand doesn't sound like anything else so it stands out in the casual observer's mind as something distinct and different -- a new technology.
Re:HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray (Score:2, Insightful)
No. VHS vs. Betamax proves you wrong on that one.
And the winner is... (Score:3, Insightful)
The format that first/most conviniently gets ripped and XvidD'ed.
Re:it's the games, stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, just like nobody bought the PS2 for it's DVD player capabilities (with the games being a bonus) in the system's early years.. Oh wait, that's wrong, a lot of people did!
Nobody I know did that.
Re:it's the games, stupid (Score:3, Insightful)
History proves you wrong. This is the exact same situation and Sony is betting on it.
So if Sony had released the PS3 with a Uber Holographic-Movie Disc (which will work on your Holographic-TV that will be relased in 2020) for only $20,000 you think people will line-up to buy one?
The fact is that the PS2 sold as a DVD player because DVD was taking off (at the time my local Blockbuster was carying a handful of DVD's for every new-release movie), everyone wanted a PS2, and the PS2 was within the typical price range of a videogame console. Essentially, the PS2 worked as a DVD player because it was a DVD player and a videogame console that was the same price as a DVD player and a traditional price for videogame console at a time when everyone wanted a DVD player.
Blu-Ray/HD-DVD are not popular mainly because there are too few movies, the movies are too expensive, and they're not readily available to buy or rent; the PS3 as a movie player is more expensive than a HD-DVD player, is much more expensive than the traditional game console, at a time where people don't care about HD-DVD/Blu-Ray players.
Re:Analog Hole (Score:3, Insightful)
Soooo... They didn't "get it" with the iPod?
Correct. They did not get DRM force-fed down their throats with the iPod.
It's not like buying from the iTunes Store (which requires DRM) is mandatory for using the iPod (which does not).
Re:Why are we advertising this failed format war.. (Score:2, Insightful)