Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Media Movies

Star Trek To Return Christmas 2008 358

Tycoon Guy writes "Paramount today announced the new Star Trek film is scheduled for release on Christmas Day 2008. The studio also confirmed the film will be directed by J. J. Abrams, who said the film will 'embrace and respect' Trek canon, but will also 'chart its own course.' Also today, rumors are out claiming Matt Damon, Adrien Brody and Gary Sinise will play Kirk, Spock, and Scotty, respectively."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Star Trek To Return Christmas 2008

Comments Filter:
  • Scotty != Bones (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @03:18AM (#18178322)
    I don't know if the editors decided not to RTFA, but TFA doesn't talk about Scotty at all, rather is saying that the role is for Bones.
  • by l0ungeb0y ( 442022 ) on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @03:22AM (#18178352) Homepage Journal
    NOoooooooo! Why not Brendan Gleeson? Both Him and Gary where born in 1955, so they're the same age. And Brendan looks and TALKS much more like what I would settle for a Scotty. I could see Sinise as McCoy, hell he even looks a bit like him. Ohhh wait.. submitter got it wrong. [trektoday.com] Sinise will be McCoy and James McAvoy is going to be Scotty. James McAvoy?!?!?!? He's a slight and frail little man! He's not close to passable as the boisterous and strapping chief engineer before his more plump years. He better start gorging on meat pies.
  • by mrchaotica ( 681592 ) * on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @03:33AM (#18178402)

    What about a DS9 movie?

    (Warning: spoilers)

    At the end of the series, they dismantled basically the entire crew (Sisko ended up in the celestial temple/wormhole, Odo went to join the great link, Garek stayed on Cardassia, Dukat died, etc. They'd need to either use a different cast (which would suck) or come up with an excuse to reunite everyone (which would most likely seem ridiculously contrived), which makes a DS9 movie relatively unlikely.

  • by Babbster ( 107076 ) <aaronbabb&gmail,com> on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @04:13AM (#18178586) Homepage
    Actually, there are books that continue the story (an "8th season" of sorts) of Bajor, DS9, the Gamma Quadrant, etc. in some pretty cool ways. At the end of the first "arc" (that's as far as I've read) they even managed to get everyone back on Bajor in a way that made sense (at least in the context of DS9). I won't spoil any of it for those who might be interested in reading the books and I'll give a reading list/order below for anyone who cares:

    1. Avatar 1-2
    2. Section 31: Abyss (haven't read)
    3. Gateways: Demons of Air and Darkness (haven't read)
    4. "Horn and Ivory" from Gateways: What Lay Beyond (haven't read)
    5. Mission Gamma 1-4
    6. Rising Son (haven't read)
    7. Unity
    8. Worlds of Deep Space Nine (three books - haven't read)

    Again, from the list above (cribbed from a post on trekunited.com by "wildcard1377") I've read seven of the books and only missed a few references while still enjoying the primary arc of the story. I'll get to the rest at some point when I have time to get down to the "big bookstore" and grab them up, but I definitely recommend the ones I have read to DS9 fans.
  • by paganizer ( 566360 ) <thegrove1NO@SPAMhotmail.com> on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @09:28AM (#18180188) Homepage Journal
    One of the reasons shatner did so well as Kirk was because he brought a couple of things to the roll that were just exactly right, namely the bearing (if not the sensibilities) of a Naval captain. Swagger arrogantly is a little bit of a cheap shot, and not accurate.
    Besides, Riker was wrong. a lot. he did have a lot of obvious Kirk mannerisms, but he missed being a kirk-like figure by a large margin; Kirk was set up and described repeatedly as a Tactical Genius, War Hero, and the best problem-solver the federation had.
  • by pl1ght ( 836951 ) on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @10:37AM (#18180874)
    He said he wasnt signed from what i could hear. Doesnt say anything definitive about Matt Damon not being able to play the next Kirk still.
  • by be-fan ( 61476 ) on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @01:26PM (#18183012)
    Uh, yes? Christmas day is actually a very busy time for movie theaters, since everybody is off work and lots of people go to see movies with their family after Christmas eve celebrations the night before. It's quite common for a studio to release a big budget movie on Christmas day. All three LOTR movies were released on Christmas day, for example.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...