Blade Runner at 25, Why the F/X Still Matter 454
mattnyc99 writes "Today marks the 25th anniversary of the release of Blade Runner, Ridley Scott's dark vision of the future that changed the future of filmmaking and still stands up today, argues Adam Savage of The MythBusters (and the F/X crews of The Matrix and Star Wars). Between the "lived-in science fiction," pre-CGI master models, futuristic cityscapes and tricked-out cars, don't you agree? And after we got the first official glimpse of him from Indiana Jones 4 this weekend, isn't Harrison Ford still the man?"
didn't know what a steier .222 looked like, found (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Special edition DVD? (Score:5, Informative)
"Blade Runner: Final Cut will arrive in 2007 for a limited 25th-anniversary theatrical run, followed by a special-edition DVD with the three previous versions offered as alternate viewing."
Re:Special edition DVD? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Special edition DVD? (Score:3, Informative)
Printable version (Score:2, Informative)
Link to printable [popularmechanics.com] version without 4 pages of ads.
Re:Maybe? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:But Is Deckard A Replicant? Or Not? (Score:5, Informative)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/07/09/20582
Re:But Is Deckard A Replicant? Or Not? (Score:3, Informative)
* Deckard was an older, presumably more reliable, model.
* When the sergeant tells Deckard that replicants have a life expectancy of 4 years, he looks at him and apologizes.
* The unicorn dread that Deckard has. The cop makes an origami unicorn as well. How the heck did he know what he was dreaming? A little too coincidental to me.
* There's a scene in his apartment where Deckard has that weird glare in his eyes like you see with other replicants.
Maybe I'm too young - I didn't find BR special (Score:3, Informative)
Do other younger
Re:i love blade runner (Score:4, Informative)
There is a lot of good "grown-up" science fiction in movies out there for those willing to look for it. I would add movies like "12 Monkeys" and "Primer" (rare serious looks at the ramifications of time travel) as personal favorites, as well as (of course) "2001: A Space Odyssey," one of the few science fiction films to treat alien/human (or is it God/human?) contact in any serious way. "Gattaca" was also good, but a bit heavy-handed for my tastes. A lot of people hated "The Fountain," but I thought it was an interesting meditation on human mortality.
Re:Some things stand up, some don't (Score:3, Informative)
Found it... (Score:3, Informative)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/825641.s
Slashdot Story Pointing to article:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/07/09/20582
Re:I've always kind of wished (Score:1, Informative)
Less than 12 parsecs (Score:3, Informative)
The Kessel Run is close to the Maw, a collection of black holes, that is between Kessel, a prison/spice production planet, and Nar Shadda, the smugglers moon orbiting the Hutt homeworld. Because of the gravitational pull of the Maw, smuggler ships that pass between Kessel and Nar Shadda have to skirt around the black holes to avoid the event horizons (even if it would take infinitely long to fall in). Faster ships can run closer, shortening their time and distance.
Re:I've always kind of wished (Score:2, Informative)
One of the reason for the amazing sets (Score:2, Informative)
Sweet jesus on a fricken' pogo stick (Score:3, Informative)
Waste your damn mod points modding this troll, it's my honest opinion. I don't give a rat's ass what someone dumb enough to like Contact thinks anyway.
Because you saw the inferior Director's Cut (Score:2, Informative)
The director's cut is the only version shown on TV and is the only version to ever be made available on DVD.
I and many others find the original theatrically released version of Blade Runner to be a far superior film. The differences between the two versions are massive. Substantive changes are present in nearly half the scenes of the movie, including the ending.
Other than the huge shift in the ending, the key difference between the two cuts is the absence of the detective noir style voice-overs. All of Harrison Ford's voice overs were removed from the director's cut. Some claim the voice overs were put in over Ridley Scott's objections, but evidence at the time of filming strongly contradicts this. (see the excellent Paul Sammon book "Future Noir - The making of Blade Runner" for the specifics)
Plainly put, the voice overs give the movie a far different feel and do a far better job of explaining the environment in which the film takes place. Had I not seen the theatrical cut, I would have found the director's cut to be quite vague.
Do yourself a favor, search the bittorrent sites for the original theatrical cut. Or wait for the October release of the 25 year anniversary package. It's been reported that an HD version of the theatrical cut will be one of the included versions.
The original theatrical version is simply a much better film.
Re:i love blade runner (Score:3, Informative)
Very interesting take on a comparison between the LA of Bladerunner and the current LA.
Re:I want the voice over (Score:5, Informative)