Court Rules Against TorrentSpy In MPAA Email Suit 130
mikesd81 writes "C|Net reports that a lawsuit filed by TorrentSpy against the MPAA, accusing it of intercepting the company's private e-mails, was tossed out of court this week. Even though a U.S District judge ruled that the MPAA broke no rules, the MPAA does admit it paid $15,000 to obtain private e-mails belonging to TorrentSpy executives. The MPAA's acknowledgment is significant because it comes at a time when the group is trying to limit illegal file sharing by imploring movie fans to act ethically and resist the temptation to download pirated movies. From the article: 'Ethically, it's pretty clear that reading other people's e-mail is wrong,' said Lorrie Cranor, an associate research professor and Internet privacy expert at Carnegie Mellon University. 'Being offered someone else's e-mails by a third party should have been a red flag.' TorrentSpy is appealing the decision." This is just not a good week for those guys.
Re:Am I reading this right?! (Score:3, Informative)
Giving a key to a thief that then breaks into a place using that key will get you in trouble. Since you know the
Screw them. (Score:3, Informative)
I support civil disobedience. Just encrypt your stuff (hint: WASTE P2P) and do it at your own risk.
Hacking a company's email is legal??? (Score:3, Informative)
"...he signed a contract stating he had come by the correspondence through lawful means."
"Anderson allegedly "hacked" into TorrentSpy's e-mail system and rigged it so that "every incoming and outgoing e-mail message would also be copied and forwarded to his anonymous Google e-mail account," records show."
Re:I don't get it. (Score:3, Informative)