Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Media Movies

Simon Pegg to Play Scotty 233

In response to yesterday's casting news about Chris Pine possibly taking the captain's chair for the new Star Trek movie, apparently Simon Pegg will be playing the role of Scotty. Simon Pegg is known for his role as Shaun in Shaun of the Dead and more recently for his leading role in Hot Fuzz. "Pegg joins Zoe Saldana as Uhura, Anton Yelchin as Chekov, John Cho as Sulu and Zachary Quinto as Spock in the film which reportedly, and logically, 'chronicles the early days of the Enterprise crew.' Leonard Nimoy will also put in an appearance, while Eric Bana signed up this week as the movie's villain, Nero."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Simon Pegg to Play Scotty

Comments Filter:
  • by F-3582 ( 996772 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:17PM (#20960935)
    www.imdb.com is your friend.
  • Oh noes (Score:4, Insightful)

    by KEnderK ( 1171753 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:19PM (#20960951)
    The Shat is really going to hit the fan now!
  • let it die (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kylemonger ( 686302 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:26PM (#20961029)
    I hate to say it but this isn't 1977. Your typical Trek fan has been gorged to satiety on Star Trek TV and movies. And considering the last efforts, the execrable "Nemesis" and TV's "Enterprise", nausea might be a better word for it than satiety. The cast is irrelevant at this point. Trek must be allowed to die instead of continuing in this horrible parody of life.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:27PM (#20961035)
    Get off your high horse (or should I say bagpipes), that's why they call it ACTING sucka.
  • Re:let it die (Score:5, Insightful)

    by moderatorrater ( 1095745 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:33PM (#20961073)
    Apparently they've started from scratch on everyone working on this so that there's the slightest chance of this being a decent movie.

    What I don't understand is why we need a story on every single person that's cast for a role. Do you think that, maybe in a week, we can just post one story on the entire cast instead?
  • Impossible. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by khasim ( 1285 ) <brandioch.conner@gmail.com> on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:39PM (#20961147)
    The problem with making a Star Trek Babies movie is that there is absolutely NO THREAT to any of the characters.

    So what if baby Kirk is shot in the head causing him to fall into an erupting volcano at the moment the planet's sun goes nova?

    It was all a dream sequence. Or it was a clone. Or a robot. Or the evil baby Kirk from the mirror dimension.

    And the more characters you take from TOS, the less the threat is.

    It's going to be like there's a HUGE TARGET painted on the one person on the bridge that isn't in TOS. And here is chief security office Ima Goingtodie.
  • Re:let it die (Score:3, Insightful)

    by B3ryllium ( 571199 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @06:46PM (#20961217) Homepage
    Go watch both seasons of Spaced, and then you'll realize why this news deserves its own article on Slashdot :)
  • by downix ( 84795 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @07:00PM (#20961329) Homepage
    When I heard of the movie project, I could do nothing but groan. "No more, Nemesis and Enterprise ruined it" was my thought. The franchise had been going down ever since the Dominion war in DS9. But, as time went on, and more details came out, I paused, and thought on it a bit. Rather than rehashing an existing concept, or trying to "expand" with jelly-sex-rubdown scenes, the producer is actually trying to reinvigorate things, but not by some highbrow concept that blew up in our faces with Enterprise and Voyager, but with a return to what makes the show stick with us after all of these years. It wasn't the TNG intellectualism, or the DS9 anti-heroism, or Voyagers attempt at survivalism, or Enterprises horrible attempt at merging all 3. It was the original series, sticking to the basic storytelling engine based on classic westerns, using Freudian psychology paired with Jung archetypes, all with the "Bandwagon to the Stars." By ripping away the layers of overdone polish and returning to the core essence of the show, then maybe, just maybe there stands a chance. Every casting choice made shows a deep understanding of this core concept. The actor choices being ideal canidates for the archetype or the psychological core element of the role being played. This gives me hope for the series I have not held for a very long time.
  • by NJVil ( 154697 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @07:02PM (#20961357)
    Is the science fiction genre so fscking bankrupt for ideas that it needs to rehash ToS? ToS was a good enough series in its time, but who is this abomination of a movie designed to appeal to? What demographic wants to see this? Who wants to see Kirk played by anyone but Shatner? The man has all but ruined the role for anyone else. Why not take these actors and cast them in roles they can make their own instead of hamstringing them with the legacies of Nimoy and Shatner?

    It's just like the abysmally stupid "Bionic Woman" nonsense; some bonehead executive decided to trot an old standard (for which some people have nostalgia) of carbonite and to "reimagine" it for a new generation... whatever the hell that means... Or the moronic Underdog movie. Or one of any other cinematic turds splattered across the big screen in the past few years. Damn.

    There have been worlds of awesome science fiction written in the past few years that could easily be adopted to the big screen. For example, "The Golden Compass" is being released this winter and looks promising. However, what do we usually get? More of the same unimaginative crap that's driven people away from the major networks and theatres.
  • by MsGeek ( 162936 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @07:19PM (#20961513) Homepage Journal
    Get a REAL Scot to do it. Ewan McGregor for the win. Sure, it would mean paying him silly money for it, but it would mean Ewan would get to leave his mark on not just one, but the EXACTA of geek icon movie series.

    Besides, Scotty always seemed older than everyone except Bones McCoy on TOS.

    Although one thing...could Ewan still do the thick-as-porridge Scots brogue he did in "Trainspotting" that required anyone not from north of Hadrian's Wall to put the closed-captioning on when watching the movie? One wonders.
  • by Scrameustache ( 459504 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @07:37PM (#20961663) Homepage Journal

    From my admittedly small sample size of three, people familiar with the trademark are not pleased with this.
    And the chances that, sooner or later, these three people will pay good money to see it are... what, 100%?
  • Re:Impossible. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by oldmanpanda ( 716466 ) on Friday October 12, 2007 @10:25PM (#20962731)
    Don't patronize us. We've all seen episode #45, The Gamesters of Triskelion.
  • by some damn guy ( 564195 ) on Saturday October 13, 2007 @04:01AM (#20964149)
    I used to laugh at Al Gore jokes... until Dec 2000 or so...

    Just haven't been as funny these last 7 years... dunno what it is...
  • by Mana Mana ( 16072 ) on Saturday October 13, 2007 @07:25AM (#20964801) Homepage
    When one of these lists-of-unknowns rolls out invariably again, can one of you brilliant posters roll out a web page with jpgs of these folks and get yourself modded informative! Ahhh, please. It's a drag to copy and paste and search repeat.

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...