Law Firm Claims Copyright on View of HTML Source 601
An anonymous reader writes "A law firm with all sorts of interesting views on copyright has decided to go the extra mile. As reported on Tech Dirt, they've decided that viewing the HTML source of their site is a violation of copyright. From the site's EULA: 'We also own all of the code, including the HTML code, and all content. As you may know, you can view the HTML code with a standard browser. We do not permit you to view such code since we consider it to be our intellectual property protected by the copyright laws. You are therefore not authorized to do so.'"
oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
:o
Cache-Control: no-render (Score:5, Funny)
Authorize my foot in your asses. (Score:5, Funny)
Smells good.
they seem a bit stressed (Score:5, Funny)
I own this! (Score:2, Funny)
I'm 'wget' - come arrest me! (Score:5, Funny)
% while 1
while? wget -rm -np http://www.cybertriallawyer.com/ [cybertriallawyer.com]
while? sleep 10
while? rm -rf *
while? end
that'll keep 'em entertained. oh, and me, too.
Re:Useless (Score:3, Funny)
I was going to prove it by posting their HTML source here, but posting any significant chunk of it, just to show what I think of their precious copyright, triggered the lameness filter. How apropos.
In other words... (Score:5, Funny)
You're in violation (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Suggested technical fix (Score:3, Funny)
Re:For those who are too lazy to do some digging.. (Score:3, Funny)
Bah! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:For those who are too lazy to do some digging.. (Score:5, Funny)
"we also are intimately familiar with the "hacking" industry"
"We maintain records of IP addresses and other information contained in log files"
"We also do not allow any links to our site without our express permission"
Well, you're screwed now. They're hackers, they have your IP, and you linked to their site.
"you should not make any copies of any part of this website in any way"
Of course, I'm in trouble too because the every act of viewing their page required me to download a copy of it. I suppose they could put their website on a CD, then mail it to everybody who calls in and asks to visit their website.
Morons.
Re:they seem a bit stressed (Score:5, Funny)
RFC 1149 fetch needed (Score:5, Funny)
Then to archive the transmit and receive buffers in a book.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html [faqs.org]
--
Frame Format
The IP datagram is printed, on a small scroll of paper, in
hexadecimal, with each octet separated by whitestuff and blackstuff.
The scroll of paper is wrapped around one leg of the avian carrier.
A band of duct tape is used to secure the datagram's edges. The
bandwidth is limited to the leg length. The MTU is variable, and
paradoxically, generally increases with increased carrier age. A
typical MTU is 256 milligrams. Some datagram padding may be needed.
Upon receipt, the duct tape is removed and the paper copy of the
datagram is optically scanned into a electronically transmittable
form.
--
Re:Well then (Score:3, Funny)
Next website I do... (Score:4, Funny)
Their HTML code revealed (Score:5, Funny)
Ha ha ha, not only can I view their precious HTML code, I'm posting it to Slashdot for all the world to see!
Re:Suggested technical fix (Score:3, Funny)
I see you've read "HTML for lawyers".
Re:Content? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Cache-Control: no-render (Score:5, Funny)
Re:they seem a bit stressed (Score:5, Funny)
Some of their code revealed!!!!one1 (Score:5, Funny)
<html>
<p>
And the most valuable, apparently:
<font>
(posted anonymous for obvious reasons)
Now sue me. Pls ! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:For those who are too lazy to do some digging.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Now sue me. Pls ! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Now sue me. Pls ! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:For those who are too lazy to do some digging.. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Generated by a Tool for Tools (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I'm 'wget' - come arrest me! (Score:5, Funny)
If you're going to fill their logs, the least you could do is add inappropriate referrer urls.
"Why are we getting hits from this .... tub ... girl. You'd better check out this site so we can send a cease and desist letter."
Re:Cache-Control: no-render (Score:2, Funny)
<p cass="bodyB">By using our website, you agree to the following:</p>
cass? Yes what about it?
Wouldn't it be a hoot if their site got hacked? (Score:5, Funny)
"we also are intimately familiar with the "hacking" industry. In fact, our website gets updated by the hacking industry from time to time."
"We maintain records of IP addresses and other information contained in log files. Soon we will figure out how to actually look at those log files to see what information is contained there."
"We also do not allow any links to our site without our express permission. In fact, you are not allowed to look at our web site without our permission. Hey, are you looking at this site right now? Stop that! Fine, our lawyers will be contacting you shortly."
Re:Now sue me. Pls ! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:they seem a bit stressed (Score:5, Funny)
int addFour ( int x ) {
return (x - 4);
}
Re:they seem a bit stressed (Score:5, Funny)
Funny. I was thinking the same thing. Only I was thinking they need to go get FUCKED.
Re:Now sue me. Pls ! (Score:2, Funny)
Indeed. It just never mentioned what direction to mod you.
Well, that means that... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:You're in violation.. not linking (Score:4, Funny)
"# apachectl stop"
it prevents people from linking to your content (at least via port 80) and stops them from viewing your source code. As a bonus it also cuts bandwidth bills.
Use it today! A better internet experience for all.
Re:These lawyers ought to know better (Score:5, Funny)
Re:they seem a bit stressed (Score:4, Funny)
Re:dynamic html (Score:1, Funny)
But congratulations on doing a google search and posting a paragraph from the first page you found.
Re:These lawyers ought to know better (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cache-Control: no-render (Score:2, Funny)