The New School of Videographers 103
Provataki writes "This editorial discusses the impending explosion of hobbyist artistic videographers, in the same way that happened with digital photography just a few short years ago. The article claims that it's time camera manufacturers create camcorders equivalent in principle to the cheap DSLRs that we currently enjoy. Some beautiful HD footage, shot by amateurs, is shown too."
But do they know how to write? (Score:5, Interesting)
Over the coming next few years it'll be really interesting to see what *does* happen with more technology and less expense in the hands of amateurs and of professionals and of the "aspiring" class stuck between the two. But for now, YouTube ahoy.
Re:crash way too much? (Score:2, Interesting)
It's also not very intuitive. Again, once you learn it it's not bad, but for someone who's new to it it can be tough. This was the issue my brother ran into; his PC runs Ubuntu quite well, and when he wanted to edit video I suggested Cinelerra. He used it for a while, but decided to invest in a used Mac just for Final Cut.
So, it's a powerful program, and worth looking into. This company [linuxmediaarts.com] actually makes turnkey Linux editing systems using Cinelerra, so it has potential.
Re:The quick answer? No. (Score:3, Interesting)
Sound is essential to a great production. I can remember in more difficult times watching a rented movie on a fourteen inch TV, but with stereo sound going to a great set of speakers. (It was a phenomenal film called Delicatessan.) The presentation was terrific, and you completely forgot that the screen was tiny -- compared to the 32 inch screen I watch now.
The sound and the pictures are supposed to support each other -- if there's clearly a mismatch, it's painful to watch and listen. If there's a really good, it becomes hypnotizing -- think Koyanniqatski (mis-spelled, I'm sure).