Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
It's funny.  Laugh. Businesses Technology

Wired's 2007 Vaporware Awards 195

Braedley sends word that Wired's annual vaporware list is up, and a number of products this community has discussed made the cut. The top spot, the position of most dishonor, was almost a foregone conclusion. "Another December, another list, another crowning achievement by the Emperor of the Ethereal, the Head Honcho of Hype, Duke Nukem Forever. We were going to disqualify him out of pity, but Sir Duke is back for 2007 thanks to a few leaked screenshots and an overwhelming number of votes. DNF creators 3D Realms even chose this week to debut a well-publicized video trailer for Duke's long-awaited return. Alas, a trailer is not a game, so — long live the king!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wired's 2007 Vaporware Awards

Comments Filter:
  • On Purpose? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Vthornheart ( 745224 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @11:49AM (#21765216)
    Maybe they keep releasing Duke Nukem screenshots on occasion as some kind of a running gag? I guess the real joke's on Duke Nukem fans in that case. =)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20, 2007 @11:49AM (#21765220)
    Who the hell still actually reads or cares what Wired has to say about anything?

  • by Applekid ( 993327 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @11:50AM (#21765234)
    So, are you saying that by being true vaporware they can live on in glory in a fictional world? Such that, in non-existance we are spared from the crushing mediocrity of "meh"?

    Truly philosophical.
  • Diablo III? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cenice ( 42933 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @11:51AM (#21765240)
    How can an unannounced product be vaporware?
  • by PinkyDead ( 862370 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:01PM (#21765374) Journal
    It might have been better for Vista if it had remained vaporware.
  • Re:On Purpose? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Ngarrang ( 1023425 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:05PM (#21765440) Journal
    Realistic Duke Nukem fans have long accepted that DNF is only theory. Crazy DN fans continue to believe that DNF will be released. I am happy with DN3D on DOS.
  • by bennomatic ( 691188 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:15PM (#21765586) Homepage
    OK, I assume this has been pointed out before, but DNF also stands for "Did not finish", and is used in races to denote the place of a driver who never crossed the finish line.

    When I saw DNF in your post and in a glance-through of the article, I thought you/they were using DNF to denote vaporware status to one of the products until I realized that you (and probably they) were specifically referring to Duke.

    This makes me think that they never planned to finish DNF; this is all just a big joke, right from day one.

  • by cowscows ( 103644 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:32PM (#21765834) Journal
    Be fair. Will Wright has successfully produced plenty of excellent games. That's not to say that Spore will necessarily be the earth shattering game experience that same people are saying it will, but I think someone like Mr. Wright has at least earned the benefit of the doubt that he'll release a game, and that it'll likely be at least halfway decent.

    For better or worse, you can't just secretly develop a product in a basement somewhere and then suddenly have them lining store shelves the next day. One company that tries really hard to do that is Apple, and they're constantly getting bashed from many directions due to their obsession with secrecy.

    While I'm not making any judgements about you personally, the reality is that consumers as a whole seem to enjoy the hype just as much as the marketing departments do. There are piles of websites dedicated to finding and sharing advanced info, future product hints, and scheming up potential company directions. Any time there's a demand for such information, someone's going to provide it. The fact that that creates an opportunity for cranks and charlatans to scam a few bucks is just a side effect.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:33PM (#21765850)
    If you want politics

    Step 1) www.digg.com
    Step 2) vote on Ron Paul
    Step 3) Blame everything on Bush/Cheney and scream for impeachment
    Step 4) ...
    Step 5) Profit

    This is a TECH site. NOT politics. There are plenty of places to bitch about the slime bag snakes that slither their way to the top. After politics, why not introduce a lolcats section, a sports section, etc. There are places elsewhere for that. I for one welcome one of the few communities that has stayed true to its roots and not caved in to crap like politics (Stories about how politics affects tech is a different subject than OMG THEY STOLE THE 2004 ELECTION!!! or Blood for oil bullshit)

    Just as a summary: Fuck politics. Keep that shit outta my nerd paradise. /rant
  • by Farmer Tim ( 530755 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @12:49PM (#21766070) Journal
    Sure something of more substance could have been #10.

    If it had substance, surely it wouldn't be vapour...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:02PM (#21766260)
    Absolutely, that was my point! Look at HURD/HIRD. It has a stupid geek-clever name, an ideologically pure license, an academically elegant design and no users. If it ever passed into use by anyone sane, it'd be just some other useless OS.
  • Re:Diablo III? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by kitsunewarlock ( 971818 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:04PM (#21766278) Journal
    When its released by a company that now relies almost solely on sequels and franchises to the extent that they need no announcement?
  • by Bananatree3 ( 872975 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:08PM (#21766328)
    1)Create Duke Nukem
    2)Make big fuss over sequal
    3)Don't deliver, but make big deal for next decade
    4)Once DNF is a household name, deliver
    5)Profit!!

    Seriously though, 3D Realms has found a good formula to get its namebrand out. I mean, what gamer hasn't heard of Duke Nukem Forever? It's the most famous non-game in gaming history. Weight for weight, DNF has more name recognition than even probably Halo. It almost behooves them to release it. It will turn every gamer's head 180 with "WTF?! DNF is finally been released!". Even if the game is say 7/10, you can guerentee a lot of copies would be sold just out of name recognition alone.



  • by Bogtha ( 906264 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:20PM (#21766496)

    OLPC produced a couple of semi-solid deals out of their usual fog of hype

    The project was only announced in 2005! How can they have a "usual fog of hype"? Isn't two years to bring something like that to fruition pretty damn reasonable?

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:45PM (#21766792)
    why beat up on MS more (oh, yeah, because it's fun!).

    Actually, I always thought it was because the pizza delivery boys around here didn't know enough about other tech to have a conversation about anything else.

    Just like that jerk off a few weeks back who got modded up (!!) claiming that Windows XP Pro was a server edition product and that XP Home was what everyone used on desktops.

    There aren't enough people on Slashdot who have a clue about anything to have a full conversation over so we need to have memes to fill in the silence that would normally be time most people take to think before they open their traps and let some stupid shit fall out. This is the same reason the political section is in such high demand around here.
  • by gid ( 5195 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:49PM (#21766840) Homepage
    Maybe they didn't want to piss off Sam and Ivan Raimi since that line was stolen from Army of Darkness.
  • Re:I for one (Score:5, Insightful)

    by jdjbuffalo ( 318589 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @01:57PM (#21766940) Journal
    I would be nice to see some changes to it. I was using it for several months until they changed it to display only 50 messages at once. I couldn't stand pressing the "More" button 10 times per story so I stopped using it.

    I really don't like the old system after using the new one but I can't stand the 50 message limit. They should make the "50" be adjustable to include 50,100,200,300,400,500,unlimited. While there was certainly problems with their Javascript timing out for big threads it wasn't too bad most of the time. They certainly still have work to do to optimize the code but the adjustable number of messages feature would certainly help in the mean time.

    Hopefully the Taco will see this message and make the adjustment ;-)
  • by operagost ( 62405 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @02:36PM (#21767534) Homepage Journal

    Unless they fuck up something fundamental, you cannot spend a decade working on something to have something so-so at the end.
    Yes you can. [wikipedia.org]
  • by Buran ( 150348 ) on Thursday December 20, 2007 @05:56PM (#21771142)
    Daikatana [wikipedia.org], anyone?

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...