Blu-ray Player Prices Hit 2008 Highs 318
An anonymous reader writes "HD DVD is almost gone and Blu-ray prices are already on their way up. TG Daily went through average retail prices of some of the popular Blu-ray players and found that you should expect to pay at least $400 for an entry-level Blu-ray player, while you could get a player for less than $330 in February. It really should not be a surprise for all of us, but it is interesting to see how quickly retail adjusted to the new situation and increased prices."
Re:PS3 (Score:5, Informative)
Price go up, price go down (Score:5, Informative)
Market forces at work
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Informative)
Monopoly? Last I heard, virtually every major CE manufacturer with the exception of Toshiba was competing for the blu ray money in your pocket. Even Toshiba has a 50% stake in a company producing blu ray drives so I'm sure they come out of their period of mourning soon enough.
Prices will drop through competition and economies of scale.
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:3, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:PS3 Sales the motivator here? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Still competing with DVD (Score:3, Informative)
So my impression that Blu-ray rises just because people start to see reasonable displays to watch those HD discs with. NOW there is reason to addopt it. Sadly for Microsoft and people who oppose Sony, they won this time. In fact, with right strategy.
Yes, I left out all issue with DRM, because it doesn't matter for common people. Like it or not.
Of course, just mine two cents,
Peter.
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Informative)
This time its different because the blu-ray consortium is not giving licenses to tom-dick-harry shop in china to make cheap players. So unlike the DVD, this time around we wont be seeing cheap DVD players. I still remember that it was some Chinese brand (apex?) which broke the $100 barrier for DVD-players and became the largest selling dvd player right behind Sony. With tighter licensing restrictions, thats not going to happen this time around with Blu-ray payers
Re:hmm (Score:3, Informative)
People will *know* that the reason HD-DVD is cheap is because it's dead. That's not a good long-term plan. At best, some studios might release a few more films in HD-DVD format than they might have otherwise.
A similar suggestion was made when HD-DVD was starting to seriously flounder, but before it was clear that it was going to be abandoned. Toshiba slashed the prices [slashdot.org], and some thought it might kick-start things. Even that was clearly a desparate measure, but things were different then- the race was still going.
Now the HD-DVD horse is dead, the defibrilators have been packed away and the vets have gone home.
It's not going to happen.
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.nerd-out.com/darrenk/600/history.htm [nerd-out.com]
It was the model to have (with the correct firmware revision) with its famous "Engineering Menu" which allowed the "Macrovision" encoding to be *disabled* and you could change it to *any* region code as many times as you desired.
DRM sucks. This Apex model *Proved* that fact to me with its 'usefulness' back in 2000 (when I took off work early to go buy one from Circuit City). It's now 8 Years old and still kicking! Good Times.
Re:Just kill it already. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:4, Informative)
You mean like PiP? Sure did, the _300_ commentary was pretty sweet (once I got a disc that wouldn't freeze), and the 1st season of Star Trek is all about the PiP..
Networking? _Transformers_ had downloadable images, presumably _Be Kind Rewind_ would have been great with this feature (user-contributed sweded videos)...
Annoying memes. (Score:4, Informative)
This is a classic example of a free market failure. One player paid an enourmous amount of money ($400 million) to kill the other player. Now that the other player is as good as gone, the prices have risen.
This is an excellent example where the free market fails: corporate collusion destroyed it.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:3, Informative)
I really don't see many desktop apps that demand more than 2GB of RAM. I'm certainly not rushing out to upgrade any of my 2GB machines.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:-1, Informative)
Yeah, reducing trade is such a great idea... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:3, Informative)
-The DVD player I bought in 1999 had component video output and optical/co-ax surround output
-Dolby Digital surround was part of the ORIGINAL spec for DVD
-I bought a reciever too early. It supported DD but not DTS. Saving Private Ryan only had surround for DTS, the DD track was stereo. I was angry.
-New profile Blu-Ray players will NOT be $200 at christmas. What makes you think this?
Re:Props for Big Black mention -old time fav (Score:3, Informative)
But I don't think it's DPI that really defines the limit here;
According to http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vision/rodcone.html [gsu.edu] there are about 120 million rods in the human eye.
Even though they aren't evenly distributed, I'd hazard that a 12k x 10k display will be close enough to human perception that further "improvements" in resolution won't be discernible.
We aren't there yet, but it doesn't seem all that far off either.
-- Should you believe authority without question?
Re:Still competing with DVD (Score:2, Informative)
Personally, I just gave up Dish so I could enjoy TivoHD; the interface means more to me than being able to stick it to my crappy cable company.
Re:Still competing with DVD (Score:-1, Informative)
(The fine print)...
TiVo® HD and Series3(TM) HD DVR: Does not support satellite service.
Sorry...
Re:Just kill it already. (Score:3, Informative)
The [www.cbc.ca] dispute [wikipedia.org] is [thestar.com] about [yahoo.com] softwood [209.85.173.104]. This can be confirmed in about two minutes on Google.
and NAFTA clearly shouldn't apply when you are destroying the environment to undercut your competitors.
Do you really think that the US was imposing duties for environmental reasons? Seriously?
Can't argue with you about the government's action re: the preservation of the spotted owl [davidsuzuki.org] though. I'm not a big fan of North America's lack of respect for the environment as a whole. Then again, I could be doing a hell of a lot more personally.
Re:Not quite (Score:3, Informative)