Blu-ray Player Prices Hit 2008 Highs 318
An anonymous reader writes "HD DVD is almost gone and Blu-ray prices are already on their way up. TG Daily went through average retail prices of some of the popular Blu-ray players and found that you should expect to pay at least $400 for an entry-level Blu-ray player, while you could get a player for less than $330 in February. It really should not be a surprise for all of us, but it is interesting to see how quickly retail adjusted to the new situation and increased prices."
Great- no more format war! (Score:1, Insightful)
PS3 Sales the motivator here? (Score:4, Insightful)
Well blow me over with a wistle (Score:2, Insightful)
The price has little to do with cost, but more to do with what you can get away with.
Ultimately making the consumer more pessemistic
G
Supply and demand at work (Score:3, Insightful)
Prices in Euros (Score:5, Insightful)
Not that this is a bad thing - it will help to correct the imbalances in the US economy far more than bleating about NAFTA or whatever other nonsense is coming out of your politicians at the moment...
Psst... you haven't won the war yet. (Score:5, Insightful)
Some advice to the Blu-Ray camp: You still haven't convinced us to buy, and raising prices ain't gonna help things.
Alternative Theory: Joe Consumer sees $400 DVD (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Insightful)
Calling Sony's victory with Blu-Ray over HD-DVD a "monopoly" is like saying Sirius' proposed merger with XMSR is a monopoly.
No sir, I don't buy it. With as many entertainment and content distribution options completing in the Audio and Visual domains... no one company can ever establish a monopoly. The only thing that can happen is the companies become entrenched with technology that isn't adopted, supported, or interoperated with and that leads to business failure.
And yes, Sony bought the format war with hundreds of millions of potentially well-spend bribes, but their is no way for them to bribe there way to some kind of vertically-integrated "entertainment" monopoly. It would cost too much. I am not worried, unless they make a play at merging with Comcast or something.
Re:Still competing with DVD (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Insightful)
Here's what's going on: both Blu Ray and HD-DVD players were being sold at a minimal profit — a loss, even — because both sides were trying to grab market share. End of format war, end of need to grab market share.
The problem has been that everybody with any brains has been waiting for the format war to end before plunking down their hard-earned cash. When consumers don't buy, sales are low, and when sales are low, there are no economies of scale. No economies of scale means high manufacturing costs, and thus high retail costs — unless the product is being sold at a loss.
So of course prices go up. But that's a short term thing. Right now, every consumer electronics company on the planet is gearing up to manufacture Blu Ray players by the million. When you manufacture something on that scale (especially electronics, where the fundamental technology is subject to Moore's Law) prices crash.
In a year or two, Blu Ray players will be as cheap as DVD players are now.
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:4, Insightful)
Sometimes I wonder if the anti-PS3 crowd are simply those people who publicly predicted its failure and are now desperate not to be proven wrong. e.g. the "I'd rather have trousers full of rabid ferrets than buy a PS3!!!" meme.
I bought a PS3 out of curiosity with Blu Ray, and after watching 2001 and A Clockwork Orange in HD (would buy Eyes Wide Shut for the nudie bits, but wife objects), I'd say it was well worth it if you're a film buff.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Still competing with DVD (Score:4, Insightful)
I have a reasonably display (37") for HD and really dont have a need to jump to the format. DVDs from my old Sony 480p DVD player look amazing. What looks terrible is my SD directivo. Right now I'm motivated to buy a HD tivo and HD service from directv. The cost of this for 12 months is what a bluray player costs me today. I watch more TV than I do movies. I seriously doubt I'm unique in this regard.
That said, the first thing people are going to do when they get an HD set is pay for HD cable or satellite. They arent going to spend 600 dollars on some fancy player for movies. They might if it costs 200 dollars or less, but that wont happen for a long time if ever. Think of all the HD content Im going to get for only 10 dollars more than Im paying now.
That said I doubt the digital download revolution will ever happen but HD via cable and satellite is here. Toss in some on-demand services and theres very little incentive to get a bluray player. For film geeks and videophiles it'll be a must-have, but then again so was the laserdisc.
Re:Psst... you haven't won the war yet. (Score:3, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:4, Insightful)
Also I think most PCs, even cheap ones, that you see from here on out are going to come with 3GB of RAM or more, since you need that in order to run Vista without losing your mind.
By the way, your first paragraph is absolutely right. Even if I did have an HDTV (I don't), and didn't have a ban on Sony-backed crap in my house (I do), I would wait a while on buying a Blu-Ray player at these prices. $200? Try $50.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Insightful)
This format (I'm not going to call it a standard) is much more tightly controlled than DVD or the CD.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm no PS3 zealot, but the system is not only the most popular BD player (by a huge margin), but it's also what the average person thinks of when they hear the word Blu-Ray. Sony's decision to pin the hopes of their new format on a game machine that just so happens to be very easily updated with whatever future tech Sony invents was a clever move by the firm, and it's going to continue to pay off, regardless of how inferior the other BD players might be.
To the average person, those other Blu-Ray players simply don't exist.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:5, Insightful)
You have, in one posting both lambasted the wastefulness of our society and managed to take a jab at the download model. So which is it? The HD wars left me a bit blase regarding the upgrade. Coincidentally, my old DVD player works as well. Thus, I will most likely avoid purchasing a BD player. I am aware that there is a perfectly viable market for BD, I won't debate it. Your arguments though seem to be based on the presumption that BD is more "futureproof". This, I would argue is irrelevant. It seems plausable that consumers would opt for a disc-less system, given a viable source for HD content and a HT player with a few TB of storage. I may very well be off the rocker on this, but most of the arguments against it also applied to Mp3s not so long ago.
I suppose my point is that yes, DVD still works. The HD content on television isn't overly compelling. If I have a burning desire to watch a movie in HD, I download it. So far, Planet Earth is the sole HD movie that imo was worth watching in HD. I'll wait to buy until they're either far less expensive or the features and content unavailable in DVD, are compelling enough. If at that time, there is no alternative then yes... I will eat my hat and purchase a BD.
Not quite (Score:1, Insightful)
That count is...um 1. Sony. Yeah, you can get others, but not easily. So let's give you an additional 1/2 because you're technically right. For all intents and purposes, only Sony is making players. There's another company making them but they're currently getting sued for making players that actually don't work. At anything.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Great- no more format war! (Score:5, Insightful)
Definitely*. Try producing a DVD player in the US without paying a lot of money to the DVD copy control association [dvdcca.org] and agreeing to implement their DRM. It won't take you long to hear from their lawyers. It only a few days for ME to hear from them back when I hosted some open source DVD stuff on my web server.
* I'm assuming you're talking about commercial, consumer video DVD stuff here since that's what the whole thread is about.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:3, Insightful)
Nothing but the law. Unless you program your own DRM circumvention software, you have to obtain it from someone who is breaking the law simply by giving/selling it to you.
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Look how quickly I adjust too (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think you understand this market. The sub $200 is when low income people buy players whereas middle income and high income people will adopt way before that point. There are a lot of people in the "middle income" bracket who have $5k entertainment setups and they won't have a problem with $200.
d
But who cares ? (Score:2, Insightful)