Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Science

Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead At 90 538

Many readers are sending in word that Arthur C. Clarke has died in Sri Lanka. He wrote over 100 books including 2001: A Space Odyssey and Rendezvous With Rama, and popularized the ideas of geosynchronous communications satellites and space elevators.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead At 90

Comments Filter:
  • Not Just the Fiction (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fishybell ( 516991 ) <.moc.liamtoh. .ta. .llebyhsif.> on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:29PM (#22788994) Homepage Journal
    The biggest addition to society that Clarke, and all other science fiction writers, have added is not in the works of fiction themselves, but the spark of imagination infused in those reading it. Some will take that spark and build their lives around it turning fiction to fact.


    The world will miss him.

  • Re:shame. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rucs_hack ( 784150 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:35PM (#22789050)
    True

    'Islands in the Sky' Blew me away when I first read it as a child, I still consider it to be one of the most prophetic of all SF books. I recently spent rather a lot of money of a 1952 paperback edition of same.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:37PM (#22789076)
    Funniest Arthur C.C. story I ever read I forget the name of - some pulp paperback published in the 50's.

    It's about a journalist traveling to Mars to write about the colony there to try and encourage more Earth-folk to emigrate there.

    Some good predictions - the ship computer held a complete library of every book and music recording ever made for the entertainment of passengers and crew.

    And some not so good - The journalist typed up an article in space on a manual type-writer and sent it back to Earth via fax.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:39PM (#22789118)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by DMoylan ( 65079 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:45PM (#22789224)
    i prefer his third law 'Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'

    the sci fi show stargate seems to be based on it. loved that they referred to him in show when mentioning how to create a sun.

    it's a great loss but he's left behind so many books and fired the imagination of so many people that i can only ask the question are there writers writing today who will have such an impact?
  • by benerivo ( 1136967 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:49PM (#22789286)
    This may lead to some of his novels being produced for the cinema. Rendezvous with Rama, starring Morgan Freeman, is out next year and i hope it does the book justice. The novel is superb.
  • by dmoo ( 1255628 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:49PM (#22789288)
    First book I ever read twice was "Islands in the Sky". Not one of his best by any means but as a kid of about 10 I guess, I got into it enough to read it again. RIP
  • by jd ( 1658 ) <imipak@ y a hoo.com> on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:51PM (#22789318) Homepage Journal
    ...it had better have stars and monoliths. I was a fan of many of his books - Islands in the Sky, 2001, 2010, Rendezvous with Rama. They were brilliant, detailed, imaginative and really achieved what they set out to. Some of his other stuff - Cradle, 2061, Imperial Earth, and the later Rama books - didn't really appeal to me in the same way.

    In terms of his factual writings, I have many of his articles that were written for Wireless World, including the letter and two follow-up articles on geostationary satellites. Those three in particular can be found on the web - many people have scanned them in. They're well worth reading. He was a highly skilled writer on technical stuff. Technical writers today should pay attention to them and learn.

  • ...I shed a tear - and then I felt...ashamed...why?

    Why is it that when one cries at a movie involving war heroes or romance it is socially acceptable, but when I become choked-up not just about the passing of one of our greats - as I have today - but at the whole of scientific discovery I feel somehow, I'm not sure...I guess just ashamed.

    This happens to me now and then. Like when I saw a documentary on mitochondrial eve, and I became full of such emotion about the interconnectedness of us all that I had to leave the room lest my wife see me weep (not that she would ridicule me, just because).

    Why should I not be proud of my tears? Why, even in this day, surrounded by so much intellect and accepting cultures should I still not disclose this little secret to anyone except the pseudo-anonymous like-minds on this website?...

    Why should we not all weep at the stars?
  • Re:shame. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Penguinisto ( 415985 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:54PM (#22789350) Journal
    Light of Other Days.

    It was either a prophesy or a forewarning on society and privacy - you pick. Even now it gives me the shivers thinking about it... and damned few SciFi books (of which I've read way too many) can do that.

    /P

  • by LoveMe2Times ( 416048 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:56PM (#22789366) Homepage Journal
    StarChild, are you now speeding amoung the stars
    finding your great connexion
    with the majesty that lies buried in mens' hearts
    watching and waiting to see if those you left behind
    will understand your message before it's too late

    arthur c clarks should have been done in threes
    a backup seer always ready
    to disarm warmongering nukes from Mercury or even Imperial Earth
    leading us across a bridge to the heavens and a rendezvous with destiny
    counting the nine billion names of god as they are one and none

    now we carbon based bipeds must confront childhood's end
    with a memory in our hearts
    of one who changed the world with intelligence, nobility and grace
    rest in peace, arthur c clarke, you will be forgotten all too soon
    but not for a little while yet
  • Death in threes (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cheebie ( 459397 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @06:58PM (#22789410)
    First Gygax, then Clarke. Who will be geek number three?

    Stallman [xkcd.com] had better keep an eye out for ninjas.
  • One of the masters (Score:4, Interesting)

    by SystemFault ( 876435 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:04PM (#22789470)
    Clarke was certainly one of the masters of SF and popular space writing; also, he was my personal favorite.

    His story "How I Lost a Billion Dollars in My Spare Time" about his failure to patent his geosynchronous communication satellite network concept is simultaneously sad and funny. He got everything right except he thought that the satellites needed to be crewed because of the requirements of changing burnt out vacuum tubes! Too bad the transistor was still ten years away at the time.

    More than once in his writings he made the claim that he was proud to be an atheist. Somehow I hope that he wasn't disappointed being wrong and instead was pleasantly surprised.
  • by fermion ( 181285 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:05PM (#22789502) Homepage Journal
    Clarke is part of a select group of people who really thought about what the machine might do, and what is might do to societal norms, and how things might go down differently given the use of the machines. It is not just space opera. It is not just a plot device. It is a deep thought of the long term impact of the industrial revelation. At the time when thes Clarke and other were writing the full effects of the industrial revolution and the possibilities were just becoming fully apparent. We know has machines and the learned techniques to build cylindrical shells big enough to construct a machine that would take a person to the moon. We were beginning to develop machines that would allow us to build a autonomous programing computing machine, that we would someday, we thought, lead to machines that would help us in our daily lives.

    They got so much wrong, but the issues they got right. We don't have flying cars, but we are different people due to technology. We do not get our food from cubes, but the fast food is just presented manner meant to imitate the food it replaces. We had pocket calculators long before the cleaning work was autonomously taken over by machine, but the roomba exists. Children are being trained in ware fare using video games. The basis of our interactions are being changed by rapid instantaneous communication. Our basic functions, such as sex, have been changed by the picture phone and internet. No longer must anyone settle for the person next door, when one can surf for an attractive specimen in the morning, text during class, and set up the date for the evening at a bus stop midway between the two of you. In fact, we never have to settle when everything can be custom made to out specifications.

    There are two things that disappoint me about many so-called intellectuals. The first is that they don't seem to read enough history. The second is that don't seem to read enough science fiction. To me this strikes me as a person who knows not where they came from, and who knows not where they are going. All they know is what is happening at the moment, their immediate desires, and all they care about is what they must do to fulfill those desires.

    Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history. His life defines him as a man who knew where he as the rest of us were likely going. I wonder what the world would be like if our leaders were like this. People of history and vision, rather than people who apparently do not even both to hold a book correctly [about.com], and proudly states that they never read, or that they read the cliff notes versions. I am reminded of John F. Kennedy, the person who pushed the nation to space, for better or worse. It is claimed in Thirteen Days that JFK had read the Guns of August, did understand that many conflicts start because leaders assume they know what the other party is thinking, and then constructs inflexible plans based on those assumptions. As he knew history, he could do something different in his attempt to achieve a result. Again, history and vision of the future. Something we are sorely lacking, and something that is all too often ridiculed by those who are justing looking at how to swindle their first million by the time they are 25.

  • by beadfulthings ( 975812 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:06PM (#22789506) Journal
    My first exposure to Clarke wasn't fiction at all but a non-fiction, non-technical look at the future of space travel called "The Exploration of Space." My father must have acquired it in the early Fifties. It was completely understandable to a young reader, and the beautiful illustrations fired the imagination. I went hunting for it on my shelves just now and could not find it; I'm thinking one of my offsprigs must have made off with it just as I appropriated it from my dad when I left home. I was in grammar school when I first read it--didn't encounter his fiction until I was somewhat older. I treasure the memory of it because it wasn't about "IF" we achieve interplanetary travel but rather about "WHEN" we achieve it.
  • Re:From TFA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ByteSlicer ( 735276 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:06PM (#22789516)

    the destination was changed to Jupiter for the sake of a shorter running time.
    Actually, the reason Jupiter was used in the movie was because special effects at the time were too crude too give a realistic image of the rings around Saturn.
  • by hyphen76 ( 1227364 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:09PM (#22789540)
    Indeed. I remember an interview of his where he discussed his ideas around satellites. The amusing thing to him was in fact how wrong he had been. He had imagined them as (relatively) enourmous, crewed space stations. A limitation of the technology at the time he was envisaging them, where you only had unreliable vacuum tubes (or whatever they would have been) which needed constant replacing, and hence a human crew. Also a salutory lesson out there for all the people who like to predict what the future holds technology wise. It is just impossible to know what is going to come along out of the blue and knock your world view on its head.
  • Also, the Newspad (Score:5, Interesting)

    by SystemFault ( 876435 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:15PM (#22789610)
    Let us be reminded that Clarke also wrote about the Newspad back in 1964; it appeared a couple of times in the film 2001, It was tablet computer accessing a world wide web, thirty years before it finally came to life. The only difference was that Clarke thought the URLs were numeric instead of ASCII strings.

    How cool it must have been for him to see so many of his visions turn into reality!
  • by vox69 ( 1225802 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:16PM (#22789616)
    I think he would have found this comment interesting and compelling, actually. RIP Sir Arthur
  • Re:From TFA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Deadstick ( 535032 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:17PM (#22789642)
    Much like Fantastic Voyage. The film producers hired Isaac Asimov to do a novelization from the screenplay, and not knowing the first thing about Asimov, told him he'd better hurry up on it because the film release was only six months away.

    Asimov dropped off the manuscript the following week, and it was promptly serialized in a magazine, leading many people to believe the film was made from an Asimov novel. Harry Kleiner, who wrote the original screenplay, was not amused...

    rj

  • by KlomDark ( 6370 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:17PM (#22789644) Homepage Journal
    You forgot to take your Paxil again today, didn't ya? ;)

    (I once forgot my Paxil for a couple days, and cried at the end of The Goonies. Really... Made no sense.)
  • Re:Ouch. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by anonypus_user ( 1236548 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:31PM (#22789804)
    "WIRED: Have you given any thought to what you'd want your epitaph to be? ACC: Oh, yes. I've often quoted it: "He never grew up; but he never stopped growing." now will some moderator with a soul please tag this story with this?
  • Re:shame. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Crazy Taco ( 1083423 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:34PM (#22789826)

    They say that the apalling sequels to Rendevous with Rama (an excellent work and a science-fiction classic) were basically entirely Gentry Lee's doing in spite of the prominent appearance of both names on the covers.

    This is a normal tactic in the book industry. It is a way for publishers to introduce new authors they think might be good to the reading public. If you saw a book by someone named Gentry Lee, how likely would you be to buy it if you had never heard of him before? Now, if you see Arthur C Clark's name on the cover, you would be likely to buy it. It's not a totally bad system, because it does help to get people who are really good authors established. My father is a best selling author and the first 6-10 of his books were coauthored with someone famous (who did little more than add a couple anecdotes and a forward).

    The big problems with the system, though, are when you have authors who are famous not checking up on the books they put their names on. This can happen either because they are lazy, getting old, or most likely just want another paycheck that they know a book with their name on it will bring. This can dilute the brand when bad books with their name on it get out, and sometimes hurt the author if thecoauthor gets into a scandal or does something disgraceful. That also happened to my dad when the famous coauthor did something entirely out of character with what the books were about.

    So here's the basic rule of thumb when buying books. If you see a book with two names on it (one of them being a famous person you recognize), IMMEDIATELY assume that the book was written by the other, unknown author with the name in small print. Know that you are taking a risk and getting a book that may not be as good as previous books by the famous author. However, also know someone at the publishing house thought this author was pretty good or they wouldn't be trying to publish him and get his name known. So there is some chance you may find a gem of a book, and if so, you should buy books from that author again. But know going in that 95% of the time you see coauthors on anything other than a university text, the famous coauthor did 0% of the work, and probably didn't even read the book before putting his name on it. You have no guarantee he liked it, and no guarantee of quality (because even if he wrote the forward, he didn't necessarilly read the book).

  • Re:shame. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MichaelSmith ( 789609 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:39PM (#22789874) Homepage Journal
    I think the Fountains of Paradise was his best. He certainly tried to make it his last great novel.

    I once read an early story of his "Travel by Wire" which is about teleportation. He goes into gory detail about what can happen to the traveller transported at too low a resolution, or when noise got into the line "They looked like nothing on Earth and very little on Venus or Mars". It ends with an observation about engineering: that the people who build things like this sometimes seem reluctant to travel on them, knowing how badly they were put together.

    At the other end of his career he wrote "Transit of Earth" which is a much better put together story but less fun to read.
  • I think that there are two different kinds of emotions here; with a movie, you're being 'forced' to feel the way you do, so it doesn't seem to be a 'real' emotion although it feels the same.
    In real life, if you will, these events cause really deep, pure emotions that are... well, difficult to handle at times.
  • by geekoid ( 135745 ) <dadinportlandNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:39PM (#22789882) Homepage Journal
    Yes, the same show that said "It's not a frequency we can here, let me turn up the volume." is definitely as technically sophisticated as Clark's writing.

    To answer your question, yes there are. I'm sure they will be recognized years from now.
  • by m4cph1sto ( 1110711 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:39PM (#22789886)
    ... including myself. Arthur C. Clarke's books are largely responsible for where I am today. I read The Fountains of Paradise as a kid and now I'm 2 years from my Ph.D. focusing on nanotechnology and ultra-high strength lightweight materials. His mind will be missed but his vision and legacy will never be forgotten.
  • by alittlespice ( 934609 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @07:44PM (#22789934) Homepage

    He is widely credited with introducing the idea of the communications satellite, the first of which were launched in the early 1960s. But he never patented the idea, prompting a 1965 essay that he subtitled, "How I Lost a Billion Dollars in My Spare Time.

    Look at the advancement of humankind because he didn't patent the idea of satelites

  • Re:Death in threes (Score:3, Interesting)

    by thelexx ( 237096 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:03PM (#22790118)
    I think it was Roy Scheider. Lots of geeks/nerds love horror films too, not the least reason for which is that they generally have more effects, which are fun to think about. Jaws was significant in that regard. And he was in the SeaQuest series and 2010. It was definitely Scheider. So, no more big-name deaths in geekdom this year dammit!
  • by VENONA ( 902751 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:10PM (#22790204)
    Some of it's on YouTube. Have a search for the third part of the Antikythera video. That was was what first brought home to me some hint of what a tremendous loss to humanity the destruction of the Library at Alexandria was. He makes a reasonable argument that it cost us 2,000 years of technological development.

    The man impacted all sorts of people, in all sorts of ways.
  • Reast In Peace. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by xtracto ( 837672 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:24PM (#22790312) Journal
    Ahh... another of the few great Science Fiction (straight real Science Fiction no SciFi and things like that) leaves us. I have always been more of an Asimov fan, but as they both used to say, I will certainly miss the two, second-best science fiction writers in the world...

    Too bad these they do not make Science Fiction writers as they used to...
  • Re:Don't worry (Score:4, Interesting)

    by xtracto ( 837672 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:34PM (#22790376) Journal
    I will use your introduction of the product of the SciFi-fantasy writer Ron Hubbard to remember that Asimov along with Heinlein distantiated from John Campbell (one very famous Science Fiction editor) when he started getting into the weird Hubbard's ideas, and publishing his psyche related novels (not Science fiction but more fantasy)...

    That goes to show that not all science fiction writers gave left good things to humanity.

    Oh and for those that are saying Science Fiction is a promoter of real science, there is an anecdote of John Campbell being visited by the FBI because in a story in "Astounding" magazine, because they got the details of the atmoic bomb very clear... Also, Asimov was a PhD in Chemistry, he based his psychohistory in the theory of gases, stating that you can not predict the specific path of a particle but you can predict the overall movement of a big set of them (or somethin like that... IANAC).

  • by MagusSlurpy ( 592575 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:48PM (#22790484) Homepage
    Being a scientist, I have found a lot of joy in the sci-fi stories where the exploration is as much of the adventure as aliens and action, such as Rendezvous with Rama, The Andromeda Strain, and Robinson's Mars trilogy. . Recently, my English professor friend asked me to introduce him to my favorite sci-fi books. I gave him some Heinlein, Card, and Rendezvous with Rama. He got about halfway through Rendezvous and asked me when the aliens were going to wake up and start killing people. It broke his little heart when I told him they weren't, that the book was about the exploration of the object, especially since he's one of those people who prides himself on being able to predict the little "twists" that are the same in every bit of popular fiction (film, television, video game, and novel) that we see today.
  • by Gideon Fubar ( 833343 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @08:53PM (#22790512) Journal
    HAL probably would have been fine, if not for it's conflicting directives.. It was more a commentary on how non-technical 'requirements' (in this case, by politically driven military supervisors with insufficient technical insight) get in the way of things..

    If nothing else, hopefully it will serve as a reminder to AI developers not to expect an AI to simultaneously 'protect the lives of the crew' and 'fulfill the mission, even if it costs the crew's lives'.
  • Re:shame. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Speare ( 84249 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:03PM (#22790598) Homepage Journal
    Paul Preuss got the same treatment. I think the series was called Venus Prime or something like it. It had a very early non-gritty proto-cyberpunk feel to it. The gimmick in the series was interesting. Paul took a short story from Arthur C. Clarke's back list, and turned it almost-absolutely verbatim into a chapter of the ongoing serial plotline. He did a reasonable job making it blend in so you couldn't spot the short story without already being familiar with it. There were at least four books, I can't be bothered to search them now, but it was cool to compare the short with the chapter after reading each novella.
  • Re:shame. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Telecommando ( 513768 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:25PM (#22790778)
    Childhood's End scared the hell out of me. I think I was 10 at the time. Reread it in college for a class and understood it a lot better. Still gave me chills, though.

    Requiem im pace, Sir Arthur. The world is not a better place for your passing.
  • Re:Also, the Newspad (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ragutis ( 934425 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:31PM (#22790820)
    He explored this further in Imperial Earth.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Earth [wikipedia.org]

    Overhead, without any fuss, the stars are going out.
  • Re:Reast In Peace. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by palegray.net ( 1195047 ) <philip DOT paradis AT palegray DOT net> on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:49PM (#22790964) Homepage Journal
    You may be interested in Wired's musings [wired.com] on Clarke. Great photo at the top of the article.
  • Memories of Paradise (Score:5, Interesting)

    by John Sokol ( 109591 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:56PM (#22791012) Homepage Journal
    Back in 1997 I did a live internet streaming event with Arthur C. Clarke, it was the first of it's type, and literally sent video across a 12 hr time difference to Chicago, even then Clarke was making internet history and I was privileged to be part of it.

    I actually got to travel to Sri Lanka and meet him. It was truly the experience of a life time. I had been following the foot steps of many other great people. Astronauts, writer, Hollywood types and scientists that have all traveled there to meet him. I had lunch at his home, got to play ping pong with him, it was one of the few physical activities he was still up to. He showed me original sketches of the Space elevator that he and Buckminster fuller had drawn. Even gave me a signed copy of one of his books.
      Unfortunately I was so broke at the time all I could afford was one of those 10 Dollar disposable cameras and none of the photo's I took came out, maybe the X-ray machine zapped em. The grand old British hotel there the Galle Face Hotel built in 1864 was incredible but was killing my finances at $150 per night. http://www.gallefacehotel.com/ [gallefacehotel.com]

        The video streaming even was at UIUC in celebration of Hal's birthday.
    It was amazing to see the turn out. On the large theater screen he was larger then life and it really seems th e internet owes him a large debt of gratitude. For he has been an inspiration for so many.

      Sri Lanka was Paradise. In spite of the Civil war, I have never been anywhere so majestic, the people were so hospitable, even strangers on the street were inviting me to there homes to have some food and drink with them. I must have walked every part of Colombo in the week I was there. The food was fantastic, the women were so beautiful, the ocean breeze and the sun sets. Oh the sun sets they put even the best ones in Santa Monica to shame. I still feel almost home sick for Sri Lanka even though I have only been there the one time.
    I can completely understand why he moved there. I would if I could also.

    Never making it back there is something that I deeply regret. Hearing this news really drove that home this afternoon. Meeting him has been one of the defining moments in my life.

    Godspeed Arthur.

    For Clarke is for us techies far more significant to us then Prices Dianna ever was.

    It's nice to see that this slashdot page it turning into a memorial. I wonder if more formal memorial services would happen around the world.

    http://www.dnull.com/~sokol/clarke.html [dnull.com] This is from the streaming even and some video clips of him.

    I actually think this may be the longest clip up on youtube, somehow they must have allowed it to slip through there size restrictions.

  • by STrinity ( 723872 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @09:57PM (#22791018) Homepage
    Unfortunately he did a lot to promote pseudoscience. I remember watching his TV series as a kid and thinking, "Wow, if Arthur C. Clarke believes in UFOs and yeti, they must be real."
  • Has anyone here... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FridayBob ( 619244 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @10:04PM (#22791066)
    ... not read one of his books of failed to be impressed? I'm sure I've read most of his books, if not all (especially the ones he wrote on his own), but probably my favorite is "Fountains of Paradise" -- I can still remember so much of the story even though I last read it in the 1980s. Maybe not all of it, but who can forget the concept?! Okay, maybe he didn't think of this one himself, but if the space elevator ever becomes a reality, it'll probably be thanks to this book.

    I'm going to miss him. He was one of those people who you've admired for so long that you hope they'll live forever. Of course, nobody ever does, so when people like Sir Arthur start to grow old and you hear that they're becoming weaker, you begin to dread the inevitable years in advance. A world without people like this is so much less interesting. Hell, I still hate the fact that Frank Zappa and Richard Feynman are no longer with us -- two of my other heros. Sir Arthur's passing is also going to take a very long time to get used to.
  • by Neop2Lemus ( 683727 ) on Tuesday March 18, 2008 @10:54PM (#22791386) Journal
    I assume that the top 100 film list you are referring to is the AFI list (American Film Institute).

    Ignore them. Their work is ignorant garbage. When they published their first list it (or at least the first one I read) there were TWO non-American films on it (IIRC so +/- 2) The AFI is an MPAA sales group and have absolutely no idea of what has cultural and entertainment value. Hope that explains your 2001 omission.

    On another topic, RIP Mr. Clarke, I hope when I get to heaven I'll get to read the new works that you, Asimov, and Wells (with perhaps a little sex and dialogue from Heinlein) will hopefully have written.

    /Great monolith in the sky.

  • Re:From TFA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by rmdir -r * ( 716956 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @12:15AM (#22791868)

    The film producers hired Isaac Asimov to do a novelization from the screenplay, and not knowing the first thing about Asimov, told him he'd better hurry up on it because the film release was only six months away.

    Asimov dropped off the manuscript the following week,

    I'd never heard that before, but I believe it. Isaac Asimov was a beast.
  • On Ice? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by quantaman ( 517394 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @01:04AM (#22792156)
    For some random reason I was reading up on cryonics today and ran across a supportive quote from Clarke

    "Although no one can quantify the probability of cryonics working, I estimate it is at least 90% -- and certainly nobody can say it is zero. [alcor.org]"

    I didn't see any mention of cryonics in any coverage of his death so I assume he never followed through with it, but if he actually did maybe there's the hope that he's not gone forever and may be back again someday.
  • by alshithead ( 981606 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @01:09AM (#22792170)
    "The biggest addition to society that Clarke, and all other science fiction writers, have added is not in the works of fiction themselves, but the spark of imagination infused in those reading it. Some will take that spark and build their lives around it turning fiction to fact."

    Respectfully, I'm not trying to argue against your point. It is valid. But please, let's not diminish the pleasure derived from being able to escape the real world by diving into another. I find myself pulling a Heinlein, or Clarke, or Niven and Pournelle down from the shelf when I've had all I can tolerate in the real world.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @01:13AM (#22792194)
    "And to this day almost no one can spot the aliens right there in plain sight (and no, they aren't the monoliths)."

    at no risk of sounding stupid -- AC here! -- could you clarify that statement, please? Or perhaps you're talking about us? Even if we were seedlings of extra-terrestrial intelligences, Earth has been our home for millions of years and I'd feel uneasy at calling ourselves aliens in our home planet...
  • Re:Huh. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Don Sample ( 57699 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @01:31AM (#22792288) Homepage
    Clarke always said that the novel credit should have been "by Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrik, based on the screenplay by Stanley Kubrik and Arthur C Clarke," and that the screenplay credit should have been "by Stanley Kubrik and Arthur C Clarke, based on the novel by Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrik."

    He even wrote a book about the process "The Lost Worlds of 2001" which includes some of their earlier ideas for what the movie should have been about, and how the story evolved.
  • Re:Also, the Newspad (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SystemFault ( 876435 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @07:51AM (#22793860)
    Amplification: Clarke's Newspad used numeric addresses exclusively; he thought of a site address as just another variety of a phone number. In the film 2001, you can see a row of digit buttons at the bottom of each Newspad. Clarke also talked about an interactive zoom for reading where a finger touch to an abstract would enlarge and expand the text of the abstracted article -- very much like clicking a hyperlink.

    Other predictions:

    1) No more extra charges for long distance telephone calls; generally fulfilled within countries and economic blocs.

    2) One world time zone; fulfilled for all computers as they use GMT/UTC. Not yet so for humans.

    3) The "Standard Encyclopedia"; that's what Wikipedia is becoming.

    4) Death of most printed newspaper by 2001; close, will likely see this soon.

    5) "Meatless days" due to economic stress and population growth, even in the US; close, will likely see this soon for many people.
  • Re:From TFA (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Jason Levine ( 196982 ) on Wednesday March 19, 2008 @09:42AM (#22794652) Homepage
    I can't remember where I read it (probably I, Asimov), but Asimov used to have three typewriters set out on three sides of him. He would type one story on one, swivel around in his chair and then work on another story, then swivel again and work on a third. He would be working on three completely different stories at the same time! He was probably one of the original multi-taskers.

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...