EMI Says Online File Storage Is Illegal 405
WiglyWorm writes "MP3tunes CEO Michael Robertson sent out an email to all users of the online music backup and place-shifting service MP3tunes.com, asking them to help publicize EMI's ridiculous and ignorant lawsuit against the company. EMI believes that consumers aren't allowed to store their music files online, and that MP3tunes is violating copyright law by providing a backup service."
It probably is illegal (Score:2, Informative)
Making copies of works that you didn't create is illegal unless you are doing it for personal use (fair use, there's a whole set up things that fall in this catagory).
Making copies of works you didn't create for the purposes earning money is illegal unless you have the copyright holders permission.
The problem is run into in the nature of the service being offered. This isn't merely storage, they are distributing the works. The way it seems to run, this isn't a common carrier thing that is being run in good faith, like say any random hosting company, this is a company that is advertising that it will distribute copies of music that you bought from someone else to you on any device you want. That changes the rules, they can't do that without a license, even if you have 5000 copies at home.
You do have the right to store it, they don't have the right to actively distribute it, especially, if my impression is correct, their goal is to make money doing this.
Re:Unfortunately (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Jumping to conclusions again. (Score:4, Informative)
Parent is probably a copyright violation (Score:4, Informative)
Ironically, the parent post seems to have been ripped from the diary of "Dr Michael Hfuhruhurr" on Kuro5hin, from more than 4 years ago.
See original on Kuro5hin [kuro5hin.org]
E.M.I,? (Score:3, Informative)
Unless you cover just another
And blind acceptance is a sign
Of stupid fools who stand in line
Like
E.M.I
E.M.I
E.M.I --Sex Pistols
remember mp3.com? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Well, piracy hurts real people. (Score:2, Informative)
* Things that come at a cost are not quality-guaranteed. I wouldn't define Britney Spears as quality.
* Things that are free are not inferior either. I could've got latest Radiohead's for free (the fact that I paid a bit for it is besides the point). I'm writing this from a computer I never paid for (recycled) running Linux.
Re:Unfortunately (Score:2, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_States [wikipedia.org]
Furthermore, murder is hardly the answer for some CEO who wants his company and shareholders to make more money. Yes, the RIAA/MPAA and the movie/music execs are a bunch of outdated douchebags. But murder? It's fucking music? Listen to Indie if you don't like the way they do business and put them out of business.
Re:Well, piracy hurts real people. (Score:1, Informative)