Meet the New Chess Boxing Champion of the World 235
Attila Dimedici writes "A Russian man has just been crowned world champion in the sport of chess boxing. Apparently the idea originated in a French comic strip from the early '90s. In 2003 a Dutch artist decided to bring the 'sport' to life. The 'sport' is played by starting a chess match in the middle of a boxing ring. After four minutes, the chess board is cleared and the opponents box for three minutes. A match consists of six rounds of chess and five rounds of boxing. A match is decided by knockout, checkmate, or points."
That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard (Score:5, Funny)
Actually, this may not be as idiotic as it sounds. (Score:5, Interesting)
Gotta say, not for me, to say the least, but I'll be very curious to see how this evolves and what kinds of people end up getting into it.
Re:Actually, this may not be as idiotic as it soun (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Actually, this may not be as idiotic as it soun (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Trying to time your squeeze is part of the problem. It is the wrong approach and certainly not the one taught in the military or police forces.
Aim, breathe steady, keep aiming, exhale while aiming, gently squeeze the trigger. The exact moment of the loud bang should be a surprise.
Re:Actually, this may not be as idiotic as it soun (Score:5, Interesting)
That is best, but you don't always have the leisure to pick your shots from a position of rest. When you're doing sprint drills across a field with an assault rifle in your hands and you have no chance to catch your breath before taking your shot and continuing to sprint, you need alternative techniques that will accommodate the physical condition you're in.
Re: (Score:2)
Who is tougher? (Score:3, Interesting)
In my experience, I would say that a disproportionate percentage of the people I've known who played chess avidly were bright guys from less educated backgrounds who simply weren't aware of as wide a range of intellectually stimulating activities as the average person I've known wit
Re:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever hea (Score:5, Funny)
They can't televise it!
The First Rule of Chess Club is You Do Not Talk about Chess Club!
Re: (Score:2)
You just talked about it, therefore you're out.
Re:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever hea (Score:5, Funny)
They can't televise it!
The First Rule of Chess Club is You Do Not Talk about Chess Club!
Oddly enough, The First Rule of Date Club is also You Do Not Talk About Chess Club.
Re:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever hea (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think it's ridiculous at all. Anyone trained in any martial art (not just eastern, count boxing, fencing, etc. as well) will probably agree.
Keeping your senses and your ability to think during a fight is anything but trivial, and requires a lot of training.
Most regular people would probably have trouble just remembering how the pieces move after a few minutes of fighting, with all the adrenaline pumping and your whole body in "I have no time for thinking" mode.
Re:That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever hea (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't think it's ridiculous at all. Anyone trained in any martial art (not just eastern, count boxing, fencing, etc. as well) will probably agree.
Keeping your senses and your ability to think during a fight is anything but trivial, and requires a lot of training.
Most regular people would probably have trouble just remembering how the pieces move after a few minutes of fighting, with all the adrenaline pumping and your whole body in "I have no time for thinking" mode.
Perhaps ironically for a geek, I don't know what it's like to be good at chess, but I do know what it's like to be good at fighting.
A lot of intelligent people aren't good at fighting because they overanalyze a fight. It's helpful to watch other people fight and analyze, but in a fight you have to be in the moment. I knew an architect who was very physically powerful, but never able to fight well because he tried to think strategically during a fight. He was always thinking, if I do this, then he'll do that, then I'll do this etc. A cunning fighter is one who reacts in the moment, in a way that is both appropriate and unpredictable.
"Thinking" in a fight -- if it can be called that -- is not sequential, nor is it analytical. It's more wholistic and intuitive. Even a swift reasoner cannot project future scenarios fast enough to keep up with the present, and being in the moment is critical. The reason the average person can't remember the details of a fight is that he isn't paying attention. He's thinking about the past ("that punch hurt") or the future ("I'm going to get murdered.") An experienced fighter is aware of every detail without being stuck on any one.
Although I can't say from experience, I wonder if this means being good at chess isn't a little like being good at sparring. My faults as a chess player are like the faults of my architect friend as a fighter; although I have formidable analytical skills, they aren't a match for somebody who moves with the swift assurance of being familiar with the scenario. I spend too much time dealing with the shambles of my "strategy" to take advantage of the opportunities my opponent's moves create.
As far as silliness is concerned, all sports are silly if you look at them the right way. Chess and barehand fighting are individual sports pared down to the minimally interesting essentials: two individuals striving to gain advantage over each other. Perhaps arm wresting is more basic, but not sufficiently complex to invite tactical analysis.
In any case, Chess Boxing is clearly a sport tailor made for Russia.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well I was once competing pretty seriously in martial artist and chess tournaments (During the same several years oddly enough) I think there is more commonality to the approach than you would expect. (Ignoring the fact that I would have loved to lay the smack down on a few of my more obnoxious chess opponents)
In both chess and martial arts you memorize a large number of moves and counters and execute the basic opening with no need for thought. My favorite chess opening I had anywhere from the first 12 t
Re: (Score:2)
I recall reading about the Deep Blue matches and seeing a very different view on this. In the first set of matches, Deep Blue won the first game, and the rest were draws or losses. It was claimed that Kasparov used this first game to learn how the computer worked, and he subsequently was able to beat it by using extremely long-range thinking. Deep Blue would see at most a dozen moves ahead during the normal part of the game, and so Kasparov was able to maneuver it into losing by seeing much farther into the
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe the study you are referencing is actually discussing a different phenomenon. (I.e. The fact that some chess grandmasters can play many simultaneous matches based on glancing at the board as they walk playing many different opponents.
Basically they learn to rapidly recognize opportunities that average chess players might miss. However if you put a couple good players in the crowd you easily beat the grandmaster by forcing them into a early bizarre gambit and playing off of them being distracted.
Re: (Score:2)
I am bemused that you listed 'karate' as a martial art.
To be fair, if Tae Kwon Do (which actually significantly de-emphasizes punching) is not a martial art, than neither is Karate- what you want is something like Krav Maga.
That is not to say, however, that defensive arts that deal mostly with the sword (although I'll argue that fencing is, as you pointed out, mostly a sport) do not have their place. There are plenty of useful things you can do when you know how to effectively wield a sword in combat.
Your post is the most ridiculous thing I've heard (Score:2, Informative)
You could be the dumbest poster I've ever seen.
Spoken like someone who has never actually been trained to fight. Just so I'm clear, learning how to position oneself, move around your opponent, and use reach and speed considerations to determine the correct time to strike for maximum effect is not "practical... in
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But punch strength doesn't determine most fights. A lot of fights are over before the first punch is thrown. And boxers learn one vitally important thing: To take a hit and go on.
I (remotely) know a guy who used to do professional boxing. He's in his 40s now. Some time recently a gang of early 20s made some rude comments about his wife on the street. He was in the middle of them and had the "lead" guy by the shirt before they were quite done. He had no fear and made it clear that if they wanted a fight, sin
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
A punch, kick, eye gab, or even a sword has a practical defensive application given the right circumstances.
At least a boxer isn't shit out of luck if he leaves his pepper spray at home by accident.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Think Rani Yahya vs. Kid Yamamoto, or for more proof go back and watch Jeremy Horn's second fight with Ch
Nikopol Trilogy (Score:2)
Yeah, but does this tournament allows ancient Egyptians Gods [wikipedia.org] cheating and helping their favourite participants ?
Re:Nikopol Trilogy (Score:4, Insightful)
Other Media (Score:3, Informative)
There's also the movie Immortel (ad vitam) [wikipedia.org], also written and directed by Bilal himself, roughly based on the same story as the Nikopol trilogy.
And Benoit Sokal's Whit Birds Productions [whitebirds...ctions.com] have a point'n'click adventure game called Nikopol, based on this series in their pipeline.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What do you think this is, Yu-Gi-Oh?
Re: (Score:2)
Kinda like Discworld with boxing? Is there an Egyption God/dess of Fate?
new sport.. (Score:5, Funny)
Hmmm....
I have come up with a new sport come April
Tax-Sex
You sit in the middle of the Kitchen and agonize over deductions for 10 minutes, then do it doggy style on them thar reciepts.
Re:new sport.. (Score:5, Funny)
Certainly not at the H&R Block....
Re: (Score:2)
They're both pretty well equally excitable, at least...
Re: (Score:2)
I've come up with a better one.
Blackjack-Sex
and this time you don't have to forget about the Blackjack!
(waits for posts about a black guy named Jack.)
Re:new sport.. (Score:5, Funny)
I've been getting fucked on my taxes for years.
Re:new sport.. (Score:4, Funny)
God that's sad - your post just reminded me to pay a late credit card bill, and now my finances are square for the month! Now where are the nipple-clamps?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:new sport.. (Score:5, Funny)
This sport, combining complicated tax work with being fucked hard, already exists: they call it "getting an audit".
Re: (Score:2)
I think the suggestion was meant to open up the possiblilites beyond anal reaming with a pool cue.
I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It isn't like the boxing and chess are simultaneous.
Hmmm, it's not a bad idea though...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't see a problem. Fighers don't fight outside their class, so why would they do it when chess-boxing. Bruiser vs. nerd would be a very odd matchup. This is a game for intellectual pugilists.
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:4, Funny)
Mike Tyson would bite the other player's pawns heads off.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
-b
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know if you've looked around lately but not all "nerds" are the svelte skinny nerds of "Revenge of the Nerds"
Nor are punishing boxers necessarily huge. Many of the light weights are not that heavy and would absolutely pulverize someone who was not in good boxing form. They could very easily hold off a good chess player for 2 rounds of chess which would be enough time to destroy them.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
One of the things it takes to be good at anything non-trivial is attention to detail -- lots of it, over a long time.
You don't find nerds becoming bar fighters because that's a pasttime for the mentally impulsive and physically gifted. Studying footwork, tactics, achieving physical conditioning you need to box or grapple takes dedication.
Re: (Score:2)
When you talk about a fighter's "class", you're talking about his weight, nothing else. Trust me, any good bantamweight will handily disassemble the geeky nerd in his weight class. And the big fat nerds...oohh, that isn't gonna be pretty.
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:5, Informative)
The chess part is speed chess, which can be quite difficult and heavily favors those who are well practiced in strategy and able to make decisions faster.
Players are given 1 - 5 minutes each to win a game, which generally does not result in a checkmate outcome. Rather, the person whose time expires first loses. The best strategy is to set up complex positions on the board that require ample thought on the part of your opponent and watch his or her time expire.
I would put my money on the chess player who can roll with the punches and make effective 1 second moves on the board. You can do rope a dope sometimes by letting other players move very quickly and eating up their major pieces when they make a mistake.
M
Much more than 5 minutes of chess (Score:3, Informative)
It's stated that there are 6 rounds of chess with 4 minutes per round. That works out to more than 20 minutes of chess, not "1 - 5 minutes to win."
I've played competitive Lightning (5 mins) and Speed (15 mins) chess before. Ample time to win a game in both modes.
Most difficult part here is probably trying to remember your plan after the boxing.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't "blitz" just German for "lightning"?
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:5, Informative)
> Players are given 1 - 5 minutes each to win a game, which generally does not result in a checkmate outcome
Do you actually play chess ? Blitz games often ends in checkmate, because the player with the biggest time pressure will blunder.
I have seen my son give otb (=over the board) checkmate in rapid chess to someone 300 ELO higher than him with 3 seconds vs 5 seconds left and 8 moves.
Of course, the player with worst position can choose not to move and lose on time, but it is the stupidest thing to do, because in chess, you can think on the opponent time
Just look at the tie-break in US women championship [chessbase.com]. 11 seconds vs 2 seconds. Wanna bet who won ?
Lurk around playchess.com. You'll see 1 minute bullets games (ie: 1 minute for each opponents). The average rate of play is higher than 1 move per second, and they generally finish in checkmate.
PS: slashdot formatting is borken for me. Can' do proper paragraphs. Such is life
Re: (Score:2)
because in chess, you can think on the opponent time
Aw hell, why didn't anyone tell me this before?
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Drawing a line between strategy and tactics in this case is really just semantics.
We've all ready the classic 'Chess Traps and Tricks' and come into most situations ready to spring out a knight in exchange for a castled rook, force an opponent into leaving hanging pawns scattered all over the place, or control the center through a complicated network or interdependent pieces.
How much of that is a result of careful planning and how much is a result of tactical tricks sprung at opportune times really depends
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:5, Interesting)
I thought the same thing, and figured they must have rules against this type of play.
But then couldn't a boxer like Mike Tyson immediately win the world champion title in the second round of the fight?
No, the WCBO's statutes foresee a minimum ELO ranking of 1800 in chess. Each competitor has to fulfil this minimum standard in order to participate in an official chessboxing fight. Someone like Mike Tyson would need years of training to reach this standard...
In addition, there's also the zugzwang rule. When a chessboxer doesn't make a move and the referee has good reason to believe that he or she is doing this deliberately, a warning is issued. When the chessboxer still fails to make a move, a second warning is issued whereupon he or she is forced to make a move. If no move is made upon the second warning, the player is immediately disqualified.
Re:I'd put money on the boxer any day (Score:4, Funny)
I, for one, am 100% behind any sport that has anything called a "zugzwang rule".
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah he might 'swell run into the wall and bang his head.
Re: (Score:2)
The real world isn't nicely divided into "brains" and "brawn". Intelligence is not inversely correlated with muscle-mass.
Why is this not on TV? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why is this not on TV? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why is this not on TV? (Score:5, Funny)
Afterwards in a rare exhibition match..... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Afterwards in a rare exhibition match..... (Score:5, Funny)
Post Fight Interview :
"Yeah I came out throwing hard. I was pretty much gassed with only a minute left in the round. He got me in that guillotine choke and I only barely got out. But then at the start of the next round, I hit him with a "QUOITED" on a triple word score, pretty much sealed the deal, I really want to win with a knock out, but I'll take the win on points."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I would so play in the "Counter Strike / Kick Boxing" league...
"Pwnwhat? Damn sniper. Come here! I'll tear your head off."
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
And the winner faces Bisu in Starcrwondo
Codeboxing (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, we have something like that at my company called codeboxing.
Developers receive documentation and go off to work on something. The moment they run into an ambiguous or poorly defined requirement, they jump into the ring with the person who wrote it for up to 6 rounds of boxing. Between rounds, they refine the language of the requirement. The match is decided by a panel of managers, agreement between the two parties, or knock out.
M
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Battle Chess Nostalgia (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Battle Chess Nostalgia (Score:5, Informative)
Whereas archon, just because you move the piece to a spot doesn't mean you get to eliminate the piece - what it does is it starts up an arcade battle between the two pieces.
The two pieces could be a knight versus a dragon, and if you are really good at the knight you could actually kill the dragon, it helps of course if the dragon was badly injured in previous battles and was not healed by the player (it costs a move to heal, so heals are rare).
Also in the first archon, white pieces and black pieces get health bonuses depending on whether the square is black, dark gray, gray, light gray or white.
Overall there was some strategy involved but it's typically overshadowed by arcade skills.
Re: (Score:2)
I always wanted to play Archon when I read about it in magazines when I was a kid (never have a C64). You have just cured me of that. Thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, don't be hating on Archon. GREAT game.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6MoTUJiOiU
I'm not the one playing.
You can probably download one of those emulators and play it - C64, Apple 2 etc.
I'm not sure Enki Bilal would be proud... (Score:4, Informative)
There is also a hockey game in the first book which ends with something like 3 goals and 5 kills for each team.
BTW : In the book, the chess-boxing match ends with the main protagonist (possessed by a god) killing his opponent with some kind of laser shot from his eyes during a chess round.
Fucking Awesome (Score:4, Interesting)
I want to see No Holds Barred Halo Boxing. Then I get to beat the crap out of the guy who thinks hes so cool with the sniper rifle.
Let's see you pwn me now!
Seriously though, this is really awesome. I have never really been into boxing or UFC, but if that dude also had to beat the guy at Chess or some other game of skill, then that makes it very very interesting.
Not just brute force.
I can see some little nerd being undefeated in the ring since he could never lose the match within 4 minutes... but going to the hospital the day he does.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The UFC is not "Just Brute Force" you ignorant jackass. If that were the case Brock Lesnar would be destroying everyone and Sean Sherk would have torn BJ Penn apart for the lightweight title. Skill, strategy, the ability to think and act under pressure are all more important that brute force.
Please do not propagate ignorant stereotypes.
Re: (Score:2)
Except there is strict rules on how long you can take per turn, 2 warnings and you get disqualified :)
french comics author is Enki Bilal: details (Score:3, Informative)
a sample of the original comics series: http://www.darkshire.net/~jhkim/archive/freerpgs/heritage/mobworld.htm#Chess%20Boxing [darkshire.net]
Article Logo (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this some new way of cashing in by directing links to websites?
1. Sign advertising agreement with other news website
2. Post article to idle.slashdot.org (?????)
3. Profit!
Boobies (Score:2)
"Whats up with the news.com.au logo next to the article"
It would appear that Slashdot is just copying FARK.com.
Re: (Score:2)
A New Application (Score:2)
I suddenly see a new way to conduct contract negotiations in pro sports.
Don't just watch the sport, watch the agents and owners duke it out over who gets paid what. Who wouldn't want to see those thin-wristed weasels who pad their wallets by blackmailing the fans beat the crap out of each other?
Re: (Score:2)
Glad somewhere, at least, they are making efforts at balanced sports.
I remember consciously feeling embarrassed that some (but certainly not all) of our American athletes possessed major skill imbalances to put it mildly.
Someday leagues such as the NFL and HNL might add IQ and each player's individual chess handicap
Re: (Score:2)
Add me to your fan base. I'd LOVE to see your suggestions put into effect. Frankly, if they're going to dump sudden-death overtime in favour of those stupid hockey and soccer shootouts, I think some kind of intellectual challenge would be a better way to resolve to a tie.
Self desturcting sports (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Prior Art (Score:5, Funny)
Sort of. 20 some odd years ago my room mate considered combining rugby and chess and called it "full contact chess".
We played beer chess instead. Somebody had a 4'x4' chess board. Pawns were Mickey's, rooks were Fosters, queens were a bottle of wine etc. Every time a chess piece was taken you had to drink it. We rarely lost; against the beer drinker types we just out played them, against the chess player types we'd trade down pieces early and out drink them.
Simpler times ...
Belthize
Marlon Brando (Score:2)
Geek Biathlon (Score:2)
Da mystery of chess boxin' (Score:2)
I suggest a new strategy: (Score:2, Funny)
Let the Wookie win.
Shoulda been kickboxing. (Score:2)
It would cut down on "low blows"-- Anyone who's heard "One Night in Bangkok" knows that chess players get their kicks above the waistline, sunshine.
obligatory xkcd blag (Score:2)
http://blag.xkcd.com/2008/05/19/friday-night/ [xkcd.com]
Re: (Score:2)