75 Comics That Are Being Made Into Films 256
brumgrunt writes "The comic book is the new spec script in Hollywood, if this list is anything to go by. Den Of Geek has uncovered 75 comics that are in the process of being turned into films, along with their estimated year of arrival. It's scary, brilliant and bizarre in roughly equal measure."
"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
that are in the process of being turned into films
Keep in mind that the "process of being turned into films" is a long and difficult one where many projects get axed at every stage. And I'm sure <5% of these see theaters--hell look at how long it took The Watchmen (arguably the greatest comic book ever) to get off the ground!
... with more to come.
Although I'm sure with the recent success of movies like X-Men, Spiderman, Fantastic Four, etc that script writers are rushing back to their desks to find any unexploited comic book series that their pen can interpret.
I cringe at the thought.
I'm reminded of so many bad action flicks from my youth, so many cheesy war movies of my young adult life, so many bad Uwe Boll video game turned movies and now I've already suffered from Batwoman & Daredevil
Seriously, could Hollywood once--just for like a year--come out with only original semi-risky ventures? I mean, can we go one year without another recycled video game, without another tired sequel of an already diluted franchise, without another rehashed Mike Myers persona that's really just Austin Powers, etc. I mean, is that too much to ask?
Akira (Score:5, Insightful)
Akira (2011)
Leonardo DiCaprio disappointed many fans of Katsuhiro Otomo's 80s manga strip by declaring that he won't be in this, though his Appian Way production company has set SFX wizard Ruairi Robinson to direct. The title character is a child of God-like powers who may have started the third world war that decimated the 'Neo-Tokyo' that biker gangs skirt round. Blade Runner-tastic. Appian Way are also developing...
Wait, what? There were people that wanted to see him star in this?
good grief (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Akira (Score:3, Insightful)
Dark Prophecy... (Score:4, Insightful)
This is what I fear happening.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah, just like every Comic adaption sucks...right? right?
(*cough* Batman, Spiderman, Sin City, 300, ...)
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Hollywood is greedy, stupid, and unoriginal. As with the videogame industry, any success is going to be followed immediately with a slew of wannabes and knock-offs.
The good news is that there are still great movies being made. But you're probably not going to find them among the "tentpole" pictures with $100 million budgets. Hollywood isn't going to take a risk with that kind of budget, they're going to play it safe. And right now, PG-13 comic book movies are as close a thing to a safe bet as the studios know of.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:3, Insightful)
You know, some of us are not so insecure about our hobbies that we feel the need to make up new words to describe them because them.
Re:good grief (Score:3, Insightful)
While Shazam would be silly (I honestly don't know a thing about the comic itself, but the name alone makes me wince), ElfQuest has some potential. There's a lot of story to follow. It could be a LotR-style production. That said, Comic Book -> Movie conversions are generally craptacular, so...
What I would like to see brought to the Silver Screen is The Invisibles [wikipedia.org]. I have been reading through the books lately and it is absolutely fantastic. A good mix of plot, philosophy, action, fantasy, and characters. From what I understand, The Invisibles was part of the inspirational material for The Matrix.
It would be interesting to see The Sandman produced as well - just not by the BBC. They completely butchered Neverwhere, turning a fantastic novel into a complete piece of crap (as they often do).
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone (I think it was Neil Gaiman) once said that "graphic novel" is to comic what "lady of the night" is to prostitute.
even mediocre properties are snapped up (Score:5, Insightful)
Just shows how there's not an original bone left in that town. The comics are like elaborate storyboards anyway so let's do one but be sure to cut out anything involving taste and quality so as not to alienate our prime market of drooling mouth-breathers. And in twenty years we'll remake 'em all! Can't you just taste that money? Fuck, yeah.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sorry, did you just give 300 as an example of a movie that doesn't suck?
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Whereas some of us know that there is a significant difference between ten pieces of colored newsprint stapled together, and a ninety page perfect bound book on quality paper containing a complete lack of sea-monkey ads.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
So it basically all boils down to print quality, then?
75 more... (Score:5, Insightful)
"75 Comics That Are Being Forever Ruined, Raped, and Pillaged"
Fixed.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:4, Insightful)
Ninety pages is a bit tiny for a book, I've seen magazines with more pages than that.
Also Asterix comes with a hardcover and that's definitely a comic.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
And torture porn in October.
Saw 33, coming soon to a theatre near you.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:2, Insightful)
Uhh... That's not what we're doing.
A "comic book" is pretty accurately defined as a mass-produced, slim, stapled funny book that costs about four bucks, has only 22 pages of actual content, is full of ads nobody pays any attention to, and focuses on the difficult lives of grown men and women who insist on wearing spandex, capes, and little pointy boots everywhere they go. Comic books are traditionally created by large teams; one artist does the pencil work, another does the inking, yet another does the coloring, then someone does the lettering, and somebody else does the writing. This team is often changed month to month, with the effect that comics are really not art per se, but rather, a manufactured form of entertainment.
A "graphic novel" on the other hand, is usually the work of one person (or a small group of friends). The same small group does all the work, and tends to stay involved with the work for its entire duration, so it's consistent and high quality. The writing tends to be much better because these people are writing for themselves and other people like them (rather than the "design by committee" you get with a commercial comic book). People who work on graphic novels tend to take more risks, try out more radical ideas, and be deeper philosophically than their purely commercial counterparts. Also they tend to AVOID writing about people who wear capes, spandex, and pointy little shoes. Their work is much closer to "reality" than the alternative. It also tends to target an adult audience; this has been true since the '70s, when graphic novel writers and artists were able to ignore the Comics Code and sell their work in specialty shops (where comic companies had to make everything G rated so they could sell in grocery stores).
Think of it this way: comic books are "Harry Potter". Graphic novels are "The Grifters" by Jim Thompson. Get it?
to all the naysayers in this thread: (Score:5, Insightful)
1. it is proven that comic book movie adaptations are a good return on the investment. therefore, from a strictly risk/ return financial analysis, you want to make a comic book movie as opposed to say, a mafia musical. therefore, any comic book property out there is going to get a good looking at, down to the fringe. it's inevitable, and what exactly then is the problem with mining comic book properties like that? what is the rationale for which you take offense at that?
2. you don't own your favorite comic book. if someone wants to turn it into a movie, why do you feel like something has been stolen from you? why do you think something will be ruined? just don't watch. why is that so difficult for you?
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally, the stunts and special effects have gotten so over-the-top that they take me "out" of the movies now. Granted, fight and chase scenes in actions movies have always been over-the-top. But stunts and effects have gone so far in one-upmanship that these scenes have become less thrilling than comical. The average human fistfight now looks more intense than the fight between the two terminators in Terminator 2 (and those guys were super-strong and built of titanium alloys). And chase scenes routinely involve jumps and falls that no human being could withstand in anything more than lunar gravity.
The Die Hard movies are the perfect example. The Die Hard series started out as a incredibly unlikely, but nonetheless at least mildly plausible. But by the third film, the characters were taking 50-foot leaps off bridges and routinely taking beatings that would have required immediate hospitalization (if not embalming services) for anyone even vaguely mortal. The last entry was particularly egregious. There is a fight scene in that one that makes the Terminator 2 fight scene look modest by comparison. I expect that by the next one, John McClain will be catching bullets fired at him with his teeth and the fight scenes will involve people being punched through bank vault walls.
Luther Arkwright (Score:3, Insightful)
ONe of the greatest works of graphic literature has been picked up for movie adaptations on more than one occasion. I'd love to see this adapted, but then again It's probably impossible to do it justice....
http://www.superherohype.com/news.php?id=4514 [superherohype.com]
Re:even mediocre properties are snapped up (Score:5, Insightful)
Taste and quality? Such as Road To Perdition or A History of Violence, both of which were originally comics?
Comics encompass as broad a world as other forms of fiction and literature, it's not just all superheroes and science fiction. As far as Hollywood adaptations are concerned, the problem isn't so much a lack of originality -- although there is some truth to that claim -- it's that producers are risk averse.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Get it?
Yes, like I said, I get very well that you are so insecure about your interests that you have to make up new words and write long, long explanations about how the things you like are much better than those things others like which look exactly the same.
Seriously, get over yourself. You're reading comics. Some comics are sillier than others, and some are deeper than others, but they're all comics. And you're allowed to like comics! You don't need to make up elaborate justifications! Just enjoy what you like and ignore what you don't like, and stop worrying about how to label things.
Re:So many already done.... (Score:3, Insightful)
No, he's right (Score:5, Insightful)
It will suck. Let me tell you why.
Listen to Kevin Smith talk about his work on the Superman Returns script. [youtube.com]
He talks about meeting the producer for Batman, and Superman Begins. John Peters. Right around 13:00 or so he talks about presenting his script summary and how it was received.
And it was liked, but John said Kevin was missing some "action beats". He says that you need an action beat every ten pages. Something big needs to happen. This is how Hollywood thinks. Every ten pages of script, you need a fight scene. And listen to the absolutely stupid ideas that get thrown around.
This is why the Watchmen will suck.
Hollywood likes comic book movies because every ten minutes you are guaranteed to have an action scene. That's what superheroes do. It automatically meets the "action beats" criteria by default. That's why so many comics are being made into film. Every ten minutes someone gets in a big fight, or something explodes. Hollywood likes that.
But that's not what happens in The Watchmen. The Watchmen is a story about people. There isn't a lot of action. Hardly any, actually. This is a story about people. It has more in common with Clerks than it does with X-Men. Most of the story is people standing around talking. Character development.
Which is why Hollywood is going to fuck it up.
They're going to insist on their action beats. And that's not at all what the story is about.
Don't get me wrong. It will look pretty. It will have most of the story parallel the book. But mark my words - the heart and soul of the story will be ripped out. Most of the character development will be missing. And it will be replaced with a ten minute CGI battle of Dr. Manhattan pacifying Vietnam, or something similar.
Sorry to sound so pessimistic, but that's what's going to happen.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:5, Insightful)
Uh huh. Right-o. So, you're into spandex, capes, and little pointed booties I guess.
There you go again, trying to show everyone how you're so much better because of what you read.
But sorry, dude, I don't read any of that. I probably read stuff that's far more obscure than you do, but I really feel no need at all to make any kind of point of that. What I read are comics. I like some of them, I don't like others, but I don't for a second think this makes me any better than anyone else, nor do I look down on others for reading the things I don't enjoy.
Hobbies and interests are not a popularity contest. You don't get points for liking some things and not others. Your interests should serve only to make yourself happier, not as some kind of measure of your worth as a person compared to anyone else.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:4, Insightful)
What I am suggesting to you is NOT that I am better or special because I'm interested in material designed to be read by adults.
Then why are you making so much noise about how you like it?
By the way, if you "don't read any of that" how exactly do you justify saying a few seconds later that "what I read are comics"?
Because perhaps "comics" is a generic term to most people, much like "music"? Most people don't think a "comic book" is some specific kind of publication. It's a book with comics in it. And that's what a graphic novel is, and that's what a superhero magazine is, and that's what a european comic album is, and that's what a manga tankubon is.
By the way, and this is very funny, you DO think something you do "makes you better than anyone else" -- specifically, you think that believing you're NOT better than anyone else makes you BETTER than people who DO think they're better than others.
If that is so, how is that inconsistent with anything I've said so far? I didn't say I didn't think anything made me a better person. I specifically said that I don't think that what I enjoy reading does.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:3, Insightful)
People like you, who cannot or will not discern between similar but different things, are a significant problem in the world today. Because of people like YOU, things like graphic novels are associated with childish superhero comics by the majority of the public, and therefore are limited in popularity here in the U.S.
A significant problem? Really?
In contrast, in Europe and Japan, and in most of Asia in fact, the distinction between kiddie comics and adult graphic novels is very well understood and the medium is much more respected there.
Funny thing, you know: I'm from Europe. And you know? Nobody here feels the need to use words like "graphic novel". It's all "comics". Comics for children, comics for adults, nobody feels the need to make up special words for them.
Re:No, he's right (Score:1, Insightful)
So I picked up a copy of Moby Dick. And read ten pages into it. What kind of a name is Ishmael anyways? I had no preconceived notions about classic literature. But I really hate whales. It was really boring.
After ten minutes of trying, I never sorted out what the big deal was. So I gave up.
Re:"In the Process?" (Score:4, Insightful)
My background and cultural heritage is Japanese, and I concur... manga is the entire continuum between 20-page kiddy pulps and glossy books full of a variety of subjects (romance, superhero, tentacle pr0n, etc.)
I think you're right. There's a large element of "comic book store guy" elitism in the "graphic novel" crowd. And generally speaking, it's based on fallacious distinctions.
Re:No, he's right (Score:2, Insightful)
Look, you don't like it, I don't like it, but it might be true. Look at all the recent high grossing movies. You don't like ignorant marketing people messing with your IT so don't mess with their marketing when you don't know what you're doing.
Re:No, he's right (Score:3, Insightful)
You don't like ignorant marketing people messing with your IT so don't mess with their marketing when you don't know what you're doing.
You're trolling, but I'll bite anyways.
I do know what I'm doing. Why? Because I can read. When I read a story, I understand it. When the movie comes out and it's different, I notice. And when the changes subtract from the original story and were only made to "spice" up the story to hold on to the public's diminishing attention span, I have every right to stop and say, "Hey, you know what? That sucks."
It's actually pretty simple shit, hombre.
Re:No, he's right (Score:2, Insightful)