iPhones, FStream and the Death of Satellite Radio 397
Statesman writes "Only a little over a year ago, the
FCC approved the merger of XM and Sirius
satellite radio companies and the combined stock was trading at $4 a share. Despite being a monopoly — or perhaps because of it — the company is failing. They are losing subscribers, the stock is now trading around 22 cents a share (a 97% decline), and they have written off $4.8 billion dollars in stock value. So, what happened? The CEO is blaming pretty much everyone except himself and his business model. But is pay-for-bandwidth even a viable business plan anymore? With millions of iPhone and gPhone users out there, free streaming audio applications like FStream, and thousands of Internet radio stations to access, the question is: why would anyone want to pay for proprietary hardware and a limited selection of a few hundred stations all controlled by one company?"
Read on for the rest of Statesman's thoughts.
Statesman continues:"It seems like the pay-for-broadcast business model is fundamentally flawed. First, satellite radio is a misnomer; if you are listening inside a big building, chances are you're really using WiFi radio, not satellite, which requires line-of-sight to the sky. In this mode, XM/Sirius offers less selection and higher cost than an iPhone and streaming audio client. Second, a monopoly is a monopoly. Sure, you can get dozens of ClearChannel stations in some markets, but after a while it does not matter whether they are country, top 40 or easy listening. They all have the same format of hypercharged 'personalities' and lots of ads. By contrast, the iPhone and streaming client can access thousands of stations from thousands of providers worldwide. Finally, you may say that an iPhone and service agreement are expensive compared to a satellite radio subscription, but if you already have the iPhone, the cost of adding a stream audio application is zero. And the iPhone is cheap compared to a cell phone plus an MP3 player plus a laptop plus internet access. Bottom line: a year after being granted monopoly status, Sirius is all but bankrupt and the satellite radio business model is dead. Time for the FCC to think seriously about making better use of this bandwidth."
Freedom to bitch. (Score:3, Funny)
"why would anyone want to pay for proprietary hardware and a limited selection of a few hundred stations all controlled by one company?"
As opposed to the freedom I enjoy of everything coming down one or more pipes controlled by either a duopoly or a monopoly.
Sigh (Score:5, Funny)
SeeqPod [seeqpod.com] is pretty cool for the iphone/ipod.
Re:Who cares about FStream?? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Howard Stern (Score:4, Funny)
But I don't even own a tv or a radio, so I'm just a bit better than you.
I don't even have a computer (nor do I know how to use one)... I post on Slashdot by rubbing ballons against my cat's fur.
A tragedy on the road (Score:3, Funny)
Re:You could say the same thing about a Jaguar (Score:4, Funny)
Stay tuned to Sirius-XM for Bollywood sound tracks and sitar music.
Re:The new Sirius lineup (Score:3, Funny)
I feel your pain. I want my Lucy back.
And Fred? Fred's dead, baby. Fred's dead.
Re:Freedom to bitch. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sigh (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Aw... (Score:4, Funny)
I'm one of those guys who just dropped XM radio. The commercials they run on may channels really pissed me off. I also got rid of my last Windows machine after Vista came out. Guess what my in-laws got me and the kids for presents this year? A Windows Vista box, and a new subscription to XM radio! Apparently, they're worried about my highly non-conformist streak.