Software-Generated Paper Accepted At IEEE Conference 235
schlangemann writes "Check out the paper Towards the Simulation of E-commerce by Herbert Schlangemann, which is available in the IEEEXplor database (full article available only to IEEE members). This generated paper has been accepted with review by the 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSSE). According to the organizers, 'CSSE is one of the important conferences sponsored by IEEE Computer Society, which serves as a forum for scientists and engineers in the latest development of artificial intelligence, grid computing, computer graphics, database technology, and software engineering.' Even better, fake author Herbert Schlangemann has been selected as session chair (PDF) for that conference. (The name Schlangemann was chosen based on the short film Der Schlangemann by Andreas Hansson and Björn Renberg.)"
Reviewers? (Score:5, Funny)
They probably used automated reviewing software - the computers are conspiring against us! Next thing you know we'll have autogenerated legislation and automated reviews for congressmen to vote on. How long till we have automaton congressmen voting for autogenerated legislation with pork provisions for "free storage enhancement" for their cronies?? OMG! :)
Fascinating Development (Score:5, Funny)
Furthermore, citations may be employed to enhance this phenomenon when used together with LaTeX and multiples of knowledge.
Crossing the doctor with buzzword bingo... (Score:5, Funny)
When asked to comment on the news story, the paper's author is quoted as saying: "How does Software-Generated Paper Accepted At IEEE Conference make you feel?"
Re:Crossing the doctor with buzzword bingo... (Score:5, Funny)
"Oh, I don't know about Software-Generated Paper. Can you tell me about it?"
Re:Reviewers? (Score:5, Funny)
In some ways, it already functions this way. There's just a lot of people waiting to be replaced with shell-scripts.
Your paradigm complements the understatement (Score:2, Funny)
As we seek the preponderance of false results loosely coupling the precipitate with the bandwidth, we limit latency at all costs.
In Soviet Russia.... (Score:5, Funny)
I For One.. Do not welcome our new computer-generated overlords.
... our new computer-generated overlords do not welcome you.
Re:What, again? (Score:5, Funny)
That gives a blow to IEEE credibility (Score:5, Funny)
Recent advances in cooperative technology and classical communication are based entirely on the assumption that the Internet and active networks are not in conflict with object-oriented languages. In fact, few information theorists would disagree with the visualization of DHTs that made refining and possibly simulating 8 bitarchitectures a reality, which embodies the compelling principles of electrical engineering. In this work we better understand how digital-to-analog converters can be applied to the development of e-commerce.
The first person to show me how digital-to-analog converters can be applied to the development of e-commerce wins an Internet.
Re:Reviewers? (Score:5, Funny)
> In some ways, it already functions this way. There's just a lot of people waiting to be replaced with shell-scripts.
That affirmation is completely false.
Stop spreading your lies.
You don't know what you're talking about.
In soviet russia your post is wrong about you.
else
echo "--Syntax error"
exit 1
fi
#-----This automated response was brought to you by:
#-----CocaCola, General Motors, RIAA
Re:Reviewers? (Score:2, Funny)
What color did you want that SQL database in?
(See OP's sig for answer)
Re:That gives a blow to IEEE credibility (Score:1, Funny)
I just happen to have a digital-to-analog money converter right here. Send me your credit card number and I'll demonstrate it's usefulness.
Re:proving my point... (Score:5, Funny)
It was probably an attempt to satisfy the author's "[citation needed]" request in Wikipedia.
Re:Reviewers? (Score:4, Funny)
My personal theory is that the reviewers were thinking "Whatever they're smoking, I hope they share it".
IEEE Transactions on Software-Generated Papers (Score:5, Funny)
Even if you look only at their own, "branded" journals (IEEE Transactions on Foo), they seem to be founding new ones ever other week, which range in quality all the way from well respected in their field, to kooky.
Don't criticize it, legalize it. Why not have an IEEE conference on Software-Generated Papers?
It may sound wacky, but it will probably solicit plenty of entries.
Hmmm ... so then the peer reviewers would also have to be Software-Generated. And Software-Generated attendees?
I can see the host convention center manager saying, "These computer folks seem to get kookier every day."
Re:Nothing new (Score:2, Funny)
No, it just managed to be passed off as a scientist, which is a whole lot easier than being passed off as a normal human.
No, really, c'mon! (Score:5, Funny)
It is enough to check the abstract (or better, just its last phrease is enough):
Recent advances in cooperative technology and classical communication are based entirely on the assumption that the Internet and active networks are not in conflict with object-oriented languages. In fact, few information theorists would disagree with the visualization of DHTs that made refining and possibly simulating 8 bitarchitectures a reality, which embodies the compelling principles of electrical engineering. In this work we better understand how digital-to-analog converters can be applied to the development of e-commerce.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
HOW DA CONVERTERS CAN BE APPLIED TO E-COMMERCE?!?!?!?
For the layman, this abstract reads like this: "We know that corn dogs are built with the assumption that Obama is the next president of the US and not of China. In fact, most scholars believe that children should not be given a lawn mower in school. Now we study how banana peels can be used to paint your house"
Re:Not a robot conspiracy (Score:5, Funny)
How does presenting the liver help?
It lets you see whether the author was a career alcoholic, or just drunk for that one paper.
Re:Not a robot conspiracy (Score:5, Funny)
Presumably someone DID review this and deny it an oral, but didn't follow up with the program committee to make sure it was pulled entirely.
Sounds like my attempts to get laid last night!
Ba dum tsh! I'll be here all week! Try the veal!
Re:Time for a law suit (Score:4, Funny)
I'm serious. I've had three papers rejected by IEEE, and they except one that came out of a hidden markov model? That seriously pisses me off.
I think we know why your paper was rejected.
Re:No, really, c'mon! (Score:1, Funny)
James, Your thesis is intriguing. Would you consider speaking at our conference? Sincerely, 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (CSSE) Committee.
Re:Editing (Score:2, Funny)
"Recent advances in cooperative technology and classical communication are based entirely on the assumption that the Internet and active networks are not in conflict with object-oriented languages....
Aha... now I know where my boss got the idea for our new project.
my insightful, carefully crafted response: (Score:5, Funny)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed dignissim massa eu odio. Ut augue enim, tempus auctor, sagittis scelerisque, varius nec, lectus. Suspendisse tempor, eros eu ullamcorper viverra, nisl sem cursus diam, et pretium pede leo sit amet mauris. Ut turpis turpis, vestibulum eu, aliquam a, lacinia ac, purus. Ut vitae dui at velit dapibus hendrerit. Nunc justo mauris, consequat eu, congue eu, laoreet vitae, nulla. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nam rhoncus gravida magna. Aliquam quis erat a erat cursus imperdiet. Morbi venenatis, purus in volutpat rhoncus, risus augue interdum lorem, sit amet mollis lectus augue et velit. Duis ultrices dapibus lacus. Fusce ornare, enim vitae accumsan dapibus, augue tortor fermentum tortor, nec consectetur nibh magna eu nisl. Aenean venenatis tempus felis. Aenean viverra. Mauris blandit velit et sem.
Integer tempor augue vitae tortor. Nulla facilisi. Donec tellus turpis, lacinia a, fermentum dictum, ullamcorper euismod, leo. Curabitur auctor mi eu justo. Vestibulum quis neque. Phasellus et dolor. Nullam quis sapien. Etiam vel purus. Nam aliquet sagittis tellus. Cras pulvinar porta erat.
Vivamus luctus dui eu augue. Morbi mattis arcu nec ante. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. In dolor risus, malesuada eu, elementum eget, accumsan a, justo. Sed pretium mauris at mauris. Aliquam in velit iaculis urna porttitor imperdiet. Duis sagittis sollicitudin lectus. Donec ut tortor. Proin vitae pede in mauris sollicitudin volutpat. Integer fringilla. Curabitur faucibus luctus urna. Pellentesque laoreet. Proin pulvinar, risus sed ultrices rhoncus, purus urna sollicitudin lectus, in scelerisque massa augue sit amet tortor. Ut pretium sapien sit amet nunc. Aenean lacus turpis, scelerisque non, sollicitudin ac, hendrerit at, turpis.
Nunc interdum cursus lectus. Aenean tempor magna sed enim feugiat fringilla. Sed leo tellus, gravida eu, auctor vitae, mollis sed, diam. Nam erat pede, rutrum quis, elementum id, tincidunt at, lacus. Vivamus ut sem. Phasellus consequat bibendum risus. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Suspendisse vestibulum porttitor magna. Nullam ante arcu, fermentum condimentum, congue vel, gravida eu, elit. Etiam sem mauris, molestie eget, suscipit sed, gravida at, urna. Mauris non sem. Curabitur porttitor, orci non sollicitudin laoreet, lorem nulla suscipit nulla, sit amet sagittis diam dui id odio. Maecenas convallis lobortis purus. Morbi euismod ipsum eu lectus. Suspendisse laoreet purus at elit.