Terry Pratchett Knighted 366
ackthpt writes "Headlines have been popping up on Google News: 'Terry Pratchett declared himself "flabbergasted" to receive a knighthood as he led a group of writers, actors and performers honoured today.' The Discworld author and stalwart adversary of Alzheimers Disease has been a member of the Order of the British Empire (OBE) for Services to Literature since 1998. He will be entering the new year as Knight Commander. Well done and Oook, Sir Terry."
Re:Real honor (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Real honor (Score:4, Interesting)
Why should any governing body, or something affiliated with a governing body, decide for people what moral causes are worth awarding shiny medals and titles for, instead of simply popular consensus? Why is that not good enough? Perhaps we should have President Bush award medals to anti-abortion groups, for "fighting for the sanctity of life", or anti-gay groups, "fighting for the sanctity of marriage?" Or for culture, how about giving Mel Gibson a medal for Passion of the Christ? Or, is it only OK when you agree with the cause or media?
And why does ANYONE need to hand out trinkets for these accomplishments? The honor, the REASON behind these awards are given almost always after such reasoning is evident to most people. Trophies and titles do not make peoples actions more or less great.
You know what? You want someone handing out blue ribbons so badly, why not you do it? What? You mean nobody cares about what you think? Well, why should I care about what the government thinks, or the queen, for that matter?
Wow! (Score:4, Interesting)
I just read this and a big smile spread across my face. I've been a fan of Pratchett's books for many years now (mid 1980s I think) and it's surprising how well he is known around the world. Isn't he something like he sells the third most books of any British author? His work is fantastic, though sometimes slated by critics - undeservedly IMHO because his books can be so original and funny and still be insightful.
Just as an example, when a very close relative of mine was undergoing major high-risk surgery, the only way I could pass the time other than biting my nails was by reading one of his books.
Congrats Sir Terry! And thank you very much for all your work.
Re:Real honor (Score:3, Interesting)
One does not get knighted for doing the exact same thing as his or her predecessors.
Tradition can be great for some things, and not-so-great for others.
Most Brits are very happy with the current arrangement, where the royal family play a strong role in the cultural development of the nation, while having a relatively minor role in the government.
"Tradition is bad, progress is good" is a terrible philosophy to live by. Don't fix what isn't broken!
Re:flabbergasted?! (Score:5, Interesting)
By throwing money at Alzheimers reserach and on a more personal level by doing all he can to remain as mentally active as possible.
It is worth noting that many believe the cause is now identified and that large pharma companies are working on getting treatments through trials.
I seem to recall a headline on /. linking high blood sugar to the memory loss effect. Hopefully this shows that more research is shedding more light on the condition.
Re:Real honor (Score:3, Interesting)
And why is the POTUS so special that he can award the various Presidential Medals, or Congress so special that it can award the various congerssional medals?
Almost every country has some kind of honours system, the British system just has rather more levels to it than most.
Paul
Re:Real honor (Score:3, Interesting)
There's a difference between "being broken" and "being an unnecessary usage of time and resources." Much like how organisms lose organs or features that, over time, become more and more useless, so too I think people are best served by removing the cruft from their lives.
Good omens (Score:5, Interesting)
Not to harp too strongly on this, but reading Rowling, or Tolkien, actually doesn't do much. Reading Pratchett exposes people to all kinds of religious, philosophical, psychological and sociological ideas. He actually manages, not only to make political correctness and liberal tolerance funny, but also attractive. Just compare his ueber-policeman, Vimes, to Jack Bauer, and you see what I mean. Although they're both cardboard, Vimes has depth. He is a middle aged man who has accidentally married into high society and learns to adapt to it, even as marriage to a woman who understands powerful men opens opportunities to him he would otherwise not have had.
Another thing about Pratchett which may reflect his collaborationism: he can view his characters from outside. For instance, Vimes appears in books in which he is not the central character, and then we see him quite differently. Even minor characters do this: we see Cheery Littlebottom as a dwarf coming out as a woman in a gender-averse society, with all the conflicts that causes, but in another book we see her from outside the police force just as another faceless instance of authority. It's depth like this that justifies a knighthood.
Re:Just for the record, only UK subjects (Score:3, Interesting)
OK, maybe I'm missing something - how does writing funny books actively inspire and help others?
You'd be amazed. A friend of mine has two kids (teenage boys) who had no interest in books before I introduced them to Pratchett. Now they read much more, and have whole worlds available to them that they didn't before.
I like Pratchett's work a lot, but my real appreciation for it comes from seeing how it works as a gateway drug for people who might otherwise never walk through the doors of the imagination. That's worth alittle acknowledgement, isn't it?
Re:Good omens (Score:3, Interesting)
I believe he never claimed to be creating a world out of nothing, rather on the basis of the Norse, English and German tales on which he was an acknowledged expert. What he did try to avoid though was the attribution of LOTR to WW2 but some of th points about warfare in general from WW1 definitely influenced it.