Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Toys NASA Space Technology

Record-Breaking Model Rocket Launch Set For April 25 156

darkjohnson writes with this impressive excerpt from Rocketry Planet: "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet tall and it will be powered by a massive array of nine motors: eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Record-Breaking Model Rocket Launch Set For April 25

Comments Filter:
  • So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by cortesoft ( 1150075 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @02:31PM (#27628607)

    When exactly does a model rocket become just a rocket?

  • Re:So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by 644bd346996 ( 1012333 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @02:44PM (#27628729)

    The FAA probably already knows about this rocket. I've been to a few launches with a local rocketry club, and they always get FAA clearance. My understanding is that they have a permanent clearance for their launch site for the first few thousand feet, but when they're launching the high-power rockets, they get unlimited clearance, making the area essentially a no-fly zone for planes. (Although that clearly didn't stop the Predator drone that was hanging out above us one day.)

  • Model Rocket (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Jared555 ( 874152 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @02:54PM (#27628845)

    I thought model rockets were just when you were following a kit and/or exact instructions..... I would think this would just fall under amateur rocketry....

    From wikipedia:

    A model rocket is a small rocket capable of being launched by anybody, to generally low altitudes (usually to around 100-500 m (300-1500 ft) for a 30 g (1 oz.) model) and recovered by a variety of means.

    According to the National Association of Rocketry, (NAR) Safety Code[1], model rockets are constructed of paper, wood, plastic and other lightweight materials.

  • A "model" rocket? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sphealey ( 2855 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:03PM (#27628909)

    I have a hard time seeing how something larger and more powerful than most of Goddard's devices can be called a "model". Amateur-built, sure. But not a "model".

    sPh

  • Re:So..... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by notthepainter ( 759494 ) <oblique&alum,mit,edu> on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:06PM (#27628939) Homepage

    I was talking with a friend about 5-10 years back and the FAA had recently pulled all approvals for model rocket launches. Being the resourceful group that model rocketeers are, they found some connections and got all set to launch from some Navy proving grounds. FAA got wind of that and got all huffy and said "no no no boys."

    And then the Navy got all huffy at the FAA, "You talking to me?"

    Must have been a fun few meetings!

  • Re:So..... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by gringofrijolero ( 1489395 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:14PM (#27628995) Journal

    Well, in theory the civilian FAA should have more authority over domestic airspace in peacetime. And until a formal declaration of war is in effect, we are at "peace". The FAA decides what airspace is restricted, not the military.

  • by wdhowellsr ( 530924 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:32PM (#27629131)
    This is not a new process just the biggest yet. There have been FAA clearance to 50k feet out west. The difference between a NASA or Military Rocket and a Model Rocket is one costs billions of dollars and has fail rate of thirty percent. A model rocket cost less than fifty thousand and has a fail rate of fifty percent.

    William D Howell Sr.
  • Re:So..... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by gringofrijolero ( 1489395 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @03:58PM (#27629351) Journal

    No sir. The FAA sets those areas at the request of the military. If it came down to a real legal turf war, the FAA must have the ultimate authority. Otherwise we are under military rule. As far as I know the US is not...yet.

  • Re:So..... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18, 2009 @04:24PM (#27629577)

    You are only working with theory.

    The FAA has no authority over MILITARY AIR SPACE.

    You also seem to confuse "the parts of the government that regulate civilian activities" with "government representatives elected by civilians".

    The only ones that can tell the navy what to do in their airspace are the navy itself, and the President of the United States.

    And possibly Space Command.

  • Top Gear (Score:3, Interesting)

    by garlicbready ( 846542 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @04:50PM (#27629847)
    I'm reminded of the TopGear episode
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b4WzWFKQ20 [youtube.com]

    where they launch a Reliant Robin (old 3 wheel car) as a re-usable space shuttle on the back of one of these things
    I wonder how the size compares?
  • Google for "MudRock" (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FlyingGuy ( 989135 ) <.flyingguy. .at. .gmail.com.> on Saturday April 18, 2009 @06:16PM (#27630703)

    Every year they launch from BLM land on the Blackrock dessert. On two days the have FAA clearance to 100,000' MSL

    Last year the highest rocket hit 31,000' MSL and hit just pver mach 3. The motor had a burn time of just a little under 4 seconds.

    And yes the FAA issues NOTAM's ( Notice to airman ) with the appropriate lat and long for the launch area.

  • by Deadstick ( 535032 ) on Saturday April 18, 2009 @07:15PM (#27631215)

    The sanctioning organization for model rocketry is called Tripoli, so named because its founder sold a collection of Libyan coins to get the incorporation money. That caused a bit of a flap during the troubles with Khaddafi, but they managed to straighten it out.

    rj

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...