District 9 Rises From the Ashes of Halo 207
JohnSmedley sent in a story about what might be the last SciFi film worth caring about this summer. He writes "Wired has an interesting piece up on the upcoming District 9 release. District 9 rose from the ashes of a failed Halo movie and expands on 'Alive in Jo'Burg' which is a South African short film by Blomkamp. Both the short and full feature films expand and explore a premise in which aliens in space are treated as badly as illegal immigrants and the underclass. The story begins as a damaged alien craft lands in Africa. The foreign race is quarantined in a remote area called District 9, and from there are subjected to xenophobia, and the desire of a multi-national conglomerate to steal their technology. The film is an exploration of what would happen in terms of segregation between an alien race and humans, subjecting the stranded visitors to the very human condition of greed, fear, and exploitation. District 9 will be in theatres on August 14'th, and you can view the trailers from the viewpoint of Multi-National United."
Interesting parallels (Score:2, Interesting)
The referenced site in the article on Wired for the trailer and the D-9 site in the article here do not work for me it seems. I found a good trailer on the site Sony made for it [district9movie.com].
This is sure to be a movie that I am going to watch, very interesting story. It also interests me that the director is from South Africa, the way the aliens are moved to camps does seem to have some parallels with the Apartheid [wikipedia.org]
Alien Nation (Score:4, Interesting)
So.. it sounds like the premise of the Sci-Fi series 'Alient Nation'.. which was a very good series.
Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire (Score:3, Interesting)
Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm South African so yay for South Africans of all colours, shapes and broken accents, and yay for an SA director making a really interesting SF movie set in SA. It is really nice to see something that isn't shallow Hollywood crap. It might be shallow South African crap, but at least it's different and interesting shallow South African crap.
"1984" vs "WE" (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Moon (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire (Score:1, Interesting)
The point of the tea party was: "No taxation without representation." If you don't want to give non-citizens the right to vote, that's fine. But according to the US's own core beliefs, you shouldn't be taxing them in that case.
Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi (Score:3, Interesting)
You can get the statistics for the past few years at the SAPSâ(TM) site: http://www.saps.gov.za/statistics/reports/crimestats/2008/crime_stats.htm [saps.gov.za] You should however bear in mind that statistics tampering has become widespread in the past few years.
This country has a lot of problems â" unfortunately a lot of foreign people are not willing to accept that (and still cling to the âoerainbow nationâ fallacy). Problems locally also do not get handled because any criticism against the government or the ANC is seen as racism. This coupled with a criminal for president really removes the confidence in the future of South Africa from any rational person.
Re:"1984" vs "WE" (Score:3, Interesting)
I am a big fan of "We" but I must say I find it to be much more in the vein of Brave New World or Brazil than 1984. It presents a society which attempts, perhaps even genuinely attempts, to run itself on principled and idealistic grounds, but which in reality imposes a bureaucratic dystopia on its people because (a) those ideals are fundamentally misplaced and (b) the very notion of forcing people to live according to particular principles is doomed to have that result. But, for example, D's friend R is a government-endorsed poet and a 'true believer' in the state and its principles. The characters are able to engage in discussion and reflection on these issues, even though those who become too prominently troublesome are subject to 'correction'.
By contrast the core of 1984 in my mind is that there is literally no room for debate or reflection - the state doesn't ask you to accept anything, it demands it with absolutely no tolerance whatsoever for anything other than complete subservience. The state is also more overtly cynical, for instance waging perpetual war as a means of keeping the domestic population under control, and deliberately entrapping its citizens to ensure total compliance. The character of O'Brien in 1984 serves to emphasise that the state is not interested in your consent - he engages Winston Smith in political/philosophical discussion, but this is just a ruse of the state to trap Winston, who still instinctively believes that there must be room for such things. This differs from the government in We which genuinely (in my opinion) believes in its stated principles and indeed wishes to export them to the rest of the universe to 'enlighten' other species.
Anyway, I suppose I take issue with your implication that Orwell stole his ideas from Zamyatin (as I think his name is spelt in English). Orwell freely acknowledged that We was very influential on him, but I think it is equally clear that 1984 takes certain ideas about the totalitarian state to much more brutal and harsh extremes. Orwell's idea is really that the state can assume total control to a point where the consent of the individual is utterly irrelevant; in We, the consent of the individual is still significant, and it is the belief in the system which allows it to continue.
Just my two cents, they are both great novels. I hope Zamyatin had a better grasp on humanity than Orwell, but I doubt it.