Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Tron Legacy Exposed 320

KingofGnG writes "Disney has chosen the San Diego Comic-Con International to present its new sci-fi project: the sequel to Tron. The classic movie from 1982 dealt with video games, virtual reality and 3D graphics when none of those things were widely popular. The new movie has got an official title and synopsis now, and they've released the very first trailer from the movie (this time without silly censorship) together with some concept art and the teaser poster." No matter how silly the movie is, they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tron Legacy Exposed

Comments Filter:
  • by winkydink ( 650484 ) * <sv.dude@gmail.com> on Monday July 27, 2009 @01:48PM (#28840533) Homepage Journal

    Videogames weren't popular in 1982? Let me guess: in 1982, you were still a
    Hershey bar in your dad's back pocket.

    One word: Pacman

  • Disney pah (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Plunky ( 929104 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @01:50PM (#28840567)

    No matter how silly the movie is they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.

    Do not give Disney your money, they will only use it to steal your culture

  • Re:Disney pah (Score:4, Insightful)

    by mcfatboy93 ( 1363705 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @01:59PM (#28840687) Homepage

    What culture?

  • Disney... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by noundi ( 1044080 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:00PM (#28840717)

    No matter how silly the movie is, they'll at least get my money for sheer nostalgia.

    Oops, you just defined the source to 90% of Disney's revenue.

  • Re:Disney... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Capt.DrumkenBum ( 1173011 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:05PM (#28840821)
    I see the other 10% of their revenue coming from the new game "LightCycles 3D"
    Which I sadly will probably buy a copy of.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:10PM (#28840901)

    Agreed, you have no idea how huge games were in 1982. There will never be anything approaching the level of furvor over video games today like what existed in the typical 80's arcade.

  • by Seumas ( 6865 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:12PM (#28840957)

    I'll get downed for the fanboys, but whatever:

    I couldn't possibly care less about a Tron sequel. The original was enjoyable when you were a kid, but watching it as an adult, you just realize what boring and uninteresting crap it is. It isn't even watchable in stretches longer than about fifteen minutes. So anyone who has finally realized what crap it is won't care about a sequel and kids today who are the age that we were when we liked the first one won't care because they weren't around for the first one.

    I could almost understand a remake and doing it right this time. But a sequel suggests that they thought the original was actually good. The only people who will care about this are those who are suffering a heavy bout of nostalgia and haven't watched it recently so still mistakenly believe it's AWESOME.

    It's like Knight Rider. I'm sure a lot of us remember how cool Knight Rider was when we were kids. Then watched a couple episodes as adults and realized how stupid and terrible and uninteresting it is.

    Instead of this shameless money-grab, they should... you know... do something new.

  • Re:Disney... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by JCSoRocks ( 1142053 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:14PM (#28840981)
    Yeah, and the reason that George Lucas continues to crap all over Star Wars. :(
  • Re:Screw TRON (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:22PM (#28841147)

    TRON gave an unrealistic expectation of what computers could do which continues to perplex Ludites to this day.

    Huh? The Tron I remember was a fantasy piece akin to a kids imagination (go figure for a Disney Movie) of what the "inside" of a computer would be like. Or the "world" inside the computer.

    The move prevailing theme was capturing the video game social crazy of the late 70's early 80's. How it was turning lives into video games as people got sucked into a games "virtual reality".

    I don't recall it taking itself anywhere near serious with regards to computer technology. Perhaps you're seeing something that wasn't there, or I'm missing something from the classic.

  • Screw the Ludites! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by KGBear ( 71109 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @02:23PM (#28841161) Homepage
    They'll have an unrealistic expectation of any expression of technology, by definition. All the while War Games and Tron were inspiring a whole generation (myself included) to learn what it's all about. We knew very well the expectations in both movies were unrealistic, but that was never the point. I had no hope of making my Sinclair ZX81 do anything remotely close to what Tron showed me but I got to fell like Flynn when I hacked a reset button for it (pin 13 to ground on the Z80). (Good) sci-fi is about inspiration, not reality. If it were realistic it would be a documentary and in 1982 a very boring one...
  • by EmagGeek ( 574360 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @03:37PM (#28842323) Journal

    Easy... the world figured out floating point arithmetic and partial derivative vector processing...

  • by gilesjuk ( 604902 ) <<giles.jones> <at> <zen.co.uk>> on Monday July 27, 2009 @03:39PM (#28842361)

    Back when video games were a fairly new thing and CGI was amazing they made Tron. The visual style was impressive, especially given the use of hand tinting and other post processing effects. These days it's all too easy using CGI and other computer gadgetry.

    There simply isn't any way that this sequel can stand out compared to all the other CGI fx laden films around. Unless of course they go for rotoscoping or similar as used in A Scanner Darkly.

  • by JockTroll ( 996521 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @04:20PM (#28842999)

    Pissing on the slashdot hive mind does have its appeal.

  • by Sponge Bath ( 413667 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @05:40PM (#28844139)

    Laurie Anderson's song "Smoke Rings"

    When I was a Hershey bar
    In my father's back pocket.
    Hey look! Over there!
    It's Frank Sinatra
    Sitting in a chair.

    Possibly something to do with the WW2 cliche of GIs offering candy for sexual favors?

  • by Sark666 ( 756464 ) on Monday July 27, 2009 @06:02PM (#28844447)

    I'm excited as hell for this movie, but I wish they brought back David Warner as Sark. You might say he's too old, but I've seen him in something recently and he still looks good. He's truly an underrated actor and makes a great villain.

    A little pointless trivia, he was also the voice of the MCP.

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...