The Hobbit Filming at 48fps 423
An anonymous reader writes "Peter Jackson has announced via his Facebook page that The Hobbit is being shot at 48 frames per second, ameliorating the '3D headaches' that many viewers have complained of in the last few boom-years for the format. Film has been shot and projected at 24fps since the 1920s, with the exception of Douglas Trumbull's 60fps 'ShowScan' format, used for the Universal Back To The Future ride, amongst others. Jackson himself predicts that the widespread adoption of 48fps workflow could not only improve the 3D but also the general cinematic experience, though it may earn itself some backward-looking critics. But until digital principal photography completely usurps celluloid, this may be good news for Kodak, who now have even more reason to lament the death of Stanley Kubrick."
Good, his movies are too long (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Wrong problem anyone? (Score:5, Funny)
... if anything, this will result in a film that looks unnaturally smooth to a movie going audience... essentially adding a distraction for the 2D viewers while not fixing anything for 3D viewers...
That's why I never go outside. And when I stay inside, I insist on strobe lighting.
Re:Good, his movies are too long (Score:5, Funny)
Twice as many frames means that if you view it at the standard 24 frames per second, the movie will be twice as long!
Videophile. . . (Score:5, Funny)
24 fps is really just, warmer, you know. You can really see the difference, and the 24fps just looks better, to my eyes anyhow. BTW, I am so glad I bought the Monster Video cables - my DVD bits have so much less signal degradation with them.
Re:Wrong problem anyone? (Score:4, Funny)
Real life is "unnaturally smooth". The frame rate on reality is approximately 1.85486e43 fps (give or take due to uncertainties in the value of Planck time).
And really -- upconversion is your standard? Really?