Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Piracy Your Rights Online

Megaupload.com Shut Down, Founder Charged With Piracy 1005

zacharye writes "Federal prosecutors in Virginia have shut down notorious file-sharing site Megaupload.com and charged the service's founder with violating piracy laws. The Associated Press broke the story on Thursday, reporting that the indictment accuses Megaupload.com's owner with costing copyright holders including record labels and movie studios more than $500 million in lost revenue."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Megaupload.com Shut Down, Founder Charged With Piracy

Comments Filter:
  • by elrous0 ( 869638 ) * on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:23PM (#38753126)

    The summary doesn't mention it, but none of those indicted or arrested were U.S. citizens or had likely even ever set foot on U.S. soil. Even if you're in another country, you had better make sure you're not violating U.S. law. Here's a full list of those foreigners who foolishly thought they weren't under U.S. jurisdiction (from the DOJ website [justice.gov]):

    Kim Dotcom, aka Kim Schmitz and Kim Tim Jim Vestor, 37, a resident of both Hong Kong and New Zealand. Dotcom founded Megaupload Limited and is the director and sole shareholder of Vestor Limited, which has been used to hold his ownership interests in the Mega-affiliated sites.

    Finn Batato, 38, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the chief marketing officer;

    Julius Bencko, 35, a citizen and resident of Slovakia, who is the graphic designer;

    Sven Echternach, 39, a citizen and resident of Germany, who is the head of business development;

    Mathias Ortmann, 40, a citizen of Germany and resident of both Germany and Hong Kong, who is the chief technical officer, co-founder and director;

    Andrus Nomm, 32, a citizen of Estonia and resident of both Turkey and Estonia, who is a software programmer and head of the development software division;

    Bram van der Kolk, aka Bramos, 29, a Dutch citizen and resident of both the Netherlands and New Zealand, who oversees programming and the underlying network structure for the Mega conspiracy websites.

    Dotcom, Batato, Ortmann and van der Kolk were arrested today in Auckland, New Zealand, by New Zealand authorities, who executed provisional arrest warrants requested by the United States. Bencko, Echternach and Nomm remain at large.

  • Re:right. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jawnn ( 445279 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:30PM (#38753246)
    You bet your ass they make sure that the lamestream media parrots those numbers as often as possible. Never mind that they've been proven, over and over again, to be utter bullshit. And notice how Chris Dodd et al keep referring to it as "theft"? Heaven forbid that CBS, or CNN suddenly grasp the real issue is an industry that is genuinely threatened by advancing technology and that industry's choice to pursue legal measures to prop up their outmoded business model instead of actually competing.
  • by b0bby ( 201198 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:30PM (#38753256)

    Looks strangely familiar [upup-downdown.com].

    In seriousness, why isn't this all over the news? Why just SOPA?

    Because this just happened today. For once, /. is pretty up to date!

  • by hawks5999 ( 588198 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:35PM (#38753348)
    If you are going to be accused of piracy, hope that you live in one of these non-extradition treaty countries: Bhutan Botswana Brunei Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad China Comoros Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Gabon Guinea Guinea Bissau Indonesia Iran Ivory Coast Jordan Kuwait Laos Lebanon Libya Madagascar Mali Maldives Mauritania Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Nepal Niger Oman Qatar Russia Rwanda Samoa Sao Tome e Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Somalia Sudan Syria Togo Tunisia Uganda United Arab Emirates Vanuatu Vietnam Yemen Yemen South Zaire
  • by MaskedSlacker ( 911878 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:59PM (#38753786)

    That's what they did. They asked New Zealand to arrest the men involved, and New Zealand police arrested them. Perhaps reading is not your strong suit?

    There are plenty of reasons to be unhappy with this that are based in fact. You should try one of those.

  • by gnick ( 1211984 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:00PM (#38753794) Homepage

    Do those taps run directly into the bottling plants tanks?

    For about 1 bottle in 4 [msn.com], yes. Yes they do [cnn.com].

  • by StikyPad ( 445176 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:04PM (#38753886) Homepage

    Sure, except then you get to experience extraordinary rendition [wikipedia.org] instead of extradition.

  • by Baloroth ( 2370816 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:11PM (#38754014)

    Aaand they didn't go after the MegaUpload guys directly either. They asked the New Zealand authorities (which is where they were living) to do it for them, presumably under the US-NZ extradition treaty.

  • by jamstar7 ( 694492 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:15PM (#38754082)
    You have not the slightest idea what the power of a fully funded bought and paid for Congress is. 'El Presidente' is supposed to be the figurehead of the government, not the Supreme Dictator. If by some chance Ron Paul does scam up the presidency, expect Congress to beat him senseless like a rented mule.
  • by shaitand ( 626655 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:17PM (#38754126) Journal

    Which would be fine. If it were the result of a CIVIL suit by the people who claimed to lose money and occurred AFTER they won in court.

    I had files on this service and can no longer access them. This hurt more than just one guy.

  • by artor3 ( 1344997 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:29PM (#38754300)

    That's a non-sequitur and you know it. You're not pirating "an internet". You're pirating a song or a movie or whatever.

  • by Fned ( 43219 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:36PM (#38754422) Journal

    Megaupload have no system in place to stop people uploading material they don't own. Simple as that.

    There is no such system.

    Simple as that.

  • by Grishnakh ( 216268 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:42PM (#38754528)

    I hope they weren't important files... you were basically trusting your data to a guy who has been convicted of credit card fraud, insider trading, and embezzlement.

    Have you never heard of encryption?

  • by SuricouRaven ( 1897204 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @07:24PM (#38755280)
    A little googling, and.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainwater_tank [wikipedia.org]

    In the State of Colorado, USA, the installation of rainwater collection barrels is subject to ... state statutes. The movement and holding of rainwater is inextricably linked with ownership of water rights and is enshrined in the constitution of the State of Colorado. The use of water in Colorado and other western states is governed by what is known as the prior appropriation doctrine. Since all water arriving in Colorado has been allocated to "senior water right holders" since the 1850s, rainwater prevented from running downstream may not be available to its rightful owner. In 2009, legislation in Colorado was enacted that permits capture of rain water for residential use subject to strong limitations and conditions.[14] To be permitted, a residence may not be connected to a domestic water supply system serving more than 3 single-family dwellings. The permit must be purchased from the State Engineer's office and is subject to water usage restrictions.

    Or, more briefly: The state already sold that rain to the water company while it was still in the air. If it falls on your land and you collect some for yourself, you are stealing water from that company.

  • Re:Safe Harbor (Score:4, Informative)

    by the eric conspiracy ( 20178 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @08:37PM (#38756196)

    The FBI charges cite examples where Megaupload was informed of infringing files that Megaupload did not remove.

    If they can prove that, no safe harbor and Megaupload is toast.

  • by fishbowl ( 7759 ) on Thursday January 19, 2012 @08:54PM (#38756390)

    They didn't just want to shut down the site! They wanted to prove that the operators knew that what they were doing was illegal, and that they were taking deliberate steps to hide the money! That is central to the indictment, that they knew (because they were told!) that they hosted infringing content, and that they did not comply with removing (very specific) items from a (very specific) server. There's a lot more to the indictment, which I encourage everyone to read before they take an activist position.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204616504577171180266957116.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories [wsj.com]

  • by symbolset ( 646467 ) * on Thursday January 19, 2012 @11:34PM (#38757666) Journal

    Found an interview. Apparently Mega was looking to go head-to-head with the big record labels, and give artists 90%. And pay them for free downloads too.

    It's here. [torrentfreak.com]

  • by Kalriath ( 849904 ) on Friday January 20, 2012 @12:02AM (#38757776)

    Then read the actual Indictment [scribd.com]. It looks pretty bad for MU. Especially since the government keeps calling Megaupload "The Conspiracy". You can't support a Conspiracy can you? That's just downright criminal!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20, 2012 @08:50AM (#38759924)

    The Megaupload executive team went ahead and referred to itself as The Mega Conspiracy. An incredibly ironic (and foolish) nickname in the end.

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...