Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Music Businesses Piracy The Media

Music Industry Sees First Revenue Increase Since 1999 393

Zaatxe writes with a bit of news about the music industry; sales are slightly up (basically flat). From the article: "The music industry, the first media business to be consumed by the digital revolution, said on Tuesday that its global sales rose last year for the first time since 1999, raising hopes that a long-sought recovery might have begun. The increase, of 0.3 percent, was tiny, and the total revenue, $16.5 billion, was a far cry from the $38 billion that the industry took in at its peak more than a decade ago. Still, even if it is not time for the record companies to party like it's 1999, the figures, reported Tuesday by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, provide significant encouragement. 'At the beginning of the digital revolution it was common to say that digital was killing music,' said Edgar Berger, chief executive of the international arm of Sony Music Entertainment. Now, he added, it could be said 'that digital is saving music.'" Because CDs aren't digital. CD sales are declining, and being replaced by the sale of lossy files. I wonder how much more money they could be making if they'd just sell folks lossless music on the open market (not just iTunes) since at least that's all that keeps me buying a CD or three a year (I own way too many CDs personally, and stopped buying music until discovering Bandcamp and easy lossless downloads rekindled my desire to find new stuff).
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Music Industry Sees First Revenue Increase Since 1999

Comments Filter:
  • by yincrash ( 854885 ) on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @09:50AM (#43023597)
    Only happened because the music industry absolutely refused to sell DRM-free music for a decade. No one wanted to buy music that could go obsolete when the store went away.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @10:12AM (#43023827)

    Revenue from albums? Actual sales are way up and have been for years:

    Here's the 2012 report:
    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120105005547/en/Nielsen-Company-Billboard%E2%80%99s-2011-Music-Industry-Report

    Overall sales
    2012, 2011, Gain
    1,661 , 1,611 , 3.10%

    Even album sales are up in that report.

    Here's their Canadian one from 2009 (couldn't find the US one)
    http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100204007048/en/Nielsen-Company-Billboard%E2%80%99s-2009-Canadian-Industry-Report

    Same thing, total tracks sales are way up, album equivalent are also up. (See the 'overall album sales' +2%).

    The price hasn't gone up, so the only way revenue has gone up, is if Apple and Walmart and the rest have paid out more of their income for the music.

  • by whisper_jeff ( 680366 ) on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @10:31AM (#43024001)

    I wrote this about a year ago. Copy/pasting because it's still relevant.

    So, claims are regularly made suggesting that the music industry is failing, usually followed by claims that tougher laws are needed to protect the hard working people in the music industry.
    Â
    Small problem - it's not true.
    Â
    The music industry is not in as bad a situation as claims would suggest.ÂHere are some interesting statistics:
    Â
    Music publishing revenues are on an upward trend.
    Worldwide Music Publishing Revenues (2006 - 2011)Â
    http://grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=69 [grabstats.com]
    $8.0 billion (2006)
    $8.3 billion (2007)
    $8.6 billion (2008)
    $8.9 billion (2009)
    $9.1 billion (2010)
    $9.4 billion (2011)
    Â
    Live music (concert) revenues are on a upward trend.
    Worldwide Live Music / Concert Revenues (2006 - 2011)Â
    http://grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=70 [grabstats.com]
    $16.6 billion (2006)
    $18.1 billion (2007)
    $19.4 billion (2008)
    $20.8 billion (2009)
    $22.2 billion (2010)
    $23.5 billion (2011)
    Â
    The entire industry's revenues (*)Âare on an upward trend.
    Worldwide Music Industry Revenues (2006 - 2011)Â
    http://grabstats.com/statmain.asp?StatID=67 [grabstats.com]
    2006 ($60.7 billion)
    2007 ($61.5 billion)
    2008 ($62.6 billion)
    2009 ($65.0 billion)
    2010 ($66.4 billion)
    2011 ($67.6 billion)
    Â
    * The "entire industry" isÂdefined as "Revenues are for record labels, music publishers, recording artists, performing artists, composers, concert venues and merchandise, companies; includes revenues from sales of physical recordings, digital music services (online and mobile), music publishing and live music."
    Â
    Â
    What is most interesting about these numbers is it supports what I have felt for a long time - the major players in the music industry have realized that CD sales are nice but that's not how to get rich - the big money (almost 2.5 times the money...) is in concerts. That is why acts like 'N Sync and Britney and Beiber and U2 and Lady Gaga and damn near everyone are regularly on tour. They've realized that people are spending more and more on actually going to the concert to experience the music. They realized that to be financially successful means touring a lot. CD sales makes one wealthy but a concert tour makes one rich.
    Â
    These numbers show that the music industry isn't failing. It isn't even shrinking. The _industry_ is growing, across the board. Yes, there are individual companies that might be suffering and there are individual bands that are suffering and there are probably specific geographic regions that are suffering but the industry, as a whole, is thriving - it is growing.
    Â
    One thing I do agree with the music industry, however, is that the internet is a big reason for this - we just disagree on the direction their profits are headed...

  • by jsepeta ( 412566 ) on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @10:38AM (#43024083) Homepage

    The diversity of available music is greater now than ever, as the industry has been evolving, albeit painfully for the older labels. Artists can make a living through hard work, not necessarily through CD sales alone. Hell, some bands make more money from merchandise than from music (I'm talking to you, KISS). This has been true since at least the 1990's when my band the Dharma Bums made a killing on t-shirts and realized that's where the money was.

    Never once has the industry blamed CLEAR CHANNEL for fucking up music distribution. Yet through their domination of local radio, nationally, Clear Channel calls the shots, picks the hits, and generally limits the availability of interesting music by focusing on the "stars" it decides to popularize. This is far more insidious than dropping $100 off at the radio station so the DJ will play your new 45.

    After Napster came out, the industry stopped selling CD singles and raised the price of CD's to $18 retail. This had a stronger dampening effect than free music downloads, as many of the people who were exposed to new music through downloads would eventually by cd's to support their new favorite musicians. Plus, one cannot claim that 1 episode of free downloading = 1 lost sale, as many downloaders would never purchase music to begin with (financial constraints, stick-it-to-the-man, live concerts not available for sale, etc). Yes, scientific studies showed that music sales went UP in college towns where Napster was popular.

    I'm encouraged by new arrivals like BandCamp, SoundCloud, Gobbler, and other new musical tools for the web -- but discouraged by the shitty pay musicians earn from streaming dis-services like Spotify. As a hobbyist musician with many friends in the industry, I recognize that it's hard to make a living doing what you like doing, but for many of them, they have no choice -- music drives creatives to create. And that is what we should support -- the human spirit, not some fucking RIAA executive making $80k/year by prosecuting grampas and teenagers.

    Let us not forget that the RIAA and MPAA have forced taxes on all Americans for blank media -- cassettes and CD-R's -- because they assume we're "pirates" who are stealing from them. Nevermind the fact that blank optical media is used for storing computer data that may not have any relevance whatsoever to their claim. Nevermind the fact that I'm more inclined to make cd's of my own songs than to dupe the latest Rihanna (will NEVER happen, boys, cuz I think she sucks #TaintedLove). The RIAA and MPAA have been nursing the public's teat for a long time -- it's time for them to grow the fuck up.

  • by frank_adrian314159 ( 469671 ) on Wednesday February 27, 2013 @12:47PM (#43025553) Homepage

    And as musicians get a bigger cut from live performances, everybody is happy except the middlemen who have been cut out and a thin elite of top musicians who hoped they could retire at the age of 30.

    Maybe not so much... Many artists are being saddled with what are called "360" deals, meaning that the labels get their cut of performances, merchandise sold at performances, publishing, and other media usage of the material. The labels will put in money promoting and fronting money for the tours and selling the new IP they've retained in the deal. But, at the end of the day, it's all accounted using the same shady practices that the 'AA's have always used, so now the artist isn't even guaranteed to make money from performance or publishing either - he or she is living advance to advance in indentured servitude trying to pay off what his or her label has supposedly fronted for his or her "success".

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...