Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Government Privacy

Legislators Introduce Bill To Stop Set Top Boxes From Watching You 161

An anonymous reader writes "For a few years now, we've been hearing about TV-related devices that have built-in cameras and microphones. Their stated purpose is to monitor consumers and gather data — often to target advertising. (We'll set aside any unstated purposes — the uses they tell us about are bad enough.) Now, two members of the U.S. House of Representatives have submitted legislation to regulate this sort of technology. '[They] said they want to get out ahead of the release of this new technology and pass legislation that ensures it would include beefed up privacy protections for consumers. They added that this legislation is particularly relevant given the recent revelations about the National Security Agency's Internet surveillance programs. ... Additionally, the bill requires a cable box or set-top device to notify consumers when the monitoring technology is activated and in use by posting the phrase "We are watching you" across their TV screens.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Legislators Introduce Bill To Stop Set Top Boxes From Watching You

Comments Filter:
  • Oh please! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fustakrakich ( 1673220 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @12:44PM (#44015405) Journal

    As if the law is going to stop people from spying...

  • Don't stop there (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rogueippacket ( 1977626 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @12:46PM (#44015411)
    Don't just limit this to set top boxes, include gaming consoles and make a big fucking red blinking light mandatory on devices like Glass.
  • Put it on the box (Score:5, Insightful)

    by clarkkent09 ( 1104833 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @12:58PM (#44015485)

    It's too late once you already bought the thing. There should be a message on the box in big bold letters, "this device may be used to watch what you are doing in your own house" or something, like on cigarette packs. If you don't mind, sure buy it but you should have the information ahead of time.

  • Re:That's fine (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kheldan ( 1460303 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:01PM (#44015509) Journal
    I know you're going for the Funny here, but:

    In the 1984-esque future that some people would have for us all, you'd be quietly picked up by law enforcement officials some time shortly afterwards, and taken to a hospital for "observation" because of your "deviant behavior", then either committed to a mental institution or a "re-education" facility to "cure" you of the mental illness causing your deviant outbursts. Have to protect the citizens, after all.
  • by sideslash ( 1865434 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:03PM (#44015511)
    The NSA doesn't ask for permission. A head honcho director just recently lied to Congress under oath about the extent of surveillance, and nobody in charge seems to mind. Tell me again exactly what this law is supposed to accomplish?
  • by __aaltlg1547 ( 2541114 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:14PM (#44015577)

    What if some customers want to be watched? I assure you, there are many such people. Why do you think there are so many people with Facebook privacy settings wide open? Instead, make it so you can't make any of the cable services dependent on it. Then users who don't want to be watched can cover the camera port. Of course, even then, they'll attempt to manipulate you. They could show you only the most annoying possible ads if the camera port is covered, but show you ads that they have calculated will be less annoying to you if they can see you. No camera? Nonstop ads for penis pills, laxatives and feminine hygiene products.

    Even basic ad targeting is more profitable than untargeted ads they shovel at us now. Why advertise high-end cars to people who can't afford them? A camera in your living room could tell that what you really might be interested in is a new couch and you probably don't have a lot of money to invest, or that you have young'uns or don't and tell whether it would be likely to be profitable to show you ads for diapers and toys.

  • by bmo ( 77928 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:24PM (#44015663)

    And have the light hardwired to the camera power so it's physically impossible for software to turn it off.

    And electrical tape or paint doesn't block light. Right?

    --
    BMO

  • Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday June 15, 2013 @01:27PM (#44015679)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...