Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Television Businesses The Almighty Buck The Internet

Are Cable Subscribers Subsidizing Internet-Only TV Viewers? 223

waderoush sends a tongue-in-cheek open letter to cable TV subscribers from somebody who has cut the cord in favor of streaming shows over the internet. "Dear Cable TV Subscriber: I don't think I've ever told you how grateful I am. I haven't paid a cent for cable television since 2009. Yet I have on-demand access via the Internet to a growing cornucopia of great shows like Game of Thrones, Homeland, Mad Men, and Breaking Bad, at reasonable à la carte prices. And it's all because you continue to pay exorbitant and ever-increasing monthly fees for your premium cable bundle (around $80 per month, on average). After all, your money goes straight to the studios and networks that produce and distribute all the expensive first-run programming that I'm perfectly happy to watch later at heavily discounted prices. So in effect, you're subsidizing my own footloose, freeloading, cord-cutting TV habits. I don't know how to thank you!"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Are Cable Subscribers Subsidizing Internet-Only TV Viewers?

Comments Filter:
  • by mattack2 ( 1165421 ) on Friday October 18, 2013 @06:29PM (#45170441)

    I admittedly only skimmed the article. But where are the "reasonable" a la carte prices?

    Both Amazon & iTunes charge $2.99 ($3.99 for HD) per episode for "Game of Thrones" S1. (Yes, a bit less per ep if you buy an entire season, but that doesn't really count as a la carte anymore, does it?)

    I would gladly pay at least the same, maybe even slightly more, than I pay now for cable, to be able to watch everything commercial free/when I want without having to Tivo them.. But I'd pay a LOT more than cable, if you use the current prices of every single individual show.

  • by alexander_686 ( 957440 ) on Friday October 18, 2013 @06:41PM (#45170531)

    I don't think so. I think these are the classes
          Free Streaming: Hulu, major network sites, etc. Payment: 1 day lag, commercials
          Cheap streaming: Premium Hulu, Amazon Prime, Netflix, etc. Payment: 1 low monthly fee.
          Purchase: Buy DVD, iTunes, whatever: Payment: less then cable.

    People pay for cable for convenience and timeliness. People are not willing to delay viewing. One example is sports. Nobody wants to watch yesterdays’ game, which is why ESPN is one of the most expensive chancels on basic TV. Game of Thrones is another example. I can either pay HBO big bucks now or I delay until the DVD comes out.

  • by PraiseBob ( 1923958 ) on Friday October 18, 2013 @06:49PM (#45170583)
    Even HBO GO requires a cable subscription ($80 + 15 for hbo), while you can buy episodes ala cart for $3, which is roughly an hours worth of entertainment. So if you watch more than 1 hour of it every single night then it could work out cheaper to subscribe.
  • by Mitreya ( 579078 ) <<moc.liamg> <ta> <ayertim>> on Friday October 18, 2013 @06:50PM (#45170595)

    Cheap streaming: Premium Hulu, Amazon Prime, Netflix, etc. Payment: 1 low monthly fee.

    Except that last I heard, Premium Hulu still has commercials. For your payment you just get an expanded library of commercial-laden content. I have no idea who pays for that.

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...