Has 3D Film-Making Had Its Day? 436
dryriver sends this hopeful note from the BBC:
"'It's three years since audiences around the world swarmed into cinemas to see James Cameron's Avatar. It rapidly became the biggest grossing film of all time, in part because of its ground-breaking digital 3D technology. But, in retrospect, Avatar now seems the high-point of 3D movie-making, with little since 2009 to challenge its achievement. Three years on, has the appeal of 3D gone flat? Nic Knowland has been a respected director of photography in Britain for 30 years. He's seen cinema trends and fads come and go, but never one for which he's had so little enthusiasm as 3D. 'From the cinematographer's perspective it may offer production value and scale to certain kinds of film. But for many movies it offers only distraction and some fairly uncomfortable viewing experiences for the audience. I haven't yet encountered a director of photography who's genuinely enthusiastic about it.'"
Re:God i hope so. (Score:4, Funny)
"Greedo Texts First!" (Score:5, Funny)
* Don't worry. George has sold it to the Mouse. He can destroy your child hood memories no more.
Re:"Greedo Texts First!" (Score:5, Funny)
Well the Death Star would have its own facebook page with millions of people "liking" it for sure.
Ooh, just imagine Facebook as it would be run by the Imperials - oh, I guess not a lot of change after all. nm
Re:Films shot in Technicolor (Score:3, Funny)
Indeed. Who cares if 99.9% of the 3D films are absolute rubbish? There's a small handful of educational documentaries that use it well, so we should STFU and appreciate the fact that Hollywood is converting movies shot in 2D into 3D regardless of how shitty that conversion is!
Re:"Greedo Texts First!" (Score:5, Funny)
"I am altering the Terms Of Service. Pray I don't alter them any further."