HBO Developing Asimov's Foundation Series As TV Show 242
wired_parrot writes: Jonathan Nolan, writer of Interstellar and The Dark Knight, and producer of the TV show "Person of Interest," is teaming up with HBO to bring to screen a new series based on Isaac Asimov's Foundation series of books. This would be the first adaptation of the Hugo-award-winning series of novels to the screen.
Yes! (Score:2, Insightful)
Best. News. Ever.
Re:Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
Good thing it's Asimov and not George R R Martin...
Hari Seldon would have been killed by a classmate before he ever developed psychohistory.
Re:Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Weiners!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, I was going to make this comment. HBO stands for Needs More Boobs.
Re: (Score:2)
They should be called HBOO (with a little dot in each "O").
Re: (Score:2)
HBO = Heavy Boobs Office?
Re: (Score:2)
There was some sort of sexual adventure between a male bot and a woman, but the story, although situated in the Foundation "universe", does not take place in the Foundation series itself. Actually, the story takes place in the distant past, before the appearance of the Foundation.
Re: (Score:2)
some sort of sexual adventure
a.k.a. "marriage"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dors_Venabili [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
No that would be Gladia Solaria in The Naked Sun and Robots Of Dawn.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Yes! (Score:5, Insightful)
Foundation was not really prudish, but Asimov really didn't include (any that I recall) blatant sex scenes or sexual themes in his books, at least directly. It was always between the lines, as a means to advance the plot. Similarly the language was pretty clean most of the time. I'm not sure how this fits HBO's M.O. I mean they added MORE sex to Game of Thrones, and the books I think covered almost every variety and perversion attainable without giving characters internet access.
Foundation to me was always more Star Trek style science fiction, geared towards dreamers and full of hope (even in spite of what psychohistory predicted, and why Foundation existed). In contrast, HBOs other series, though well done, tend to focus on our seedier side. HBO can make a good show, but I wonder if the end product will resemble the series it's based on. Sex won't ruin it, but done the way HBO does it, will certainly be distracting.
Re: (Score:2)
Foundation was not really prudish, but Asimov really didn't include (any that I recall) blatant sex scenes or sexual themes in his books, at least directly.
...and still, Golan Trevize really got around. ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
Cmdr. Riker-like, not more.
If you look at Star Trek:TNG Series 1-2, Riker was quite a ladies' man, but the way it was put on screen was great: developed his character very well without turning into softporn.
Re:Yes! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Foundation was not really prudish, but Asimov really didn't include (any that I recall) blatant sex scenes or sexual themes in his books, at least directly.
Well fush!
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
One of the reasons for the lack of sex in the Foundation stories is that most of them appeared in Astounding (now Analog) back when Kay Tarrant was John Campbell's assistant. She was well known for not letting any such stuff through in the stories.
It wouldn't have bothered Asimov, although it'd likely be more masked in double-entendre and implication than anything graphic. After all, this is the guy who wrote "The Dirty Old Man's Guide to Sex" and co-wrote "Limericks: Too Gross".
Re:Yes! (Score:4, Informative)
Depends on which books, and where in his career he was. He got fairly blatant around mid-career, although rarely actually explicit. When they say 'Foundation Series' it's open to interpretation on which books are likely meant - The original three were early in his career, and didn't really have much sex in them. The later two (mid-career) at the end have sex as a major plot driver/enabler, and the two prequels (end-career) feature it without making it a huge point. So it depends somewhat on where they start. I'm betting they'll start with the prequels - they have a strong central character, and can lead into the rest without much issue even after he dies. (And a fair amount of sex if they want it.)
The other point I'd be worried about is violence - the Foundation Series is about the fall of an empire and the rise of a new one, but actual fighting doesn't occur often. There are several places where it looks like it's about to, but then the forces of history make it unnecessary. (Or the populace gets mind-controlled, in one case...) It'd be very tempting for a director of a drama series to ramp up the violence, but it would change a large part of the point of the stories.
Oh, and in response to a couple levels up: They didn't use robots for sex in the stories. They didn't use robots for anything, in fact. There was a complete ban on higher-level AIs and on humanoid machines, to the level of taboo. (Although there were a few characters who where extremely humanoid robots in the prequels and sequels - and were basically the reason for the bans.)
Re: (Score:2)
it will be now... in fact with HBO it will be the main story line.
Re: (Score:2)
I've read the series a few times. The Foundation series had very few robots as most were long gone by this point in the timeline. Though, there was one character in this series, if you include the prequels, that was intimate with a robot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Asimov bridged his two large series, "Robot" and "Foundation", into the same timeline with the book "Robots and Empire". You seem to suggest that the Foundation series starts with this book. I disagree. "Prelude to Foundation" is where I say the Foundation series starts, and it is many, many thousands of years after "Robots and Empire" and "Pebble in the Sky". The Galactic Empire was thought to have lasted about 12,000 years and the Foundation series starts at the end of that.
The question I have, which
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I hope they start at the Foundation itself, at least in terms of Hari Seldon establishing the original Foundation with the holographic recordings and the sense of excitement that happened when the first of these recordings started to play. Prelude to Foundation sort of ruins the whole
My hope is that they don't rush the Mule into existence soon in the series. It is a great story arc, but something that definitely needs to be about season 3-4.
Having the second foundation sort of hinted throughout the first
Re: (Score:3)
...and Martin would have been killed my old age before he ever finished the final novel.
Re: (Score:2)
...and Martin would have been killed my old age before he ever finished the final novel.
No way .. I've got my money on "heart attack"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There WAS a VHS "game" that came out that matched the plot of Caves of Steel back in the 80s... It actually wasn't that bad. That's about as close as you're going to get to film/video right now.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh my god yes! Bring on the Nuclear Hand Drills!
Re: (Score:3)
Let's not get too excited. The Foundation setting is a mash-up of ancient Rome anbd 50's sci-fi. The closest thing in contemporary movie culture that captures the same 'feel' would be the original Star Wars trilogy (Lucas cited Asimov and Flash Gordon as a few of his inspirations). I'm not sure it matches with the modern Hollywood sci-fi formula.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm not sure it matches with the modern Hollywood sci-fi formula.
Maybe this is exactly why people ARE excited.
Yay! (Score:2)
I bet there will be a lot more nudity than I remember in the books.
Re: (Score:2)
Eh, it'll fit in with the Hober Mallow storylines. He was hanging out basically nude in his tanning room even with other politicians visiting.
Re: (Score:2)
I bet there will be a lot more nudity than I remember in the books.
Yeah, my books didn't have any pictures _at all_! :(
While you're at it... (Score:5, Interesting)
Make a Rendezvous With Rama movie, would ya?
Re: (Score:2)
First book was great. The sequels....well...this was about the time that Clarke was phoning it in with things like 3001.
Re: (Score:2)
Well the other three were co-authored. Yea, that first book was amazing. There was a video game too. It wasn't so great. :(
Re: (Score:2)
There are so many great, GREAT books which deserve great, GREAT movies: Tuf Voyaging, A Fire Upon The Deep, Spin (by Robert Charles Wilson), Camouflage (which is really not difficult to put on screen). :)
If you really want to go crazy, Greg Egan's books are the thing. I'd be very much curious to see Schild's Ladder as a movie.
As for the sex-laden tendency of HBO as of late, they should simply take "Tous vers l'extase" written by Philippe Curval and be done with it - they don't even have to modify it
Re: (Score:2)
Greg Egan's stuff wouldn't translate well to the screen, I think. I absolutely love his work (Permutation City is one of my favorite books, and I loved Schild's Ladder, Quarantine, and all of his short fiction). The problem is that there's too heavy of a cognitive science/philosophical bent to them. You'd have to have a character sit down a monologue for a while to get everything out.
Re: (Score:3)
William Gibson's Neuromancer should be made into a movie. Just as long as they get the "Cyberspace" stuff right (there are some "cyberspace" type scenes in Jonny Mnemonic that are exactly how it should be done.
Cryptonomicon is another book deserving of a movie (and with all the current stuff going on, the modern-day parts of the book are scarily topical)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0134933/a [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:3)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0134933/ [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Granted! But it's going to be on That Other Network:
http://deadline.com/2014/09/ch... [deadline.com]
I'm sure it will suck (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Since the book(s) have all the action in the background, and the big reveal in the post crisis recap, I am sure the movie will suck.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the GoT TV series sucked much less than the books, so it's a positive in HBO's column.
Re:I'm sure it will suck (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not the translation of action that I am concerned about. It can be done. Books and movies have different strengths, and "action" is not the strong suit of books. HBO has done a good job. Personally, I think of Jackson's Lord of the Rings / Hobbit movies, where Jackson either extended or invented from scratch action scenes.
I am more concerned about scope. Each chapter in the Foundation saga is a vignette, a thin slice of time, separated by vast amounts of time. For each seasons they would almost have to fire the entire cast, strike all of the sets, etc. It would have the same problem as anthology shows like the Twilight Zone or Tales from the Crypt. There is a low correlation between a winning episode and a losing episode. Hit upon a great story line or a new great actor and you need to junk it for the next episode. The Twilight Zone was consistently good, but Tales from the Crypt was all over the place.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Since the book(s) have all the action in the background, and the big reveal in the post crisis recap, I am sure the movie will suck.
Except GRRM grew up in the age of television and has written for television. Even if he didn't write with the aim of a television adaption his books were still written with the influence of television storytelling and visual action. They're a lot easier to adapt for television as a result.
Asimov grew up with pulp magazines and the major non-book mass media would have been radio (which also influenced the pulp fiction), as a result his stories emphasized dialogue over visual storytelling.
They still might be
Re: (Score:2)
Political drama? HBO has shown they can do those too (and do them well) with West Wing :)
Re: (Score:3)
Political drama? HBO has shown they can do those too (and do them well) with West Wing :)
Am I missing something? Didn't The West Wing [wikipedia.org] air on NBC?
Re:I'm sure it will suck (Score:4, Insightful)
This is an HBO series, not a movie. They are big on dramas, not CGI explodaramas. I have my reservations about how well this will translate, but if it sucks it won't be because they turned it into a Michael Bay action shit-fest.
There's gonna be high expecations from Asimov fans (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If my wife hears about this, she's liable to want us to go out and get cable again.
HBO is going to have a standalone service [businessinsider.com] in the near future.
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, but many HBO shows are available via Amazon VOD. It looks like it is one season behind (in the case of Game of Thrones, at least), but you could still catch up with the Foundation series without subscribing to HBO/Cable TV.
Re: (Score:2)
Just to clarify, he's talking about the *purchase each episode individually* scenario on Amazon. (IMHO, ridiculously expensive.)
It's not available on (free with Amazon Prime) Amazon Prime Video. That's only (some?) HBO shows several years old. That's not meaning to disparage it, it has a bunch of good shows (e.g. Rome, Sopranos, Six Feet Under, etc.) Just not currently airing shows.
News for Nerds! (Score:2)
This is definitely news for nerds. I hope they don't butcher the story.
Re: (Score:2)
This is definitely news for nerds. I hope they don't butcher the story too much.
There. FTFY
Re: (Score:2)
I somehow worry less about them butchering the story with it as a HBO series than I would were they going to turn it into a movie (or even a series of movies). In the latter case, Michael Bay would probably get hired to direct, Hari Seldon would turn into a buff action star out to save the galaxy along with his scantily clad female assistant, and things would explode (utilizing the latest in CGI explosion technology) just by people looking at them.
Woo-hoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Now I don't have to read the books.
Re: (Score:2)
Just the trilogy, I hope (Score:4, Insightful)
The original trilogy was awesome, but later books were not the same caliber. But knowing how the entertainment industry works, they'll milk it for all its worth.
Re: Just the trilogy, I hope (Score:2, Funny)
Make three movies. Then reboot a few years later with lots of lens flare. Then reboot the reboot without the lens flare but the Mule will be an actor who is all steroided out body builder. Then of course there will be a Wayan brothers' spoof called "Floundation Series" and the mule is a pot head flaming gay guy.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah I felt the later stories were fair stories but not groundbreaking in the same way. I think the whole thing where he wants to connect the Robots saga stuff with the Foundation stuff felt a bit forced, although as a fan of his work I recall enjoying it at the time of reading (when I was much younger.)
And I tremble at the idea they might be trying to do this. I think Foundation and Stephen Donaldson's Thomas Covenant stories are two series I read when I was much younger that I always wondered if someon
It's HBO and... (Score:3)
...Jonathan Nolan that will make this good. HBO is careful about choosing show runners for these projects, and I think they'll treat it with the proper gravitas. Even the changes in the Leftovers were fine.
Just when will they start? Asimov wrote the prequels later, and they were really tight stories about Hari Seldon and the formation of the Foundation. However, the Golan Trevize storyline was great too. The Mule was short, I don't think you could base a series on it.
Maybe they'll cross-cut timelines from before The Sack to the ultimate end of the story.
The Prequels Would Translate... (Score:2)
to television more easily, including the the ones written by the Killer B's [kaedrin.com], IMHO.
don't remember any sex in it (Score:2)
I remember space ships and personal shield belts but no sex. HBO has a lot of work to do
Re: (Score:2)
"I call myself the Mule, but not because of my strength." ; ).
Re: (Score:2)
Asimov never aspired to be Science Fiction's God of Sex - he left that for Heinlein. But the only reason that the original foundation was so tame was because no one had sex back then.
He wrote very differently once the 1970's rolled in and had some very outspoken views on sex, the evolution of marriage, and other consequences of the century's improvements in lifespan, birth and disease control.
Sweet! (Score:2)
Up next? Ringworld? That would be incredible.
Superficial (Score:2)
Take the names of the characters, drop all the technobabble (the essence of the stories), add a starlet for romance, use an existing script for the plot, and bang! Hollywood SciFi disaster.
Hope it's better than the movies (Score:3)
I Robot, and Bicentennial man simply did not live up to the books.
Re:Hope it's better than the movies (Score:4, Insightful)
I Robot had nothing to do with the book. It was in fact written on another title first and then they bought the name to slap on it because people would recognize it, and, hey, it's about robots, right? A bit of script touch-up to change a few names (gotta have Susan Calvin, although of course she won't be plain) and put in a few references to Asimov's concepts, and we're done!
Re: (Score:2)
I Robot had nothing to do with the book. It was in fact written on another title first and then they bought the name to slap on it because people would recognize it, and, hey, it's about robots, right? A bit of script touch-up to change a few names (gotta have Susan Calvin, although of course she won't be plain) and put in a few references to Asimov's concepts, and we're done!
I love Will Smith, and the movie was quite the spectacular, but Asimov would have had an aneurysm.
Asimov was actually more of a mystery writer than a straight-up SF author. He wrote straight mystery novels, too, but then he wrote something for every aisle of the Dewey Decimal System. The robot stories are almost all mysteries, and quite a few of them were murder mysteries, where a robot was apparently at fault despite the Three Laws. The riddle was how to explain what happened without violating those laws.
T
Re: (Score:3)
But it did follow the same format Asimov's short stories usually took: Present the 3 laws as the pinnacle of perfection and show how broken they actually are. I loved it.
Time Jumps (Score:2)
It's been years since I read the original books. (I should definitely go back and re-read them.) Wasn't each book/story set in a different time period? You had the introduction with Hari coming up with Psychohistory, then various stories involving the Foundation (actually First Foundation though we don't learn of the Second Foundation until later). Each story takes place years, if not decades later often with an entirely different cast of characters.
It will be interesting to see how they handle this. W
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
... if not decades later often with an entirely different cast of characters.
Not infrequently a century or more, IIRC. The Foundations were supposed to collapse the interregnum down to a mere millenium or so.
Cautiously optimistic (Score:2)
I got HBO..well..mainly because Verizon gave it to me for free for a few months, but after watching Newsroom, John Oliver, and some of the other original programming they've done (From the Earth to the Moon, Band of Brothers), I think they could nail this. I mean, all of the talk about doing World War Z properly would be to make it a miniseries on HBO. Sure a TV show might need to change a few things but there's lots of opportunity for background stories to make this into a multi-season show.
Rendezvous with Rama (Score:2)
Pre chaos theory (Score:2)
The whole premise of the Foundation series is obsolete. The premise was that it was possible to predict the future to a moderate level of detail by calculation. Now that vast efforts have been expended in that direction by the weather and financial communities, we have a reasonably clear understanding of what can and cannot be accomplished in the prediction department. We know now that little changes grow into big ones (the "butterfly effect") rather than being filtered out. The future is driven by unpredi
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want to spoil too much for you but they reveal that they can't predict stuff as good as they led you to believe later on in the series.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This was actually the theme of one of Asimov's humorous short stories: a future America in which political polling had become so advanced that every presidential election was decided by a single voter picked at random. The election commission would ask that person all kinds of questions about cultural attitudes and current events (but not "Who wold you vote for?") and then infer what his/her choice would be.
Re: (Score:3)
The whole premise of the Foundation series is obsolete. The premise was that it was possible to predict the future to a moderate level of detail by calculation. Now that vast efforts have been expended in that direction by the weather and financial communities, we have a reasonably clear understanding of what can and cannot be accomplished in the prediction department. We know now that little changes grow into big ones (the "butterfly effect") rather than being filtered out. The future is driven by unpredictable noise.
Hardly obsolete. Validated, if anything. The modern-day psychomathematics is just Big Data and statistical analysis rules. The book gets thicker every day, and the NSA is based on it. So is corporate marketing.
Asimov also realized that a butterfly could run the train off the rails, which is why Seldon didn't merely work out the mathematics and turn it all loose. The Second Foundation existed precisely to apply compensating forces and to re-calculate the math as time unfolded.
Re:Pre chaos theory (Score:4, Interesting)
The story has antigravity, faster-than-light travel, force-shield projectors you can wear as a belt buckle and you're okay with the unrealistic physics, but you dismiss the entire series because you don't like the abstractly-defined maths in the first book?
If you thought Asimov was unaware of chaos theory, then you haven't read past the first book, and you also don't know the author's other works.
Are we ready for a universe without aliens? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Are we ready for a universe without aliens? (Score:5, Funny)
Most movies and TV shows take place in a universe where the only sentient beings are humans from Earth.
Quite a few seem to be based in a universe where there aren't any sentient beings at all. We call them "reality TV".
Re: (Score:2)
I can't help but wonder if people will be put off by the idea of a universe where the only sentient beings are humans, from earth.
Obvious rejoinder:
Wait, sentient beings from Earth? That's major Sci-Fi right there!
Ok, I'm in (Score:2)
Or, it could suck. It could suck like Skiffy's Earthsea miniseries. We'll have to see.
The potential is there. We have the technology to show pretty much everything that happened in the books, at a budget that a TV series could afford. Hell, Hari Seldon's future history handheld calculator is practically current technol
As I recall (Score:2)
"TV Adaptations are the last refuge of the semi-literate." --Salvor Hardin
Radio Drama anyone? (Score:3)
For those who care: https://archive.org/details/Is... [archive.org]
Will be interesting to see if HBO does better than the BBC ;>
Re: (Score:3)
For those who care: https://archive.org/details/Is... [archive.org]
Will be interesting to see if HBO does better than the BBC ;>
Yes! You beat me to it. I taped these off my old valve radio when they were broadcast, back when I was 14. I lovingly cared for the cassette tapes over the decades since, hearing them once every blue moon... and then found out I could get flawless copies off this website.
I remember hanging the mike next to the speaker... portable cassette player. Back in those days, the big thing was recording birdsong.
Bad idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If they base it on the original trilogy, Seldom would have about five to ten minutes of screen time tops.
Pity the old man is dead. He would have been thrilled.
Re: (Score:2)
5-10 minutes? It's a television series, not a movie.
The entire first episode (at LEAST) will be devoted to the first short story ("The Psychohistorians"), of which Hari Seldon is the main character.
In fact, I expect they will want to do one season per book (3 seasons to cover the trilogy). If that is the case, having each of the 5 short stories that comprise Foundation take up two episodes each would make for an ideal 10-episode season of TV.
Re:Is it true? (Score:5, Funny)
That Al-Quaida gets its name from these books?
Yes. As a Russian American Jew, Asimov represented everything that Bin Laden loved.