Pandora Loses 7 Million Listeners (siliconvalley.com) 115
An anonymous reader quotes the Bay Area Newsgroup:
So many listeners have turned off Pandora that Friday could have been called the day the music died for the internet radio streaming pioneer. Late Thursday, Pandora said it ended its third quarter with 73.7 million active listeners, a decline of more than 7 million listeners from the 81 million it had in the same quarter a year ago. Declining listener numbers, along with weaker-than-expected advertising revenue and a disappointing fourth-quarter forecast, had investors tuning Pandora out on Friday, as the company's shares fell by almost 25 percent, to close at $5.59.
Pandora still has more listeners than Apple Music, which has 27 million paying subscribers. But the Oakland-based music streaming business trails its other major rival, Spotify, which has 140 million active listeners, including 60 million who pay a monthly fee for on-demand streaming and to avoid listening to commercials with their music.
For comparision, Pandora now has just 5.19 million paying subscribers for its two ad-free streaming music services.
Pandora still has more listeners than Apple Music, which has 27 million paying subscribers. But the Oakland-based music streaming business trails its other major rival, Spotify, which has 140 million active listeners, including 60 million who pay a monthly fee for on-demand streaming and to avoid listening to commercials with their music.
For comparision, Pandora now has just 5.19 million paying subscribers for its two ad-free streaming music services.
Just a free Pandora user here. (Score:3, Insightful)
The ads and the nag screens got to be too much. I barely use it anymore.
Re: (Score:3)
Plus, competitors. No one wants to pay for ad-free when spotify, apple, google, and flying the black flag do it better. Amazon probably doesn't do it better, but at least prime members get that ad free.
Used to use Pandora (Score:3)
They stream low-quality to high-end systems. You can pay the subscription fee, you still get crap on a high-end receiver or prepro.
They want my money, they have to fix that. And since they were told about it years ago
Re: (Score:2)
...since they were told about it years ago and haven't lifted a finger to fix the quality of the music... to heck with 'em.
There's now a "Higher quality audio" option that warns, "Music will sound better, but may skip more often." I don't know if the higher quality would meet your needs, but I assume it's comparable with the other services. I don't know why it wouldn't be.
Re: (Score:2)
That option - last I looked - only worked on the non-receiver / prepro integrated clients.
Re: (Score:2)
Well then they need to acknowledge their goose got cooked years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
i have had Pandora for years, i got tired of listening to the same song over and over regardless of what station i was on. also the random adding of "artist" adds for paid subscribers, where you have to turn it off per channel.... it just got to be a bit much. mix that with already having Amazon prime, and it's "free" version, which i honestly like better because the stations keep true and don't bleed over..
I'm counted in one of their 5m paid subscribers, but i canceled my membership, and don't plan on
Re: (Score:2)
...the random adding of "artist" adds for paid subscribers, where you have to turn it off per channel.... it just got to be a bit much.
I agree that the artist inserts are annoying, but they can now be turned off once universally rather than "per channel."
Re: (Score:1)
The audio ads aren't that bad. Yes, they play them far too often, but it's less than broadcast radio. A 30s spot every 30min is perfectly acceptable. When they start spamming me with 2min ads (!!!!), and ads every 10-15min, it's time to delete the BS.
For me, the last straw is the completely unusable UI because the asshats have to spam you with ad after ad after ad if you so much as look at the UI. You cannot interact with the damn thing without it filling the screen with bloody ads. And to make matters wors
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Just a free Pandora user here. (Score:4, Insightful)
What gets me with the ads is the same thing as with terrestrial radio: why do they play several ads in a row? If I knew I was getting back to the music or whataver program after 30 seconds, I'd listen through, but when it's going to be a few minutes I change the channel or turn it off. I understand bigger breaks in TV, where the content doesn't break up easily, but music is already in 3-5 minute chunks.
Re: Just a free Pandora user here. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Or Tony, Orlando, and Dawn. Though admittedly I never did figure out which one was Orlando.
Re: (Score:2)
The reason for ads on Pandora isn't so much for them to make money from ads. It's to annoy free users into subscribing. This is why the ads are as grating and repetitive as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't work. There's this thing called going elsewhere. Which does work.
Re: (Score:1)
Linux did UNIX right.
Service with a smile (Score:2)
Eunuchs did...
Er, no, wait. Never mind.
Re: (Score:2)
I have to agree with you on this one. Also, it checks to see "if I'm still here" every hour. PITA when I'm eating dinner or entertaining.
I do like the ability to select "artist channels" and play their songs at random. Something I can't seem to do easily with Spotify.
I was actually going to pay for the service but they won't just allow me to pay for a year. I must give them my credit card number so they can continually bill me.
No thanks. You missed your chance.
I'm sticking with TuneInRadio and listenin
And Nothing Of Value as Lost. (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
- Too many devices that can't play the music.
- Too many places you can't play the music.
- No support for premium quality.
- No support for turning off loudness compression.
- No support for gapless playback (which is a big deal for some genres).
- A search system that doesn't have exclusions, making searches worthless because you drown in what you don't want. (This is not just a problem with Pandora, but quite a few product search engines. That isn't a mitigating factor, though.)
- Ads becoming more intrusive
Re:And Nothing Of Value as Lost. (Score:4, Insightful)
and everyone forgeting that Pandora is only available in the U.S.
Re: (Score:2)
and everyone forgeting that Pandora is only available in the U.S.
The parent post covered that: "- Too many places you can't play the music."
When was it lost!?!? (Score:5, Insightful)
What world did all of you come from? How is having over 73 million active listeners considered "the day the music died for (Pandora)"?!??!!?
At this moment, every comment is critical of pandora in some way. WTF? How are people leaping to that conclusion from these numbers:
Spotify: 140 million active listeners (60 million paying)
Pandora: 73.7 million active listeners (5.19 million paying)
Apple: 27 million users (all paying)
Sure, Pandora took a loss of 7 million users over the past year, but if they had not lost those, they'd simply be at 80.7 million active listeners. Maybe they're not first place, but they're the only one of those three that offer a service like theirs, and they have MILLIONS of users, and MILLIONS of paying users.
These comparisons on that level are just stupid. They say nothing about whether the company can be successful or not. FWIW, I'm not arguing that they are, or have been, successful/profitable/etc, but these numbers don't spell the end in any language. They're top of their class, and in the top 3 for internet streaming music. That should still be impressive, not a death knell.
I feel like things weren't always this way, and this is an internet age thing, where people feel only one or two companies/products can be even considered, and everything else is garbage (or, on the low end, everything is garbage and just buy the cheapest shitty stuff you can get your hands on). It's depressing that 3rd place no longer counts for anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Also, you can pick what you listen to on Spotify, while Pandora still has that bullshit "Due to streaming rights we cannot skip this song or replay it". Their algorithm is cool, but it's not enough when you ignore and annoy your users, even when they pay.
Re: (Score:2)
You answered your own question. Spotify has twice the listeners and 14 times the paid listeners.
There are way more Hershey's bars sold per day than pop rocks, but that doesn't mean pop rocks are dead. You can use any products/companies here. One company/service having a larger share of users does not mean that all others in the market are dead ("the day the music died for (Pandora)").
Also, you can pick what you listen to on Spotify, while Pandora still has that bullshit "Due to streaming rights we cannot skip this song or replay it".
Uhhh, d'uh. They're different products. That's actually why Pandora has a chance of still making it regardless of how well others are doing.
Apple Music and Spotify are far more similar than Pandora and Spotify. Apple Mus
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I used Pandora, for a while. I quit, for the same reasons I stopped listening to the radio. Too many ads, not enough of the music I like. Between a large(ish) music collection, two flea markets, and a half dozen second-hand music stores, nothing of value was lost.
In my case, not only were there a lot of ads but for some reason Pandora thinks I live hundreds of miles from where I actually live and give me ads for services and companies there. In addition, for some reason if you like Jimmy Buffet and the Dead you must be a country music fan and feeds me a bunch of country music I do not like.
Re: (Score:1)
Same, I loved the service and used it to listen to music at work all day. The day they suddenly decided we were not worthy was a sad day for me.
Re: (Score:1)
You don't use Pandora, obviously.
Re: (Score:2)
There's far too much rap and people don't want to support it.
I think there might even be a correlation between liking rap and not being willing to pay for services.
But the main problem is not being able to exclude rap. You have to include all the other genres, and still get plenty of rap results because they're also marked as belonging to other genders - some clueless marketing guy (sorry, I repeat myself) probably thinks this increases listening and ad exposure...
So no matter what you do, if you happen to dislike the most popular genre these days, you're going to d
Re: (Score:2)
You know, that's strange, because I have several channels that I listen to on Pandora, and most of them have no rap.
A comedy channel - lots of Weird Al, vintage comedy sketches (Hope and Crosby, Marx Brothers, etc.).
Classic rock channel - no rap
Heavy metal channel - no rap
Tom Petty channel - no rap
It's almost like you either don't use Pandora or just want to complain about rap.
Re: (Score:2)
A Capella station - rap
You could argue a case for it, but really? Bad enough there is only ~20 songs on the station...
Re: White People don't like music now (Score:1)
Link me to some of those white singers fucking their sister. Pretty sure that's 0.
Meanwhile, pretty much every black rapper sings about fuckin hos and getting paid. Why do you think the black community is knee deep in crime? If they can't be a rapper or pro athlete, they have no fallback.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
People have preferences. Not liking rap/hiphop or it's "culture" isn't racist. No more racist than feeling the same about country.
Re: (Score:2)
I tend to listen to the white redneck types reminiscing about that music Grandma and Grandpa used to play, or a young buck kicking the Devil's ass in a fiddle showdown, or singing auctioneer style about all the places he has been, or singing about how he loves being on the road again and making music with his friends, etc.
On profitability of streaming services (Score:1)
Music streaming is as profitable as it is convenient compared to piracy. Being able to listen to any song, any time and without ads helps to it. Once you start making your service shittier to the point piracy becomes enticing once more, you lose paying customers. Simple as that.
Shoutcast marches on. (Score:3)
I've been finding and streaming stations since the early 2000s. Any genre you could possibly want. Streams on almost any device. Streamripper still works great.
Playlists (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
I can't believe it's not butter.
Spotify often a combo offer with a mobile sub (Score:1)
I might have continued if it still worked (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
they removed the seeding feature, I can't get it to not play the same 5 bands over and over, there are dozens of bands in the genre that I like, but the damn thing only plays the same 5.
That's a mixed blessing. There were also too many idiots who had no clue what genre music belonged to, or even what a genre was, and used it as a personal grouping system. So you could listen to hard rock and get heavy metal, country or even rap presented as hard rock.
It's still a partial problem, in that those who now do assign genres tend to work by an uneducated guess system and over-assignment, so some genres are full of stuff that just doesn't belong there, while other genres are almost empty.
They cannot be surprised. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So I paid for Pandora for years, and stopped. The final straw for me was when they decided to play in politics and "take a stand" with the "Black Lives Matter" thing..
I'm of two minds about this...on one hand I think that overall, it's probably a good thing that companies do what they can to raise awareness of various issues, social or otherwise. It can make a difference.
On the other hand, I have to admit I don't like them doing that even when I agree with the cause or issue.
I would prefer that companies I patronize be more-or-less neutral, I don't want every damn thing to be seen as "taking sides" or voicing an opinion, mine or anyone else's.
And yet at the same time...I
Pandora who? (Score:2)
They jacked up the price and still have the nerve play loads of commercials that interrupt the music.
I mean, what's not to like about that?
Perfect example of the need to listen to customers (Score:1)
Is someone doing discovery better? (Score:1)
SJW caused me to leave.... (Score:2, Insightful)
When they jumped on board the SJW crap and came out in support of Black Lives Matter, that's when I canceled my subscription and closed my account.
I just want music on my music program. Keep your politics to yourself. When you decide to alienate half of the country, don't be surprised when they decide to part ways with your product.
Moved over to Spotify. No idea how they lean politically, because they just play music.
Re: (Score:1)
what do Single Jewish Women have to do with this?
Ob (Score:2)
"Losing one is unfortunate. Losing seven million looks like carelessness."
--
Stephen Fry. Or maybe it was Bernie Madoff?
Simple (Score:3)
There are other options out there free - I'm not sure if they play more, fewer, or comparable ads - and the paid service just keeps getting more and more expensive.
IIRC (it was a while ago) when we started paying for it, it was something like $20/year. Now it's what, either $6/mo or $10/mo?
That's nuts when there are tons of equally-tolerable options.
(Note: I'm not saying Pandora are evil greedy sonsabitches. I felt that they're terrifically screwed by their royalty contracts because they tried to do the right thing and compensate artists, but they're paying MULTIPLES of what radio stations have to pay, per song. I really like the company and think they're victims here, a little.)
The new interface must be driving them away... (Score:2)
I listen to Pandora on my PC at work, when I can. They switched to a cruddy flash interface a few months ago, which I suspect is part of why their numbers are down. The new interface locks up, doesn't pause correctly, and just sucks in general. The only reason I haven't switched is the effort I put into creating my stations, but that day is coming soon.
Re: (Score:1)
use what I'm already paying for (Score:1)
I just decided to use what I'm already paying for instead of listening to advertisements. I'm using Amazon Music since I'm already a Prime member. No need to debate it with myself, it's just a simple choice.
Decline in users not surprising (Score:2)
On July 14, 2017, Pandora emailed Australasian users to notify them that the New Zealand and Australian access to Pandora would cease on July 31, 2017.
Now Pandora is back to being an isolationist US only service, while Spotify and Apple Music have expanded their service globally. How can a company expect to survive with a strategy like this?
Pandora wasn't new, it was the old on the internet (Score:2)
Spotify is much closer to actually pandering to my tastes. The one thing that it does not seem to want to do is allow me to block certain artists. Who the hell wants to listen to Bieber? I certainly don't, yet the damn thing keeps putting him in my "discover" list. I want to block his tattooed ass right now. This is where Spotify also
the faster they go under the better (Score:2)
Pandora isn’t available where you are yet.
Pandora is only available in the U.S. right now – but we are working on bringing our music service to other parts of the world.
I was a paying subscriber for awhile (Score:2)
a couple years, more than a few years ago, until they billed me without my consent. I dropped their shit that day and never looked back and sent them shitty email where I got a form letter effectively telling me to fuck off.
The variety of their music when you listen to something eclectic isn't great (I found out once you could open an xml in there somewhere and it would show you the next several songs that it was going to play for a given channel which made it even more predictable).
My wife, however, still
They Ran Their Customers Off (Score:1)
I love Pandora and prefer it to Spotify. I was a paying customer for years, even when it offered 40 hrs ad free. I loved the service so much that I paid for it anyway. I was paying about $4/mo. My wife and son were both able enjoy it as part of that. But, they switched and no longer allowed more than one user. So, that tripled my price. For the same money, I was able to get Spotify, which allowed you to play any song. Then, Pandora came out with that option and it was $10 or $12 per month, with no family
Pandora's "like" algorithms blow (Score:2)
like an artist and they show up no matter where you are. feel like listening to genre X?, well that artist in genre A you once liked is going to come up every third track regardless of how out of place it is.
I sttill prefer streaming of real radio stations (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Classical music (Score:2)
I pay (Score:1)
I am a paying subscriber. I have noticed a downgrade of quality and some more annoying items. For example on one channel , an artist interrupted the music playing to discuss upcoming concert dates. That is not something I could opt out of. Other times on some channels the algorithms play songs that are way out of the preferences I have been setting up with my upvotes. It feels almost like the artist paid to be inserted into my music stream.
what idiot pays for Pandora? (Score:1)
no commercials, unlimited skips, you're welcome...
It's their own damn fault (Score:1)
It was the worst listening experience I can imagine. One or more commercials between every single song, sometimes a minute or more in length. Video ads loading and playing flashing battle scenes and shit while my phone was on my dashboard, in my car, dri
Crappy flash (Score:2)