Apple Campus Missing From MSN Earth 413
webguru4god writes "The Register has an article detailing a significant omission from Microsoft's new Virtual Earth application. Apparently the satellite image view of 1 Infinite Loop in Cupertino, CA shows a large empty lot, whereas Google Maps shows the sprawling Apple campus. Hmmm, I wonder if the Google campus is missing too?"
It's just an old map (Score:5, Informative)
Before Apple, the campus was the HQ of the now-defunct Four Phase Systems. The buidling was sufficiently damaged in the earthquake on 17 Oct 1989, that it was abandoned and eventually razed.
So much for conspiracy theories.
Re:It's just an old map (Score:5, Funny)
I think that's just MS way (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure it's not on purpose, it's just the way MS does things.
I've also read in the Register that the Twin Towers from WTC are still there.
I mean, wouldn't one of the beta testers check for that?
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:2, Interesting)
I have read that M$' implementation is better than Google's in some ways:
http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050523-1252 08 [searchenginewatch.com]
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05042/455971.stm [post-gazette.com]
IIRC M$ has been in the map business for a long time.
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:5, Informative)
Terraserver is 7 years old to be precise (Score:3, Interesting)
Specifically, Terraserver came online all the way back in 1998. At that time, it was the world's largest online database (accessible to the public at least) and it offered over a terabyte worth of data-- which was a pretty big database in 1998.
This is the earliest entry in the wayback machine:
http://web.archive.org/web/19981111185028/http:// t [archive.org]
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:3, Informative)
IIRC, Microsoft started TerraServer basically as a showcase for SQL Server 2000. It's a double entendre for "terra" meaning earth and "tera" as in tera-byte, showing how much data SQL Server can handle. As far as I can tell, they're not selling anything.
Check it out: terraserver.microsoft.com [microsoft.com]
TerraServer is operated by the Microsoft Corporation as a research project for developing advanced database technology, and was born at the Microsoft Bay Area Research Center. TerraServer's foundation is Micr
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:2)
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:5, Informative)
Google's is all over the place as far as high vs. low resolution images. Champaign-Urbana [google.com] is in low-res, whereas there are a few high-res areas with tiny towns nearby (e.g. Homer [google.com] or Downs [google.com] ). Bloomington-Normal [google.com], just north-west of Downs, is surrounded on both sides by high-res blocks. In Peoria [google.com], East Peoria is low-res, West Peoria is high-res. Dawson, Buffalo and this little unnamed bundle of houses [google.com] are the most interesting things in a mostly empty block of high-res, whereas Decatur [google.com] just to the east is low-res.
Most of Grand Junction [google.com] is low-res (including my brother's house), but Redlands just to the west is in a strip of high-res.
The center of Lake Tahoe [google.com] is mostly high-res, whereas most of the surrounding area is low-res.
Re:I think that's just MS way (Score:5, Informative)
Yup, still visible in the picture [msn.com]
Re:It's just an old map (Score:5, Interesting)
I find it amusing that in the span of ten miles in a dense urban/suburban area they could both have such vastly different images. Google has current images for Apple's campus and Microsoft has old images. Google has old images for my neighborhood and Microsoft has current images. Makes me want to start searching for the seam between modern and 10 years old just to see if they try to blend them or just have a gross cut between them.
(and no, I'm not going to post my home address for people to compare images. I'm just too paranoid to do that
Re:It's just an old map (Score:5, Funny)
...
(and no, I'm not going to post my home address for people to compare images. I'm just too paranoid to do that
I guess the solar panels on your new garage arent a dead give away....
Re:It's just an old map (Score:4, Funny)
Google uses blending, Terraserver used cuts (Score:5, Interesting)
Terraserver, when they went from simply demonstrating the capabilities of SQL7 to actually maintaining it, they added new images. When they did this, they basically just plopped them in - there's obvious cuts in the map where the two sets line up. I haven't used the MSN images thing yet but when I used Terraserver back in '99 it was all black and white. They may have improved it since then.
The images look great in color on Google maps though, especially the summertime sets.
Re:Google uses blending, Terraserver used cuts (Score:3, Funny)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:3, Informative)
Well, I'm not sure on the dates of these, but here's a very obvious seam between black & white and color data (just a few miles from the Apple campus)
http://virtualearth.msn.com/default.aspx?cp=37.32 8 429 [msn.com]|-122.005218&style=a&lvl=17&v=1
Re:It's just an old map (Score:3, Funny)
That would be a good hack, knowing when the sat was going to update and cutting out date/time in the lawn with a large lawn mower. then seeing in on google maps.
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2)
TerraServer Data (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, though, Microsoft did the usual overkill, attempting to put too much into the user interface. Hence odd mouse controls, unnecessary zomming animation when a simple quick redraw at the new zoom level is preferred, etc.. More time spent on glitz than substance.
Re:TerraServer Data (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:TerraServer Data (Score:4, Interesting)
Not always Malicious (Score:4, Interesting)
Why? Your guess is as good as mine, but we do have loads of chemicals in the plant. And seeing as they used to partner with the company that did the imagery, I can see some reasons why.
You'll also notice that the syracuse airport and the Rochester airport are both missing as well. The buffalo airport is present, as well as JFK.
Conspiracy to protect our softer targets? You decide.
Exactly (Score:2, Funny)
So MSN's map service sucks apparently
Re:Exactly (Score:2, Funny)
Who would have thought ?
Re:Exactly (Score:2)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2, Funny)
On Google Maps, the highest resol
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2)
I find that far stranger than a bit old images.
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2, Funny)
Absolute Non-Story PARANOIA (Score:2)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2, Informative)
You can see the Oklahoma Memorial, where the Murrah Building stood until 1995. The memorial was created in roughly 1997-98, considerably later the the Apple campus. Also visible downtown is a new library built in ±2003. Not shown is the new federal building built in ±2004 to replace the Murrah building.
Real story .... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:It's just an old map (Score:2)
Slashdot should move this article off the front page.
Re:It's just an old map (Score:4, Informative)
Apple's "sprawling" campus is actually quite a bit smaller than it used to be. The buildings in the Santa Clara Valley are now clustered around the intersection of Mariani St. and De Anza Blvd.
Instead of maintaining satellite buildings like customer service in Campbell and the printer and imaging group located in Sunnyvale, Apple pulled everything within a three-block radius of 1 Infinite Loop between 1996 and 1998. Just that single move seemed to wonders for corporate communications, although it was well underway when Steve came home.
Compared to many other large tech companies in the valley, Apple's "campus" is relatively small, but tightly integrated. For example, not only is there an excellent restaraunt in place of the old "Cafe Macs", but there is a relatively decent brew pub with a cute name in the parking lot and another beer/TV joint across the street.
What's new? (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously though, Microsoft's effort is still in development and what mattered to them was not the data per se, but the codebase behind the data as Microsoft is not interested (historically) in providing people with data or resources as much as they are interested in making money. Once the infrastructure is in place, Microsoft will wrap their map technology into other bits of software to sell GIS functionality in their handheld OS and other applications. It is an entirely different way of business than Google's model which wants to deliver information to people and make their product easy to use and informative even during development. They are smart enough to realize this approach builds a customer base much more effectively than if they were to get access to free, or almost free (and therefore less useful) data with which to populate their databases. It is an investment that has paid off along with their easy to use and intuitive interfaces deliver.
Re:What's new? (Score:2)
Re:What's new? (Score:2)
Yeah, clearly Apple's headquarters is protected by a cloaking device recovered from the lost city of the Ancients [gateworld.net], probably to guard against industrial espionage.
Re:What's new? (Score:2)
So let me guess, I'm going to have to purchase Virtual Earth SP1 to get the up to date maps. If I want maps from 1994 I can use the free ones, but to get current stuff I'll have to buy the service pack. Sounds like a typical Microsoft revenue model to me.
I estimate: 1989 (Score:5, Informative)
Scrolling around the map you can also see some condo complexes completely missing, which were build around that time.
Based on these landmarks (and more) you can tell that MSN's data for cupertino and its surrounding area is over 15 years old! Pitiful!
Re:I estimate: 1989 (Score:2)
Re:I estimate: 1989 (Score:2)
Re:I estimate: 1989 (Score:2)
The Google Maps picture is from early 2004, just before Charley knocked the remaining trees down.
Re:I estimate: 1989 (Score:2)
Jesus gimmie a break.
Re:I estimate: 1989 (Score:3, Funny)
Hey, sidenote, if you come to visit my hometown munich, germany for soccer championship (I know you US guys couldn't care less) next year be sure to check out our new stadion [google.com] wich is a true beauty [allianz-arena.de] by now and got deleted from MSN with my entire country.
They're from October 30, 1991 (Score:4, Informative)
Outdated photo or global conspiracy? (Score:2)
Not the only change.... (Score:5, Funny)
- G
Re:Not the only change.... (Score:2)
Wow! Thank Goodness that Mycroft isn't a friend of Bill's. Although, if it shows Mr. Gate's home, I'm sure I could talk Mike into letting me use Little David's Sling for a few minutes.
Re:burrow-dwelling rebel scum!! (Score:2)
Alright. Had all can take.
Throw rocks at 'em, Mike! Big Rocks!
It's Biblical, laugh! (Score:5, Funny)
I tried to find Google's campus on the map but all I could find was a serpent and a tree holding the most succulent fruit. Strange, I didn't think that their campus looked anything like that...
Microsoft's HQ, OTOH, was the Garden of Eden with little rabbits and naked nymphs running around. Bill was sitting there laughing because another person bought a copy of Windows and the fire grew brighter where Apple's HQ was supposed to be.
I was thinking God, I really need to switch to another browser, these exploits are of Biblical proportions and then I watched as Bill reached out from MSN Maps, grabbed me by the throat and said, "THEY AREN'T EXPLOITS!"
Scary!
Down boy, Down! (Score:2, Informative)
Nice conspiracy theory guys, but I'm afraid that the Register is just having fun getting you all worked up.
Re:Down boy, Down! (Score:2)
older pics? (Score:3, Funny)
How suiting...Anyway, aren't the MSN pics pretty old compared to google's anyway?
Re:older pics? (Score:2)
Heh. Exactly
Microsoft outsourcing... (Score:4, Funny)
For the lazy... (Score:5, Informative)
Google's Map [google.com]
Re:For the lazy... (Score:3, Informative)
I wonder if the Google campus is missing too?
Google [google.com]
MSN [msn.com]
OMG, It appears to be a dirt field on Both! Shock! Awe! Conspiracy!
Re:For the lazy... (Score:2)
Re:For the lazy... (Score:2)
Re:For the lazy... (Score:2)
Cool links, but I have an OT question: how do you get the latitude/longitude for this? I can't seem to figure it out using Google Maps.
Re:For the lazy... (Score:2, Informative)
MSN Earth? (Score:2)
Quote from Bill G... (Score:5, Funny)
Grass (Score:2, Interesting)
Ignorance before Malisciousness (Score:5, Interesting)
As least, I hope so. Either way, it only erodes any kind of trust I'd have in a Microsoft solution for encyclopedias, maps, and so on. If they did it on purpose, then why should I trust them for anything? And if done in ignorance - then that means that their competitor has more accurate information.
Either way, it doesn't make Microsoft look good. Which, in a weird way, I almost feel bad about. I'd love to see Google with a real competitor if only because I like seeing competition, because it usually benefits me (the customer (but not consumer)) - but if Microsoft is only going to make a half-assed shot at it, then they may as well stay out of the game.
Of course, this is just my opinion. I could be wrong.
Google is much more evil (Score:5, Funny)
Evil or funny? (Score:3, Funny)
If it's not built, it's not there (Score:2)
"Even more disturbing MSN's Virtual Earth still shows the twin towers of the World Trade Center in all their pre-9/11 glory."
Gee, I wonder if there's a relationship here...
The Register sure have some l337 journalist and conclusion skillz.
They lie too, because AFAIK, they have no evidence Microsoft have "deleted" anything. A very strange choice of words if it's about looking on an outdated map.
Re:If it's not built, it's not there (Score:2)
Not to mention... (Score:2)
OK, I know they were panicked about Google Earth etc, but couldn't they have paid for better, more recent imagery?
Compared to Google Maps, this seems like a particularly half-assed effort.
m-
Google Campus == Former SGI Campus (Score:3, Interesting)
Google now occupies the SGI Shoreline campus. Not sure when that was built though.....
1998 or so (Score:5, Interesting)
Google indeed occupies the four funky looking fromer Silicon Graphics Inc buildings on Shoreline Drive. These were built in the late 1990s. Right across the street to the south is the former home of Adobe (and occupied by Sun at one time too). SGI's first funky looking building is right off of 101 and was built in 1995, it's now home of the Computer History Museum. At one time SGI had almost 20 buildings in that area, some built in the early 1980s. SGI now lives in three newer buildings a few blocks away on Crittenden Drive built in about 2002. The whole shoreline area is a mix of buildings ranging from 1 to 25 years old.
Not deleted (Score:2)
Google is there (Score:3, Interesting)
As kevcol [slashdot.org] pointed out, you can clearly see their campus [catatonic.org] - in fact, arguably it's more clear that Google's own version [catatonic.org] of the same spot.
Other missing parts (Score:2)
There is a weird penquin shaped part out of Finland
The Netherlands (will follow in about a year, they are always a year behind).
After 3 Seconds of playing with MSN Virtual Earth (Score:3, Interesting)
ex:
Moving your cursor to the Tool bar in Mozilla/Firefox
Or to a different monitor if you are using IE...
When you return your cursor to the map, it will move without having to click your mouse...
Sweet.
Black Laser Technology (Score:3, Funny)
Steve Jobs's penchant for high absorptivity wardrobe combined with his obsession for personal privacy probably explains why MS sees nothing.
cheating...as usual (Score:2)
Really cool! (Score:5, Funny)
See people, you guys badmouth Microsoft all the time, but these guys obviously know how to innovate! All you slashdot trolls just got PWNED by Microsoft, baby. WOOT!!1
</sarcasm>
Re:Really cool! (Score:3, Interesting)
Slashdot needs a new "Sensationalism" category (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft was apparently too cheap to purchase more recent satellite imagery so they got old, crappy data. Google's is more recent.
Nothing here to see folks except a few people with short attention spans that don't do adequate research.
The mods are to be blamed for this. Just today I had a story rejected that had more information than the one published, but it wasn't as pointed in its title.
Re:Slashdot needs a new "Sensationalism" category (Score:2)
Now for Area 51... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Now for Area 51... (Score:3, Informative)
You think thats bad? (Score:2)
other things of note... (Score:2)
Try finding the Microsoft campus in Google Maps... (Score:2)
Priorities, gentlemen.
1 Microsoft Way visible on Google Maps (Score:2)
(Yes, this tinyurl really *is* a Google Maps URL, not anything heinous. Guaranteed safe for work.)
MS makes toys (Score:2)
I mean really, with all that money MS could not afford current photographs? Do we need anymore evidence that MS cannot innovate at all.
Area 51 isn't there. (Score:2)
Or it could be that they can claim they are trying to obey the US Govt. Maybe they had a picture of a Flying Saucer
Old maps? what good is it? (Score:2)
Ancient maps are pretty much useless for this perpose. (except maybe for nostalgia)
Is there a way to moderate stories? (Score:2)
This one should be moded down in some harsh way. Next thing you know they will post a story about gas prices going up or down or something.
On Microsoft TerraServer (Score:4, Informative)
Apple Cloaking Devices working Properly (Score:3, Funny)
Other things that are missing (Score:4, Insightful)
Stuck in a loop. (Score:5, Funny)
Bill's house seems to be there... (Score:3, Insightful)
Still I'll admit that I Googled [google.com] for the address and got a hit without even having to drill down!
Re:Hilarious... but kinda creepy too (Score:2)
No, it's just that Microsoft used really old USGS maps, and *you* really only end up looking like a giant roll of tinfoil...