Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
It's funny.  Laugh. Media Movies Television

The Ultimate Star Trek Collection 414

roelbj writes "For those Star Trek fans wondering what to ask for this Christmas, you may wish to consider The Ultimate Star Trek Collection to be released on November 15. For just (cough) $2499.99, you'll get 212, count them, 212 DVDs with everything ever produced under the name, including all seasons of all five telvision series as well as the ten feature films. Before loading up your disc changer and hitting play, remember to get up once in a while."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Ultimate Star Trek Collection

Comments Filter:
  • by AmicoToni ( 123984 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @04:40AM (#13967905)
    It doesn't seem to contain Star Trek: The Animated Series!... [startrekanimated.com]
  • by Quirk ( 36086 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @04:47AM (#13967930) Homepage Journal
    Most geeks must have good memories. The amount of info that has to be assimilated and managed is, to say the least, considerable. It follows most geeks would be able to retain a storyline and much attendant material from watching a movie once or maybe twice.

    What makes owning this set of dvds and, presumably, rewatching the material worthwhile?

    The only movies I've watched repeatedly are Casablanca, Apocalypse Now and to a lesser extent Alien and Blade Runner, but I've no idea why I can watch Casablanca and Apocalpse Now over and over. I know the material very nearly by heart, but have no idea what the mechanism is that hooks me in.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07, 2005 @05:00AM (#13967976)
    The validity of the events in the animated series in connection to the original series timeline is disputed.
  • referal fee (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Celt ( 125318 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @05:36AM (#13968092) Journal
    I'm curious how much trektoday get if somebody buys that set through their handy referal link in this slashdot story, nice that the editors left the link intact.
  • by fmwap ( 686598 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @05:39AM (#13968103) Journal
    So...it's a very, very boring night at work...
    Here's the tally, this doesn't include any special features, commentaries, or otherwise useless filler:

    ST TOS:
    47 mins, 79 eps, 22 discs, 3,713min = 2days 13hrs 53mins
    ST TNG:
    45 mins, 178 eps, 48 discs, 8,010min = 5days 13hrs 30mins
    ST DS9:
    45 mins, 176 eps, 48 discs, 7,920min = 5days 12hrs
    ST Voyager:
    45 mins, 172 eps, 47 discs, 7,740min = 5days 9hrs
    ST Enterprise:
    42 mins, 98 eps, 27 discs, 4,116min = 2days 20hrs 36mins

    The Motion Picture (Directors Cut): 136mins 2 discs
    The Wrath of Kahn (Directors Cut): 116mins 2 discs
    III: The search for spock: 105mins 2 discs
    IV: The Voyage Home: 119mins 2 discs
    V: The Final Frontier: 107mins 2 discs
    VI: The Undiscovered Contry: 113mins 2 discs
    Generations: 118mins 2 discs
    First Contact: 106mins 2 discs
    Insurrection: 103mins 2 discs
    Nemesis: 116mins 2 discs

    Grand Total (Minus Commentaries, deleted scenes, additional features) :
    212 Discs
    32,638 minutes
    3wks 1day 15hrs 58mins

    References:
    Amazon.com product info [amazon.com]
    IMDB Star Trek search [imdb.com]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07, 2005 @05:51AM (#13968124)
    There is something bizarre in US culture causing problems like this. Nobody hears of these problems in France, germany, africa, australia, russia, china, india... it's just the US.

    Unless the US is suddenly the only place where people have "metabolic disorders" or "catch obesity" or obestity is a "disease" then the culture of the fat people is to blame, not their bodies.

    Laziness and lack of personal responsibility, and little more.
  • by cheekyboy ( 598084 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @06:35AM (#13968237) Homepage Journal
    Now personally, If I had than many eps, id put em all on HD-converted to mpeg4 or something.
    One 600giger will take care of it, though a lof of CPU time to convert though, but more portable
    than 3 folders of 80 DVDs each.
  • Re:No way (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sdnoob ( 917382 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @06:50AM (#13968286)
    purchased individually, though... what parts *wouldn't* you buy, even at 50 a season?

    at ahem, NORMAL pricing...
    28 total seasons @ 49.95
    10 feature films @ 19.95
    comes to a grand total of: 1598.10
    so they've over priced it by 900 bucks. they must still be trying to recoup losses from enterprise or something. if it (upn) wasn't on a pissy little low-power uhf around here, i would probably have watched it (reception lousy even on digicable). (btw, the enterprise dvd sets must be selling well if startrek.com only had 10 copies to give away in a recent promotion http://www.startrek.com/custom/exclude/giveaways/0 51004_enterprise/detail.jsp [startrek.com])

    a more fan-friendly company might even discount the whole set a bit over separate prices to encourage sales of it, otherwise people would just purchase the individual items periodically as sort of a payment plan to getting the whole set. 20 percent off "my" total would be about half what amazon's charging.

    the movies by themselves at amazon (se versions) is 122. which means at 2500 you're paying 85 for each and every season. a very generous discount from tptb, don't ya think? when mainstream tv series sell for 35-50 a season and have been spotted at 20 or less on sale lately.

    considering the cost to duplicate, package and distribute, they could sell for 499 and still be in the black. the star trek empire has already paid for itself many times over (and no wonder with the prices they charge).. so why not do something crazy like deep discounts on an "ultimate collection" for a holiday season.. star trek could even end up being more popular than elmo dolls instead of being something only a google shareholder can afford.

    they could even do it on hd-dvd or bluray instead and bundle a player. all for 399. that'd be one way to really get the new players on the market real quick. if this could get rolling and out the door before new format players hit the general market, whatever format they pick could very easily wind up being the "winner". even if priced at a loss, the future revenue for the hardware makers (& studios themselves by folks buying 2nd, 3rd, or even 4th formats of other movies they already have) over the next 20 years is huge and more than enough to subsidize a promo like this.
  • Also (Score:4, Interesting)

    by blincoln ( 592401 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @06:58AM (#13968309) Homepage Journal
    It's missing the theatrical cut of The Wrath of Khan, which I vastly prefer to the extended/alternate footage television version on the two-disc set - and I'm not even a big enough dork to own ANY of the television episodes.

    Over two thousand dollars and they can't throw in a second copy of the best Trek film evar? What a swindle.

    Man, I think the first Slashdot post I ever made was a complaint that the two-disc set didn't include the original release. What were they thinking? Extended is great. Replacing certain scenes - that I thought were great - with alternate takes, and then not including both versions a la the Terminator 2 DVD, that's lame.
  • by meringuoid ( 568297 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @07:39AM (#13968414)
    Three weeks?... Well, I finally watched Gokuu and Uubu fly off into the sunset last night, so I'm kind of in the market for another ridiculously long bit of geek viewing. This is alarmingly tempting, though monstrously overpriced.

    The sad thing, though, is:

    TOS: 47 min
    TNG, DS9, Voy: 45 min
    Enterprise: 42 min

    ... those ad breaks just get longer and longer, huh?

  • Re:worth it? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Darkling-MHCN ( 222524 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @07:43AM (#13968428)
    I think I'll wait until the entire thing comes out on one single disc or cube or whatever it is data will be floating around on 5-10 years from now.

    Consumers are smart. They know this data isn't going anywhere, it'll be around for as long as they are (and then some). They'll hold out for as long as it takes to get a decent price before forking out any cash. Personally I don't think I'd consider paying much more than about $500 for this.

    Hollywood needs to provide better and cheapers ways of providing its content to consumers, if they don't they'll end up going the same way as the Music Industry. Whilst they don't immediately face the threat the music industry does (dvd quality video with 5.1 sound doesn't come down the wire that quick) eventually they will face it. Hopefully by that time (for their own sake) they'll think my offer is quite generous.
  • Re:Validity? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by JabberWokky ( 19442 ) <slashdot.com@timewarp.org> on Monday November 07, 2005 @10:06AM (#13969028) Homepage Journal
    Here are the answers to your questions. Note that they may be spoilers to some people:

    Romulans were officially known to Starfleet during TOS "Balance of Terror", although the Vulcans and Romulans had been engaged in minor disputes and actions for a long time before that, some of which were known to other races and Starfleet... the Vulcans hid the existance of Romans by shrugging them off as radical Vulcan splinter factions, although at least some non-Vulcan individuals knew of them.

    Klingons look like they do in TNG. During TOS they were Klingon-Human hybrids (well, technically Klingon-Engineered-human hybrids) due to an accident involving theft of military genetic enginering technology left over from the Terran Eugenics Wars. See Enterprise season 4.

    Stardates are a way of creating a system of time that accounts for differences in relativity. As a result they vary (and they vary in speed) depending on where you are in the galactic plane. The system was revised between TOS and TNG, at the same time pulsed warp made it necessary to revise the warp factor (to a logarithmic scale with 10 being infinite speed).

    There are some much nicer places of contradiction. Those are pretty well established.

    --
    Evan

  • Re:No way (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07, 2005 @10:08AM (#13969036)
    The thing is, that's almost certainly not true, because their marketing people almost certainly did some trials on what people would be prepared to pay and picked the sweet spot that maximises their income.

    Yes, that is the unfortunate result of the purely capitalist mindset. Instead of being "How much can I satisfy the needs of society in which I am a member while still making a comfortable wage?" it's "How much can I squeeze out of every sucker so I can buy a third boat?".

  • by spaceorb ( 125782 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @12:26PM (#13970023)
    I think you are just way too sensitive in general. Don't like movies like Jarhead? Then you wouldn't like how grunts in the military act, because that is just the way we are. I have not run into one infantry Marine, present or former, that did not like what they did there.
  • by Lord_Dweomer ( 648696 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @01:10PM (#13970402) Homepage
    Actually, I just saw an episode of Nip Tuck recently where a lady was so fat and shat herself so much on the couch that her skin had fused to the couch and she was all infected. When they operated, she died.

    Now, is that a serious matter? Yes! Do I feel bad for people who are in that shape? HELL YES! Is it ok to laugh about it? YES!

    The reason why we joke about this is because it does several things...it helps us feel better about ourselves and all of the myriad of serious problems we all have going on in our lives...it encourages us to AVOID the kind of behavior that can potentially lead to being in this situation...and it stops us from getting depressed and angry about every single horrible problem in the world, because frankly if we did, we'd probably kill ourselves.

    If people don't like what was posted, avoid it. Don't push your morals onto the rest of us though.

  • Re:No way (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ArsonSmith ( 13997 ) on Monday November 07, 2005 @01:49PM (#13970934) Journal
    Keeping the prices on DVDs high also keeps the ability to license it out to brodcasters high. Getting rerun rights is going to be a pretty big payoff as well. If everyone owns the DVDs then noone will watch the reruns, thus less money from that point. Yet without any DVDs they don't get the buzz needed to get people to watch re reruns as well.

    That is where the sweet point is to be found.

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...