Purdue Claims World Record Goldberg Machine 79
With 244 steps The Time Machine, built by by members of the Purdue Society of Professional Engineers and Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, took first place and broke a world record at the 24th Annual National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest. From the article: "It starts with the Big Bang, re-creates the extinction of the dinosaurs, holds a jousting competition, flips over an album, and simulates World War II, a shuttle launch, the fall of the Berlin Wall, and even the alleged apocalypse in 2012. In its precisely executed review of history, 'The Time Machine,' a Rube Goldberg contraption built by members of the Purdue Society of Professional Engineers and Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, incorporates a record-breaking 244 steps—all to water a single flower."
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
It's pretty shocking. Rather than a handheld camera to capture the continuous nature of the thing there's a load of cutting here and there; missing the action and so on. It would be nice to see the whole thing in one go.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure it's not-- but the video doesn't help any.
Re: (Score:3)
It doesn't feel like my concept of a rube goldberg machine. I had aspect, but it was more a half dozen short rube goldberg chains that were lined up in a raw than the single long chain of cause and effect that defines a rube goldberg machine to me.
Pug
Re: (Score:2)
It kinda fails to address what I'm looking for in a Rube Goldberg device: A continuous flow towards the goal. It seem that the goal "water the plant" is more some minor side effect at the end when all the other gadgets are done so hell, turn on the faucet and do what's got to be done, in a fairly "normal" manner considering the contraption that came before it. Pump water through a pipe? Gee, really? Who'd have expected that?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Pffft (Score:3)
Thanks, I'll be here all weekend. Be sure to tip your waitstaff.
Oblig family guy (Score:2)
"It doesn't re-enact history, it just shoots you."
And in the end... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not Pointless Enough (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't think that the steps to the end are useless enough to be a goldberg machine. Everything it does presents a sort of storyline, so it is more of a mechanical play. It's just too useful, or perhaps not abstract enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It seems like there was something controlling the timeline marker that was independent of everything else going on.
Re:Not Pointless Enough (Score:5, Informative)
It was. I watched this one live at the regional competition. Each step was started with a electromechanical actuator and each one ended on a switch. Each of the stages had microswitches when it was 'reset' and the back panel had lights that lit up when the stage was reset. It allowed it to be debugged easily and if a stage got stuck they could skip it with the switches.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Is there a "Society of Caucasian Professional Engineers" ?
If not, why?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Nice Edison quote at the end (Score:1)
Great future (Score:4, Funny)
With efficiencies like that, they have a bright future in government.
Re: (Score:1)
...or any other Fortune 1000 company, business or IT consulting, etc.
Lego Machine (Score:5, Interesting)
http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2011/04/elaborate-and-mesmerizing-lego-great-ball-contraption.html [makezine.com]
This is eight minutes of pure awesome.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or the Lego Antikythera Mechanism [youtube.com]
*that* is my idea of cool - Pug
Compared to other RG machines... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The really captivating RG machines use everyday objects and simple geometrical shapes to achieve complex interactions.
not to mention clever uses of potential energy like pails falling down that are attached to a pulley bringing something back up so that it can fall down again. This seemed like a sequence of motors being driven by a battery...
the mythbusters did a better job if they had more (Score:2)
the mythbusters did a better job if they had more time it would not of failed as much as it did.
Re: (Score:2)
I quite agree! Unfortunately, from the article :
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Note the complete lack of Hispanics in the picture and lack of Hispanic names in the article. It's probably just a way to apply for minority grants and such.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
yeah there is a difference, Hispanic engineering gets you more woman than Caucasian engineering
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
And it involves hydraulics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They don't NEED such a group, but the reason minorities form such groups is for several reasons. One is Networking, which will help you secure a good job, Another is to encourage more people in that minority group to enter the profession; e.g. The Society of Women Engineers.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't get it. I can understand having separate cultural student groups when the goal is to celebrate your culture, but is there any reason why Hispanics need their own separate Engineer society? Is there something different about Hispanic engineering or does this mean the Society of Professional Engineers excludes Hispanics? Can't we all just get along?
Uh. To encourage hispanic people to enter the field and provide professional development for them? Hispanic folk have found themselves facing a lot more employment discrimination and education discrimination than regular white folk and so felt it necessary to put a club together to try and fix that.
Or are you just angry about hispanics for some reason?
i hate to tell you this (Score:1)
sit down you might not be ready to hear this.
there is still racism in business, and most business dudes are not hispanic
i know i know. i told you you should have sat down.
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't you get the memo? Racism is O.K. as long as you're not white.
Re: (Score:1)
Let me guess...a film student made the video? (Score:4, Insightful)
All in all, it was (probably) a great engineering effort that was ruined by someone trying to exercise clever video skills.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There's a much better take available at Purdue's newsroom [purdue.edu]. It looks like it didn't run quite perfectly, though (the timeline arrow never hit the end).
Ugly (Score:4, Insightful)
!= Honda's machine... (Score:1)
I must say.. Honda's is way better.
There's WAY too much machine here, not enough physics. Drop a ball, hit this switch, pull this string. I'm sure it took a lot of hard work, but it's not impressive at all IMO.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is genius!
Wonder how often they had to try it...
Video of the winning machine in action... (Score:2)
... can be found here [youtube.com]
So our software quality process inventor was R.G.! (Score:1)
Oxymoron in action (Score:2)
I have never thought that a Goldberg machine can be actually partially useful such as teaching history (albeit very loosely).
Maybe they should create a new class of Goldberg machines to provide some educational purpose ;)
- JsD
That's Nothing (Score:1)
I once built an apple from scratch.
Re: (Score:1)
I still prefer... (Score:3)
Virtual (Score:3)
Next up to conquer is virtual RGM's......oh wait, MS-Office.
Need "Powerhouse" playing in the background (Score:2)
For full effect, you need Raymond Scott's Powerhouse playing in the background when watching this (or any other) Rub Goldberg machine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9-7uLg-DZU [youtube.com]
No animals involved? (Score:2)
I was under the impression that an authentic rube goldberg device had to involve at least one live animal in the process. (from the rube goldberg cartoons)
No such requirement seems evident in the contest.