Star Wars Uncut Project Complete 175
An anonymous reader writes "In 2009 we discussed the Star Wars Uncut Project, a crowd-sourced effort to re-create the entirety of Episode IV as series of 15-second clips filmed and submitted by fans. Well, it's done at last, and CmdrTaco has written his review of the two-hour film. He says, 'A great number of shots demonstrate technology well beyond what was available when the original Star Wars was made. Other shots are stylishly animated in CG. Others are rotoscoped in mediums from chalk to pencil to marker. There’s also a plethora of stop motion, claymation, and even some puppetry to go around. [A] few shots are only slightly modified from the originals, but those are the rarity, and generally done to pull off a specific joke. ... It's a glorious achievement.'"
Early reviews (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Early reviews (Score:5, Informative)
I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.
Re: (Score:2)
I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.
Well, the first thought that came to my mind was "wait, this is not unlike Plan 9 from Outer Space with two actors alternating for a single character"...only this is even worse. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Early reviews (Score:5, Interesting)
I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable. I made it through less than five minutes, and that was extremely painful.
I personally had the exact opposite reaction. I thought it would be completely unwatchable, but once I started watching it, I couldn't stop, because it was awesome.
I plan to watch it again with a group of friends.
Re: (Score:2)
I personally had the exact opposite reaction. I thought it would be completely unwatchable, but once I started watching it, I couldn't stop, because it was awesome.
Exactly the same here. I planned to give it a few minutes before the inevitable closing, but it was just so creative, so different and so hilarious in parts I couldn't stop.
One of the best things I've seen on the Internet and such a great example of the culture of the remix and why it is so important that copyright is not further bastardised so that projects like this can not go ahead.
It was so great to see such a wide range of people involved too - young kids to the elderly. All having a blast making it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Early reviews (Score:4, Funny)
I realize you were joking, but to be honest, it's a really cool idea that produced something completely and totally unwatchable.
So it's art!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on who you are. I'm not even 4 minutes in and I've laughed out loud repeatedly, most recently at a perfectly serious-looking Rebel soldier wearing a newspaper hat. Obviously, anyone looking for Oscar-winning cinematography throughout will be disappointed, but it's thoroughly entertaining.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Episode I:
"So who is this pilot, master?"
"His name is Skywalker. He's an ace for the Republic, amassing an incredible array of kills. We're to award him a medal."
"Sending two Jedi is a great honour."
Then the two Jedi meet the adult Anakin, realize he's force sensitive and off the charts, so they start training him in secret. Darth Maul kills Liam Neeson.
Episode II:
Anakin falls in love, Jedi council encourages the marriage. Padme gets assassinated and then Anakin finds out there's a Sith way to bring peo
Re: (Score:2)
Uh-huh.... Thus demonstrating that it's still impossible to reconcile Episode IV with Episode V and all the crap that followed without rewriting Episode V. And, of course, all the other crap that followed.
Or, we could just turn our attention to a prequel that's not doomed to utterly suck [imdb.com].
Re: (Score:3)
Inconsistencies between IV and V (Score:2)
The most obvious problem is that in Episode IV, Darth Vader killed Luke's Father. In Episode V, it's "revealed" that Darth is Luke's father. It's not "impossible" to reconcile, but Obi-wan saying "what I told you was true, from a certain point of view", is an obvious attempt to wallpaper over this inconsistency. Best case, it just makes Obi-wan look like a liar and untrustworthy.
Another issue comes up when Obi-wan's ghost and Yoda are discussing Luke's running off to save his friends at Cloud City:
Yoda: Tol
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, Obi-wan
Wow, have you ever read a book? (Score:3)
That Vader killed Anakin is hardly unknown in story telling, in fact quite a few stories tell that of the adult version killing the child version of the same person.
In Red Dwarf, Rimmers lost good points are shown as graves in his sub concious.
It is a pretty weak attempt to show a loop hole just because someone uses a bit of flowery language. What next, if you found out your grandfather didn't really go to sleep but croaked you are going to claim you parents lied as well? Really kid, read a book. Just one.
T
Re:Early reviews (Score:5, Funny)
Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.
So, Han and Greedo shoot at the same time?
Re: (Score:2)
Early reviewers say that the result is worse than the original, but much better than the Special Edition.
But still better than Red Tails
A short history of Star Wars (Score:3)
The original was the result of a lot of talented people, many barely recognized by the casual fan, coming together and doing what they do best without to many pressures to deliver because nobody expected a Sci-Fi movie to do all that well in the late 70's.
The next two movies were made with bigger budgets but also greater expectations, partly this was delivered on with greater special effects and better writing in the second, even better special effects in the third but at that time the demand for merchandis
Re:Early reviews (Score:4, Insightful)
Such as.. commenting on Slashdot? This is a really unique arts project, and it's probably worth watch through just for the laughs.
Re: (Score:3)
I've watched an hour so far, and it's surprisingly watchable for such a mish-mash! There have been plenty of comedy moments, and some awesome ideas/styles :)
I wouldn't recommend it to those who haven't seen the original a few times, but that's unlikely around these parts!
Re: (Score:3)
The C3P0 "sex bot" scene (After Luke buys the droids and is cleaning them) was rather disturbing, but I couldn't help but laugh my head off.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it (Score:5, Funny)
Next edit will replace everything with bad CGI, have a crying Han Solo beg Greedo for his life, and feature an extended 3D sequence of an aged Jar Jar Binks dancing a jig and flipping off the camera.
Re:Don't get attached...Lucas will just re-cut it (Score:5, Funny)
All while snorting mountains of cocaine off of dead hookers, because why not? Can't make it any worse...
I always wondered what led to the creation of the Holiday Special.
Re: (Score:2)
Bad acid. We'd already eaten up all the good stuff in the early 70's, all that was left was Orange Barrel.
Re: (Score:2)
Just one question (Score:5, Funny)
Does Han shoot first?
Re:Just one question (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Just one question (Score:5, Informative)
Does Han shoot first?
See for yourself, at the 49 minute 12 second mark. Here's the time-coded link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ezeYJUz-84#t=49m12s [youtube.com]
Re:Just one question (Score:5, Informative)
Han has much nicer boobs than I remember.
Re:Just one question (Score:5, Funny)
Only on Slashdot this gets moderated informative... :)
Re: (Score:2)
Does it blend?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes [tumblr.com] ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Better question: does Greedo shoot?
Watched it this weekend (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
True. The whole thing is a half and half mix of creatives and kids in backyards. The bright spots are pretty fun. The burning cardboard Star Destroyer definitely gave me a chuckle as well the trashcan Sand Crawler (literally a model of a massive brown plastic trashcan that someone clearly spent a bit of time on).
More shop vac R2's than you can throw a [insert Star Wars reference here] at.
R2D2's USB sound effects! (Score:2)
Those were good too. They actually fooled some viewers on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/op2ep/the_final_version_of_star_warsuncut_is_up_for/c3ixgdd [reddit.com] ...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Watched it this weekend (Score:5, Funny)
What, you mean it's like the 2-hour film version of slashdot?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Link to the project (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Already blocked for german IP adresses (Score:5, Informative)
"This video is unavailable in Germany since it might possibly contain music for which the necessary rights have not been granted by GEMA" (my translation).
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, as this could be considered fair use, as parody. It's not like anyone is making money off it!
Parody in German copyright law (Score:2)
Because it is not a parody (Score:2)
freely tr
Cue Lawsuit From Lucasfilms... NOW! (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Does Hans shoot first in this version?
Ja. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Only an eye twitch? :)
I just killed three hookers after seeing that line.
I bet he thinks his last name is Olo.
link plz (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
CmdrTaco! (Score:3)
Who's this CmdrTaco guy... (Score:5, Funny)
...and why do his posts jump to the front page?
Man, how many more people is Slashdot going to auto-post (I mean, how many more people beyond Ian McAllister and this "CmdrTaco" )?
This is totally unfair
*ducks*runs* :)
The best joke.. (Score:5, Funny)
JOIN STARFLEET
[starfleet logo]
We Don't Choke Minions
Hilarious
SOPA (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The laws that limit how much of this can be done are hundreds of years old. There is only so much you can do without the copyright holders permission. PIPA and SOPA are objectionable not because they are protecting copyright holders but because of how they are trying to do it.
Re:SOPA (Score:5, Informative)
The laws that limit how much of this can be done are hundreds of years old.
Under the original terms of American copyright, Star Wars would have gone into the public domain six years ago.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Coming up, Pongo's review of Rocky five....thousand. Pongo.
Re: (Score:3)
Except that once you become rich, you use your power to make sure nobody else does the same thing. Disney profited on public works when they were getting started and had a hard enough time just doing the animation. Now others can't use th
And you thought episode 1 was bad... (Score:2)
Turns out in relative terms not so much.
Star Wars Uncut: Special Edition (Score:3)
In the Star Wars Uncut: Special Edition, not only does Han shoot first, he then goes on to shoot George Lucas several times, and then fits Lucas with a Colombian Necktie. Like a boss!
Alternate ending: Han Solo teams up with Boba Fett and Darth Maul to hunt down Lucas and toss him in the Sarlacc, after fitting him with a restraining bolt.
Look, Honey... (Score:2)
Nerds!
Goofy but funny (Score:2)
I watched the first 30 minutes of this over the weekend.
Having done a few film projects of my own, including a parody of The Twilight Zone, I appreciate the efforts of all involved.
Kudos.
Fair use... (Score:2)
...shouldn't even be an issue. Episodes 4-6 should already be in the public domain. And would be, if it weren't for infinite copyright.
I participated in this project (Score:3, Funny)
And if you look closely at the background in my scene, you'll find a disk, a back flap, and a scorpion.
Re: (Score:2)
Could be more glorious... (Score:2)
I think the project could evolve to true greatness if the individual scenes could be put into competition, with the highest voted scenes making the final cut in a monthly release...
It just goes to show . . . (Score:2)
Charming and funny (Score:2)
Obviously Nothing better (Score:2)
It doesn't matter because of the kind of film it is, but it really amazes me that there are so many that think there is some depth, importance, signif
Re: (Score:2)
Did that stop you from watching the actual movie? :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If you were 15 back in 1977 - Carrie Fisher was very sexy. Anyone much younger than that has lived through the MTV and Baywatch eras... and may have different views due the media sexuality overload that started in the 80's/90's.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh. Thanks. I was going to watch Star Wars again tonight. But now, thanks to the anon....
You know. Nevermind. I'm too bored to actually finish this post.
Re: (Score:2)
When you watch the latest action packed scifi movie years from now with your grandkids, you will still be able to point out which ideas first came from Star Trek or Star Wars.
Except they didn't [vimeo.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It contains John Williams' original score. I guess they got permission from him or ASCAP/BMI but not from GEMA.
Re: (Score:2)
there's no fair use under GEMA, not even if you were the original creator.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't fair use under 30 seconds? So individually perhaps the videos may not violate copyright law, but I am unsure on the final product.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't fair use under 30 seconds?
No. There is no specific standard. The purpose of law is not to make rules but rather to create interpretation opportunities that enrich attorneys through litigation.
Re:cant wait (Score:4, Insightful)
I do believe copyright is necessary, but should only be about 15 years tops (no renew option).
Why is that? Seriously. Do you believe that authors and inventors would no longer create writings and discoveries if there were no copyright? I imagine that ancient Rome's monopolies on copyright were quite below par, but I doubt there would be many people claiming that there was no art in ancient Rome.
Or, look at it another way. The beneficiaries of writings and discoveries are the people who read the writings and use the discoveries. (That's interpreted loosely: obviously, one doesn't read a painting.) The copyright monopoly is part of the price we pay in order to do that. In the same way that I want to pay as little as possible when I buy a gallon of gasoline, I want to pay as little as possible when I read a writing. We shouldn't be looking at the most length for copyright monopolies, we should be looking at the least. In fact, I've seen reference to studies purporting to claim that two years is plenty long enough for a copyright in contemporary times.
I really think that the reason things have gotten so turned around is that our legislators and artists have conspired against us. By that, I mean that copyright owners have given large amounts of money to legislators who promote strengthening of copyright, and the legislators have in turn passed copyright laws that give much more profit to copyright owners who are then able to give large amounts of money to legislators. In fact, I've read that the original copyrights were for that very purpose. Monarchs granted letters of patent to their supporters.
I would like to see copyrights reduced to two years. I would also like a return to the previous requirement that a copyright notice appear on the writing. In fact, I would like to see a requirement that current contact information appear so that it would always be possible for people who want to copy to negotiate a license. If the contact information goes dead, then so does the copyright.
I would also like to see patent reduced to two years. I would also like it to be limited to things that can't be reverse engineered. Patent declarations tell us how to make something, and is part of the payment an inventor makes to receive a monopoly. If it's obvious how to make something then the payment is worthless.
I would also like to see trade secret eliminated entirely. Why are we paying the monopolists if we can't ever get the benefit?
I would also like to see trademark weakened considerably. However, I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe allow each company only a single trademark? And it has to refer to the company name somehow? The reason I'm suggesting this is that it's supposed to give consumers confidence that the quality of the product is sufficiently high, and that it's not being counterfeited by a lower-quality producer.
Finally, I would like to see free unicorns and rainbows. Frankly, I think I'll see the latter before I see the former, so long as the conspiracy of monopoly continues.
~Loyal
Re:cant wait (Score:4, Interesting)
I've said it before and I'll say it every time. A year from the first day of sale is more than enough. Damn near every medium you hear of (books, movies, games, etc.) makes it money in the first few weeks. A saying in the game and movie industries is that if you don't turn a profit by the end of the sixth week then it's a flop.
Re: (Score:2)
I've said it before and I'll say it every time. A year from the first day of sale is more than enough. Damn near every medium you hear of (books, movies, games, etc.) makes it money in the first few weeks. A saying in the game and movie industries is that if you don't turn a profit by the end of the sixth week then it's a flop.
The problem is that if it were only a year the studio would just not pay the artist and after a year mass produce the book/song/whatever and keep all the money. You need a long enough duration so the people with the means of distribution and control over advertising would rather pay the artist than wait out the copyright.
Re: (Score:2)
if copyright was a short time from creation (as opposed to a short time from publication), that might not work.
Re: (Score:2)
When copyright is banned outright you'll be coming round with your hat in hand begging for fifteen years. People are getting really pissed off right now. Congress is granted the power in the Consitution to grant copyrights - but it is not REQUIRED to do so. Copyright is not a natural right.
Freedom of speech and due process of law are, however natural rights that are beyond the power of the government to take away. And when you start trying to screw with those natural rights to maximize the benefit of y
and we learned that the grinch's heart (Score:2)
was two sizes, too small!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can download it from their Vimeo page [vimeo.com]. You'll need a Vimeo account, and you might have to wait, since videos are limited to 100 downloads a day.
Re: (Score:2)