The Effort To Create an 'Iron Man' Type Exoskeleton 52
Nerval's Lobster writes: Tony Stark, as played by Robert Downey, Jr., is the epitome of suave wit—but without his metal shell, he's just another engineer who's made good. The exoskeleton is a technology platform that, while young, is gaining traction in industrial, medical and military circles. For several years, the U.S. Special Operations Command has been working on a Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit, or "TALOS," that would provide "provide [infantry with] comprehensive ballistic protection and peerless tactical capability," in the words of Gen. Joseph Votel, SOCOM's commander. Meanwhile, several companies—including Raytheon, Ekso Bionics and US Bionics—are working on products that could help the disabled become more mobile, or allow warehouse and other workers to handle physical tasks with greater efficiency and safety. That means people who specialize in robotics, artificial intelligence, and other areas have an increasing opportunity to get involved. According to Homayoon Kazerooni, president of Berkeley-based US Bionics and a professor of mechanical engineering at UC Berkeley, control and software engineers are the leads in developing these next-generation products. Although he can't estimate the ultimate size of the market for these intelligent exoskeletons, Kazerooni describes the industry as "fast-growing, but infant," with "very diverse uses" for the suits. Just don't expect the aforementioned suits to allow you to fly or blow anything up anytime soon.
Re: (Score:2)
Latency.
Mostly just for fun..The same reason we send people to space.
d00d do you even scientifiction?! (Score:2)
There are a dozen different ways of delivering destruction in impersonal wholesale, via ships or missiles of one sort or another, catastrophes so widespread, so unselective that the war is over because that nation or planet has ceased to exist. What we do is entirely different. We make war as personal as a punch in the nose. We can be selective, applying precisely the required amount of pressure at the specified point at a designated time. We've never been told to go down and kill or capture all left-handed redheads in a particular area, but if they tell us to, we can. We will. We are the boys who will go to a particular place, at H-hour, occupy a designated terrain, stand on it, dig the enemy out of their holes, force them then and there to surrender or die.
Why even bother posting on this story if you aren't acquainted with the concept of the 30-second talking bomb?
Re:Energy (Score:4, Insightful)
Much like the movie, it's all about the energy source, the mechanics are a solved problem already.
The mechanics of how to keep a man from being turned to jelly when the suit gets tossed into a nearby building by the Hulk have been solved?
Seriously, though, there will never be an exoskeleton as maneuverable and fast as the Iron Man suit, since there is no way to protect the occupant from mistakes that cause sudden deceleration. Even a fast turn could be deadly.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
For those who don't believe you, see eggs.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes. It works great.
http://www.instructables.com/i... [instructables.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Easy, just put a Tardis inside of it
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the bones and skin are saved, but the soft tissue is still mush.
For example, in the first Iron Man movie, when the tank shell hits him out of the sky (lol yeah right), he would have been killed ON IMPACT with the shell most likely, but certainly killed when he smashed into the ground. Just because the suit stops his bones from shattering doesn't mean that his organs smashing against the inside of the suit won't still devastate him. One good punch to the head from the Hulk and his brain would squish al
Re: (Score:2)
Your knees are going to become vertical frisbees and will penetrate the Earth with such force that Satan will actually become real, rise up and will destroy all of us.
Now you're just being silly.
Re: (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
This only works up to 15~20G, apparently, since PFCs are denser than you, and will crush your innards (lungs, probably) if you+fluid is swung/impacted hard enough.
Fluids closer to water's density will work better, but at obscenely greater impacts (assuming the suit is a perfect material that doesn't simply shatter
Fixed that for ya' (Score:2)
>> ...people who specialize in robotics, artificial intelligence, and other areas have an increasing opportunity to get involved...
Lemme fix that for ya': ...defense contractors who can claim they can build out the necessary robotics, AI, and other areas have an increasing opportunity to get lucrative contracts...
Confirmed: Slashdot is dead. (Score:1)
Article about real-life Iron Man suits (Yeah! Exoskeletons! W00t!)
Initial Post: 2:43 PM EST
First Comment: 2:50 PM EST
SEVEN MINUTES and NOBODY had ANYTHING to say?
Sure, sure. I guess everyone must have just gone to RTFA... riiight.
Sigh.
"he's just another engineer who's made good?" (Score:5, Informative)
No, without his suit, Tony Stark is a "Genius Billionaire Playboy Philanthropist [youtube.com]."
Do I have to explain the simplest things to you people?
Need the ARC reactor (Score:3)
Which we DO NOT HAVE.
Without it, all they have is a man in a suit with a long power cord - a cord that can easily also transfer commands, which moves the pilot out of the suit and into a significantly safer nearby workstation. Put in a camera with an optional microphone and you reduces the weight the machine has to move around.
Which means what we can do is create an industrial robot.
Putting the man inside is incredibly stupid - until we have a viable power source. If we get that power source, the mech suit becomes an incredibly GOOD idea.
Re:Need the ARC reactor (Score:4, Insightful)
Given the unpredictability in a military or search and rescue situation a power source would be problematic. In an industrial situation a tethered power source might be more practical and allow the operator better precision in a more timely manner than remotely controlled.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The Talos Principle (Score:3)
"Talos"? Now the SOC is just trolling us.
How many revisions will there be? (Score:2)
I've always heard you should stay away from Talos 4.
Re:The Talos Principle (Score:4, Informative)
"Talos"? Now the SOC is just trolling us.
Talos in Greek mythology was an animated bronze colossus who was charged with guarding Europa, so it seems appropriate in this context. You see it pop up a lot in fiction and when naming programs that deal with anthropomorphic robots, particularly military ones.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thank the gods, somebody gets my reference.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that was my point.
You apparently don't know the whole story. This is where a classical education comes in handy: Talos was killed when Medea drove him crazy by giving him drugs and then pulling the plug out of his heel.
Talos was a failure whose
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Suppose the enemy can jam signals controlling the drone. Your drone becomes a dead pigeon in that case.
Re: (Score:2)
Let's shoot for Call Of Duty tech first (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Nah, just tie on some of those mylar party balloon filled with helium.
They'll make your pack much lighter, and they come in bright festive colors to boot!
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, just tie on some of those mylar party balloon filled with helium. They'll make your pack much lighter, and they come in bright festive colors to boot!
It's always good to hear from actual combat veterans rather than the usual slashdot armchair generals.
Obligatory (Score:2, Funny)
Get away from her, you BITCH!