1st Episode Of Animatrix Released 285
Devistater writes "The official Matrix page has word of the first officially released widescreen Anime episode of the Animatrix for download (in quicktime format). This is the first of 4 free episodes that will be released on the web. A total of 9 episodes will be availible for purchase on DVD within the next few months. The feature-quality anime shorts range in length from 6 minutes to 16 minutes. There's a trailer availible if you want to get a taste for what they will be like."
Pretty impressive (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pretty impressive (Score:4, Funny)
Slashdotted...
Huzzzah! (Score:4, Funny)
Also in good taste... (Score:2)
I think more movie companies should do that with miniseries and stuff, give out the first few episodes for free so they get more exposure. I mean, it's an incredibly smart way of letting people know what the premis is, and it also shows a lot of goodwill on the part of the company. I think I just might buy the boxed set due to this, whereas previously I wasn't really that interested in it, and I think overall there are a lot of people like that.
Of course there are also people who will just dl the first 4 eps, then pirate the rest. :P
I don't get it... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I don't get it... (Score:5, Funny)
OSHA regulations, of course.
Re:I don't get it... (Score:3, Funny)
More interesting: Why does one of the robots watch tv instead of processing the signal itself?
The DRMA, of course... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The DRMA, of course... (Score:2)
Re:I don't get it... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I don't get it... (Score:4, Insightful)
It would be much more sensible to ask what a robot is doing sitting on risers for a "lunch break," or why they have a zillion of them pulling a cargo container up the ramp great-pyramid-construction style.
Incidentally, this Matrix comic strip [warnerbros.com] is a good companion-piece to the current animated short.
Download link... (Score:5, Informative)
Two more links... (Score:5, Informative)
320x136 [aol.com]
480x204 [aol.com]
640x272 [aol.com]
Re:Download link... (Score:2)
Re:MD5 sums of the files anyone? (Score:2)
lg final is the 640x472. I've got the same one, and my MD5 is: Oh yeah, also, it crashes my QT 6 (latest) on windows after about 10 seconds. Anyone else having problems?
wget + $this.url(); (Score:5, Informative)
for lame masterl, simply do: wget http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/
!note it's mov not mo v
If you just want to download it... (Score:2, Interesting)
wget "http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/animatrixlgfinal_dl.m ov"
Have Fun!
URL, Impression and Kudos (Score:5, Informative)
As for the trailer
God bless timothy for posting this at 6:49AM. =)
Re:URL, Impression and Kudos (Score:2)
Re:URL, Impression and Kudos (Score:4, Informative)
I believe that this one is created by the brothers, as it pretty much gives the origin of The Matrix.
Re:URL, Impression and Kudos (Score:2)
Re:URL, Impression and Kudos (Score:2)
Damn (Score:4, Interesting)
Starting playback...
mjpeg: JFIF header found (version: 1.1)
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (c2)
VDec: Codec did not set sh->disp_w and sh->disp_h, trying workaround.
Error while decoding frame!04 ct: -0.000 3/ 3 0% 0% 0.0% 0 0 0%
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (cf)0.000 5/ 5 0% 0% 0.0% 0 0 0%
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (cf)
etc...
Re:Damn (Score:4, Informative)
Basically a bunch of normal jpegs in sequence, not even Motion-Jpeg. It's about as simple as you can get for a video codec.
I am amazed that mplayer would have trouble with that...
Re:Damn (Score:2)
It's not:
MOV: Warning! Variable FOURCC detected!?
To me, it looks like there is *one* photo-frame (menu?) and then the movie, and all in one stream (stupid arrangement) which throws mplayer off
Quicktime Fix for Animatrix with Mplayer (Score:3, Informative)
Now, if someone could just tell me how to apply it...
Re:Quicktime Fix for Animatrix with Mplayer (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Quicktime Fix for Animatrix with Mplayer (Score:2)
Re:Damn (Score:2, Informative)
To play quicktime (Score:3)
Looks like he was just trying to play the initial frame (which is a different track, and appears to be specially stored as a JPEG image.
Re:To play quicktime (Score:2)
Seems so
which is a different track,
As I've already said above, it looks like it is the same track and that's exactely why it doesn't work and unfortunately I don't know a work around =/
Re:To play quicktime (Score:2)
AUDIO: 44100 Hz, 2 ch, 16 bit (0x10), ratio: 5986->176400 (47.9 kbit)
Selected audio codec: [qdmc] afm:qtaudio (Quicktime QDMC/QDM2 audio decoders)
Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
Selected video codec: [ffmjpeg] vfm:ffmpeg (FFmpeg MJPEG decoder)
AO: [oss] 44100Hz 2ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian)
Building audio filter chain for 44100Hz/2ch/16bit -> 44100Hz/2ch/16bit...
Start playing...
mjpeg: JFIF header found (version: 1.1)
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (c2)
VDec: codec didn't set sh->disp_w and sh->disp_h, trying to workaround!
VDec: vo config request - 0 x 0 (preferred csp: Planar YV12)
VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 3)
Movie-Aspect is undefined - no prescaling applied.
VO: invalid dimensions!
FATAL: Cannot initialize video driver!
FATAL: Couldn't initialize video filters (-vop) or video output (-vo)!
Re:To play quicktime (Score:3, Interesting)
Opening video decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg's libavcodec codec family
Selected video codec: [ffmjpeg] vfm:ffmpeg (FFmpeg MJPEG decoder)
A bit later, we get...
Checking audio filter chain for 44100Hz/2ch/16bit -> 44100Hz/2ch/16bit...
AF_pre: af format: 2 bps, 2 ch, 44100 hz, little endian signed int
AF_pre: 44100Hz 2ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian)
AO: [oss] 44100Hz 2ch Signed 16-bit (Little-Endian) (2 bps)
Building audio filter chain for 44100Hz/2ch/16bit -> 44100Hz/2ch/16bit...
Starting playback...
mjpeg: JFIF header found (version: 1.1)
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (c2)
VDec: Codec did not set sh->disp_w and sh->disp_h, trying workaround.
Error while decoding frame!37 ct: -0.009 3/ 3 0% 0% 0.0% 0 0 0%
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (cf)0.015 5/ 5 0% 0% 0.0% 0 0 0%
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (cf)
mjpeg: unsupported coding type (cf)
After a few screens of this, I get:
MPlayer interrupted by signal 11 in module: decode_audio
- MPlayer crashed by bad usage of CPU/FPU/RAM.
Recompile MPlayer with --enable-debug and make a 'gdb' backtrace and
disassembly. For details, see DOCS/bugreports.html#crash.b.
- MPlayer crashed. This shouldn't happen.
It can be a bug in the MPlayer code _or_ in your drivers _or_ in your gcc
version. If you think it's MPlayer's fault, please read DOCS/bugreports.html
and follow the instructions there. We can't and won't help unless you provide
this information when reporting a possible bug.
SoundConverterEndConversion:0
SoundConvert
If anyone can help out with this, I'd appreciate it. I don't have any trouble watching other quicktimes with this...
Re:Damn (Score:2, Informative)
I just watched the first episode (Score:2)
Interesting but... (Score:4, Interesting)
Its also quite sympathetic to the machines. If you are one of the last of a group which has almost been wiped out, you are unlikely to see your history from the point of view of those who did the wiping.
Re:Interesting but... (Score:2)
Re:Interesting but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Interesting but... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Interesting but... (Score:2)
Re:Interesting but... (Score:2)
Really? There was some Nazi (or was it Soviet?) propeganda released called 'The Secret Protocols of the Elders of Zion' or something similar, which detailed how the Jewish supposedly were really running the world... I wonder....
Hanna Barbera needs to get in on this (Score:2, Funny)
What exactly is going on? (Score:2)
(I haven't watched the videos yet, I'm downloading them right now.)
Re:What exactly is going on? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What exactly is going on? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What exactly is going on? (Score:3, Informative)
The announcement of the Animatrix last year did answer one burning question...it was mentioned in news stories that, aside from Final Fantasy, Square USA would produce only one other bit of animation--a short film--but it was never mentioned what it was. Then, when it was announced, a lot of people were going, "Ohhhh!"
Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Assoc. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:2)
Additionally, the concept of the universe (similar to the Terminator universe) is that there was a conflict between humans and artificial life. The first movie was told from the viewpoint of a human, of course a human would view the robots as evil, they're the enemy. A story told from the viewpoint of one of the robots wouldn't portray technology as bad at all. Watch the first Animatrix, there is definitely a pro-machine slant to it.
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:5, Insightful)
These things are all MacGuffins. Don't let them distract you from the storytelling.
What makes science fiction interesting is not the idea of self-aware computers that want to kill us, or time travel, but the implications of those things for future societies... how people respond to them. Dan Simmons wrote one of the best S.F. stories I've ever read in "Hyperion" and its follow-ups and I'm pretty sure he used all three of those MacGuffins, maybe more. Alfred Bester wrote two incredible novels that, using your analysis, were "anti-telepathy" or "anti-teleportation," but in fact they were much more.
There are lots of bad S.F. books and films out there as well that explore (or try, or maybe don't even try) the same themes. "The Matrix" and the first two "Terminator" movies certainly were not bad. You might argue that one or more (or all) of those episodes of ST:TOS where Kirk blows up the evil computer controlling a society, or his ship, are better examples of how not to do it.
So, to sum up, it's not only Hollywood, it's not really Luddism, and if done right can be really interesting and enjoyable.
Oh, come on. (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't be silly. The insistence that people must belong to one camp or another is tiresome in the extreme.
Technology is just technology. It's not something to be For or Against. All it represents is the ability to use the natural elements of the Universe around us. What bothers people is the total lack of regard and responsibility displayed by those who make big, messy displays as they use Technology; as they interact with the Universe in destructive, dirty and dangerous ways which affect the world and everybody around them whether we like it or not. Technology isn't ruining the world. It's the greedy morons who are using technology in the negative who are ruining the world.
Films like The Matrix and Terminator aren't anti-technology. Heck, Frankenstein, the grand daddy of Luddite-style thinking, isn't anti-technology, even if Mary Shelly thought that it was, (and I'm not at all convinced that English professors are correct in their claim that she did!). These are messages which address the very real concerns that technology placed in the hands of greedy assholes is, in no uncertain terms, bloody dangerous!
I don't see anything wrong or misplaced in these concerns, or in being interested in the issues raised by those concerns. And in any case, The Matrix and Terminator were entertaining for more than just their sociological and special effects values. They were exciting films, for flip's sake! Change out of your camp tee-shirt, get on the bus, and come back to reality.
-Fantastic Lad --"Ain't no flies on us!"
Dang. Did I just get taken by a Troll. . ? (Score:2, Funny)
-Fantastic Lad
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:5, Insightful)
Were we watching the same film?
It says nothing about technology being bad. If you look past the fact that they are machines and see them as a people you can see many elements of some of the biggest fuckups in human history. The number of references to these were staggering. Off the top of my head (after just seeing it once), I got the following:
They are undoubtably more in there that I missed.
I could cite a dozen references to each of these in the past 100 years alone. So called "modern society" in the west is guilty of most of them, some we are doing right now! Mainly, I thought the short was about how we repeat the same mistakes again and again and never seem to learn. With what is going on in the world at the moment, it's clear that we haven't learned a thing from history.
But nowhere was it implied that technology is "bad". At the most it was a futuristic negative utopia (1984, Brazil, Blade Runner), and it's clear that future human society will be utilising more and more technology, so it goes without saying that AI/machines will feature in it.
Watch it again, this time viewing the machines as people, sort of a "working class" society.
I gotta say, it was one of the most thought provoking things I've seen in a while. Very impressed, and normally I'm not remotely interested in Anime.
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:2)
We've all learned well enough. We're just too lazy and comfortable to act on the lessons, and who can blame us?
"Man, I've been fragging on Quake III for seven hours straight while surfing for pr0n during the high ping times. Guess I need to go out to the backyard and plow up my wheat field to get my lazy ass back to nature."
Right. Sorry, but until my box grows a hand and gives me a bitch slap, my curvy ass is staying put abusing it.
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:2, Insightful)
All forms of technology have good/bad sides. A subtle example is the old bow + arrow. Somewhat Good: Kill animals easier for survival and food. Bad: Kill our fellow man easier as well.
How about something more drastic: Atomic fusion. Good: Very powerful energy source. Bad: Very powerful bombs.
I think really one of the points is to make sure we guide the technology, not follow it.
Re:Matrix: another film by Hollywood Luddites Asso (Score:2)
It becomes a lot harder to blame the machines for creating the Matrix after seeing this short.
T3 Rise of the Machines? (Score:2)
Oh wait..
The animation seems to fit both stories..
Animation was quite well done though. Thank goodness its early.
this is why we don't want AI (Score:2)
Do we really want our machines forming unions, striking, having feeling etc. etc..
I want my machines doing what I tell them todo and not much else.
Ever seen those new robot toys.. They get into bad moods if you don't pay attention to them.. Enough to drive one nuts.
Dammit..... (Score:2, Funny)
I saw "Animatrix" and thought "female animator". Bad hormones! *smack*
Filthy Machine Sympathizers! (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh well, I'm just going to pretend I didn't watch it...
Re:Filthy Machine Sympathizers! (Score:2)
Forvere? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Filthy Machine Sympathizers! (Score:2)
No, they didn't. Given things like Agent Smith's comment that "entire crops were lost" when early incarnations of the Matrix failed, the humans in the Matrix were very likely grown by the machines for their power plant. The machines could be seen as abused children who are now lashing out at their children because that's all they understand about humans.
Either way, humans have an opportnity to break the cycle of violence; maybe Neo will figure that out in the last two movies. I kind of doubt it, because "can't we all just get along?" doesn't mesh well with awesome fight sequences...
Jay (=
Matrix 3 (Score:5, Funny)
Morpheus: Neo, we now have the ultimate weapon against the machines... a weapon so powerful that our victory is insured...
neo just stands there with his mouth hanging open
Morpheus: The Slashdot effect. Named after cyber attack (per the DMCA in the early 2000s), it harnests the power of millions of overweight single geeks checking out the newest movie clip at the same time. This will allow us destroy the machines once and for all.
Neo: whoa
--
Here are the direct download URL's (Score:4, Informative)
I would reccomend using a tool like wget or lftp to grab them, as my connection reset several times while downloading (due to the traffic I imagine).
Small (30MB+):p rogressive/thematrix/us/med/animatrixsmfinal_dl.mo v [aol.com]
http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/
Medium (90MB+):p rogressive/thematrix/us/med/animatrixmedfinal_dl.m ov [aol.com]
http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/
Large (140MB+):p rogressive/thematrix/us/med/animatrixlgfinal_dl.mo v [aol.com]
http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/
This is ANOTHER DUPE. Just ignore the story. (Score:5, Funny)
I gotta stop others from leeching until I can get the file.
Sorry, my bad. Not a dupe. (Score:5, Funny)
Leech away
Damn, that was cool (Score:3, Insightful)
While I like the "Star Wars" universe and even enjoy a few meager facets of the worn-out "Star Trek" universe, it's great to find anime used to generate realism and convincing stories within a very intriguing framework like the "Matrix" movies.
It's not extremely original, the story. We've got a basic Arthurian legend story going in the same way in the latter "Star Wars" movies. But, as any writer would tell you, it's all in the presentation. And present this offering does. Very fun to watch, and illuminating.
In case you'd like to watch it later (Score:2, Informative)
or
curl -o http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/
^&@(*@#$&!!!! Site! (Score:2)
Drats. (Score:2)
I was hoping it would be filled with some disturbing imagery.
</joking asside>
*shudder*
About two minutes in, I had to stop watching it at work for fear someone would see it over my shoulder and be offended. I guess I'll watch it later.
Re:Drats. (Score:2)
crap... (Score:2)
Do you people realize what this is? (Score:5, Interesting)
I've always thought people said that to justify their copyright violations.. well, now's your chance to prove me, and more importantly WB, wrong.
Re:Do you people realize what this is? (Score:2)
Get it at Kazaa! (Score:3, Informative)
I'm starting to rip it to SVCD (Score:2)
Re:I'm starting to rip it to SVCD (Score:2)
*Phew* (Score:2)
Ugh... (Score:2)
Navigating the site is nice & easy, and what I get from the download is at full bandwidth (150k/dsl).
However, I get 5-10% complete with the download and it just terminates.
Safari, IE, even curl.
Can someone get a mirror up?
Re:Ugh... (Score:3, Interesting)
Apparently Quicktime Player itself will piece the thing together, even if the server drops the connection repeatedly.
From within Quicktime Player, go to File --> Open URL in New Player
They cut and paste:
http://progressive.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonlin
Worked like a charm. Full speed ahead.
BitTorrent mirror for the file (Score:3, Informative)
animatrixlgfinal_dl_mov.torrent [scarywater.net]
Since the main site seems to have been hit hard by this slashdotting, try getting it from this BitTorrent site [scarywater.net]; Please leave your download window open as long as possible after finishing the download to help out others getting the file.
BitTorrent is a peer to peer file swarmer. You can get the client from http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/download.html [bitconjurer.org]; it is Free, open, and does not contain ad/spyware; versions exist for *ix, win32, OS X, etc.
Re:Way to download those ? (Score:2)
Re:Way to download those ? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Way to download those ? (Score:4, Informative)
Animatrix Part 1 [aol.com]
just right click and choose "save as" if you're using IE =)
Re:Way to download those ? (Score:2)
if it is in XML [apple.com], you just pick out the real URL.
If it is binary, you run strings on it and pick out the real URL.
Then, unless it is a RTSP URL, you just use curl or wget to download.
Re:heh (Score:4, Funny)
Re:It's not anime (Score:2)
Re:It's not anime (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:4, Interesting)
As to anime as porn, replace every instance of anime in your previous statement with "movie." We have live action porn movies in this country, it uses a medium that is also used to convey works of art and random schlock. Just like anime. As a feminist should I avoid everything that might be tainted with non feminist ideals or should I just keep that in mind while I watch a damn goos show?.
If you want disturbing elements though, try reading up on the casual libking of sex and violence in Japanese culture. It gets very disturbing when you delve into it.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:2)
A series that is soon to be available again, this time on DVD, is Cat Girl Nuku Nuku. In it, you have some remarkable female characters. Mishima Akiko is the CEO of Mishima Heavy Industries, and her two-woman Administrative Assistant hit squad kick some serious butt too, especially Arisa, the gun-crazy "warrior maiden." One of the sub-plots has to do with Akiko trying to fit into the role of a stereotypical Japanese housewife to get closer to her son Ryunosuke, but coming to the realization that this is not for her. Kicking ass and taking names is. :-)
Yes, Nuku Nuku herself is a kawaii little thing in a Sailor-suit High School uniform. But don't fsck with her either. She knows how to throw down too. And if she's a little fluffy around the edges, don't blame her...she started out her existence as a cat. ;-)
Cat Girl Nuku Nuku is coming out on the 10th. ADVision. A brand-new dub joins the subtitled version on the DVD. It's not going to have a lot of goodies like what they are doing with Excel Saga but oh well, at least it is coming out.
One last thing: Japanese pop culture has a lot of violence, sex, and sex and violence co-mingled. However, Japanese civil culture is perhaps one of the least violent the world has ever known. Investigate the homicide rate in Japan, then compare it to the US and Europe. Then get back to me.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:5, Insightful)
So before you make blanket comments (especially about something as varied as anime), try to have some clue what you're talking about. Or at least give evidence.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:4, Interesting)
However, and this has been true for a long time, it is not a recent devlopment, a great deal of anime is not sexist.
In a lot of anime the female characters are stylised representations with exagerated secondary sexual characteristics - this is often true in material which objectifies women in a sexist fashion, but sylised (cartoony) representations of people do NOT necesarilly objectify them. Any particular work must be viewed as a whole. Having been a teenage boy, I can say that my perception of women at that time was hyper-sexualised; this is pretty much universal among straight teenage boys.
Is adolescent male sexuality inherently sexist? I think that it is not.
Is it sexist for artists who were teenage boys to represent female characters in this way, particularly if the protagonist is an adolescent male, as is often the case? It is not. It's an accurate representation of an internal environment, which is what a cartoon is intended to do.
To the extent that this stylistic element is repeated in works by women, which are about 50% of what is produced - I will not speculate on the internal environment of adolescent girls, but I don't think this arises from self-loathing, I think that would be reflected in the female characters behavior rather than in how they are drawn.
Finally, in a sexist society (Japan) is it sexist to represent sexist interpersonal relationships in a work of fiction? I agree that it is good and laudible for a work of fiction to attempt to break down popular preconceptions and prejudices, but it is always okay for a work of fiction to reflect one's actual experiences.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:2)
Every 'how to draw manga' type book I've ever read simply points out that large, exaggerated curves are more visually appealing than the alternative; it's a visual medium, so you exagerate things visually.
Or do you think that every artist who draws typical gravity-defying 'anime hair' was mocked as a child for having the traditional haircut? Or that the males who draw the seven foot, three inch wide 'CLAMP' style men have eating disorders? Or the swords that would break your arms off, should you ever actually try to swing them, were failed fencing students?
Sometimes, just sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes, just sometimes, the typical attributes of a visual art form are simply the typical attributes of a visual art form.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:2)
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:2)
I'm aware that CLAMP is several females, but use them only as an example of a rather easy-to-identify anime/manga sub-style.
Hell, take a look at Yu Watase's Fushigi Yuugi; chock full of cute little girls in revealing school uniforms, an evil chick who's magic centers around 'hot lusty sexxxx to achieve inner peace and healing,' rape as a method of dominance and control, yet the entire story is a hopeful and magical 'magic girl' story. And she's a female artist.
Oh, and it's just oozing with bishonen prettyboys who strip to their skivvies at a moment's notice, and fall all over each other to be the best damn boyfriend they could ever possibly be.
Re:Adapting anime for a new feminist millennium (Score:2)
Re:01? (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe it depends where you live... (Score:2)
I don't know anybody who has bought a new 4:3 TV in the last few years.
Re:Widescreen (Score:2)
Link to some examples [widescreen.org] of the difference between Fool Screen, or Pan and Scam, and Widescreen that will show the amounts lost in the picture.
Of course, I'm sure I just latched onto a troll.
Re:MD5 sum? (Score:2)
Not that it made any difference in being able to watch the thing; mplayer doesn't support its stream type yet. Thankfully, I have Crossover [codeweavers.com].