Matrix Reloaded Trailer Released 687
phreak404 writes "The full theatrical trailer for The Matrix Reloaded was released today. Its in Quicktime, 1000px by 540px, and weighs in at about 100MB. Looks awesome and unlike the previous teasers, actually has some of the plot." As soon as someone puts up a bitorrent we'll post it here.
Update: 04/11 00:40 GMT by J : And here it is,
http://f.scarywater.net/
(includes links to client download, stats, old torrents, fun stuff like that).
hmmm.. Woah.... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:hmmm.. Woah.... (Score:2, Interesting)
Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:5, Informative)
Alternatively, you can download the small [aol.com], medium [aol.com] or Large [aol.com] versions.
Re:Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:2, Interesting)
QT Blows (Score:5, Insightful)
Well my theory (oh no, wait, this is actually my direct experience) is that Quicktime for Windows has always been a giant dump. To even imply that it's optimized, or a reasonably cross-platform streaming solution is a joke
I love people trying to find alternatives to Microsquat, but I hate people trying to foist lazy crap down our throats in the name of Freedom. That baby should either be fixed, or thrown out with its bathwater.
Sorry moderators, I hate it when my actual opinion sounds like a troll or flamebait, but them's the facts as I see them.
Re:QT Blows - GET EO_VIDEO (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:2)
Re:Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:3, Insightful)
and the point of that would be?
Apple is in the business of selling computers incompatible to PC's. Naturally, they would produce software that works better on Mac's than on PC's, especially if it is free.
Re:Warning.. ultra high res needs a fast machine (Score:3, Funny)
Patience is a virtue! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Patience is a virtue! (Score:5, Funny)
Which topic of conversation could be more important than Carrie-Anne Moss in a tight leather catsuit?
Re:Patience is a virtue! (Score:5, Funny)
I'll bite: Carrie-Anne Moss without a tight leather catsuit, perhaps?
(smiles, sighs)
Re:Patience is a virtue! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Patience is a virtue! (Score:5, Funny)
I'll just bite Carrie-Anne Moss with or without the tight leather catsuit
Anyone else notice the odd effect in 1st scene? (Score:3, Interesting)
Anyone else notice that the scene with her falling out the window looks completely fake? Her head moves really weird, in time with each uzi firing a round...her head jumps around or something, really wierd- didn't look right at all.
I wonder how much scruitiny the big fight scene with the 100 Agent Smiths will stand up to...it sure looked good at full speed. Too bad mplayer doesn't have a slow-mo button. Grrrrr. xine does...
Re:Patience is a virtue! (Score:2)
Re:Not this time. (Score:2)
Re:Not this time. (Score:2)
I'm ready.... (Score:5, Funny)
Long as I get some of those cool sunglasses, I'll be okay....
The Matrix (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Matrix (Score:4, Funny)
And you call yourself a NERD!
Why...you...you...
Re:The Matrix (Score:3, Funny)
Hunchback of Cleveland?
HoverBot Overlord Class?
Hairy Back Oiled Chest?
you lie! (Score:5, Funny)
And the part where he goes "I just learned kung fu!" its a crime that he didn't win an oscar for it!
Screw BitTorrent (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Screw BitTorrent (Score:3, Interesting)
BT is saving me a 2 hour wait
All right soldiers.... (Score:5, Funny)
Don't stop until we've "liberated" every last kilobit of bandwidth from AOL.
Re:All right soldiers.... (Score:2)
Re:All right soldiers.... (Score:2, Funny)
That, or when they get the bandwidth bill.
WARNING! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:WARNING! (Score:4, Informative)
BitTorrent Link (Score:5, Informative)
Re:BitTorrent Link (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Link (Score:2)
Re:BitTorrent Link (Score:2)
Torrentse.cx has a pretty decent selection of torrents, updating continuously.
Re:BitTorrent Link (Score:2)
At some point, I'm going to kill this domain provider. Sorry for the trouble.
ironic (Score:5, Funny)
5.7kb/sec currently, and probably will not get better (on a T1, no less), which means:
waiting 4 hours 42 minutes and 33 seconds to see a tailer for a movie that will last, at most, half of that.
I am sure there is something wise to be said here.
Re:ironic (Score:2)
I'm firewalled and getting 35-70kbps
Darn - there goes the /. effect (Score:2)
113 kbps
99 kbps
96 kbps
92 kbps
DARN DARN DARN
Re:Darn - there goes the /. effect (Score:2)
Re:Darn - there goes the /. effect (Score:2)
Summary For Those Without Broadband (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Summary For Those Without Broadband (Score:4, Funny)
It's an upside world... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It's an upside world... (Score:2, Informative)
Because of this, posters kinda have to come to us, or we have to catch the post in time to make a bittorrent of it, and relay it to a
Re:It's an upside world... (Score:5, Insightful)
bittorrent://mirrorable.site.com/filename.bitto
That way
QuickTime is Evil (Score:3, Interesting)
I promise double points... and a happy reply
----
"Computer science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes" - E. W. Dijkstra
Mysterious Future (Score:3, Informative)
winzip reports 3% compression (Score:2)
Re:winzip reports 3% compression (Score:5, Informative)
Other sizes (Score:5, Informative)
640 pixels (58 MB) [aol.com] and 320 pixels (17.4MB) [aol.com] are available.
There may be others as well, I didnt try many posibilities.
yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:3, Insightful)
I personally think the Matrix is cheese, it doesn't have a strong message, and is a little too melodramatic... in music, in story, in the overal mood of the movie. CHEESE..and not even real cheese, like cheeze in a can.
Its all about kick punch kick, run away, kick punch kick, 3d animation...
I'm sure I'm going to watch it- but seriously is this cheese really worth all the hype- there are so many other things (movies/comics/anime) that are just so much more deserving.
Sci-Fi movies have gone to shit- they are nothing more than overhyped action crapola- Star Trek Nemesis blew the big one, not to mention that flick with the electrocution/blow stuff up/jounrey to the center of the earth crap.
Minority Report on the other hand was great, and well if it counts Monsters Inc. was too- the only two sci-fi movies in recent memory I can stand...
I'm sure given that this is slashdot I stand alone in this opinion... but that's what forums are for tight?... so enjoy the download
Re:yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:5, Insightful)
I am a fan of Akira and Ghost in the Shell as well, but there is something to be said about the goose bumps you got the first 5 times you watched the matrix and you saw trinity kicking that cops ass in bullet time.
Heck, I'm getting goose bumps just remembering how I felt the first time I saw Neo dodge the bullets.
It's all about enjoying what's there: people whine about Jar-Jar Binks, or Keanu's poor acting, but really, in the end, you come out of that theatre thinking "hey, maybe if I try real hard, I can walk on that wall"... which is exactly why I see these movies... because I want them to transport me somewhere that's not real, and just plain feels cool.
If you're going in there to come back out with the insights you get after watching Apocalypse Now, your priorities might be wrong.
Re:yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:2)
If I just want mind numbing retardation with a nice buzz- I'll just do speed or acid or something!
Re:yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:3, Funny)
But he didn't dodge any bullets. He just fell over backwards. It looked silly!
Exactly the point (Score:3, Insightful)
And of course, for others, they simply find the most entertainment in this [ebaumsworld.com] set of matrix clips...
Re:yeah I'm in a trollish mood (Score:2)
Troll, ahoy. But I think you are egregiously off. I am a literary critisicm fellow, and what grabbed me about The Matrix was its epic/heroic/mythic themes. I found the "humans as batteries" concept complete BS as a scientific speculation, but as a mythic theme, HOLY SHIT that is good stuff. Star Wars did the same thing (originally, in IV) with the mechanistic, soulless Empire as "the State" crushing your will t
Indeed you are (Score:3, Interesting)
And?
Look, I'm going to watch the Hulk when it comes out too, and I won't be watching for political themes, nor will I watch XMEN2 to see a superb ensemble cast.
I, and most SciFi/movie fans are going to the matrix, et all, to see the skill with which the production tools are used. Cameras, Sets, Special effects. If you can appreciate what it takes to film a movie and make it visually appealing, there doesn't need to be a subplot abou
Casting. (Score:5, Funny)
*cough* Patrick Stewart *cough* Ian McKellen *cough*
lacking speeds? (Score:4, Funny)
Best (Score:2)
Advertising (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Advertising (Score:5, Informative)
Now that's odd... (Score:5, Interesting)
On my Athlon 700 running Linux and mplayer, it plays smoothly and sharply, but with no sound (not supported).
On my Athlon 950 running Windows 2000, QuickTime plays sound but drops hella frames.
Any explanations?
Re:Now that's odd... (Score:4, Interesting)
QT sucks unless it's running on a Mac. Not a general statement on Apple software, but their software on Windows feels and acts the same way as IBM's - an afterthought. People complain stuff is not ported to Linux - I wish stuff was ported to Windows correctly.
I've never really gotten QT to work correctly in Windows. Multiple machines, multiple versions of the OS, etc. Something is always wrong.
OTOH, on a Mac QT is absolutely amazing, especially the sound.
Re:Now that's odd... (Score:3, Informative)
> but their software on Windows feels and acts
> the same way as IBM's - an afterthought.
I think that's a both very general and apt summary of Apple software on Windows - QT is far from as bad as it gets. WebObjects for windows is a disgrace. Buggy; unmaintaned; just installing it reduces the staiblity of your machine; slow; written in a braindead way so that the frame abstraction acts like it would on a mac (except buggy); too much stuff bundled in the s
Re:Now that's odd... (Score:3, Informative)
You need to get the 'faad' codec for MPlayer--
"http://www.mplayerhq.hu/DOCS/codecs.h
Then you can recompile MPlayer and all is good
AAC Audio? (Score:2, Informative)
I'm using Quicktime 5 and mine won't play sound either, in Windows XP. Looks like I'll have to "upgrade." The video quality itself, however, is absolutely amazing.
Sorry... I gotta pull "The comic book guy" (Score:5, Funny)
Where did I put my clue stick? (Score:2)
Let's hope that Neo has a better knowledge of basic information theory than whoever put these trailers online.
Insert foot. (Score:3, Insightful)
Think of it this way, 7% of 100 meg times 250,000 downloads. It makes sense to do the compression this way thereby speeding up the slowest part of the whole trailer experience, the download.
Corporate proxies... (Score:2)
I hope some of that slo-mo was inserted (Score:3, Funny)
Seriously, I understand that playing with the speed of the camera can make things more dramatic, but that was just ridiculous! It doesn't work if you keep using the same trick over and over again.
The red pill... (Score:5, Funny)
Taco: The Duplicates?
Morpheus: Do you want to know what THEY are? The Duplicates are everywhere. They are all around us, even now in this very forum. You can see them when you search for old stories or when you view yesterday's stories. You can read them when you go to work, when you go to user's groups, in the background when you do your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Taco: What truth?
Morpheus: That you are a slave to techno news & discussion, Taco. Like everyone else you were born into bondage, born into a prison that you cannot smell or taste or touch. A prison for your mind.... Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Duplicates are. You have to see them for yourself. This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how many rabbits are in the hole.... Remember, all I'm offering is the truth, nothing more.... Follow me.... Cowboy Neal, are we online?
Cowboy Neal: Almost.
Morpheus: Time is always against us. Please, take a seat there.
Taco: You did all this?
Trinity: A-huh.
Morpheus: The pill you took is part of a trace program. It's designed to disrupt your input/output carrier signal so we can find similar inputs.
Taco: What does that mean?
Cypher: It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas is going bye-bye.
Taco: Did you...
Morpheus: Have you ever read a story, Taco, that you were so sure was original. What if you were unable to tell the difference. How would you know the difference between the original story and the duplicate?
Taco: This can't be...
Morpheus: Be what? A duplicate?
Trinity: It's going into replication.
Morpheus: Cowboy Neal?
Cowboy Neal: Still nothing.
Taco: It's old. It's old.
Morpheus: Tank, we're going to need a signal soon.
Trinity: We've got duplication.
Morpheus: Cowboy Neal, location.
Cowboy Neal: Targeting almost there.
Trinity: It's going into the home page.
Cowboy Neal: Lock, I've got him.
Morpheus: Now, Tank. Now.
Mplayer audio/sound problem: aac and faad (Score:4, Informative)
Basically, as others said, the problem is that the new quicktime movies us aac (advanced audio codec) audio instead of mp3 like older quicktime files. The solution of course is to install aac support for mplayer.
To do this, first you must install the codec. The codec that supports aac is available at audiocoding.com [audiocoding.com]. It's called FAAD2. I used the cvs (1.2 beta) so I don't know if the stable 1.1 will work. (The 1.1 requires a small patch to get it to compile with newer forms of the libsndfile or forms of gcc > 3.) Other than that it compiled fine. The second change is that the libraries for faad are installed in /usr/local/lib. Apperently mplayer doesn't, by default, look in /usr/local/lib. I symbolically linked the libraries to /usr/lib (where mplayer DOES look), but I assume you could add /usr/local/lib to the search path.
Hopefully this helps many of the peopole who want to run these and other quicktime files on linux. Mplayer has made great strides and while it's not perfect, (crashes if you try to run 2 qt files back to back without restarting), it is the best there is for linux, (or for that matter any other system). (As an alternate note, the rpm faad2-1.1-fr1.20030409.i386.rpm does not work. While it installs to the correct place, the mplayer config is not able to detect the version of faad from it.)
Floating wheels and bad FX? (Score:5, Interesting)
Specifically, the freeway scene with the motorcycle chase.
See this picture:
floating trucks [murmurs.com]
Does anyone else see the problem here? The lighting under the truch is all wrong, and the wheels are floating and not giving any sense of weight. I know its really a little detail, but you can honestly see it on a few of the other cars and trucks in this scene as well.
Still, it rocks, just get rid of the floating trucks!
Re:Floating wheels and bad FX? (Score:3, Funny)
Why the fuck are you frame-by-frameing the fucking trailer? Do you have no fucking life? Get a job you hopless fuck! It's a movie not
racing the effect (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:racing the effect (Score:2)
BT is giving me 30kbps
download is 9kbps
and with BT you can resume... otherwise you have to use something like gozilla
Re:Screw it (Score:2, Funny)
Obligatory Nelson Quote: "HA HA"
Re:Screw it (Score:4, Funny)
Obligatory Nelson Quote: "HA HA"
Soon the pants will be dropped, and the rulers are going to come out.
Re:Screw it (Score:2)
MBONE? (Score:3, Informative)
--grendel drago
Re:Here we go... (Score:2)
Re:Here we go... (Score:3, Insightful)
Remember, financial troubles for AOL mean financial troubles for Netscape, which means 95% of the major Mozilla coders have to find new jobs. AOL isn't completely evil.
bitorrent links ......... (Score:2, Informative)
http://www.torrentse.cx/download.php?fil
http://www.torrentse.cx
High Quality
http://www.torrentse.cx/download.php?fil
http://www.torrentse
Re:No FS in QT6 (Score:2)
Works great here on my wimpy 450MHz G4 (1600px wide).
Re:No FS in QT6 (Score:2)
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/ 19062
its jsut an applescript that opens the file and calls the window mode
http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/10767
but i assume your not using a mac, so in that case, good luck.
Re:No FS in QT6 (Score:2)
Re:what the kids want... (Score:2)
Re:Savannah College of Art and Design (Score:2)
Thats cause everyone else is OUTSIDE, enjoying the FRESH AIR and SUNSHINE !!
I even here tell of something called GIRLS and, shudder, BEER.
Could you verify and report back. If we don't here from you, we'll assume your just having to much fun.
Thanks
Georgia Tech (Score:2)
Re:Some Problems (Score:2)
Re:Some Problems (Score:2)
Re:Some Problems (Score:2)
Re:Some Problems (Score:2)
Re:nice of them to make a movie my kids can't watc (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow (Score:5, Interesting)
You say that "[o]n-screen sex... does something far more permanent and destructive to the mind [than on-screen violence]." You don't say what that is though.
What is weird to me is that you are OK exposing your children to something that if they imitated, you would be horrified. At the same time, you protect them images of things that you probably expect them to do one day.
You also mentioned that no-one in your family will be going to see the movie because of the sexual content. Why? You reason that sexual imagery damages young people in some ill-defined way, and yet you protect yourself as well. Does it damage adults as well? Where is the line drawn? Does watching people kiss cause some kind of harm too? Maybe you'd be better off watching Bollywood movies - I believe the Hindu censors are more in line with what you are comfortable with.
All this talk about studies linking on-screen sex to immorality at home is tedious. Let's be honest - I suspect that you believe that anything of an erotic nature that involves people other than one's husband or wife is strictly forbidden. Thus, anything contrary to this belief is damaging.
I really think you'd be better off just saying this rather than trying to use studies to prove that you are right. You'd be more likely to convince people by saying "This is my belief, take it or leave it," instead of attempting to prove things to people.
I think its disingenuous to claim that my experts have an agenda, but your experts are just straight-forward right-thinking folk. Clearly, you have an agenda - that is to prevent people from having sex outside of marriage. The whole STD/AIDS thing you people harp on so much is just a cover. Do you really expect to convince us that you really just want to save us from disease? Its an obvious scare tactic. Now, I'm sure you believe you are doing the right thing, and maybe you are, but why not just be honest? Why doesn't the truth speak for itself? The STD thing is a side issue - be honest. Admit that the main issue is that sex outside of marriage is a sin, and it doesn't matter what studies come up to prove or disprove that.
So, you're trying to stop people from sinning. Isn't that God's job? I mean, you can only present them with the truth and it is their free-will decision to make to accept or reject it. I presume that God knows what he's doing.
Apparently, STDs are God's way of punishing the sinners, which is why condoms are not encouraged. If one was careful, one could enjoy virtually unlimited sinfulness. The punishment is circumvented. Indeed, God is circumvented! I can see why you'd want to ban them. Apparently sheets of latex are an effective barrier against acts of God.
I propose the following: God doesn't care about which bodily fluids you share with which people, or whether the government issued you a license to do it or not. God cares about whether you are doing unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is the whole of the law.
Re:nice of them to make a movie my kids can't watc (Score:4, Insightful)
First up, you haven't demonstrated your research anywhere, even when explicitly asked for it. Which makes me suspect you're bluffing on that front.
Secondly I find it very, very scary that your 15-17 year olds are being shielded from any kind of sexuality (In this case what will most likely be maybe some kissing, and probably just some tight clothing), but you're perfectly happy for them to see violence en mass... oooo kkkk. I really want to see you back up this reasoning with your research, as I sure don't get what you think you're instilling in your children. (Who at their age are very much young adults now).
Also, your last point, of American Society not being afraid or inhibited enough... oh come on... not afraid? Why do you have so many guns? Why, whenever I get in an argument with an American as to why they have a gun do they come out with 'so some sicko doesn't come into my house and rape my 8 year old' line?
People feeling like they have to carry a gun to be safe sure smacks of being afraid to me.
And uninhibited? Oh come on, the only television in the world that I see someone giving the finger being pixelated out is American television... it's a FINGER people! I spent some time living in America, and I got the distinct feeling that you are, by and large, very afraid, and very inhibited. And by the looks of what you're doing to your children, you're continuing this trend.